Advertisement

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 159–176 | Cite as

Evolution of the Knowledge Economy: a Historical Perspective with an Application to the Case of Europe

  • Jadranka ŠvarcEmail author
  • Marina Dabić
Article

Abstract

The goal of the article is to explore the evolution of original concept of knowledge economy based on science intensive production sectors toward service type economies which significantly changed the role of scientific research and technological innovation for economic growth. The paper argues that this transition is due not only to the structural changes in global production, but the theoretical evolution and paradigmatic shift of the concept of “knowledge economy” in general and “knowledge” in particular has played a significant role. The paper examines the different interpretation of knowledge within new types of intangible economies (e.g., new/Internet, weightless, service, creative, cultural economies) where knowledge is perceived to be generated not as a product of scientific research but as a service or creative activity and critically examined the role of scientific research in a service led knowledge economy. Additionally, the paper argue how these phenomena, which marked the global economy in the last decades, enable the transition of the standard concept of knowledge economy originated from industrial production and manufacturing to a knowledge economy equalized with various types of expanding intangible economies, primarily those based on service and creative industries.

Keywords

Knowledge economy Concept evolution European countries Service economy 

References

  1. Abramovitz, M. (1989). Thinking about growth. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, F. (2014). Measuring national innovation performance, The innovation union scoreboard revisited, Heidelberg. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Antonelli, V., & Fassio, C. (2014). The economics of the light economy: globalization, skill biased technological change and slow growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2005). Is Europe becoming the most dynamic knowledge economy in the world? Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(3), 433–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audretsch, D. B. (2009). The entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post industrial society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(2), 157–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Block, J. H., Thurik, R., & Zhou, H. (2013). What turns knowledge into innovative products? The role of entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23, 693–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2014). Business model innovation as antecedent of sustainable enterprise excellence and resilience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(3), 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlaw, K., Oxley, L., Walker, P., Thorns, D., & Nuth, M. (2006). Beyond the hype: intellectual property and the knowledge society/knowledge economy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 633–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coyle, D. (1997). The weightless world: strategies for managing the digital economy. Capstone Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  12. Dasgupta, P. & David, P. (1988). Priority, secrecy, patents and the socio-economics of science and technology. Stanford University, Research Paper. No. 127.Google Scholar
  13. Drucker, P. (1969). The age of discontinuity: guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  14. Dubina, I. N., Carayannis, E. L., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Council (2000). Presidency conclusions, 100/1/00. Lisbon. 23-24 March 2000.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission (2005a). Working together for growth and jobs: a new start for the Lisbon Strategy. COM(2005) 24 Final, February 2.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission (2005b). The future of creative industries: implications for research policy. Fore sighting Europe, Issue 7, 1st quarter 2005, p. 7.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission (2006). The Economy of Culture in Europe, Study prepared for the EC, http://ec.europa.eu/culture/library/studies/cultural-economy_en.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.
  19. European Commission (2010a). Europe 2020 – a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission (2010b). Lisbon strategy evaluation document. Commission Staff Working Document Brussels, 2.2.2010, SEC(2010) 114 final.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission (2011a). Innovation union competitiveness report, EUR 24211, Brussels.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission (2011b). Employment and social developments in Europe 2011. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission (2012a). Action for stability, growth and jobs. COM(2012) 299 Final, May,30.Google Scholar
  24. European Commission (2012b). State of the innovation union 2012 - Accelerating Change. COM (2013) 149 final, March, 21.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission (2012c). A stronger European industry for growth and economic recovery. COM (2012) 582 final, October, 10.Google Scholar
  26. European Commission (2013a). European Economic Forecast. European Economy 7|2013. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2013/pdf/ee7_en.pdf. Accessed 8 Sept 2014.
  27. European Commission (2013b). Employment and social developments in Europe 2013. Brussels.Google Scholar
  28. Eurostat (2013). Social protection. Eurostat News release, 174/2013, 21 November 2013.Google Scholar
  29. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national system of innovation? In G. Dosi et al. (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–348). London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2007). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: what we can learn from the past”. UNU-MERIT, Working paper series.Google Scholar
  32. Gallouj, F., Matthias Weber, K., Stare, M., & Rubalcaba, L. (2015). The futures of the service economy in Europe: a foresight analysis, Technological forecasting & social change, article in press.Google Scholar
  33. Gambardella, A., & McGahan, A. M. (2010). Business model innovation: general purpose technologies and their implication for industry structure. Long Range Planning, 43, 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. García-Muñiz, A. S., & Vicente, M. R. (2014). ICT technologies in Europe: a study of technological diffusion and economic growth under network theory. Telecommunications Policy, 38(4), 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gatta, M., Boushey, H., & Appelbaum, E. (2005). High-touch and here-to-stay: future skills demands in US low wage service occupations. Sociology, 43(5), 968–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Godin, B. (2004). The new economy: what the concept owes to the OECD. Research Policy, 33(5), 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Godin, B. (2008). Innovation: the history of a category, Working Paper No. 1.Google Scholar
  38. Godin, B. (2011). The rise of innovation surveys: measuring a fuzzy concept. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/events/KP_Conf_03/documents/Godin.pdf. Accessed 8 Sep 2014.
  39. Heger, T., & Rohrbeck, R. (2012). Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2008). Cultural and creative industries. In Bennett, T. & Frow, J. (eds.), The sage handbook of cultural analysis, 552–569. Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  41. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The cultural industries (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., Laestadius, S., & Smith, K. (2003). Low-tech industries and the knowledge economy: state of the art and research challenges. STEP REPORT 16-2003. http://www.nifu.no/files/2012/11/STEPrapport2003-16.pdf. Accessed 8 Sep 2014.
  43. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Lee, H. (2000). Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Howkins, J. (2001). The creative economy: how people make money from ideas. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  45. Hughes, S.M. (2011). Genentech: the beginnings of biotech, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Jansson, J. O. (2009). The myth of the service economy – an update. Futures, 41(3), 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., Backman, M., & Juusola, P. (2007). The Lisbon Agenda from 2000 to 2010. CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper No.106. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:487429/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.
  48. K4G (2007). What policies are needed to overcome the EU’s R&D deficit. Knowledge for Growth Policy Debate No. 1, October 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/policy_debate.pdf. Accessed 8 Sep 2014.
  49. Ketokivi, M. (2009). Unbundling R&D and manufacturing: postindustrial myth or economic reality? Review of Policy Research, 26(1–2), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–304). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kogut, B. (ed.) (2004). Introduction: the Internet has borders. In Bruce Kogut (ed.), The global internet economy, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kok, W. (Ed.). (2004). Facing the challenge. The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  54. Krippner, G. R. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kushida, K. E., & Zysman, J. (2009). The services transformation and network policy: the new logic of value creation. Review of Policy Research, 26(1–2), 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lall, S. (1995). Science and technology in the new global environment: implications for developing countries. UNCTAD, Science and Technology Issues.Google Scholar
  57. Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  58. Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Maglio, P. P., Kieliszewski, C. A., & Spohrer, J. C. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of service science. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Mendonça, S. (2009). Brave old world: accounting for ‘high-tech’ knowledge in ‘low-tech’ industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Miles, I. (2005). Knowledge intensive business services: prospects and policies, foresight. 7(6), 39–63. doi: 10.1108/14636680510630939.
  62. Mokyr, J. (2003). The knowledge society: theoretical and historical underpinnings, presented to the Ad Hoc Expert Group on Knowledge Systems, United Nations, New York, Sept. 4-5, 2003.Google Scholar
  63. Nauwelaers, C., & Wintjes R. (2002). Improving trans-national policy learning in innovation, report for the European Commission (DG Enterprise), November, Innovation Trend Chart project, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  64. Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Oakley, K. (2004). Not so cool Britannia: the role of the creative industries in economic development. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. OECD. (1971). Science, growth and society – A new perspective (the Brooks Report). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  68. OECD. (1996). The knowledge based economy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  69. OECD. (2000a). The service economy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  70. OECD. (2000b). A new economy? The changing role of innovation and information technology in growth. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  71. OECD. (2002). Frascati manual. Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experiment development. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  72. OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  73. OECD (2011). ISIC rev. 3 technology intensity definition, OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, 7 July, 2011, available at: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/48350231.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2014.
  74. OECD. (2012). Science, technology and innovation outlook in 2012. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Petit, P. (1995). Employment and technical change, In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technical change (pp.367–407). Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  76. Pratt, A. C., & Jeffcutt, P. (2009). Creativity, innovation and the cultural economy: snake oil for the twenty-first century? In C. Pratt & P. Jeffcutt (Eds.), Creativity, innovation and the cultural economy (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  77. Quah, D. (1999a). The weightless economy in growth. The Business economist. 30 (1), 40–53. http://econ.lse.ac.uk/~dquah/. Accessed 8 Sep 2014.
  78. Quah, D. (1999b). Unpacking globalisation and new technology in Britain. Economics Department LSE, http://econ.lse.ac.uk/~dquah/p/9911esrc.pdf. Accessed 8 Sep 2014.
  79. Rohman, I. K. (2013). The globalization and stagnation of the ICT sectors in European countries: an input-output analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4–5), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Romer, M. P. (1989). Endogenous technical change. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper serious, No. 3210.Google Scholar
  81. Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American university and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rosenberg, N. (1985). The commercial exploitation of Science by American industry. In K. B. Clark et al. (Eds.), The uneasy alliance (pp. 19–50). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  83. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Solberg Søilen, K. (2012). The fallacy of the service economy: a materialist perspective. European Business Review, 24(4), 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Solow, M. R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39.Google Scholar
  86. Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  87. Švarc, J. (2011). Croatia in the knowledge economy: what are we talking about? Društvena istraživanja, 20(4), 919–942. (In Croatian).Google Scholar
  88. Tassey, G. (2004). Policy issues for R&D investment in a knowledge-based economy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 53–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Turro, A., Urbano, D., & Peris-Ortiz, M. (2014). Culture and innovation: the moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Uppenberg, K., & Strauss, H. (2010). Innovation and productivity growth in the EU services sector; European Investment Bank, July 2010.Google Scholar
  91. Witt, U. (2013). Environmental innovation and societal transitions: viewpoint. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 120–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wölfl, A. (2005). The service economy in OECD countries, OECD science, technology and industry working papers, 2005/03. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social Sciences “Ivo Pilar”ZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Nottingham Business SchoolNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations