Advertisement

Acta Oceanologica Sinica

, Volume 38, Issue 8, pp 48–55 | Cite as

Effects of key species mud snail Bullacta exarata (Gastropoda) on oxygen and nutrient fluxes at the sediment-water interface in the Huanghe River Delta, China

  • Baoquan Li
  • Tjeerd J. Bouma
  • Quanchao Wang
  • Laura M. Soissons
  • Francesco Cozzoli
  • Guanghai Feng
  • Xiaojing Li
  • Zhengquan Zhou
  • Linlin ChenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Since the mud snail Bullacta exarata was introduced for economic aquaculture in the Huanghe River (Yellow River) Delta in 2001, its quick population growth and expanded distribution make it a key-species in the intertidal zone of this area. This significantly contributed to the economic income of the local people, but its potential ecological impact on the benthic ecosystem remains unknown. A mesocosm study was conducted to test whether its bioturbation activities affect the microphytobenthos (MPBs; i.e., sedimentary microbes and unicellular algae) productivity and the nutrient exchange between the sediment-water interface. Our results show that the mud snail significantly impacted the dissolved oxygen (DO) flux across the sediment-water interface on the condition of normal sediment and light treatment, and significantly increased the ammonium efflux during recovery period in the defaunated sediment and dark treatment. The presence of micro- and meiofauna significantly increased the NH4-N flux in dark treatment. Whereas, in light treatment, these small animals had less effects on the DO and NH4-N flux between sediment-water interface. Our results provide better insight into the effect of the mud snail B. exarata on the ecosystem functioning via benthic fluxes.

Key words

bioturbation mud snail Bullacta exarata oxygen flux nutrient flux benthic metabolism Huanghe River (Yellow River) Delta 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the managers of Long-term Experimental Stations in the Huanghe River Delta of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (YIC-CAS) for assistance with this experiment and Charlie Qu for his help in the respiration measurements as well as the students from the YIC-CAS for their helps during field experiments.

References

  1. Aller R C, Yingst J Y. 1985. Effects of the marine deposit-feeders Heteromastus filiformis (Polychaeta), Macoma balthica (Bivalvia), and Tellina texana (Bivalvia) on averaged sedimentary solute transport, reaction rates, and microbial distributions. Journal of Marine Research, 43(3): 615–645, doi: 10.1357/002224085788440349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An S, Joye S B. 2001. Enhancement of coupled nitrification-denitrification by benthic photosynthesis in shallow estuarine sediments. Limnology and Oceanography, 46(1): 62–74, doi: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.1.0062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bao Jianmin, Wang Zhizheng, Chen Qiheng, et al. 2007. Acute toxic effects of four heavy metals on Bullacta exarata. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Natural Science) (in Chinese), 26(3): 252–256Google Scholar
  4. Bartoli M, Nizzoli D, Viaroli P. 2003. Microphytobenthos activity and fluxes at the sediment-water interface: interactions and spatial variability. Aquatic Ecology, 37(4): 341–349, doi: 10.1023/B:AECO.0000007040.43077.5fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callender E, Hammond D E. 1982. Nutrient exchange across the sediment-water interface in the Potomac River Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 15(4): 395–413, doi: 10.1016/0272-7714(82)90050-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davey J T. 1993. Macrofaunal community bioturbation along an estuarine gradient. Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 27(2–4): 147–153, doi: 10.1007/BF02334777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eleftheriou A. 2013. Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos. 4th ed. Chichester: WileyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flindt M R, Nielsen J B. 1992. Heterotrophic bacterial activity in Roskilde Fjord sediment during an autumn sedimentation peak. Hydrobiologia, 235–236(1): 283–293, doi: 10.1007/BF00026220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freitag T E, Klenke T, Krumbein W E, et al. 2003. Effect of anoxia and high sulphide concentrations on heterotrophic microbial communities in reduced surface sediments (Black Spots) in sandy intertidal flats of the German Wadden Sea. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 44(3): 291–301, doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00076-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerino M. 1990. The effects of bioturbation on particle redistribution in mediterranean coastal sediment. Preliminary results. Hydrobiologia, 207(1): 251–258, doi: 10.1007/BF00041463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordon L I, Jennings Jr J C, Ross A A, et al. 1993. A suggested protocol for continuous flow automated analysis of seawater nutrients (Phosphate, Nitrate, Nitrite and Silicic Acid) in the WOCE Hydrographic Program and the Joint Global Ocean Fluxes Study, WOCE Operations Manual, vol. 3: The Observational Programme, Section 3.2: WOCE Hydrographic Programme, Part 3.1.3: WHP Operations and Methods. WHP Office Report WHPO 91-1; WOCE Report No./91. November, 1994, Revision 1, Woods Hole, Mass, USA, 52 Loose-leafGoogle Scholar
  12. Graf G, Rosenberg R. 1997. Bioresuspension and biodeposition: a review. Journal of Marine Systems, 11%(3–4): 269–278, doi: 10.1016/S0924-7963(96)00126-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li Baoquan, Keesing J K, Lourey M, et al. 2013. Feeding and bioturbation effects of the sand dollar Peronella lesueuri (L. Agassiz, 1841) (Echinodermata) on microphytobenthos and sediment fluxes. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 46(6): 431–446, doi: 10.1080/10236244.2013.850834Google Scholar
  14. Lohrer A M, Thrush S F, Gibbs M M. 2004. Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions. Nature, 431(7012): 1092–1095, doi: 10.1038/nature03042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mermillod-Blondin F. 2011. The functional significance of bioturbation and biodeposition on biogeochemical processes at the water-sediment interface in freshwater and marine ecosystems. Freshwater Science, 30(3): 770–778Google Scholar
  16. Mermillod-Blondin F, Rosenberg R. 2006. Ecosystem engineering: the impact of bioturbation on biogeochemical processes in marine and freshwater benthic habitats. Aquatic Sciences, 68(4): 434–442, doi: 10.1007/s00027-006-0858-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Michaud E, Desrosiers G, Mermillod-Blondin F, et al. 2005. The functional group approach to bioturbation: the effects of biodiffusers and gallery-diffusers of the Macoma balthica community on sediment oxygen uptake. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 326(1): 77–88, doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2005.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Michaud E, Desrosiers G, Mermillod-Blondin F, et al. 2006. The functional group approach to bioturbation: II. The effects of the Macoma balthica community on fluxes of nutrients and dissolved organic carbon across the sediment-water interface. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 337(2): 178–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Montserrat F, van Colen C, Provoost P, et al. 2009. Sediment segregation by biodiffusing bivalves. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 83(4): 379–391, doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nils R P. 2003. Coupled nitrification-denitrification in autotrophic and heterotrophic estuarine sediments: on the influence of benthic microalgae. Limnology and Oceanography, 48(1): 93–105, doi: 10.4319/lo.2003.48.1.0093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nizzoli D, Bartoli M, Cooper M, et al. 2007. Implications for oxygen, nutrient fluxes and denitrification rates during the early stage of sediment colonisation by the polychaete Nereis spp. in four estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 75(1-2): 125–134, doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Revsbech N P, Jørgensen B B, Brix O. 1981. Primary production of mi-croalgae in sediments measured by oxygen microprofile, H14CO3-fixation, and oxygen exchange methods. Limnology and Oceanography, 26(4): 717–730, doi: 10.4319/lo.1981.26.4.0717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Røy H, Hüttel M, Jørgensen B B. 2002. The role of small-scale sediment topography for oxygen flux across the diffusive boundary layer. Limnology and Oceanography, 47(3): 837–847, doi: 10.4319/lo.2002.47.3.0837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rysgaard S, Christensen P B, Sørensen M V, et al. 2000. Marine meiofauna, carbon and nitrogen mineralization in sandy and soft sediments of Disko Bay, West Greenland. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 21(1): 59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Siebert T, Branch G M. 2006. Ecosystem engineers: Interactions between eelgrass Zostera capensis and the sandprawn Callianassa kraussi and their indirect effects on the mudprawn Upogebia Africana. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 338(2): 253–270, doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.06.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith D J, Underwood G J C. 2000. The production of extracellular carbohydrates by estuarine benthic diatoms: the effects of growth phase and light and dark treatment. Journal of Phycology, 36: 321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sundbäck K, McGlathery K. 2005. Interactions between benthic macroalgal and microalgal mats. In: Kristensen E, Haese R R, Kostka J E, eds. Interactions Between Macro- and Microorganisms in Marine Sediments, Volume 60. Washington: American Geophysical Union, 7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tang Min, Kristensen E. 2007. Impact of microphytobenthos and macroinfauna on temporal variation of benthic metabolism in shallow coastal sediments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 349(1): 99–112, doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tita G, Desrosiers G, Vincx M, et al. 2002. Intertidal meiofauna of the St Lawrence estuary (Quebec, Canada): diversity, biomass and feeding structure of nematode assemblages. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 82(5): 779–791, doi: 10.1017/S0025315402006148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Widdicombe S, Austen M C. 1998. Experimental evidence for the role of Brissopsis lyrifera (Forbes, 1841) as a critical species in the maintenance of benthic diversity and the modification of sediment chemistry. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 228(2): 241–255, doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00032-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ye Shufeng, Lu Jianjian. 2001a. Analysis on the spatial distribution of Bullacta exarata (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Atyidae) population in Yangtze River Estuary, China. Zoological Research (in Chinese), 22(2): 131–136Google Scholar
  32. Ye Shufeng, Lu Jianjian. 2001b. Characteristics and ecological significance of the developing population of Bullacta exarata (Philippi, 1848) (Mullusca: Gastropoda, Atyidae) in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin (in Chinese), 10(3): 216–222Google Scholar
  33. You Zhongjie, Wang Yinong, Ding Wei, et al. 1994. Some environmental factors on the different development stages of the mud snail Bullacta exarata. Journal of Zhejiang College of Fisheries (in Chinese), 13(2): 79–85Google Scholar
  34. Yu Hong, Wang Yinong, Shao Jianzhong. 2003. Biological characteristics, artificial breeding and culture techniques of mud snails. Marine Fisheries (in Chinese), 4: 198–199Google Scholar
  35. Yuan Chunting, Liu Jinming, Bo Xuefeng, et al. 2006. Report on the culture of mud snail Bullacta exarata in intertidal zone of Dongying. Shandong Fisheries (in Chinese), 23(3): 25–26Google Scholar
  36. Zheng Huaiping. 2003. Preliminary study on characteristics of behavior and reproductive biology for Bullacta exarata (Philippi). Marine Sciences (in Chinese), 27(1): 69–71Google Scholar
  37. Zilius M, Daunys D, Petkuviene J, et al. 2012. Sediment-water oxygen, ammonium and soluble reactive phosphorus fluxes in a turbid freshwater estuary (Curonian lagoon, Lithuania): evidences of benthic microalgal activity. Journal of Limnology, 71(2): 309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Society for Oceanography and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Baoquan Li
    • 1
  • Tjeerd J. Bouma
    • 2
    • 3
  • Quanchao Wang
    • 1
    • 4
  • Laura M. Soissons
    • 2
  • Francesco Cozzoli
    • 2
  • Guanghai Feng
    • 5
  • Xiaojing Li
    • 1
    • 4
  • Zhengquan Zhou
    • 1
    • 4
  • Linlin Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of SciencesYantaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Spatial EcologyRoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ-Yerseke)Yerseke 140The Netherlands
  3. 3.University of Applied SciencesVlissingenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.Dawenliu Management Station of Yellow River Delta National Nature ReserveDongyingChina

Personalised recommendations