Advertisement

Smart Specialization as a New Strategic Framework: Innovative and Competitive Capacity in European Context

  • Ewa Kopczynska
  • Joao J. Ferreira
Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

The smart specialization framework is an addition to the European policy agenda aiming to foster innovation and smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth. The framework is expected to boost innovativeness and competitiveness of the European Union. However, it raises a number of doubts and concerns, especially due to the currently limited state of knowledge about the concept and its possible implications. To contribute to the need for further analysis of the issue, the paper examines the current smart specialization framework, its basic assumptions, conceptual basis, and current developments in the field. The policy analysis aims to identify the strengths of the framework, as well as its weaknesses that will require attention and corrective measures. Basing on existing literature and declared by regions smart specializations, the authors provide a list of conclusions regarding the current shape of the smart specialization framework in the context of European Union strategic objectives and their implications for policy makers. Provided recommendations suggest improvements of the approach to smart specializations required for the realization of the EU strategic objectives.

Keywords

Smart specialization Innovation policies European Union policy Knowledge-oriented strategies RIS 

References

  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., & Saint-Paul, G. (1998). Virtues of bad times: interaction between productivity growth and economic fluctuations. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2, 322–344.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, U., Dasí, A., Mudambi, R., & Pedersen, T. (2016). Technology, innovation and knowledge: the importance of ideas and international connectivity. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Añón Higón, D., Manjón, M., Máñez, J. A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2015). Does R&D protect SMEs from the hardness of the cycle? Evidence from Spanish SMEs (1990-2009). International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(2), 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(77), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. AtKearney (2015). Rebooting Europe’s high-tech industry, San Francisco, February 2015, AtKearney. https://www.atkearney.pl/communications-media-technology/ideas-insights/future-of-europes-high-tech-industry. Accessed 29 Jan 2016.
  7. Autant-Bernard, C., Fadairo, M., & Massard, N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy, 42(1), 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barcelona European Council (2002). Presidency Conclusions, European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/barcelona_european_council.pdf Accessed 15 January 2016
  9. Bartholomew, S. (1997). National systems of biotechnology innovation: complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 2(2), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belkhodja, O., & Landry, R. (2007). The triple-Helix collaboration: why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers? Scientometrics, 70, 301–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bellini, N., & Hilpert, U. (2013). Europe’s changing geography: the impact of inter-regional networks. New York: Regional Studies Association, Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Borsekova, K., Vanova, A., & Vitalisova, K. (2017). Smart specialization for smart spatial development: innovative strategies for building competitive advantages in tourism in Slovakia. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 58, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, J., & Floros, I. V. (2012). Access to private equity and real firm activity: Evidence from PIPEs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(1), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruijn, P., & Lagendijk, A. (2005). Regional innovation systems in the Lisbon strategy. European Planning Studies, 13(8), 1153–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 212–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carayannis, E.G., Meissner, D., & Edelkina, A. (2015). Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 1–25.Google Scholar
  18. CEC (2001). Communication on the future of the European Union. Brussels: European Governance. 25.7.2001 COM(2001) 428. europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-01-10_en.pdf.
  19. Charles, D., Grross, F., & Bachtler, J. (2012), ‘Smart specialisation’ and cohesion policy—a strategy for all regions?, European Policies Research Center. IQ-Net Thematic Paper No. 30(2) http://www.clusterpolisees3.eu/ClusterpoliSEEPortal/resources/cms/documents/2012.06.20_Smart_specialisation_and_Cohesion_Policy_-_A_Strategy_for_All_Regions.pdf
  20. Cincera, M., & Veugelers, R. (2012). Young leading innovators and the EU's R&D intensity gap. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(2), 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction. Origins of the concept. In Braczyk, H.-J., et al. (Eds.), Regional Innovation Systems. London: UCL Press, pp. 2–25.Google Scholar
  22. Cooke, P., Urangab, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policies, 26(4–5), 475–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cooke, P. H., Boekholt, P., Tödtling, F. (1998). Regional innovation systems: designing for the future, Final Report, EU Commission.Google Scholar
  24. Cooke, P. N., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, J. (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world. London: Psychology Press, Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Delgado, M., Porter, M., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(4), 495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. EC (2010). Commission staff working document, Lisbon Strategy evaluation document, European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/lisbon_strategy_evaluation_en.pdf. Accessed 28 December 2015.
  27. EC (2010a). Council conclusions on Innovation Union for Europe, 3049th Competitiveness Council meeting, Brussels, 26 Nov 2010, Council of the European Union: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/118028.pdf.
  28. EC (2012). Europe 2020: Europe’s growth strategy, European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/europe_2020_explained.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2015.
  29. EC (2012a). Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3), European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/smart_specialisation/smart_ris3_2012.pdf. Accessed 18 October 2015.
  30. EC (2014). National/Regional Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/smart_specialisation_en.pdf.
  31. Etzkowitz, H., & Klofsten, M. (2005). The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Etzkowitz, H., & Mello, J. M. C. (2004). The rise of a triple helix culture: innovation in Brazilian economic and social development. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 2(3), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. EU (2016). The EU in the world, 2016 edition, Publication Office of the European Union: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/7589036/KS-EX-16-001-EN-N.pdf/bcacb30c-0be9-4c2e-a06d-4b1daead493e
  34. Faber, J., & Hesen, A. B. (2004). Innovation capabilities of European nations: cross-national analysis of patents and sales of product innovations. Research Policy, 33(2), 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2011). Smart specialization. From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation, MTEI Working Paper. Management of Technology & Enterepreneurship Institute. http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/170252/files/MTEI-WP-2011-001-Foray_David_Hall.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  36. Frank, A. G., Cortimiglia, M. N., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Oliveira, L. S. (2016). The effect of innovation activities on innovation outputs in the Brazilian industry: market-orientation vs. technology-acquisition strategies. Research Policy, 45(3), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fransman, M. (1999). Is national technology policy obsolete in a globalized world? In: Fransman, M. (Ed.), The Japanese Vision. Visions of Innovation: The Firm and Japan. New York: Oxford, pp. 167–201.Google Scholar
  38. Freeman, C. (1982). Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Draft Paper Submitted to the OECD Ad hoc Group on Science, Technology and Competitiveness.Google Scholar
  39. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  40. Furman, J. L., & MacGarvie, M. (2009). Academic collaboration and organizational innovation: The development of research capabilities in the U.S. pharmaceutical research laboratories. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 929–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Furman, J., Porter, M., Stern, S. (2000). Understanding the drivers of national innovative capacity. Academy Of MANAGE Proceeding August 2000 Meeting Abstract Supplement A1-A6.Google Scholar
  42. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31, 899–933.Google Scholar
  43. Goedhuys, M., & Veugelers, R. (2012). Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: firm-level evidence from Brazil. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 516–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grupp, H., & Schubert, T. (2010). Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Research Policy, 39, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Guisado-González, M., Vila-Alonso, M., & Guisado-Tato, M. (2016). Radical innovation, incremental innovation and training: analysis of complementarity. Technology in Society, 44, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hasan, I., & Tucci, C. L. (2010). The innovation-economic growth nexus: global evidence. Research Policy, 39, 1264–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hausman, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 8952.Google Scholar
  48. Hecksher, E., & Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hill, Ch. W.L. (2017). International business: competing in the global marketplace, 11th edition, New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  50. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskinsson, R. E. (2015). Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization: concepts, 11th edition. Stamford: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  51. Huggins, R., & Kitagawa, F. (2012). Regional policy and university knowledge transfer: perspectives from devolved regions in the UK. Regional Studies, 46(6), 817–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hughes, A. (2012). Enhancing impact: the value of public sector R & D: summary report, Council for Industry and Higher Education: http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/centre-for-business-research/downloads/special-reports/specialreport-enhancingimpact.pdf. Accessed 17 November 2015.
  53. Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). A cross-disciplinary exploration of entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management, 33(6), 891–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jones, C. I. (1995). R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Karo, E., & Kattel, R. (2015). Economic development and evolving state capacities in central and Eastern Europe: can “smart specialisation” make a difference? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(2), 172–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Komninos, N., Musyck, B., & Reid, A. I. (2014). Smart specialisation strategies in South Europe during crisis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 448–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Krammer, S. M. S. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: Evidence from a panel of eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38, 845–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Krammer, S. M. S. (2017). Science, technology, and innovation for economic competitiveness: The role of smart specialization in less-developed countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and Pattern of Trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.Google Scholar
  60. Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Encyclopedia of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Lundvall, B., (1992). Introduction. In: Lundvall, B. (Ed.), National systems of innovation toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  63. Lundvall, B. (2007). National Innovation Systems — Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lundvall, B.-Å., & Borrás S. (1997). The globalising learning economy: implications for innovation policy. Report from DG XII, Commission of the European Union.Google Scholar
  65. MacMillan, I. C., Kulow, D. M., & Kholian, R. (1989). Venture capitalists’ involvement in their investments: extent and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  67. McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions. Economy and Society, 6(2), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014). Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Metcalfe, J. S. (1995). Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 25–46.Google Scholar
  70. Midtkandal, I., & Sörvik, J. (2012). What is smart specialisation? Nordregio News Issue, 5, 2012.Google Scholar
  71. Mieszkowski, K., & Kardas, M. (2015). Facilitating an entrepreneurial discovery process for smart specialisation. The case of Poland. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Miozzo, M., & Walsh, V. (2006). International competitiveness and technological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Moretti, E. (2012). The new geography of jobs. New York: Houghton Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  74. Nelson, R. R. (1990). Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, 19(3), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Niosi, J., & Bellon, B. (1994). The global interdependence of national innovation systems—evidence, limits, and implications. Technology in Society, 16(2), 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. O’Sullivan, M. (rapporteur) (2007). The EU’s R&D Deficit and Innovation Policy, report based on contributions of the members of the EU Commissioner J. Potoˇcnik’s Expert Group on “Knowledge for Growth”, see: http://ec.europa.eu/invest-inresearch/pdf/downloaden/rdddeficit report0207.pdf.
  78. OECD (2013). Innovation-driven growth in regions: the role of smart specialisation, OECD: http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/smart-specialisation.pdf.
  79. Pontikakis, D., Chorafakis, G., & Kyriakou, D. (2009). R&D specialisation in the EU: from stylised observations to evidence-based policy, in Pontikakis, Kyriakou and van Bavel (eds) 2009, The question of R&D specialisation: Perspective and policy implications, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC51665.pdf Accessed 17 November 2015.
  80. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–91.Google Scholar
  81. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6),77–90.Google Scholar
  82. Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.Google Scholar
  83. Porter, M. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6–7), 545–546.Google Scholar
  84. Raffo, J., Lhuillery, S., & Miotti, L. (2008). Northern and southern Innovativity a comparison across European and Latin American countries. The European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ricardo, D. (1817). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  87. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Roth, S. (2009). Non-technological and non-economic innovations: contributions to a theory of robust innovation. Bern: Peter Lang AG.Google Scholar
  89. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard Economic Studies 46.Google Scholar
  90. Simmie, J. (2004). Innovation and clustering in the globalised international economy. Urban Studies, 41(5–6), 1095–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.Google Scholar
  92. Soete, L. (2006). A knowledge economy paradigm and its consequences, United Nations University—Maastricht Economic and social Research and Training Center on Innovation and Technology.Google Scholar
  93. Vecchio, P., & Passiante, G. (2017). Is tourism a driver for smart specialization? Evidence from Apulia, an Italian region with a tourism vocation. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(3), 163–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Watkins, A., Papaioannou, T., Mugwagwa, J., & Kale, D. (2015). National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: a critical review of the literature. Research Policy, 44(8), 407–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. WIPO (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015, World Intellectual Property Organization: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII-2015-v5.pdf Accessed 5 January 2016.
  96. Zacharakis, A. L., Shepherd, D. A., & Coombs, J. E. (2003). The development of venture-capital-backed internet companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NECE – Research Unit in Business Sciences and PhD Candidate in ManagementUniversity of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal
  2. 2.Management and Economics Department and NECE – Research Unit in Business SciencesUniversity of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal

Personalised recommendations