Africa Is Rich, Africans Are Poor! A Blessing or Curse: An Application of Cointegration Techniques

Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of the current survey is to examine the presence of the resource curse mechanism for a panel of 22 African countries during the time span 1990–2013. For this purpose, our survey uses the Pedroni panel cointegration test to detect the existence of a long-run relationship, fully modified ordinary least square, dynamic ordinary least square, and the vector error correction model techniques to check the causality direction. Our empirical evidence reveals the fact of a negative long-run relationship between resource intensity index and the economic performance which means that the existence of curse mechanism implies that the resource abundance exerts a negative influence on the economic performance. Hence, this curse is defined by the economic theory as the “resource curse hypothesis” (RCH). Thus, the RCH is well validated in our framework. We suggested that adequate and sufficient investments affecting the human aspect were devoted; hence, generating coherent externalities related to the productivity and ecological aspects and thus sustainability. Good quality of institutions depicts as one crucial efficient condition for a better environment and wealth, combining with human development investments.

Keywords

Resource curse hypothesis Africa Pedroni panel cointegration VECM 

References

  1. Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 493–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abou-Ali, H., & Abdelfattah, Y. M. (2013). Integrated paradigm for sustainable development: a panel data study. Economic Modelling, 30, 334–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akinlo, H. (2012). How important is oil in Nigeria’s economic growth? Journal of Sustainable Development, 5, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al Rawashdeh, R., & Maxwell, P. (2013). Jordan, minerals extraction and the resource curse. Resources Policy 38, 103–112.Google Scholar
  5. Ansari, D. (2016). Resource curse contagion in the case of Yemen. Resources Policy, 49, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2014). The oil curse, institutional quality, and growth in MENA countries: evidence from time-varying cointegration. Energy Economics, 46, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arai, Y., & Kurozumi, E. (2007). Testing for the null hypothesis of cointegration with a structural break. Econometric Reviews, 26(6), 705–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asekunowo, V. O., & Olaiya, S. A. (2012). Crude oil revenue and economic development in Nigeria (1974–2008). OPEC Energy Review, 36, 138–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Askari, H., & Jaber, M. (1999). Oil exporting countries of the Persian Gulf: what happened to all that money? Journal of Energy Finance and Develoment, 4, 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atkinson, G., & Hamilton, K. (2003). Savings, growth and the resource curse hypothesis. World Development, 31, 1797–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Auty, R. (2001). Resource abundance and economic development. World Institute for Development Economic Research of the United Nations University UNU/WIDER. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Betz, M. R., Partridge, M. D., Farren, M., & Lobao, L. (2015). Coal mining, economic development, and the natural resources curse. Energy Economics, 50, 105–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhagwati, J. N. (1982). Directly-unproductive profit-seeking (DUP) activities. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 988–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhattacharyya, S., & Hodler, R. (2010). Natural resources, democracy and corruption. European Economic Review, 54(4), 608–621.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bjorvatn, K., & Farzanegan, M. R. (2013). Demographic transition in resource rich countries: a blessing. World Development, 45, 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boyce, J. R., & Emery, J. C. H. (2005). A Hotelling explanation of “the curse of natural resources”. Department of Economics Discussion Paper, 06. University of Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
  18. Boyce, J. R., & Emery, J. C. H. (2011). Is a negative correlation between resource abundance and growth sufficient evidence that there is a “resource curse”? Resources Policy, 36, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brunnschweiler, C. N. (2008). Cursing the blessings? Natural resource abundance, institutions, and economic growth. World Development 36, 399–419.Google Scholar
  20. Brunnschweiler, C. N., Bulte, E. H. (2008). The resource curse revisited and revised: a tale of paradoxes and red herrings. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55(3), 248–264.Google Scholar
  21. Bulte, E. H., Damania, R., & Deacon, R. T. (2005). Resource intensity, institutions, and development. World Development, 33, 1029–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carmignani, F. (2013). Development outcomes, resource abundance, and the transmission through inequality. Resource and Energy Economics, 35, 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cavalcanti, T. V. d. V., Mohaddes, K., & Raissi, M. (2011). Growth, development and natural resources: new evidence using a heterogeneous panel analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 51, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cockx, L., & Francken, N. (2014). Extending the concept of the resource curse: natural resources and public spending on health. Ecological Economics, 108, 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cockx, L., & Francken, N. (2016). Natural resources: a curse on education spending? Energy Policy, 92, 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Costa, H. K. M., & Santos, E. M. (2013). Institutional analysis and the “resource curse” in developing countries. Energy Policy, 63, 788–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Costantini, V., & Monni, S. (2008). Environment, human development, and economic development. Ecological Economics, 64, 867–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. de Mendonça, H. F., & da Fonseca, A. O. (2012). Corruption, income, and rule of law: empirical evidence from developing and developed economies. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 32, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.Google Scholar
  30. Ding, N., & Field, B. C. (2005). Natural resource abundance and economic growth. Land Economics, 81, 496–502.Google Scholar
  31. Dülger, F., Lopcu, K., Burgaç, A., & Ballı, E. (2013). Is Russia suffering from Dutch disease? Cointegration with structural break. Resources Policy, 38, 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eisgruber, L. (2013). The resource curse: analysis of the applicability to the large-scale export of electricity from renewable resources. Energy Policy, 57, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Elhannani, F. E. (2013). Oil price volatility and economic growth in Nigeria: new channels for the resource curse. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. Abou bakr Belkaid University, Tlemcen.Google Scholar
  34. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Farhadi, M., Islam, M. R., & Moslehi, S. (2015). Economic freedom and productivity growth in resource-rich economies. World Development, 72, 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gillis, M., Perkins, D. H., Roemer, M., & Snodgrass, D. R. (1996). Economics of development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Gregory, A. W., & Hansen, B. E. (1996a). Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gregory, A. W., & Hansen, B. E. (1996b). Tests for the cointegration in models with regime and trend shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58(3), 555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gylfason, T. (2001). Natural resources, education, and development. European Economic Review, 45, 847–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gylfason, T., & Zoega, G. (2006). Natural resources and economic growth: the role of investment. World Economics, Wiley Blackwell, 29, 1091–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Isham, J.,Woolcock, M., Pritchett, L., & Busby, G. (2003). The varieties of resource experience: how natural resource export structures affect the political economy of economic growth. Middlebury college economics discussion paper, vol. 08. Vermont, Middlebury.Google Scholar
  43. James, A., & Aadland, D. (2011). The curse of natural resources: an empirical investigation of US counties. Resource and Energy Economics, 33, 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1992). Testing structural hypotheses in a multivariate cointegration analysis of the PP and UIP for UK. Journal of Econometrics, 53, 211–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (2001). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, & R. C. Hill (Eds.), Non stationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels (Advances in Econometrics) (Vol. 15, pp. 179–222). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  48. Kaufman, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2008). Governance matters VII: aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2007. World Bank policy research working paper no. 4654.Google Scholar
  49. Komarulzaman, A., & Alisjahbema, A. (2006). Testing the natural resource curse hypothesis in Indonesia: evidence at the regional level. Working paper in economics and development studies no. 200602, Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University.Google Scholar
  50. Krueger, A. O. (1990). Asian trade and growth lessons. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 108–112.Google Scholar
  51. Krueger, A. O. (1998). Why trade liberalization is good for growth. The Econometrics Journal, 108, 1513–1522.Google Scholar
  52. Leite, C., & Weidman, J. (1999). Does mother nature corrupt? IMF working paper 99/85.Google Scholar
  53. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mark, C. N., & Sul, D. (2003). Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and long-run money demand. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 655–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Matsen, E., & Torvik, R. (2005). Optimal Dutch disease. Journal of Development Economics, 78, 494–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. (2002). Institutions and the resource curse. Department of Economics Memorandum, 29. Norway: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  57. Mehlum, H., Moene, K., & Torvik, R. (2005). Cursed by resources or institutions? Department of Economics Working Paper, 10. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.Google Scholar
  58. Mehrara, M. (2009). Reconsidering the resource curse in oil-exporting countries. Energy Policy, 37, 1165–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Michaels, G. (2010). The long term consequences of resource-based specialisation. The Economic Journal, 121, 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mo, P. H. (2000). Income inequality and economic growth. Kyklos, 53, 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Neumayer, E. (2004). Does the “resource curse” hold for growth ingenuine income as well? World Development, 32(10), 1627–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Odularo, G. (2008). Crude oil and the Nigerian economic development. Oil and Gas Business Journal, 4, 1–29.Google Scholar
  64. Ouoba, Y. (2016). Natural resources: funds and economic performance of resource-rich countries. Resources Policy, 50, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Papyrakis, R., & Gerlagh, R. (2004). The resource curse hypothesis and its transmission channels. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Papyrakis, E., & Gerlagh, R. (2007). Resource abundance and economic growth in the United States. European Economic Review, 51, 1011–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Paul, C. (2003). Natural resources, development and conflict: channels of causation and policy interventions. World Bank.Google Scholar
  68. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pedroni, P. (2001a). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, & R. C. Hill (Eds.), Non stationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (Advances in Econometrics) (Vol. 15, pp. 93–130). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  70. Pedroni, P. (2001b). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20, 597–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pesaran, H. M., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 621–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Phillips, P. C. B., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies, 57, 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrika, 75, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ross, M. L. (1999). The political economy of the resource curse. World Politics, 51, 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ross, M. L. (2013). The politics of the resource curse: a review. In C. Lancaster & N. van de Walle (Eds.), Handbook on the politics of development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER working paper, 5398. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  78. Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (1997). Natural resource abundance and economic growth. NBER working paper no.5398.Google Scholar
  79. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1999). The big push, natural resource booms and growth. Journal of Development Economics 59, 43–76.Google Scholar
  80. Sachs, J., & Warner, A. (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45, 827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Saikkonen, P. (1991). Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegration regressions. Econometric Theory, 7, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sala-i-Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the natural resource curse: an illustration from Nigeria, IMF working paper WP/03/139, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  83. Sarmidi, T., Law, S. H., & Jafari, Y. (2014). Resource curse: New evidence on the role of institutions. International Economic Journal, 28, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Satti, S. L., Farooq, A., Loganathan, N., & Shahbaz, M. (2014). Empirical evidence on the resource curse hypothesis in oil abundant economy. Economic Modelling, 42, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Segal, P. (2012). How to spend it: resource wealth and the distribution of resource rents. Energy Policy, 51, 340–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shao, S., & Qi, Z. Y. (2009). Energy exploitation and economic growth in western China: an empirical analysis based on the resource curse hypothesis. Frontiers of Economics in China, 4, 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shao, S., & Yang, L. L. (2010). Natural resource abundance, resource-based industry dependence, and China’s regional economic growth. Management World, (9), 26–44.Google Scholar
  88. Shao, S., & Yang, L. (2014). Natural resource dependence, human capital accumulation, and economic growth: a combined explanation for the resource curse and the resource blessing. Energy Policy, 74, 632–642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.07.007i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shaw, D. L. (2013). Good governance in the post-soviet south: Testing theories of the resource curse in Azerbaijan. Journal of Politics & International Studies, 9, 520–561.Google Scholar
  90. Shuai, S., & Zhogying, Q. (2009). Energy exploitation and economic growth in western China: an empirical analysis based on the resource curse hypothesis. Frontiers of Economics in China, 4, 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Siddiqui, D. A., & Ahmed, Q. M. (2013). The effect of institutions on economic growth: a global analysis based on GMM dynamic panel estimation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, B. (2015). The resource curse exorcised: evidence from a panel of countries. Journal of Development Economics, 116, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61, 783–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. The African Development Bank Group. (n.d.) Available at: https://www.afdb.org/
  95. Tiba, S., Omri, A., & Frikha, M. (2015). The four-way linkages between renewable energy, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: a comparative analysis between high and middle-income countries. Energy Systems, 7, 103–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. UNDP. (2009). Human development report 2009—Overcoming barriers: human mobility and development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Van Wijnbergen, S. (1984). The ‘Dutch disease’: a disease after all? The Economic Journal, 94, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. World Bank (2015). World Development Indicator Database. (n.d.) (CD ROM-2015).Google Scholar
  99. Xu, X., Xu, X., Chen, Q., & Che, Y. (2016). The research on generalized regional “resource curse” in China’s new normal stage. Resources Policy, 49, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhang, X., Xing, L., Fan, S., & Luo, X. (2008). Resource abundance and regional development in China. The Economics of Transition, 16, 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zuo, N., & Schieffer, J. (2014). Are resources a curse? An investigation of Chinese provinces. Paper presented at the southern agricultural economics association (SAEA) Annual Meeting Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and ManagementUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations