Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 492–510

Innovation in Palestinian Industries: A Necessity for Surviving the Abnormal

  • Imad A. Khatib
  • Lena Tsipouri
  • Yiannis Bassiakos
  • Ayman Haj-daoud
Article

Abstract

Knowledge, research, and innovation are of crucial importance for the competitiveness of an economy and a recipe for economic development not only for developed and developing countries, but also for entities surviving a political abnormality, such as the Palestinian territories. As Palestinians are currently planning for their future viable state, the policy and decision makers should formulate relevant science, technology, and innovation policies that encourage the different national sectors to utilize the available innovation potentials and the experience and support of other countries, for developing a competitive economy. Conducting and analyzing a community innovation survey on two major Palestinian industrial sectors, namely quarrying and stone fabrication and the food and beverages sector, brought about very promising indicators and showed high innovative potentials in both sectors. Employment, export, and revenues are clearly improved in innovative enterprises. Lack of cooperation between the industrial sector and the higher education and research and development institutions is found to be a major problem that should be tackled in order to strengthen the enterprises’ ability to innovate.

Keywords

Community innovation survey Palestinian industries Palestinian economy Quarrying and stone fabrication Food and beverages 

References

  1. 1.
    Alaoneh A (2010) Governing family owned companies in Palestine. Economical Policies Magazine, Issue2, March 2010, Palestinian Economic Council for Development and Reconstruction (PECDAR), Palestinian AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atyani N, Al-Haj Ali S (2009) Problems of micro, small and medium enterprises in Palestine. Palestinian Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS), PalestineGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Capron H, Meeusen W (2000) The national innovation system of Belgium. Springer, BelgiumCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carayannis E, Campbell D (2009) ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag 46(3/4):201–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carayannis E, Campbell D (2010) Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev 1(1):41–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carter C, Williams B (1958) Investment in innovation. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen W, Levinthal R (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ J 99:569–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Economist (2010) Innovation. The new masters of management, 15 April 2010Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edquist C (1997) Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. Pinter/Cassell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Etzkowitz H (2008) The triple helix—university-industry-government innovation in action. Rutledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    FRASCATI Manual (2002) OECD, ISBN 92-64-19903-9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griliches Z, Klette TJ, Moen J (1999) Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures—microeconomic evaluation studies? Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1861, Harvard Institute of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Labor Office (2010) The situation of workers of the occupied Arab territories, International Labor Conference, 99th Session 2010, Report to the Directorate-General, ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawasmi H,White S (2010) Towards a policy framework for the development of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the occupied Palestinian territories: assessment report. International Labor Organization and Ministry of National Economy, PalestineGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu H (2010) Analysis of the impact of globalization on the Palestinian economy. Int J Business Manag 5(7):204–207Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lundvall B-Å (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Malerba F (2006) Innovation and the evolution of industries. J Evol Econ 16(1–2):2006Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Metcalfe JS (1988) The diffusion of innovation: an interpretive survey. In: Dosi G et al (eds) Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, London, pp 560–589Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ministry of Education and Higher Education (2008) Education development strategic plan 2008–2012. Towards quality education for development, July 2008. Palestinian AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ministry of Planning (2010) Palestinian reform and development plan 2008–2010, MOP, Palestinian AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassachussettsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National innovation system: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Organization for the Economic Cooperation and Development (1992) Oslo Manual, Paris, 1st editionGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Organization for the Economic Cooperation and Development (1996) Oslo Manual, Paris, 2nd editionGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Organization for the Economic Cooperation and Development (2005) Oslo Manual, Paris, 3rd editionGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (2010a) http://www.pcbs.gov.ps
  27. 27.
    Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (2010b) Palestine in Figure—2009, PCBS, Palestinian AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Palestinian Federation of Industries (2009) The current status of industrial sector in Palestine, April 2009, PFI, Palestinian Authority, 93 pagesGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy 13:343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pitelis C (2002) The growth of the firm. In: The legacy of Edith Penrose. Oxford University Press, London, 28 March 2002Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2009 reprintGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scherer F (1993) Lagging productivity growth: measurement, technology and shock effects. Empirica 20:5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shinn C, Glicksberg J, Loerke M (2009) The Palestinian faculty development program: improving higher education in the West Bank and Gaza, Institute of International Education 2009Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Soete L, Freman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G (eds) (1988) Technical change and economic growth. Pinter Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Teubal M (2006) Innovation and technology policy (ITP) for catching up: a three phase life cycle framework for industrializing economies, 2006Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    UNCTAD (2004) Palestinian small and medium-sized enterprises dynamics and contribution to development, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, UNCTAD/GDS/APP/2004/1, United Nations, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vania S (2004) The return of the prince of Denmark: a survey on recent developments in the economics of innovation. Econ J 114(496):F312–F332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    The World Bank (2006) Middle East and North Africa, Human Development Group, West Bank and Gaza, education sector analysis, impressive achievements under harsh conditions and the way forward to consolidate a quality education system, September 7, 2006Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    The World Bank (2009) Palestinian economic prospects: Gaza recovery and West Bank revival, The World Bank, 43 pagesGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    The World Bank (2010) The underpinnings of the future Palestinian state: sustainable growth and institutions economic monitoring report to the ad hoc liaison committee, September 21, 2010, The World Bank, 31 pagesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imad A. Khatib
    • 1
  • Lena Tsipouri
    • 2
  • Yiannis Bassiakos
    • 2
  • Ayman Haj-daoud
    • 3
  1. 1.Palestine Polytechnic UniversityHebronPalestine
  2. 2.University of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.Palestine Academy for Science and TechnologyJerusalemPalestine

Personalised recommendations