Advertisement

Knowledge Exchange and the Trust Institution: a New Look at the Problem

  • Sergey M. Vasin
  • Leyla A. Gamidullaeva
  • Nicholas WiseEmail author
  • Konstantin Yu. Korolev
Article

Abstract

In the knowledge economy, the search and exchange of knowledge is widely recognized as a key factor contributing to the creation and mobilization of company’s knowledge resources to maintain its competitive advantage. This study is devoted to identifying the role of interpersonal trust in the process of searching and sharing knowledge. Theoretical analysis shows that previously conducted studies in this research field are mainly focused on revealing the relationship between interpersonal trust and the willingness to use knowledge. This study is interested in the willingness to establish contact between economic actors for the purpose of knowledge exchange, and this becomes important when discontinuities in innovation result from a lack of knowledge exchange and interaction between stakeholders. The effects of two different types of interpersonal trust (cognition-based trust and affect-based trust) on willingness to share explicit and tacit knowledge between individuals have been separately examined and tested. The analysis conducted is based on data obtained from surveying 295 employees from large organizations in Penza, Russia. To validate the survey, a confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling was undertaken to verify advanced causal hypotheses. To test the hypotheses, a multiple correlation-regression analysis was used. Results reveal that both types of interpersonal trust positively correlate with the willingness to share both explicit and implicit knowledge. Additionally, it has been established that the willingness to share tacit knowledge is more influenced by affect-based trust between individuals, while cognition-based trust is more significant in explaining the willingness to share explicit knowledge. The need to create favorable conditions within organizations to ensure the exchange of knowledge without constraints is highlighted.

Keywords

Knowledge economy Knowledge exchange Interpersonal trust Innovation Interactions Institutions 

JEL Classification

O39 O43 B52 

Notes

Funding Information

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research Project No. 18-010-00204-a.

References

  1. Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(4), 64–77.Google Scholar
  2. Alnafrah, I., & Mouselli, S. (2017). The knowledge society vis-à-vis the knowledge economy and their potential development impacts in Russia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-017-0448-2.
  3. Balogun, A. G., & Gabriel, A. (2015). Willingness to share and use tacit knowledge among employees in team-based organisations: are the dimensions of interpersonal trust facilitators? Information and Knowledge Management, 5(7), 100–107.Google Scholar
  4. Belyanin, A. V., & Zinchenko, V. E. (2010). Trust in the economy and in the society. Moscow: Mission of Society.Google Scholar
  5. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.Google Scholar
  6. Boh, W. F., & Wong, S. S. (2015). Managers versus co-workers as referents: comparing social influence effects on within-and outside-subsidiary knowledge sharing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.008.Google Scholar
  7. Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social network. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445.Google Scholar
  8. Bromiley, P., & Cummings, L. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. M. Krammer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 302–330). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Choo, C. W. (1998). The knowing organisation: How organisations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chowdhury, S. (2005). The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(3), 310–326.Google Scholar
  11. Cross, R., & Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science, 15(4), 446–462.Google Scholar
  12. Elias, M. (2015). Gender, knowledge-sharing and management of shea (Vitellaria paradoxa) parklands in central west Burkina Faso. Journal of Rural Studies, 2015, 27–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.006.Google Scholar
  13. Epstein, L. D. (2000). Sharing knowledge in organizations: How people use media to communicate. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Foos, T., Schum, G., & Rothenburg, S. (2006). Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 6–18.Google Scholar
  15. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gamidullaeva, L. A. (2016). Institutions in the economic system development. Journal of Economic Regulation., 7(1), 93–103.Google Scholar
  17. Gausdal, A. H. (2015). Methods for developing innovative SME networks. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(4), 978–1000.Google Scholar
  18. Gershman, M., & Kitova, G. (2017). Assessing government support for research and innovation in Russian universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8, 1067–1084.Google Scholar
  19. Golichenko, O. G., & Malkova, A. A. (2017). The analysis of processes of new knowledge production in key world regions and Russia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(4), 1133–1145.Google Scholar
  20. Gross, N., & Kluge, A. (2014). Predictors of knowledge-sharing behavior for teams in extreme environments: an example from the steel industry. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 8(4), 352–373.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343414540656.Google Scholar
  21. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.Google Scholar
  22. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128–140.Google Scholar
  24. Huang, Q., Davison, R. M., & Gu, J. (2011). The impact of trust, Guanxi orientation and face on the intention of Chinese employees and managers to engage in peer-to-peer tacit and explicit knowledge sharing. Information Systems Journal, 21, 557–577.Google Scholar
  25. Hult, G. T. (2003). An integration of thoughts on knowledge management. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 189–195.Google Scholar
  26. Janicot, C., Mignon, S., & Walliser, E. (2016). Information process and value creation: an experimental study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 276–291.Google Scholar
  27. Jeon, S. H., Kim, Y. G., & Koh, J. (2011). Individual, social, and organizational contexts for active knowledge sharing in communities of practice. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12423–12431.Google Scholar
  28. Kindras, A., Meissner, D., & Vishnevskiy, K. (2015). Regional foresight for bridging National Science, technology, and innovation with company innovation: experiences from Russia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0296-x.
  29. Lee, F. (2002). The social costs of seeking help. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, J.-H., Kim, E.-J., & Ahn, J.-H. (2014). The effects of individual and social factors on the knowledge sharing activities of the virtual community of practice. Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 17(2), 23–38.  https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2012.17.2.023.Google Scholar
  31. Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, J. (2010). Culture and knowledge transfer: theoretical considerations. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3(1), 159–164.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2010.31020.Google Scholar
  33. Lucas, L. (2005). The impact of trust and reputation on the transfer of best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 87–101.Google Scholar
  34. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Ma, W. K., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2011). Gender differences of knowledge sharing in online learning environment. In R. Kwan, J. Fong, L.-f. Kwok, & J. Lam (Eds.), Hybrid learning (pp. 116–128). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Massaro, M., Moro, A., Aschauer, E., & Fink, M. (2017). Trust, control and knowledge transfer in small business networks. Review of Manegerial Science.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0247-y.
  37. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
  38. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.Google Scholar
  39. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, J. (2000). Trust: The moral importance of an attitude. Practical Philosophy, 3, 45–54.Google Scholar
  41. Milner, B. Z. (1998). Trust as a key to the success of economic reforms. Social priorities and mechanisms of economic modernization in Russia. FNPR, Russian Academy of Sciences: Мoscow.Google Scholar
  42. Minbaeva, D. B., Makela, K., & Rabbiosi, L. (2012). Linking HRM and knowledge transfer via individual-level mechanisms. Human Resource Management, 51(3), 387–405.Google Scholar
  43. Nadler, J., Thompson, L., & Boven, L. V. (2003). Learning negotiation skills: four models of knowledge creation and transfer. Management Science, 49(4), 529–540.Google Scholar
  44. Nasledov, A. D. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics 20 and AMOS: Professional analysis of statistical data. Saint-Petersburg: Piter.Google Scholar
  45. Natkhov, T. V. (2011). Education and trust in Russia: empirical analysis. HSE Economic Journal, 15, 353–373.Google Scholar
  46. Nebus, J. (2004). Learning by network: Knowledge search and sharing in multinational organizations. In Proceedings of the 46th Academy of International Business Annual Meeting: Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  47. Nebus, J. (2006). Building collegial information networks: a theory of advice network generation. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 615–637.Google Scholar
  48. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.Google Scholar
  49. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 40–54.Google Scholar
  50. Nonaka, I., Byosiere, P., Borucki, P. C., & Konno, N. (1994). Organizational knowledge creation theory: a first comprehensive test. International Business Review, 3(4), 337–351.Google Scholar
  51. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosiere, P. (2001). A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 487–491). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. North, D. C. (1995). The new institutional economics and third world development. In J. Harriss, J. Hunter, & C. Lewis (Eds.), The new institutional economics and third world development (pp. 17–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Ozhegov, S. I. (Ed.). (1988). Dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow: RusskiiYazyk.Google Scholar
  54. Pee, L. G., & Min, J. (2017). Employees’ online knowledge sharing: The effects of person-environment fit. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 432–453.Google Scholar
  55. Perrini, F., & Castaldo, S. (2007). Editorial introduction: corporate social responsibility and trust. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 1–2.Google Scholar
  56. Petrakis, P. E., & Kostis, P. C. (2015). The role of knowledge and trust in SMEs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(1), 105–124.Google Scholar
  57. Renzl, B. (2008). Trust in management and knowledge sharing: the mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega, 36(2), 206–220.Google Scholar
  58. Santosh, B. R., & Muthiah, K. (2012). Knowledge transfer from repatriated employees: the Indian experience. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, E. A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311–321.Google Scholar
  60. Stenmark, D. (2002). Sharing tacit knowledge: A case study at Volvo. In S. Barnes (Ed.), Knowledge management systems: Theory and practice (pp. 36–49). London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  61. Tulgan, B. (1995). Managing generation X. Santa Monica: Merritt Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Ullmann-Margalit, E. (2004). Trust, distrust, and in between. In R. Hardin (Ed.), Russell Sage foundation series on trust: Distrust (pp. 60–82). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Vasin, S., Gamidullaeva, L., Shkarupeta, E., Palatkin, I., & Vasina, T. (2018). European Research Studies Journal. Emerging trends and opportunities for industry 4.0 development in Russia. 21(3), 63–76.Google Scholar
  65. Yang, S., & Farn, C. (2009). Social capital, behavioral control, and tacit knowledge sharing: a multi-informant design. International Journal of Information Management, 29(3), 210–218.Google Scholar
  66. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organizational Science, 9(2), 141–159.Google Scholar
  67. Zhang, X., de Pablos, P. O., & Xu, Q. (2014). Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: a mixed method. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 491–498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.021.Google Scholar
  68. Zhou, S., Siu, F., & Wang, M. (2010). Effects of social tie content on knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(3), 449–463.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergey M. Vasin
    • 1
  • Leyla A. Gamidullaeva
    • 1
  • Nicholas Wise
    • 2
    Email author
  • Konstantin Yu. Korolev
    • 1
  1. 1.Penza State UniversityPenzaRussia
  2. 2.Liverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations