Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 217–231 | Cite as

Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems

  • Sotiris ZygiarisEmail author


The objective of this paper is to address the smart innovation ecosystem characteristics that elucidate the assembly of all smart city notions into green, interconnected, instrumented, open, integrated, intelligent, and innovating layers composing a planning framework called, Smart City Reference Model. Since cities come in different shapes and sizes, the model could be adopted and utilized in a range of smart policy paradigms that embrace the green, broadband, and urban economies. These paradigms address global sustainability challenges at a local context. Smart city planners could use the reference model to define the conceptual layout of a smart city and describe the smart innovation characteristics in each one of the six layers. Cases of smart cities, such as Barcelona, Edinburgh, and Amsterdam are examined to evaluate their entirety in relation to the Smart City Reference Model.


Urban innovation ecosystems Smart cities Intelligent cities Green cities Sustainable cities Innovating cities 


  1. 1.
    European smart cities—project. Accessed 2 April 2011
  2. 2.
    Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp A (2009) Smart cities in Europe. University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and EconometricsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toppeta D (2010) The smart city vision: how innovation and ict can build smart, “liveable”, sustainable cities. THINK! REPORT 005/2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cozens M (2008) New urbanism, crime and the suburbs: a review of the evidence. Urban Policy and Research 26(4):429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenburg E (2004) Codifying new urbanism: how to reform municipal land development regulations. American Planning Association PAS Report Number 526Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marshall D, Toffel W (2005) Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: a sustainability hierarchy. Environ Sci Technol 39(3):673–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGeough U, Newman D (2004) Model for sustainable urban design with expanded sections on distributed energy resources. Sustainable Energy Planning Office Gas Technology Institute and Oak Ridge National Laboratory GTI Project # 30803-23/88018/65952Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkinson R, Castro D (2008) Digital quality of life. The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. pp. 137–145Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Belisent J (2010) Getting clever about smart cities: new opportunities require new business models. ForesterGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shapiro J (2003) Smart cities:explaining the relationship between city growth and human capital. Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adams W (2006) The future of sustainability, re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. The World Conservation UnionGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Smarter Cities. Accessed 3 March 2011
  13. 13.
    Amsterdam Living Lab, Accessed 4 May 2011
  14. 14.
    Amsterdam Smart City, Accessed 14 March 2011
  15. 15.
    Artemis Sofia project. Accessed 14 March 2011
  16. 16.
    Barcelona city council. Accessed 3 April 2011
  17. 17.
    Barcelona. Smart city 22@ Accessed 14 March 2011
  18. 18.
    Barcelona urban studies. Accessed 3 April 2011
  19. 19.
    Bell R, Jung J, Zacharilla L (2009) Broadband economies: creating the community of the 21st century. Intelligent Community ForumGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data – the story so far. Issue on Linked Data, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blewitt J (2008) Understanding sustainable development. Earthscan, London, pp 21–24Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gillett E, Lehr H, Osorio C (2004) Local government broadband initiatives. Telecommun Policy 28(7):537–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ergen M (2009) Mobile broadband—including WiMAX and LTE. Springer, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chee-Yee C, Kumar S (2003) Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges. Proc IEEE 91(8):1247–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leon N (2006) The well connected city A report on municipal networks Supported by The Cloud. Imperial College LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Komninos N (2006) The architecture of intelligent cities; Integrating human, collective, and artificial intelligence to enhance knowledge and innovation. 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Institution of Engineering and Technology, AthensGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Florida R (2003) The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Perseus Books GroupGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Intelligent Community Forum. Accessed 25 February 2011
  29. 29.
    Ford G, Koutsky K (2005) Broadband and economic development: a municipal case study from Florida. Applied Economic StudiesGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    OECD (2009) Smart sensor networks: technologies and applications for green growth. Working Party on the Information Economy (WPIE)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    SISCO. Accessed 12 April 2011
  32. 32.
    OECD, Internet (2008) broadband and the economy. Seoul Ministerial Meeting On the Future of the Internet EconomyGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Partridge H (2004) Developing a human perspective to the digital divide in the smart city. AliaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    LEED, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accessed 22 April 2011
  35. 35.
    EU Strategic Energy Technology (SET) plan Accessed 12 March 2011
  36. 36.
    Cappellin R (2007) Learning, spatial changes, and regional and urban policies. The Territorial Dimension of the Knowledge Economy, American Behavioral Scientist, Volume 50, Number 7Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    IBM smart cities. Accessed 12 February 2011
  38. 38.
    Green K (2007) A wireless sensor city. MIT Technology Review, April 13th, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wilson J (2008) Sensor technology handbook. Newnes/Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    COM (2009) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the EuropeanGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Landi G, Laura G, Memeo V, Pucci P, Rapp S (2009) A unified smart city environment based on SOFIA’s Interoperability Open Platform. SOFIA ARTEMISGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    EU Smart Grids Task Force. Accessed 24 March 2011
  43. 43.
    Wei Y, Blake B (2010) Service-oriented computing and cloud computing: challenges and opportunities. IEEE vol. 14 no. 6Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Santander Smart City, Accessed 10 March 2011
  45. 45.
    Komninos, N, Sefertzi, E (2009) Intelligent cities: R&D offshoring, web 2.0 product development and globalization of innovation systems. Second Knowledge Cities Summit, Shenzhen, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Komninos N (2008) Intelligent cities and global innovation networks. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    OECD (2003) The e-government imperative: main findings, Policy Brief, Public Affairs Division, Public Affairs and Communications DirectorateGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    The creative class. Accessed 10 March 2011
  49. 49.
    Urenio Smart city portal. Accessed 4 February 2011
  50. 50.
    Smart city Edinburgh. Accessed 5 March 2011
  51. 51.
    Wi-fi library services of the Edinburgh city council

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.URENIO ResearchAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations