Advertisement

Disabled People in the Stakeholder Theory: a Literature Analysis

  • Guido Migliaccio
Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the role of disability management primarily in social, economic, and corporate systems by focusing on the stakeholder theory. This paper examines the main international literature on this topic to offer qualitative evidence of this phenomenon. In other words, the paper formulates certain theoretical interdisciplinary considerations based on a qualitative approach with an updated conceptualization of the international literature. Business logic may lead to a bias against disability stakeholders if they are perceived as factors that affect productivity. A more balanced assessment should consider both the tangible and intangible effects on the business system in which people with disabilities may have stakeholder roles. Disabled employees have a greater impact in terms of structural requirements, training, prevention, and healthcare in addition to the operational discontinuities that any form of disability is likely to cause. Disability, however, could contribute to the creation of a stimulating, motivating, and empowering working environment, thus maximizing the overall performance. Diversity and disability management also increase overall productivity because they tend to boost tolerance with positive effects in terms of reputation. Financial benefits from government grants often compensate for the expenses. The beneficial impact on the economic system is also often overlooked: otherwise, unproductive resources are brought back into use, thus freeing productive energies within families with disabled members. Disabled stakeholders who are customers or users represent a substantial and growing target for companies that produce specific goods and services and are tailoring their strategies according to demand.

Keywords

Disability stakeholders Disability management Diversity management Inclusive society Handicap 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is a revised and expanded version of a paper entitled “Disability stakeholders. Considerations from Italian Context” presented in Verona (Italy) at the 8th Annual Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business (16-18 September 2015). A similar paper was presented in Bergamo (Italy) at the 3rd Bergamo-Wharton Joint Conference (1-2 July 2010). The author's deepest gratitude goes to prof. Rosa Lombardi for her thoughtful comments, discussion and suggestions. The author also thanks prof. Matteo Rossi for his advice to present it at international conferences.

References

  1. Abrahams, L. (2011). South Africa’s e-development still a futuristic task. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(1), 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, E. M. (2010). Information and communications technology effects on East Asian productivity. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(3), 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, E. M., & Ridzuan, R. (2013). The impact of ICT on East Asian economic growth: panel estimation approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(4), 540–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali, M. (2016). Impact of gender-focused human resource management on performance: the mediating effects of gender diversity. Australian Journal of Management, 41(2), 376–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ancell, D., & Graham, A. (2016). A framework for evaluating the European airline costs of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility. Journal of Air Transport Management, 50(1), 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angeloni, S. (2010). L’aziendabilità. Il valore delle risorse disabili per l’azienda e il valore dell’azienda per le risorse disabili. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  7. Angeloni, S. (2013). Integrated disability management: an interdisciplinary and holistic approach. SAGE Open, 3(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azevedo, L. F., Costa-Pereira, A., Mendonça, L., Dias, C. C., & Castro-Lopes, J. M. (2016). The economic impact of chronic pain: a nationwide population-based cost-of-illness study in Portugal. European Journal of Health Economics, 17(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauman, Z. (2005). Globalizzazione e glocalizzazione (Globalization and glocalization). Roma: Armando.Google Scholar
  10. Berndt, E., Crown, W., Kallich, J., Long, S., Song, X., & Lyman, G. H. (2005). The impact of anaemia and its treatment on employee disability and medical costs. PharmacoEconomics, 23(2), 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bocconi, S. and Ott, M. (2013). ICT and universal access to education: towards a culture of accessibility. In D.L. Miltiadis, R. Da, R.D. Tennyson, P. Ordonez De Pablos, F.J.G. Peñalvo, L. Rusu (Eds.); Information systems, e-learning, and knowledge management research. 4th World Summit on the Knowledge Society, WSKS 2011, Mykonos, Greece, September 21–23, 2011. Revised Selected Papers (pp. 330–337). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Bruni, L., & Zamagni, S. (2004). Economia civile. Efficienza, equità, felicità pubblica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  13. Bruyére, S., & Filiberto, D. (2013). The green economy and job creation: inclusion of people with disabilities in the USA. International Journal of Green Economics, 7(3), 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burns, J., Euske, K. J., & Malina, M. A. (2014). Debating diversity in management accounting research. In M. J. Epstein & J. Y. Lee (Eds.), Advances in management accounting, 24 (pp. 39–59). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carayannis, E. G. (2008). Conceptual framework for an analysis of diversity and heterogeneity in the knowledge economy and society. In E. G. Carayannis, A. Kaloudis, & Å. Mariussen (Eds.), Diversity in the knowledge economy and society: heterogeneity, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 95–116). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carayannis, E. G., & Sagi, J. (2002). Exploiting opportunities of the new economy: developing nations in support of the ICT industry. Technovation, 22(8), 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carayannis, E. G., Kaloudis, A., & Mariussen, Å. (Eds.). (2008). Diversity in the knowledge economy and society: heterogeneity, innovation and entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Carayannis, E. G., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2014). Business model innovation as lever of organizational sustainability. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carvalho-Freitas, M. N. (2009). Insertion and management of people with disabilities at work: a case study. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(spe), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chiu, T.-K., & Wang, Y.-H. (2014). Determinants of social disclosure quality in Taiwan: an application of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Colella, A., & Varma, A. (1999). Disability-job fit stereotypes and the evaluation of persons with disabilities at work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 9(2), 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cuomo, S., & Mapelli, A. (2007). Diversity management. Gestire e valorizzare le differenze individuali nell’organizzazione che cambia. Milano: Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
  23. D’Amato, A. (2009). Il governo della diversità tra filosofia organizzativa e approccio strategico: il diversity e il disability management. In G. Metallo, P. Ricci, & G. Migliaccio (Eds.), La risorsa umana “diversamente abile” nell’economia dell’azienda (pp. 229–262). Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  24. Del Giudice, M., & Straub, D. (2011). IT and entrepreneurism: an on-again, off-again love affair or a marriage? MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 35(4), iii–vii.Google Scholar
  25. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 1, 65–91.Google Scholar
  26. Fei, D., & Chen, X. (2015). The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) paratransit cost issues and solutions: case of Greater Richmond Transit Company (GRTC). Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(4), 402–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Felce, D., Cohen, D., Willner, P., Rose, J., Kroese, B., Rose, N., Shead, J., Jahoda, A., Macmahon, P., Lammie, C., Stimpson, A., Woodgate, C., Gillespie, D., Townson, J., Nuttall, J., & Hood, K. (2015). Cognitive behavioural anger management intervention for people with intellectual disabilities: costs of intervention and impact on health and social care resource use. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2015). Organizations, stakeholders, and intermediaries: towards a general theory. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9(4), 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freeman, E.R. (2010). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press (1st edition 1984 as a part of the Pitman Series in Business and Public Policy).Google Scholar
  30. Freeman, E. R., & Evan, W. M. (1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In G. D. Chryssides & J. H. Kaler (Eds.), An introduction to business ethics. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  31. Gallucci, C., & Marino, V. (2009). Ripensare il marketing dei servizi turistici per la co-creazione di esperienze e soluzioni per i «diversamente abili». In G. Metallo, P. Ricci, & G. Migliaccio (Eds.), La risorsa umana “diversamente abile” nell’economia dell’azienda (pp. 449–478). Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  32. Garbutt, M. and Kyobe, M. (2013). Knowledge practices of people with disabilities and the role of ICT. In 2013 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Accessibility, ICTA 2013; Hammamet; Tunisia; 24-26 October 2013. USA and Canada: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Genereaux, D., Bansback, N., & Birch, P. (2016). Development and pilot testing of a tool to calculate parental and societal costs of raising a child with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 41(1), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gensby, U., Labriola, M., Irvin, E., Amick III, B. C., & Lund, T. (2014). A classification of components of workplace disability management programs: results from a systematic review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 24(2), 220–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glocalist, M. (2008). The glocalist manifesto. From the web site (consulted March 13, 2016): http://www.glocalisti.org/blog/the-glocalist-manifesto/.
  36. Govardhan, A., Srujan Raju, K., Mandal, J.K., Satapathy, S.C., (Eds) (2015). Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 49th Annual Convention of Computer Society of India: Emerging ICT for Bridging the Future, AISC 2014, Hyderabad; India; 12–14 December 2014, Voll. 337–338, 2015, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Graham, G., & Hanna, N. (2011). Re-connect Canada: a community-based e-development strategy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(1), 38–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guzzetti, G. B. (1987). Cristianesimo ed economia (Disegno Teoretico). Milano: Massimo.Google Scholar
  39. Hancock, R., & Pudney, S. (2014). Assessing the distributional impact of reforms to disability benefits for older people in the UK: implications of alternative measures of income and disability costs. Ageing and Society, 34(2), 232–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hanna, N. K. (2011). International experience in e-transformation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., & de Abreu, M. C. S. (2015). Stakeholder theory as an ethical approach to effective management: applying the theory to multiple contexts. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 17(55), 858–869.Google Scholar
  43. Hasnas, J. (2013). Whither stakeholder theory? A guide for the perplexed revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Holck, L., Muhr, S. L., & Villeseche, F. (2016). Identity, diversity and diversity management on theoretical connections, assumptions and implications for practice. Equality diversity and inclusion, 35(1), 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. IBM Foundation and Asphi Foundation (2007). Linee guida per l’integrazione dei disabili in azienda; da obbligo a RISORSA. http://www.asphi.it/DisabilitaOggi/LineeGuida_2007.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2010.Google Scholar
  46. Ivanova, J. I., Birnbaum, H. G., Samuels, S., Davis, M., Phillips, A. L., & Meletiche, D. (2009). The cost of disability and medically related absenteeism among employees with multiple sclerosis in the US. PharmacoEconomics, 27(8), 681–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Janssens, M., & Zanoni, P. (2014). Alternative diversity management: organizational practices fostering ethnic equality at work. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(3), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaufmann, H. R., & Shams, S. M. R. (Eds.) (2016). Entrepreneurial challenges in the 21st century: creating stakeholder value co-creation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Kleibrink, A., Niehaves, B., Palop, P., Sörvik, J., & Thapa, B. E. P. (2015). Regional ICT innovation in the european union: prioritization and performance (2008–2012). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 320–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Knight, P. T., & Routti, J. (2011). E-development and consensus formation in Finland. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(1), 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Konrad, A. M., Yang, Y., & Maurer, C. C. (2016). Antecedents and outcomes of diversity and equality management systems: an integrated institutional agency and strategic human resource management approach. Human Resource Management, 55(1), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kulkarni, M., & Gopakumar, K. V. (2014). Career management strategies of people with disabilities. Human Resource Management, 53(3), 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Labucay, I. (2015). Diversity management and performance: paving the way for a revised business case. European Journal of International Management, 9(4), 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lara, L. F., de Campos, E. A. R., Stefano, S. R., & de Andrade, S. M. (2016). Inclusion and diversity: a study of human resources management practices for people with disabilities. Espacios, 37(3), 3.Google Scholar
  55. Li, C. J. (2013). The study on the synergy of corporate stakeholders in the corporate governance: based on the theory of complex systems. In E. Qi, J. Shen, & R. Dou (Eds.), Book of proceedings of international Asia conference on industrial engineering and management innovation: core areas of industrial engineering, IEMI 2012, Beijing; China; 10 August 2012 through 11 August 2012 (pp. 1557–1567). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Li, C.-R., Liu, Y.-Y., Lin, C.-J., & Ma, H.-J. (2016). Top management team diversity, ambidextrous innovation and the mediating effect of top team decision-making processes. Industry and Innovation, 23(3), 260–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lombardi, R. (2010). Il capitale relazionale: il ruolo della fiducia. Impresa, Ambiente, e Management, 2, 271–296.Google Scholar
  58. Lombardi, R., Del Giudice, M., Caputo, A., Evangelista, F., & Russo, G. (2016). Governance and assessment insights in information technology: the Val IT model. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 292–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Loyalka, P., Liu, L., Chen, G., & Zheng, X. (2014). The cost of disability in China. Demography, 51(1), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lu, C.-M., Chen, S.-J., Huang, P.-C., & Chien, J.-C. (2015). Effect of diversity on human resource management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 857–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lucadamo, A., & Simonetti, B. (2009). Diverse abilità: elementi quantitativi. In G. Metallo, P. Ricci, & G. Migliaccio (Eds.), La risorsa umana “diversamente abile” nell’economia dell’azienda (pp. 137–150). Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  62. Maccali, N., Suemi Souza Kuabara, P., Roseli Wünsch Takahashi, A., De Déa Roglio, K., & De Toledo Martins Boehs, S. (2015). Human resource practices for diversity management: the inclusion of intellectual disabilities in a public Federation of Brazil. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 16(2), 157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Manton, K. G., Lamb, V. L., & Gu, X. (2007). Medicare cost effects of recent U.S. disability trends in the elderly: future implications. Journal of Aging and Health, 19(3), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mauri, L., & Visconti, L. M. (Eds.). (2004). Diversity management e società multiculturale. Teorie e prassi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  65. McCrone, P., Heslin, M., Knapp, M., Bull, P., & Thompson, A. (2008). Multiple sclerosis in the UK: service use, costs, quality of life and disability. PharmacoEconomics, 26(10), 847–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Medeghini, R. (Ed.). (2015). Norma e normalità nei disability studies. Riflessioni e analisi critica per ripensare la disabilità. Trento: Erickson.Google Scholar
  67. Mehrotra, N. (2013). Disability, gender and caste intersections in indian economy. Research in Social Science and Disability, 7, 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Metallo, G., Ricci, P., & Migliaccio, G. (Eds.). (2009). La risorsa umana “diversamente abile” nell’economia dell’azienda. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  69. Migliaccio, G. (2007). La disabilità nell’economia e nel bilancio sociale d’azienda. In A. Attanasio (Ed.), Atti del Convegno dei Giuristi Telematici su ITC disabilità e diritto, Roma, 28-29 ottobre 2005, (pp. 131–150). Milano: Nyberg.Google Scholar
  70. Migliaccio, G. (2009). Le «diverse abilità» negli approcci economico ed etico-economico. In G. Metallo, P. Ricci, & G. Migliaccio (Eds.), La risorsa umana “diversamente abile” nell’economia dell’azienda (pp. 199–216). Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  71. Migliaccio, G. (2014). The disability marketing and the cultural ‘product’. Italian experience and propositions for international contexts. In L. Aiello (Ed.), Management of cultural products: e-relationship marketing and accessibility perspectives (pp. 321–346). Hershey: Igi Global.Google Scholar
  72. Migliaccio, G. (2015). Disability management and ‘glocalization’ for an inclusive society. In V. Dermol, A. Trunk, & M. Smrkolj (Eds.), Conference proceedings of MakeLearn and TIIM 2015 international conference managing intellectual capital and innovation for sustainable and inclusive society (pp. 20–29). Bangkok: ToKnowPress.Google Scholar
  73. Migliaccio, G. (2016). ICT for disability management in the net economy. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 8(1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Miralles, C., Marin-Garcia, J. A., Ferrus, G., & Costa, A. M. (2010). Operations research/management science tools for integrating people with disabilities into employment. A study on Valencia’s sheltered work centres for disabled. International Transactions in Operational Research, 17(4), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Morad, T. (2007). Tourism and disability. A review of cost-effectiveness. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 6(3), 279–282.Google Scholar
  76. Morciano, M., Hancock, R., & Pudney, S. (2015). Disability costs and equivalence scales in the older population in Great Britain. Review of Income and Wealth, 61(3), 494–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business & management. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  78. O’Brien, R. L. (2013). Economy and disability: labor market conditions and the disability of working-age individuals. Social Problems, 60(3), 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Oberfield, Z. W. (2014). Accounting for time: comparing temporal and atemporal analyses of the business case for diversity management. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 777–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Olsen, J. E., & Martins, L. L. (2016). Racioethnicity, community makeup, and potential employees’ reactions to organizational diversity management approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Padua, D. (2007). Sociologia del diversity management. Il valore delle differenze culturali. Perugia: Morlacchi.Google Scholar
  82. Parks, P. J. (2012). The digital divide. San Diego: ReferencePoint.Google Scholar
  83. Paul, K. (2014). Stakeholder theory, meet communications theory: media systems dependency and community infrastructure theory, with an application to California’s cannabis/marijuana industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 705–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pennington, M., Prince, E., Bateman, N., Gray, J., Croudace, T. J., Redley, M., Wood, N., & Ring, H. (2012). Factors influencing the costs of epilepsy in adults with an intellectual disability. Seizure, 21(3), 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Perry, J., Allen, D. G., Pimm, C., Meek, A., Lowe, K., Groves, S., Cohen, D., & Felce, D. (2013). Adults with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: the costs and outcomes of in- and out-of-area placements. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(2), 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pick, J. B., & Nishida, T. (2015). Digital divides in the world and its regions: a spatial and multivariate analysis of technological utilization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2007). Strategia e società. Il punto d’incontro tra il vantaggio competitivo e la Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review Italia, 14(1/2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  88. Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2016). Gender diversity in top management teams and innovation capabilities: the initial public offerings of biotechnology firms. Long Range Planning, 49(4), 507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Retolaza, J. L., Ruiz-Roqueñi, M., & San-Jose, L. (2015). An innovative approach to stakeholder theory: application in Spanish transnational corporations. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 17(55), 1007–1020.Google Scholar
  90. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. M. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  91. Roh, H., & Kim, E. (2016). The business case for gender diversity: examining the role of human resource management investments. Human Resource Management, 55(3), 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Romeo, R., Knapp, M., Tyrer, P., Crawford, M., & Oliver-Africano, P. (2009). The treatment of challenging behaviour in intellectual disabilities: cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(7), 633–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ruiz-Jimenez, J. M., del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M., & Ruiz-Arroyo, M. (2016). Knowledge combination capability and innovation: the effects of gender diversity on top management teams in technology-based firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Russell, M. (2002). What disability civil rights cannot do: employment and political economy. Disability and Society, 17(2), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Russell, M. (2006). What disability civil rights cannot do: employment and political economy. In L. Barton (Ed.), Overcoming disabling barriers: 18 years of disability and society (pp. 218–238). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  96. Sabharwal, M. (2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sadashivam, T. (2010). A new paradigm in governance: is it true for e-governance? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(4), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sagoo, G. S., Mohammed, S., Barton, G., Norbury, G., Ahn, J. W., Ogilvie, C. M., & Kroese, M. (2015). Cost effectiveness of using array-CGH for diagnosing learning disability. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 13(4), 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Saidi, K., Hassen, L. B., & Hammami, M. S. (2015). Econometric analysis of the relationship between ICT and economic growth in Tunisia. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(4), 1191–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Scarpat, O. (Ed.). (1987). Economia e handicap. L’analisi costi-benefici dell’inserimento dei disabili nel mercato del lavoro. Milano: Unicopli.Google Scholar
  101. Scholten, A. C., Haagsma, J. A., Panneman, M. J. M., Van Beeck, E. F., & Polinder, S. (2014). Traumatic brain injury in the netherlands: incidence, costs and disability-adjusted life years. PloS One, 9(10), e110905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Scullion, P. (2009). Economy and disability in Tokyo and Manchester. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(10), 522–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Shahbaz, M., Rehman, I. U., Sbia, R., & Hamdi, H. (2016). The role of information communication technology and economic growth in recent electricity demand: fresh evidence from combine cointegration approach in UAE. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 797–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Shams, R. S. M. (2014). Modernism to postmodernism: the transdisciplinary mode-2 knowledge production of relationship marketing. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Marketing and consumer behavior: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, Vol. 1–4 (pp. 154–166). USA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  105. Shang, X. (2000). Bridging the gap between planned and market economies: employment policies for people with disabilities in two Chinese cities. Disability and Society, 15(1), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Skrtic, T. M. (2005). A political economy of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Stienstra, D. (2002). Disabling globalisation: rethinking global political economy with a disability lens. Global Society, 16(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Tullberg, J. (2013). Stakeholder theory: some revisionist suggestions. Journal of Socio-Economics, 42(1), 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Twigg, J. L. (2005). The cost of illness, disability, and premature mortality to Russia’s economy. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 46(7), 495–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Verbeke, A., & Tung, V. (2013). The future of stakeholder management theory: a temporal perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 529–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Vicente-Herrero, M. T., Terradillos García, M. J., Capdevila García, L. M., de la Torre Ramírez Iñiguez, M. V., & López-González, Á. A. (2013). Costs of temporary disability in Spain related to diabetes mellitus and its complications. Endocrinologia y Nutricion, 60(8), 447–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Vicente-Herrero, M. T., Terradillos García, M. J., De La Torre Ramírez Iñiguez, M. V., Aguilar Jiménez, E., Capdevila García, L., & López-González, Á. A. (2014). The cost of temporary disability for headaches in Spain. Neurologia Argentina, 6(4), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Vidal, N. G., Berman, S., & Van Buren, H. (2015). Stakeholder theory and value creation models in Brazilian firms. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 17(55), 911–931.Google Scholar
  114. Wasiak, R., Kim, J., & Pransky, G. (2006). Work disability and costs caused by recurrence of low back pain: longer and more costly than in first episodes. Spine, 31(2), 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wicks, A. (2014). Stakeholder theory and spirituality. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 11(4), 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  117. Wu, J., & Wokutch, R. E. (2015). Confucian stakeholder theory: an exploration. Business and Society Review, 120(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative MethodsUniversity of SannioBeneventoItaly

Personalised recommendations