Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 551–567 | Cite as

Visibility and Reputation of New Entrepreneurial Projects from Academia: the Role of Start-Up Competitions

  • Roberto Parente
  • Rosangela Feola
  • Valentina Cucino
  • Gemma Catolino


Academic spin-offs, i.e., new venture projects backed by one or more researchers, are attracting increasing attention by researchers and policy makers as an effective way to increase the rate of technology transfer from Public Research Organizations (PROs) to the business environment. With the aim of supporting technology transfer processes, in the last years, many universities have carry out specific policies and a wide range of programs addressed to the development of academic entrepreneurship. Among these, the organization of a start-up competition is rather popular. But, how effective do such activities result, in particular the start-up competitions, in supporting academic researchers toward entrepreneurship? Are these kinds of initiatives able to raise the level of the reputation of academic entrepreneurial projects? If so, would such social capital have any real impact on the entrepreneurial development of academic spin-off? Is this social capital able to improve the spin-off’s ability to gain access to and acquire an initial stock of resources? Our exploratory research, following the emerging paradigm of the Quadruple-Helix Model, takes into consideration the mediating role of Media players in building visibility and reputation of nascent entrepreneurial projects from academia. The study that we performed is based on the results of web citations of business projects that won at least one prize awarded by an academic start-up competition. We consider the 2013 edition of the Italian universities business plan competitions (PNI), and we tried to measure the visibility and the reputation effect experienced by winners of local and national steps of the business plan competition. Implications of the study might be that investing in start-up competition is a useful mechanism to gain in visibility and might be useful as an ignition mechanism to start a positive entrepreneurship discourse about academic spin-offs among stakeholders that control access to valuable resources for them.


Media and new ventures Start-up competitions Technology transfer 


  1. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio C., eds. (2007). Universities and strategic knowledge creation: specialization and performance in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  5. Brett, A., Gibson, D., & Smilor, R. (1991). University spin-off companies. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Inc, Maryland.Google Scholar
  6. Burt, R. S. (1983). Corporate profits and cooptation. New York: Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. Springer Briefs in Business, 7, 1–63.Google Scholar
  8. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.Google Scholar
  9. Dasgupta, P., & David P.A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521.Google Scholar
  10. Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: an integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsch, Y., & Ross, T. W. (2003). You are known by the directors you keep: reputable directors as a signaling mechanism for young firms. Management Science, 49, 1003–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dierckx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dollinger, M. J. (2003). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and resources. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.Google Scholar
  16. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernhaber, S. A., & McDougall‐Covin, P. P. (2009). Venture capitalists as catalysts to new venture internationalization: the impact of their knowledge and reputation resources. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(1), 277–295.Google Scholar
  18. Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Marzocchi, G. L., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-off. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Marzocchi, G. L., & Sobrero, M. (2012). The determinants of corporate entrepreneurial intention within small and newly established firms Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice, 36(2), 387–414.Google Scholar
  20. Florida, R. (1999). The role of the university: leveraging talent, not technology. Issues in Science and Technology, 15(Summer), 67–73.Google Scholar
  21. Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realising value from the corporate image. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fombrun, C. J., & Abrahamsn, E. (1988). Weaving the institutional fabric of organizational environments. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, New York University.Google Scholar
  23. Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridg, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  27. Holmstrom, B., & Tirole J, (1989). The theory of the firm, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willing (eds.) Handbook of industrial organization, vol. 1, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
  28. Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Harvard University Press, Cambridg, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Katz, E. (1987). Communications research since Lazarsfeld. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 51, Part 2: Supplement: 50th Anniversary Issue, S25–S45.Google Scholar
  30. McQuail, D. (1985). Sociology of mass communication. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 93–111.Google Scholar
  31. Miles, R. H. (1982). Coffin nails and corporate strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986). Price and advertising signals of product quality. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 796–821.Google Scholar
  33. Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parente, R. (2013). Recruiting partners for co-evolution: leveraging on sidecar investments and escalating commitment. In: Proceedings of EFMD entrepreneurship conference - empowering entrepreneurs for growth Madrid 4–5 March Pag.1–13.Google Scholar
  35. Parente, R, & Feola, R. (2013). Entrepreneurial intent and entrepreneurial commitment of young researchers. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development Vol 12, n. 2, November 2012.Google Scholar
  36. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: certification contests, legitimation and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895-1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29–44. (Supplement S1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Resetarits, A., Resetarits-Tincul, A.M. (2012). Fuzzy concepts – a new approach in the description of boundaries as creative knowledge environments in educational sciences. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, E. B. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lesson from MIT and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberts, E. B., & Malone, D. E. (1996). Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from. R & D Management, 26(1), 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sahaym, A. (2013). Born with a silver spoon of legitimacy but struggling for identity? The paradox of emerging spin-offs in a new sector. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2210–2217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 659–679.Google Scholar
  46. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study’. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: organizational and societal implications’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J. Y., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D, Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2013). Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. Conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2013, Oral).Google Scholar
  49. Sohl, J. (2003). The private equity market in the USA: lessons from volatility. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 5(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sorrentino, M. (2008). Le imprese science-based. Roma: Carocci Editore, Roma.Google Scholar
  51. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  53. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Vohora, A., Wright M., Lockett A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spin-out companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 144–175.Google Scholar
  55. Weigelt, K., & Camerer, C. (1988). Reputation and corporate strategy: a review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiley, M. G., & Zald, M. N. (1968). The growth and transformation of educational accrediting agencies: an exploratory study in social control of institutions. Sociology of Education, 41(1), 36–56.Google Scholar
  57. Wilson, R. (1985). Reputations in games and markets. In A. Roth (Ed), Game-theoretic models of bargaining (pp.27–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Parente
    • 1
  • Rosangela Feola
    • 1
  • Valentina Cucino
    • 1
  • Gemma Catolino
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SalernoFiscianoItaly

Personalised recommendations