Advertisement

Organisms Diversity & Evolution

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 409–419 | Cite as

The enigmatic Alpine opilionid Saccarella schilleri gen. n., sp. n. (Arachnida: Nemastomatidae)—isolated systematic placement inferred from comparative genital morphology

  • Axel L. Schönhofer
  • Jochen Martens
Original Article

Abstract

In Opiliones, male genital morphology plays a key role in systematics and understanding the evolution of the group because functional modifications often outline higher taxonomic levels. In Nemastomatidae, different lateral stabilizing structures on the penial truncus cane developed independently. These wing-like protuberances serve as anchor points for two muscular tendons and are interpreted traditionally as generic characters. A newly discovered species from Monte Saccarello in the Ligurian Alps of North-western Italy is unique in providing anchor points as stabilizing parts of the distal truncus cane below the glans by short and narrow lateral folds. To place this unusual species within the Nemastomatidae one must re-evaluate the usefulness of male genital morphological and other characters used in the systematics of the family. The resulting phylogenetic framework is supplemented with available molecular genetic data. Based on both datasets, the creation of a new genus seems justified. Saccarella schilleri gen. n. sp. n. is subsequently described and further defined. The endemism and biogeography of the harvestmen fauna in the South-western Alps are discussed with respect to this enigmatic genus.

Keywords

Morphology-based systematics South-western Alps Endemism Biogeography 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We especially wish to thank Wolfgang Schiller for donating various opilionids among which this unexpected novelty was detected. He further provided information to localize the very spot of his activities and gave detailed ecological information. We also thank Wolfgang Schawaller for kindly establishing contacts with W. Schiller. Marshal Hedin (San Diego, USA), provided access and introduced A.S. to using the BK Lab System used for taking the images in Figs. 11, 13 and 14. Robert Keith (San Diego, USA) helped to improve the English. The Feldbausch and Wagner Foundation, both at the Fachbereich Biologie, Mainz University, provided grants for field activities to J.M. Presently, A.S. is funded by a postdoc grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to work on systematics and biogeography of holarctic Opiliones. He received an EDIT/ATBI + M travel grant for research in the South-western Alps in 2008. ATBI + M (All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory and Monitoring project) aims to provide comprehensive data on the presence and abundance of organisms in outlined biodiversity hotspots in the framework of the European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy: EDIT.

No ethic standards were violated.

References

  1. Ausserer, A. (1867). Die Arachniden Tirols nach ihrer horizontalen und verticalen Verbreitung. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 17, 137–170.Google Scholar
  2. Casazza, G., Zappa, E., Mariotti, M. G., Médail, F., & Minuto, L. (2008). Ecological and historical factors affecting distribution pattern and richness of endemic plant species: the case of the Maritime and Ligurian Alps hotspot. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Diadema, K., Bretagnolle, F., Affre, L., Yuan, Y. M., & Médail, F. (2005). Geographic structure of molecular variation of Gentiana ligustica (Gentianaceae) in the Maritime and Ligurian regional hotspot, inferred from ITS sequences. Taxon, 54, 887–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dresco, E. (1952). Étude du genre Sabacon (Opiliones). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, série 6, 121, 117–126.Google Scholar
  5. Giribet, G., Vogt, L., Pérez González, A., Sharma, P., & Kury, A. B. (2010). A multilocus approach to harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones) phylogeny with emphasis on biogeography and the systematics of Laniatores. Cladistics, 26, 408–437.Google Scholar
  6. Gruber, J. (1976). Ergebnisse zoologischer Sammelreisen in der Türkei: Zwei neue Nemastomatidenarten mit Stridulationsorganen, nebst Anmerkungen zur systematischen Gliederung der Familie (Opiliones, Arachnida). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 80, 781–801.Google Scholar
  7. Gruber, J. (1979). Ergebnisse zoologischer Sammelreisen in der Türkei. Über Nemastomatiden-Arten aus der Verwandschaft von Pyza aus Südwestasien und Südosteuropa (Opiliones, Arachnida). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 82, 559–577.Google Scholar
  8. Gruber, J., & Martens, J. (1968). Morphologie, Systematik und Ökologie der Gattung Nemastoma C. L. Koch (s. str.) (Opiliones, Nemastomatidae). Senckenbergiana biologica, 49, 137–172.Google Scholar
  9. Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17, 754–755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Isaia M., Paschetta, M., Lana, E., Pantini, P., Schönhofer, A.L., Christian, E., & Badino, G. (2011). Aracnidi sotterranei delle Alpi Occidentali italiane (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Palpigradi, Pseudoscorpiones)/ Subterranean Arachnids of the Western Italian Alps (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Palpigradi, Pseudoscorpiones). Monografie del Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino, Italy.Google Scholar
  11. Koch, C. L. (1836). Die Arachniden getreu nach der Natur abgebildet und beschrieben (Vol. 3). Nürnberg: C. H. Zeh'schen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  12. Kratochvíl, J. (1958). Höhlenweberknechte Bulgariens (Palpatores—Nemastomatidae). Práce Brněnské základny Československé akademie věd, Brno, 30(12), 523–576.Google Scholar
  13. Martens, J. (1969). Die Abgrenzung von Biospezies auf biologisch-ethologischer und morphologischer Grundlage am Beispiel der Gattung Ischyropsalis C. L. Koch 1839 (Opiliones, Ischyropsalididae). Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Systematik, 96, 133–264.Google Scholar
  14. Martens, J. (1973). Feinstruktur der Chelieren-Drüse von Nemastoma dentigerum Canestrini (Opiliones, Nemastomatidae). Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und mikroskopische Anatomie, 136, 121–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martens, J. (1976). Genitalmorphologie, System und Phylogenie der Weberknechte (Arachnida: Opiliones). Entomologica Germanica, 3(1/2), 51–68.Google Scholar
  16. Martens, J. (1978). Spinnentiere, Arachnida—Weberknechte, Opiliones. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 64, 1–464.Google Scholar
  17. Martens, J. (1983). Europäische Arten der Gattung Sabacon Simon 1879 (Arachnida: Opiliones: Sabaconidae). Senckenbergiana biologica, 63(3/4), 265–296.Google Scholar
  18. Martens, J. (1986). Die Grossgliederung der Opiliones und die Evolution der Ordnung (Arachnida), in: Barrientos, J.A. (Ed.), Actas del X Congreso Internacional de Aracnologia (Jaca, Spain), vol. 1 (pp. 289–310), Barcelona.Google Scholar
  19. Martens, J. (2006). Weberknechte aus dem Kaukasus (Arachnida, Opiliones, Nemastomatidae). Senckenbergiana biologica, 86(2), 145–210.Google Scholar
  20. Martens, J. (2011). The Centetostoma scabriculum complex – a group of three cryptic species (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nemastomatidae). Zootaxa, 2783, 35–51.Google Scholar
  21. Martens, J., & Chemini, C. (1988). Die Gattung Anelasmocephalus Simon, 1879. Biogeographie, Artgrenzen und Biospezies-Konzept (Opiliones: Trogulidae). Zoologische Jahrbücher Systematik, 115, 1–48.Google Scholar
  22. Martens, J., & Schawaller, W. (1977). Die Cheliceren-Drüsen der Weberknechte nach rasteroptischen und lichtoptischen Befunden (Arachnida: Opiliones). Zoomorphologie, 86, 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maurer, R., & Thaler, K. (1988). Über bemerkenswerte Spinnen des Parc National du Mercantour (F) und seiner Umgebung (Arachnida: Araneae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 95, 329–353.Google Scholar
  24. Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mello-Leitao, C. (1936). Les Opilions de Catalogne. Treballs del Museo de Ciències Naturals, Barcelona (ser. Entomol.), 11(9), 1–18.Google Scholar
  26. Pawlowski, B. (1970). Remarques sur l’endémisme dans la flore des Alpes et des Carpates. Vegetatio, 21, 181–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Posada, D. (2008). jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25, 1253–1256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prieto, C. E. (2004). El género Nemastomella Mello-Leitão 1936 (Opiliones: Dyspnoi: Nemastomatidae) en la Península Ibérica, con descripción de la primera especie de Andalucía. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, 9, 107–121.Google Scholar
  29. Rambla, M. (1969). Una n. sp. del gen. Nemastoma, grupo bacilliferum de la Peninsula Ibérica (Opiliones, Fam. Nemastomatidae). Publicaciones del Instituto de Biologica aplicada, 47, 89–96.Google Scholar
  30. Rambla, M. (1983). Sobre los Nemastomatidae (Arachnida, Opiliones) de la Península Ibérica. VI. Acromitostoma rhinocerus y Acromitostoma hispanum (nueva combinación). Speleon, 26(27), 21–27.Google Scholar
  31. Redikorzev, V. V. (1936). Materialy k faune Opiliones SSSR - Beiträge zur Opilioniden-Fauna von U.S.S.R. Trudy Zoologiceskogo, 3, 33–57.Google Scholar
  32. Roewer, C. F. (1923). Die Weberknechte der Erde Systematische Bearbeitung der bisher bekannten Opiliones. Fischer: Jena.Google Scholar
  33. Roewer, C. F. (1951). Über Nemastomatiden. Weitere Weberknechte XVI. Senckenbergiana, 32(1/4), 95–153.Google Scholar
  34. Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P. & van der Mark, P. (2005). MrBayes 3.1 Manual, Draft 5/26/2005, online at http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/manual.php. Accessed 20 August 2011).
  36. Schönhofer, A. L., & Martens, J. (2010). Hidden Mediterranean diversity: Assessing species taxa by molecular phylogeny within the opilionid family Trogulidae (Arachnida, Opiliones). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 54(1), 59–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shear, W. A., & Gruber, J. (1983). The opilionid subfamily Ortholasmatinae (Opiliones, Troguloidea, Nemastomatidae). American Museum Novitates, 2757, 1–65.Google Scholar
  38. Šilhavý, V. (1956). Sekáči [Harvestmen - Opilionidea]. Fauna ČSR, 7, 1–272.Google Scholar
  39. Šilhavý, V. (1966). Über die Genitalmorphologie der Nemastomatidae (Arach., Opiliones). Senckenbergiana biologica, 47(1), 67–72.Google Scholar
  40. Simon, E. (1879). Les Arachnides de France. Contenant les ordres des Chernetes, Scorpiones et Opiliones. Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Tome 7.Google Scholar
  41. Simon, E. (1881). Arachnides nouveaux ou rares de la faune française. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France, 6, 82–91.Google Scholar
  42. Snegovaya, N. Y. (2010). New Harvestman Genus and Species from Kyrgyz Republic (Kyrgyzstan) (Arachnida: Opiliones: Nemastomatidae). Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 62(3), 351–354.Google Scholar
  43. Staręga, W. (1976). Die Weberknechte (Opiliones, excl. Sironidae) Bulgariens. Annales Zoologici (Polska Akademia Nauk), 33(18), 287–433.Google Scholar
  44. Staręga, W. (1978). Katalog der Weberknechte (Opiliones) der Sowjet-Union. Fragmenta Faunistica, 23(10), 197–234.Google Scholar
  45. Stoch F., & Vigna Taglianti, A. (2005). I corotipi della fauna italiana, in: Ruffo, S., Stoch, F. (Eds.), Checklist e distribuzione della fauna italiana. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 2. serie, Sezione Scienze della Vita, 16, 25–28.Google Scholar
  46. Vigna Taglianti, A., Audisio, P. A., Biondi, M., Bologna, M. A., Carpaneto, G. M., De Biase, A., Fattorini, S., Piattella, E., Sindaco, R., Venchi, A., & Zapparoli, M. (1999). A proposal for a chorotype classification of the Near East fauna, in the framework of the Western Paleartic region. Biogeographia, 20, 31–59.Google Scholar
  47. Westwood, J. O. (1874). Thesaurus Entomologicus Oxoniensis or, Illustrations of new, rare, and interesting insects. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Life Sciences NorthSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Systematic Zoology Institute of ZoologyJohannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations