Advertisement

Spinner Model: Prediction of Propensity to Innovate Based on Knowledge-Intensive Business Services

  • Ronnié FigueiredoEmail author
  • João José de Matos Ferreira
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

This study proposes a model for the prediction of propensity to innovate based on KIBS in the service sector of an emerging country (Brazil). The Spinner model presents, in a dynamic form, three dimensions: knowledge creation, knowledge transfer, and innovation, similar to the three axes of interaction of a fidget spinner, KIBS being the center. KIBS were divided in p-KIBS (professional KIBS) and t-KIBS (technological KIBS), according to the analysis carried out in 71 small, medium, and large firms. The Spinner model test was done based on three econometric models of logistic regression (logit), which examined the defined dimensions and variables. The model allowed us to evaluate prediction of propensity to innovate based on KIBS, considering the relationship between knowledge creation and transfer, where dimensions presented a positive sign, as expected. The findings contribute to theory development on knowledge intensive solutions, by revealing elements such as the relationship of knowledge creation and transfer with innovation in KIBS, and their relationships in the assessment prediction of propensity to innovate.

Keywords

KIBS Knowledge creation Knowledge transfer Innovation Spinner 

Notes

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1993). Analysing innovation output indicators: The US experience. In A. Kleinknecht & D. Bain (Eds.), New concepts in innovation output measurement (pp. 10–41). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, S., Erramilli, M. K., & Dev, C. S. (2003). Market orientation and performance in service firms: Role of innovation. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(1), 68–82.Google Scholar
  3. Amara, N., Landry, R., & Traoré, N. (2008). Managing the protection of innovations in knowledge intensive business services. Research Policy, 37(9), 1530–1547.Google Scholar
  4. Antonietti, R., Bronzini, R., & Cainelli, G. (2017). Inward Foreign Direct Investment and the Birth-Death Rate of Italian manufacturing firms. Scienze Regionali, 16(2), 261–282.Google Scholar
  5. Asikainen, A-L. (2013). Innovation modes and strategies in knowledge intensive business services. Service Business, 9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0219-5.
  6. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. Internactional Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 441–457.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What's new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.Google Scholar
  9. Bader, M. A. (2008). Managing intellectual property in the financial services industry sector: Learning from Swiss Re. Technovation, 28(4), 196–207.Google Scholar
  10. Barras, R. (1986). Towards a theory of innovation in services. Research Policy, 15(4), 161–173.Google Scholar
  11. Barras, R. (1990). Interactive innovation in financial and business services: The vanguard of the service revolution. Research Policy, 19(3), 215–237.Google Scholar
  12. Beinhocker, E., Davis, I., & Mendonça, L. (2009). The 10 trends you have to watch. Harvard Business Review, 87(7/8), 55–60.Google Scholar
  13. Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Marklund, G., & Miles, I. (1998) Services in innovation: Knowledge intensive business services (KIBS) as co-producers of innovation. SI4S Project, Synthesis Paper S3, STEP group, Oslo.Google Scholar
  14. Blind, K., & Jungmittag, A. (2004). Foreign direct investment, imports and innovations in the service industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 25(2), 205–227.Google Scholar
  15. Bolfarine, H., & Sandoval, M. C. (2000). Introdução à Inferência Estatística. São Paulo: SBM.Google Scholar
  16. Brax, S. (2005). A manufacturer becoming service provider – Challenges and a paradox. Managing Service Quality, 15(2), 142–155.Google Scholar
  17. Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362.Google Scholar
  18. Cainelli, G., Iacobucci, D., & Morganti, E. (2006). Spatial agglomeration and business groups: New evidence from Italian industrial districts. Regional Studies, 40(5), 507–518.Google Scholar
  19. Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233–245.Google Scholar
  20. Cassiolato, J. E., & Lastres, H. (1999). Globalização e inovação localizada: experiências de sistemas locais no Mercosul. Brasília: IBICT.Google Scholar
  21. Castells, M. (1997). The Information Age: Economy, society and culture (the power of identity, vol. II). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Chen, S., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Service Culture and its Impact on Service Innovation: Based on the Model of Service Value Chain. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS 2009), Wuhan University, China. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5304776/?reload=true.
  23. Chesbrough, H. W. (2011). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Chesbrough, H. W., & Spohrer, J. (2006). A research manifesto for services science. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 35–40.Google Scholar
  25. Consoli, D., & Elche-Hortelano, D. (2010). Variety in the knowledge base of Knowledge Intensive Business Services. Research Policy, 39(10), 1303–1310.Google Scholar
  26. Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
  27. Coombs, R., & Miles, I. (2000). Innovation, measurement and services: The new problematique. In J. S. Metcalfe & Miles (Eds.), Innovation systems in the service economy: Mesauremente and case study analysis (pp. 85–103). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Corrocher, N., Cusmano, L., & Morrison, A. (2009). Modes of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services evidence from Lombardy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 173–196.Google Scholar
  29. De Vries, J. (2006). European Urbanization, 1500–1800 (Vol.4). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. De-xue, H., & Jie-chang, X. (2009). Services economics. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  31. Den Hertog, P. (2000). Knowledge intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 491–452.Google Scholar
  32. Den Hertog, P. (2002). Co-producers of innovation: The role of knowledge-intensive business services in innovation. In J. Gadrey & F. Gallouj (Eds.), Productivity, innovation and knowledge in services: New economic and socio-economic approaches (pp. 223–255). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Den Hertog, P., Van der Aa, W., & De Jong, M. W. (2010). Capabilities for managing service innovation: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 490–514.Google Scholar
  34. Devore, J. L., Farnum, N. R., & Doi, J. (2014). Applied statistics for engineers and scientists (3rd ed.). Stamford: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  35. Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2001). Patterns of innovation organisation in service firms: Postal survey results and theoretical models. Science and Public Policy, 28(1), 57–67.Google Scholar
  36. Doloreux, D., Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2008a). Mapping regional and sectoral characteristics of knowledge-intensive business services: Evidence from the province of Quebec (Canada). Growth and Change, 39(3), 464–496.Google Scholar
  37. Doloreux, D., Zenker, A., & Muller, E. (2008b). Services à forte intensité de connaissances, contexte régional et comportements d'innovation: une comparaison internationale (No. R1/2008). Arbeitspapiere Unternehmen und Region.Google Scholar
  38. Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2010). Exploring and comparing innovation patterns across different knowledge intensive business services. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(7), 605–625.Google Scholar
  39. Doloreux, D., & Laperrière, A. (2013). Internationalisation and innovation in the knowledge-intensive business services. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions, and organizations. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Edvardsson, B., Gustafsson, A., Kristensson, P., & Witell, L. (2010). Service innovation and customer co-development. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science (pp. 561–577). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Fernandes, C., Ferreira, J. J., & Marques, C. S. (2013). Innovation management capabilities in rural and urban knowledge intensive business services: empirical evidence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  43. Freeman, C. (1988). Introduction. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  44. Gadrey, J., Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1995). New modes of innovation: How services benefit industry. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(3), 4–16.Google Scholar
  45. Gallego, J., Rubalcaba, L., & Hipp, C. (2013). Organizational innovation in small European firms: A multidimensional approach. International Small Business Journal, 31(5), 563–579.Google Scholar
  46. Gallouj, F. (2000). Beyond technological innovation: Trajectories and varieties of services innovation. In M. Boden & I. Miles (Eds.). Services and knowledge based economy. New York: Continuum, 2000 (chap. 7, 129-145).Google Scholar
  47. Gallouj, F., & Djellal, F. (2010). Introduction: filling the innovation gap in the service economy–a multidisciplinary perspective. The handbook of innovation and services. A multi-disciplinary perspective, chapter Introduction, 1-23.Google Scholar
  48. Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 537–556.Google Scholar
  49. Garthwaite, P., Jolliffe, I., & Jones, B. (2002). Statistical inference (2a ed)C. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Gil, A. C. (2002). Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas.Google Scholar
  51. Goes, J. B., & Park, S. H. (1997). Interorganizational link and innovation: The case of hospital services. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 673–696.Google Scholar
  52. Gourlay, A., Seaton, J., & Suppakitjarak, J. (2005). The determinants of export behaviour in UK service firms. The Service Industries Journal, 25(7), 879–889.Google Scholar
  53. Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(4), 429–458.Google Scholar
  54. Griliches, Z. (1979). Sibling models and data in economics: Beginnings of a survey. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5, part 2), S37–S64.Google Scholar
  55. Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 353–378.Google Scholar
  56. Guimarães, J. D. A., & Meirelles, D. S. (2014). Caracterização e localização das empresas de serviços tecnológicos intensivos em conhecimento no Brasil. Gestão & Produção, 21(3), 503–519.Google Scholar
  57. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2011). Econometria Básica-5. Porto Alegre: AMGH Editora.Google Scholar
  58. Hipp, C. (1999). The role of knowledge-intensive business services in the new mode of knowledge production. AI & SOCIETY, 13(1), 88–106.Google Scholar
  59. Hu, T. S. (2017). Interactive relationships, knowledge flow and development effects among KIBS firms and their clients in Taiwan: A comparative study. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(2), 257–271.Google Scholar
  60. Hsieh, J., Chiu, H., Wei, C., Yen, H. R., & Cheng, Y. (2013). A practical perspective on the classification of service innovations. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(5), 371–384.Google Scholar
  61. IfM, & IBM. (2008). Succeeding through service innovation: A service perspective for education, research, business and government. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing ISBN: 978-1-902546-65-0.Google Scholar
  62. Jacob, F., & Ulaga, W. (2008). The transition from product to service in business markets: An agenda for academic inquiry. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 247–253.Google Scholar
  63. Jacobs, W., Koster, H. R., & van Oort, F. (2013). Co-agglomeration of knowledge-intensive business services and multinational enterprises. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2), 443–475.Google Scholar
  64. June, S., & Kheng, Y. K. (2014). Innovative work behavior (IWB) in the knowledge intensive business services (KIBS) sector in Malaysia: The effect of leader-member exchange (LMX) and social capital (SC).Google Scholar
  65. Kandampully, J. (2002). Innovation as the core competency of a service organisation: The role of technology, knowledge and networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(1), 18–26.Google Scholar
  66. Knights, D., Murray, F., & Willmott, H. (1993). Networking as knowledge work: a study of strategic interorganizational development in the financial services industry. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 975–995.Google Scholar
  67. Kristensson, P., Matthing, J., & Johansson, N. (2008). Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(4), 474–491.Google Scholar
  68. Kubota, L. C. (2009). As KIBS e a inovação tecnológica das firmas de serviços. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, 18(2), 349–369.Google Scholar
  69. Leiponen, A. (2001). Why do firms not collaborate? Competencies, R&D collaboration, and innovation under different technological regimes. In A. Kleinknecht & P. Mohnen (Eds.), Innovation and firm performance: Econometric explorations of survey data. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  70. Leiponen, A. (2006). Managing knowledge for innovation: The case of business-to-business services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(3), 238–258.Google Scholar
  71. Lievens, A., & Moenaert, R. K. (2000). New service teams as information-processing systems: Reducing innovative uncertainty. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 46–65.Google Scholar
  72. Lightfoot, H. W., & Gebauer, H. (2011). Exploring the alignment between service strategy and service innovation. Journal of Service Management, 22(5), 664–683.Google Scholar
  73. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.Google Scholar
  74. Lojkine, J. (1995). A revolução informacional. São Paulo: Cortez.Google Scholar
  75. Love, J. H., & Mansury, M. A. (2007). External linkages, R&D and innovation performance in US business services. Industry and Innovation, 14(5), 477–496.Google Scholar
  76. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). Explaining inter-firm cooperation and innovation: Limits of the transaction cost approach. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  77. Lundvall, B. Å., & Foray, D. (1996). The knowledge-based economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. In Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  78. Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (1998). The globalising learning economy: Implications for innovation policy, targeted socio-economic research. TSER Programme. Mimeo. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  79. Mansury, M. A., & Love, J. H. (2008). Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: A firm-level analysis. Technovation, 28(1), 52–62.Google Scholar
  80. Mas-Tur, A., & Soriano, D. R. (2013). The level of innovation among young innovative companies: the impacts of knowledge-intensive services use, firm characteristics and the entrepreneur attributes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  81. Matthing, J., Sandén, B., & Edvardsson, B. (2004). New service development: Learning from and with customers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(5), 479–498.Google Scholar
  82. Matthyssens, P., Vandenbempt, K., & Berghman, L. (2006). Value innovation in business markets: Breaking the industry recipe. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 751–761.Google Scholar
  83. Mercedez, R. (2014). Innovation, knowledge spillovers and high-tech services in European regions. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 25(1), 31–39.Google Scholar
  84. Menor, L. J., Tatikond, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: Areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 135–157.Google Scholar
  85. Miles, I. (1999) Services in national innovation systems: From traditional services to knowledge intensive business services. In G. Schienstock, & O. Kuusi (Eds). Transformation towards a Learning Economy. Helsinki, Sitra report N. 213. (pp. 57-98).Google Scholar
  86. Miles, I. (2005). Knowledge intensive business services: Prospects and policies. Foresight, 7(6), 39–63.Google Scholar
  87. Miles, I. (2007). Knowledge intensive services and innovation. In J. Bryson & P. W. Daniels (Eds.), The handbook of service industries (pp. 277–294). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  88. Miles, I. (2008). Knowledge services. In G. Hearn & D. Rooney (Eds.), Knowledge policy: Challenges for the 21st century (pp. 11–27). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  89. Miles, I. (2011). From knowledge-intensive services to knowledge-intensive service systems. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 16(2), 141–159.Google Scholar
  90. Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Flanagan, K., Huntink, W., & Bouman, M. (1995). Knowledge-intensive business services: Users, carriers and sources of innovation. European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS) Reports. Retrieved from www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/datastream?publicationPid=uk-ac-man-scw:75252&datastreamId=FULL-TEXT.PDF.
  91. Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H. F., & Miles, I. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337–1351.Google Scholar
  92. Miozzo, M., & Grimshaw, D. (2005). Modularity and innovation in knowledge-intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK. Research Policy, 34(9), 1419–1439.Google Scholar
  93. Mukkala, K., & Tohmo, T. (2013). Inter-industry job mobility in the knowledge economy in Finland. International Journal of Manpower, 34(8), 918–938.Google Scholar
  94. Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–1516.Google Scholar
  95. Najafi-Tavani, Z., Giroud, A., & Andersson, U. (2014). The interplay of networking activities and internal knowledge actions for subsidiary influence within MNCs. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 122–131.Google Scholar
  96. Neder, H. D. (2008). Amostragem em Pesquisas Socioeconômicas. Campinas: Grupo Átomo & Alínea.Google Scholar
  97. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Neu, W. A., & Brown, S. W. (2008). Manufacturers forming successful complex business services: Designing an organization to fit the market. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(2), 232–251.Google Scholar
  99. Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 160–172.Google Scholar
  100. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1997). National Innovation Systems. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf
  101. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2006). Innovation and knowledge-intensive services activities. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  102. Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies, and regional policy. International Regional Science Review, 19(1–2), 85–90.Google Scholar
  103. Ramadan, B. M., Dahiyat, S. E., Bontis, N., & Al-Dalahmeh, M. A. (2017). Intellectual capital, knowledge management and social capital within the ICT sector in Jordan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 437–462.Google Scholar
  104. Rodriguez, M., Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2016). Innovation strategies, innovator types and openness: a study of KIBS firms in Spain. Service Business, 10(3), 629–649.Google Scholar
  105. Rodriguez, M., Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2017). Variety in external knowledge sourcing and innovation novelty: Evidence from the KIBS sector in Spain. Technovation, 68, 35–43.Google Scholar
  106. Schumpeter, J. (1934). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  107. Schwarz, S., Durst, C., & Bodenforf, F. (2012). Service innovation – A Rodmap for practitioners. Service Science and Management Research, 1(1), 8–16.Google Scholar
  108. Simmie, J., & Strambach, S. (2006). The contribution of KIBS to innovation in cities: An evolutionary and institutional perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(5), 26–40.Google Scholar
  109. Smedlund, A., & Toivonen, M. (2007). The role of KIBS in the IC development of regional clusters. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(1), 159–170.Google Scholar
  110. Soete L., & Miozzo M. (1990). Trade and development in services: A technological perspective. UNU-MERIT, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  111. Sundbo, J. (1998). The theory of innovation: Entrepreneurs, technology and strategy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  112. Sundbo, J. (2000). Organization and innovation strategy in services. In M. Boden & I. Miles (Eds.). Services and the knowledge based economy. New York: Continuum, 2000 (chap. 6, pp. 109-128).Google Scholar
  113. Sundbo, J., & Gallouj, F. (1998). Innovation in services – SI4S project, Synthesis Paper N. 2. STEP Group, Oslo.Google Scholar
  114. Sundbo, J., & Gallouj, F. (2000). Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 1(1), 15–36.Google Scholar
  115. Toivonen, M., Smedlund, A., & Tuominen, T. (2006). Development of knowledge intensive business service innovations and innovation networks. Management: Journal for Management Theory and Practice, 40, 4–11.Google Scholar
  116. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  117. Vergara, S. C. (2000). Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em Administração. 3a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Atlas.Google Scholar
  118. Wiig Aslesen And, H., & Isaksen, A. (2007). Knowledge intensive business services and urban industrial development. The Service Industries Journal, 27(3), 321–338.Google Scholar
  119. Windrum, P., & Tomlinson, M. (1999). Knowledge-intensive services and international competitiveness: A four-country comparison. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(3), 391–408.Google Scholar
  120. Wooldridge, J. M. (2006). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (4th ed.). Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  121. Yam, R. C., Lo, W., Tang, E. P., & Lau, K. W. (2010). Technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 42, 1009–1017.Google Scholar
  122. Yanqiu, L., Jingmin, Z., & Huijun, W. (2010). Influence mechanism of service innovation based on the knowledge value chain model. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE) (pp. 3033-3036).Google Scholar
  123. Zaefarian, G., Henneberg, S. C., & Naudé, P. (2013). Assessing the strategic fit between business strategies and business relationships in knowledge-intensive business services. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(2), 260–272.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management Department, NECE (Research Center in Business Sciences)Beira Interior UniversityCovilhãPortugal

Personalised recommendations