Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 550–568 | Cite as

Regional Innovation Policy Beyond ‘Best Practice’: Lessons from Sweden

  • Roman Martin
  • Jerker Moodysson
  • Elena Zukauskaite


This paper deals with policy measures in the regional innovation system of Scania, Southern Sweden. Focus is on the innovation policy requirements of actors representing industries that draw on different knowledge bases. Previous studies have identified profound industry-specific differences concerning the organisation of knowledge sourcing between firms and other actors. In correspondence with these findings, industries are also expected to vary with regard to how policy measures aiming to support innovation are perceived and implemented. Still, there is a tendency among regional policy programmes to base their strategies on one ‘best practice’ model, inspired by successful (or sometimes less successful) cases in other parts of the world. Here, regional policy initiatives targeting three distinct industries in Scania, namely life science, food and moving media, are discussed, in particular their ability to meet the specific needs and demands of firms in these industries. The findings reveal that the existing initiatives are customized on a rather generic level and not sufficiently fine-tuned to the particular needs and demands of the respective actors. Policies are recommended to take the specific characteristics of the industrial knowledge base into account in order to provide appropriate support and to become an effective part of the institutional framework of the regional innovation system.


Innovation policy Regional innovation systems Knowledge bases Sweden 


  1. 1.
    Asheim B (2000) Industrial districts: the contributions of Marshall and beyond. In: Clark GL, Feldman MP, Gertler MS (eds) The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 413–431Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asheim B, Hansen HK (2009) Knowledge bases, talents, and contexts: on the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Econ Geogr 85:425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asheim BT, Coenen L (2005) Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: comparing Nordic clusters. Res Policy 34:1173–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asheim BT, Coenen L, Vang J (2007) Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 25:655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asheim BT, Gertler MS (2005) The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 291–317Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campbell JL (2006) What’s new? General patterns of planned macro-institutional change. In: Hage J, Meeus M (eds) Innovation, science, and institutional change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 505–524Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cappellin R, Wink R (2009) International knowledge and innovation networks: knowledge creation and innovation in medium-technology clusters. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooke P (1996) The new wave of regional innovation networks: analysis, characteristics and strategy. Small Bus Econ 8:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooke P (2002) Biotechnology clusters as regional, sectoral innovation systems. Int Reg Sci Rev 25:8–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooke P, de Laurentis C, Tödtling F, Trippl M (2007) Regional knowledge economies: markets, clusters and innovation. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edquist C (2001) Innovation policy—a systematic approach. In: Archibugi D, Lundvall B-Å (eds) The globalizing learning economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 219–238Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edquist C (2002) Innovationspolitik för Sverige. Mål, skäl, problem och åtgärder. VINNOVA Forum. Innovationspolitik i Fokus. VINNOVA, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edquist C (2009) Public procurement of innovation (PPI)—a pilot study. CIRCLE working papers, 2009/13. CIRCLE, Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Egstrand ÅK, Sätre A-M (2008) Collaboration for local economic development: business networks, politics and universities in two Swedish cities. Eur Plan Stud 16:487–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (1997) Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fritsch M, Stephan A (2005) Regionalization of innovation policy—introduction to the special issue. Res Policy 34:1123–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gertler MS (2008) Buzz without being there? Communities of practice in context. In: Amin A, Roberts J (eds) Community, economic creativity and organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 203–226Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gertler MS, Levitte YM (2005) Local nodes in global networks: the geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Ind Innov 12:487–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hall P (2010) Historical institutionalism in rationalist and sociological perspective. In: Mahoney J, Thelen K (eds) Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 204–224Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hansen T, Winther L (2010) Innovation, regional development and relations between high- and low-tech industries. 8th European Urban and Regional Studies Conference, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hassink R (2005) How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. Eur Plan Stud 13:521–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Helgoy I, Homme A (2006) Policy tools and institutional change: comparing education policies in Norway. Swed Engl J Public Policy 26:141–165Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Henning M, Moodysson J, Nilsson M (2010) Innovation and regional transformation: from clusters to new combinations. Malmö, Region SkåneGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hollingsworth JR (2000) Doing institutional analysis: implications for the study of innovations. Rev Int Polit Econ 7:595–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knight J (1992) Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lambooy JG, Boschma RA (2001) Evolutionary economics and regional policy. Ann Reg Sci 35:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lundequist P, Waxell A (2010) Regionalizing “mode 2”? The adoption of centres of excellence in Swedish research policy. Geografiska Annaler Ser B Hum Geogr 92:263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahoney J, Thelen K (eds) (2010) Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mahoney J, Thelen K (2010) A theory of gradual institutional change. In: Mahoney J, Thelen K (eds) Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–37Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martin R, Moodysson J (2011a) Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography of knowledge flows in the regional innovation system of southern Sweden. CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series, WP 2011/02Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Martin R, Moodysson J (2011b) Innovation in symbolic industries: the geography and organisation of knowledge sourcing. European Planning Studies 19:1183–1203Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moodysson J (2007) Sites and modes of knowledge creation: on the spatial organization of biotechnology innovation. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Lund University, LundGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moodysson J (2008) Principles and practices of knowledge creation: on the organization of “buzz” and “pipelines” in life science communities. Econ Geogr 84:449–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moodysson J, Coenen L, Asheim BT (2008) Explaining spatial patterns of innovation: analytical and synthetic modes of knowledge creation in the Medicon Valley life-science cluster. Environ Plan A 40:1040–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nauwelaers C, Wintjes R (2002) Innovating SMEs and regions: the need for policy intelligence and interactive policies. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 14:201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    OECD (2009) Interim Report on the OECD Innovation Strategy. An Agenda for Policy Action on Innovation. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Peck J (2000) Doing regulation. In: Clark G, Gertler M, Feldman M (eds) The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 61–80Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schwerin J, Werker C (2003) Learning innovation policy based on historical experience. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 14:385–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scott WR (1995) Institutions and organizations. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sheingate A (2010) Rethinking rules: creativity and constraint in the U.S. House of Representatives. In: Mahoney J, Thelen K (eds) Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 168–203Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Storper M (1997) The regional world. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Swyngedouw E (2000) Elite power, global forces, and the political economy of ‘glocal’ development. In: Clark GL, Feldman MP, Gertler MS (eds) The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 541–558Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tödtling F, Trippl M (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Res Policy 34:1203–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman Martin
    • 1
  • Jerker Moodysson
    • 1
  • Elena Zukauskaite
    • 1
  1. 1.CIRCLE (Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy)Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations