Constructing Regional Advantage in the Austrian ICT Sector—Towards Fine-Tuned Innovation Policies?
- 168 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Regional innovation policies are often applied in a standardized way oriented at best practice models developed elsewhere. These policies fail to take specific sectoral and regional characteristics sufficiently into account. However, innovation processes and problems vary for firms in particular sectors since these exhibit distinct features dependent on their knowledge base. Also, companies are located in different types of regional innovation systems (RIS) facing specific innovation conditions. “One-size-fits-all” approaches, thus, frequently do not work. In the present paper, we are going to investigate for the information and communications technology (ICT) sector and three regions of Austria which differences exist in the innovation conditions and activities of companies and in their pattern of knowledge sourcing. We also try to find out to which extent policies are addressing such specific conditions. The regions investigated are the metropolitan region of Vienna representing an institutionally and organizationally “thick” RIS, the non-metropolitan region of Salzburg standing for “thin” RIS in this respect, and the industrial region of Upper Austria showing characteristics of a “networked” RIS. The analysis is based on interviews with 110 companies in the ICT sector as well with a number of key policy actors.
Keywords
Regional innovation system Types of regions ICT Business innovation Innovation policy AustriaReferences
- 1.Amin A, Thrift N (1995) Globalisation, institutional thickness and the local economy. In: Healey P (ed) Managing cities. The new urban context, vol. 108. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- 2.Asheim B, Gertler MS (2005) The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation 291. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 291–317Google Scholar
- 3.Boschma RA, Frenken K (2009) Technological relatedness and regional branching. In: Bathelt H, Feldman M P, Kogler DF (eds) Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation in innovation. Routledge, Taylor and Francis, forthcoming, downloadable as Paper in Evolutionary Economic Geography 09.07Google Scholar
- 4.Chesbrough HW (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cooke PN, Boekholt P, Tödtling F (eds) (2000) The governance of innovation in Europe. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cooke PN, Heidenreich M, Braczyk HJ (eds) (2004) Regional innovation systems: the role of governance in a globalized world. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cooke PN, De Laurentis C, Tödtling F, Trippl M (eds) (2008) Regional knowledge economies, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cooke PN, De Laurentis C, Mac Neil S, Collinge C (eds) (2010) Platforms of innovation—dynamics of new industrial knowledge flows. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- 9.Doloreux D (2002) What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society 24:243–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fritsch M (2004) Cooperation and the efficiency of regional R&D activities. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28(6):829–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Glaeser EL (1999) Learning in cities. Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier 46(2):254–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hollanders H (2007) 2006 European Regional Innovation Scoreboard (2006 RIS). MERIT, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
- 13.Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Moodysson J, Jonsson O (2007) Knowledge collaboration and proximity: the spatial organization of biotech innovation projects. European Urban and Regional Studies 14:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Porter ME (2000) Locations, clusters, and company strategy. In: Clark GL, Feldman MP, Gertler MS (eds) The Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 253–274Google Scholar
- 16.Simmie J (2003) Innovation and urban regions as national and international nodes for the transfer and sharing of knowledge. Regional Studies 37(6):607–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Tödtling F (2002) Die Region Wien aus einer Innovationssystem-Perspektive. In: Schmee J (ed) Dienstleistungsmetropole Wien. Arbeiterkammer Wien, Vienna, pp 42–53Google Scholar
- 18.Tödtling F, Trippl M (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34(8):1203–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Tödtling F, Trippl M (2009) Innovation and knowledge links in metropolitan regions—the case of Vienna. SRE discussion paper 2009/02Google Scholar
- 20.Tödtling F, Lehner P, Trippl M (2006) Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: the nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies 14(8):1035–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Tödtling F, Höglinger C, Grillitsch M, Schneider R (2010) How do companies source knowledge in different types of RIS? Findings from ICT firms in Austria. Paper presented at the AAG 2010 annual meeting, WienGoogle Scholar
- 22.Trippl M, Tödtling F, Lengauer L (2009) Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: evidence from the Vienna software sector. Economic Geography 85(4):443–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Weterings ABR, Boschma RA (2009) Does spatial proximity to customers matter for innovative performance?: evidence from the Dutch software sector. Research Policy 38(5):746–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar