Translational Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 276–285 | Cite as

Successful dissemination of Fun 5 — a physical activity and nutrition program for children

  • Claudio Nigg
  • Karly Geller
  • Paula Adams
  • Michele Hamada
  • Phoebe Hwang
  • Richard Chung
Original Research

ABSTRACT

Examine the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) of an evidence-based physical activity and nutrition curriculum disseminated to after-school programs. Program components included nutrition, physical activity, and sustainability, adapted to after-school settings and disseminated across 4 years (2004–2008). The RE-AIM framework was used to evaluate dissemination quality through direct observations, surveys, and interviews. In the final year, the Fun 5 program was implemented in 90% (>22,000 students) of Hawai'i after-school sites. Despite substantial annual increases in program reach, implementation and adoption remained consistently effective, and students' physical activity levels during program activities peaked in the final year. Further, evaluations demonstrated strong long-term program sustainability potential. The Fun 5 program demonstrated promise for long-term maintenance with potential for a public health impact among Hawai`i after-school students. Future emphasis on wide-spread program dissemination is encouraged, bridging research and community efforts to improve our children's health and impact public health.

KEYWORDS

Dissemination Children Physical Activity Nutrition After-school RE-AIM 

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mirmiran P, Noori N, Zavareh MB, Azizi F. Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Metabolism. 2009;58(4):460-468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Epstein LH, Gordy CC, Raynor HA, Beddome M, Kilanowski CK, Paluch R. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9(3):171-178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Beecher MD, Roemmich JN. Increasing healthy eating vs. reducing high energy-dense foods to treat pediatric obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(2):318-326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rolls BJ, Ello-Martin JA, Tohill BC. What can intervention studies tell us about the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and weight management? Nutr Rev. 2004;62(1):1-17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146(6):732-737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Revised dietary guidelines to help Americans live healthier lives. FDA Consumer. 2005; 39(2):18–19.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guenther PM, Dodd KW, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM. Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106(9):1371-1379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wechsler H, Devereaux RS, Davis M, Collins J. Using the school environment to promote physical activity and healthy eating. Prev Med. 2000;31(2):S121-S137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for school and community programs to promote lifelong physical activity among young people. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997;46(RR-6):1-36.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Health Utilisation Research Alliance (HURA). Ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation and consultation rates in New Zealand general practice. J Health Serv Res Po. 2006; 11(3):141-149.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atkin AJ, Gorely T, Biddle SJ, Marshall SJ, Cameron N. Critical hours: physical activity and sedentary behavior of adolescents after school. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2008;20(4):446-456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pratt C, Webber LS, Baggett CD, et al. Sedentary activity and body composition of middle school girls: the trial of activity for adolescent girls. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(4):458-467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Savige G, Macfarlane A, Ball K, Worsley A, Crawford D. Snacking behaviours of adolescents and their association with skipping meals. Int J of Behav Nutr Phys. 2007;4:36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coleman KJ, Geller KS, Rosenkranz RR, Dzewaltowski DA. Physical activity and healthy eating in the after-school environment. J Sch Health. 2008;78(12):633-640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pate RR, Davis MG, Robinson TN, Stone EJ, McKenzie TL, Young JC. Promoting physical activity in children and youth: a leadership role for schools: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Physical Activity Committee) in collaboration with the Councils on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation. 2006;114(11):1214-1224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Optimal calcium intake. NIH Consens Statement Online. 1994; 12(4): 1–31. http://consensus.nih.gov/1994/1994OptimalCalcium097html.htm
  19. 19.
    Fawcett J, Aber C, Weiss M, et al. Adaptation to cesarean birth: implementation of an international multisite study. Nurs Sci Q. 2005;18(3):204-210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Introduction to community based participatory research. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, eds. Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003:3-26.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE. Translating effective clinic-based physical activity interventions into practice. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(4):S45-S56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scheirer MA. Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. Am J Eval. 2005;26(3):320-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nigg CR, Battista J, Chang JA, Yamashita M, Chung RS. Physical activity outcomes of a pilot intervention using SPARK Active Recreation in elementary after school programs. J Sports Exerc Psychol. 2004;26:S144-S145.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE. The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students. Sports, play and active recreation for kids. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(8):1328-1334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-1327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR, et al. BEACHES: an observational system for assessing children's eating and physical activity behaviors and associated events. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991;24(1):141-151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Nigg
    • 1
  • Karly Geller
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paula Adams
    • 1
  • Michele Hamada
    • 1
  • Phoebe Hwang
    • 1
  • Richard Chung
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Hawai’i at MānoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Cancer Research Center of Hawai’iHonoluluUSA
  3. 3.Miami UniversityOxfordUSA
  4. 4.Hawai`i Medical Service AssociationHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations