Advertisement

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 205–216 | Cite as

Urban Smartness: Perspectives Arising in the Periphéria Project

  • Grazia Concilio
  • Luciano De Bonis
  • Jesse Marsh
  • Ferdinando Trapani
Article

Abstract

The paper discusses the concept of “urban smartness” starting from the early results of the Periphèria Project. Periphèria is a 30-month pilot B action funded by the European Commission under the CIP ICT PSP Programme and it aims at deploying convergent Future Internet platforms and services for the promotion of sustainable lifestyles in and across emergent networks of “smart” peripheral cities in Europe. Periphèria develops the Living Lab premise of shifting technology R&D out of the laboratory and into the real world in a systemic blend of technological with social innovation. It defines five archetypical “Arenas”—specific urban settings or innovation playgrounds, with defined social features and infrastructure requirements—as the spaces where co-design and service integration processes unfold. The paper is divided into three parts. In the first part, the authors review the concept of urban smartness as it is recently discussed in the literature. In the second part, they present the early results of the Periphèria project paying attention to the city smartness, urban smartness, and perspectives. Finally, in the third part, the spatial dimension of urban smartness is explored.

Keywords

Urban smartness Future internet Living labs 

Supplementary material

References

  1. 1.
    Acatec (2011) Smart Cities. German high technology for the cities of the future. Tasks and opportunities. Acatech bezieht Position, Nr. 7, Heidelberg inter alia. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amin A, Thrift N (2002) Cities: reimagining the urban. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barro RJ (1993) Macroeconomics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brighenti AM (2010) On territorology. Towards a general science of territory. Theory Cult Soc 27(1):67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2009) Smart cities in Europe. http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/ 1871/15296/2/20090048.pdf. Accessed September 2011
  6. 6.
    Carruthers JI (2008) Does ‘smart growth’ matter to public finance? Urban Stud 45(9):1791–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Celino A, Concilio G (2010) Participation in environmental spatial planning: structuring-scenario to manage knowledge in action. Futures 42(7):733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Concilio G, De Bonis L, Trapani F (2011) The territorial dimension of living lab approaches: starting the European “participant observatory”. In: Cunningham PM (eds). eChallenges e-2011 Conference Proceedings, IIMC International Information Management Corporation, 2011Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Bonis L (2006) Oltre la “non partecipazione”. In: Trapani F (ed) Urbacost. Un progetto pilota per la Sicilia centrale. Urbanizzazione costiera, centri storici e arene decisionali: ipotesi a confronto. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 271–282Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ESDP Expert Document “Managing the Territorial Dimension of EU Policies after Enlargement” (2003) [http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/debate/document/futur/member/esdp.pdf]
  11. 11.
    Faludi A (2009) A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The ‘Territorial Agenda of the European Union’ and the ‘First Action Programme’. Prog in Plan 71:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gibbson W (2011) Life in the meta city. Scientific American, September, 88–89Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glaeser E (2011) Engines of innovation. Scientific American, September, 50–55Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holland RG (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12(3):303–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishida T, Isbister K (eds) (2000) Digital cities: technologies, experiences, and future perspectives. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jakob D (2011) Constructing the creative neighborhood: hopes and limitations of creative city policies in Berlin. City Cult Soc 1:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Komminos N (2002) Intelligent cities: innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Komminos N (2008) Intelligent cities and globalisation of innovation networks. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Komninos N, Schaffers H, Pallot M (2011) Developing a policy roadmap for smart cities and the future internet. In: Cunningham PM (eds). eChallenges e-2011 Conference Proceedings, IIMC International Information Management Corporation, 2011Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lévy P (1994) L’intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace. La Découverte, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Macdonald KI (2000) Use and valuation: information in the city. Urban Stud 37(10):1881–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marsh J (2008) Living labs and territorial innovation. In: Cunningham PM (ed) Collaboration and the knowledge economy: issues, applications, case studies. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    May G (1976) The future is ours. Greenwood, WestportGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective actions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pallot M, Trousse B, Senach B, Schaffers H, Komninos N (2011) Future internet and living lab research domain landscapes: filling the gap between technology push and application pull in the context of smart cities. In: Cunningham PM (Eds). eChallenges e-2011 Conference Proceedings, IIMC International Information Management Corporation, 2011Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paskaleva KA (2009) Enabling the smart city: the progress of city e-governance in Europe. Int J of Innov and Reg Dev 1(4):405–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Periphèria (2011) Deliverable 2.1. Arena models 1, Periphèria Project [www.periphria.eu]
  29. 29.
    Ratti C, Townsend A (2011) The social nexus. Scientific American, September, 42–49Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smart Cities (2007) Smart cities: ranking of European medium-sized cities. Final report. [http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf]
  31. 31.
    Stoker G (2008) The microfoundations of governance: why psychology rather than economics could be the key to better intergovernmental relations. Paper presented at Zhejiang University. http://www.soton.ac.uk/ccd/people/stokerg.html. Accessed June 2008
  32. 32.
    Wesley SJ (2007) Smart growth as urban reform: a pragmatic ‘recoding’ of the new regionalism. Urban Stud 44(1):15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    European Commission (2009) Ageing report: economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 member states (2008–2060). European Commission, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs, Brussels.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    World Health Organization (2008) The world health report 2008. Primary health care - now more than ever. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grazia Concilio
    • 1
  • Luciano De Bonis
    • 2
  • Jesse Marsh
    • 3
  • Ferdinando Trapani
    • 4
  1. 1.DiAP, Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Università del MoliseCampobassoItaly
  3. 3.ATELIER, S.A.PalermoItaly
  4. 4.DARCHUniversità di PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations