Advertisement

Organisms Diversity & Evolution

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 57–70 | Cite as

The phylogeny of halichondrid demosponges: past and present re-visited with DNA-barcoding data

  • Dirk Erpenbeck
  • Kathryn Hall
  • Belinda Alvarez
  • Gabriele Büttner
  • Katharina Sacher
  • Simone Schätzle
  • Astrid Schuster
  • Sergio Vargas
  • John N. A. Hooper
  • Gert Wörheide
Original Article

Abstract

Halichondrid sponges play a pivotal role in the classification of demosponges as changes in their classification has had direct consequences for the classification of Demospongiae. Historically, the systematics of halichondrids has been unstable. During the 1950s, the order was divided into two subclasses, which were based on empirical and assumed reproductive data. Subsequent morphological and biochemical analyses postulated the re-merging of halichondrid families, but recent molecular data indicate their polyphyly. Here we review the classification history of halichondrid taxa, compare it with the current and predominantly ribosomal molecular data, and support the new phylogenetic hypotheses with mitochondrial data from DNA barcoding.

Keywords

Sponges Porifera Demospongiae Halichondrida Phylogeny Barcoding CO1 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Sponge Barcoding Project thanks The Marine Barcode of Life initiative (MarBol), funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the GeoBio-CenterLMU, for financing the subsampling and extraction of 17,000 sponge specimens of the Queensland Museum. We thank the DNA Bank at the Zoologische Staatssammlung München (http://www.zsm.mwn.de/dnabank) for collaboration in DNA subsampling and storage. G.W. acknowledges funding by the German Science Foundation (DFG) through the “Deep Metazoan Phylogeny” Priority Program (Project Wo896/6). We furthermore thank the editors and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Alvarez, B., & Crisp, M. D. (1994). A preliminary analysis of the phylogenetic relationships of some axinellid sponges. In R. W. M. Van Soest, T. M. Gv. Kempen, & J. C. Braekman (Eds.), Sponges in Time and Space (pp. 117–122). Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, B., Crisp, M. D., Driver, F., Hooper, J. N. A., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2000). Phylogenetic relationships of the family Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae) using morphological and molecular data. Zoologica Scripta, 29(2), 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez, B., & Hooper, J. N. A. (2002). Family Axinellidae Carter. In J. N. A. Hooper & R. W. M. Van Soest (Eds.), Systema Porifera, A guide to the classification of Sponges (Vol. 1, pp. 724–747). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez, B., & Hooper, J.N.A. (2009). Taxonomic revision of the order Halichondrida (Porifera: Demospongiae) from northern Australia. Family Axinellidae. The Beagle, Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory, 25, 17–42.Google Scholar
  5. Alvarez, B., & Hooper, J. N. A. (2010). Taxonomic revision of the order Halichondrida (Porifera: Demospongiae) of northern Australia. Family Dictyonellidae. Beagle, 26, 13–36.Google Scholar
  6. Alvarez, B., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2002). Family Bubaridae Topsent. In J. N. A. Hooper & R. W. M. Van Soest (Eds.), Systema Porifera, A guide to the classification of Sponges (Vol. 1, pp. 748–754). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  7. Alvarez, B., Van Soest, R. W. M., & Rützler, K. (1998). A revision of Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae) of the Central West Atlanic Region. Smithonian Contributions to Zoology, 598, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alvarez de Glasby, B. (1996). The Phylogenetic Relationships of the Family Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  9. Belon, P. (1553). De aquatilibus (Vol. Libri II). Parisiis.Google Scholar
  10. Bergquist, P. R. (1978). Sponges. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
  11. Bergquist, P. R. (1980). A revision of the supraspecific classification of the orders Dictyoceratida, Dendroceratida, and Verongida (class Demospongiae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 7, 443–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergquist, P. R., & Hartman, W. D. (1969). Free amino acid patterns and the classification of the Demospongiae. Marine Biology, 3, 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borchiellini, C., Chombard, C., Manuel, M., Alivon, E., Vacelet, J., & Boury-Esnault, N. (2004). Molecular phylogeny of Demospongiae: implications for classification and scenarios of character evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 32(3), 823–837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowerbank, J.S. (1864, 1866, 1874). Monograph of the British Spongiadae (Vol. I–III). London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
  15. Bowerbank, J.S. (1874). A monograph of the British Spongiadae (Vol. 3). London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
  16. Carballo, J. L., Uriz, M. J., & GarciaGomez, J. C. (1996). Halichondrids or axinellids? Some problematic genera of sponges with descriptions of new species from the Strait of Gibraltar (southern Iberian Peninsula). Journal of Zoology, 238, 725–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter, H.J. (1875). Notes Introductory to the Study and Classification of the Spongida. Part II. Proposed Classification of the Spongida. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (4) 1(6(92)), 126–145, 177–200.Google Scholar
  18. Chombard, C., & Boury-Esnault, N. (1999). Good congruence between morphology and molecular phylogeny of Hadromerida, or how to bother sponge taxonomists. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 44, 100.Google Scholar
  19. Chombard, C., Boury-Esnault, N., Tillier, A., & Vacelet, J. (1997). Polyphyly of "sclerosponges" (Porifera, Demospongiae) supported by 28S ribosomal sequences. The Biological Bulletin, 193(3), 359–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Laubenfels, M.W. (1936). A discussion of the sponge fauna of the Dry Tortugas in particular and the West Indies in general, with material for a revision of the families and orders of the Porifera. Publications Carnegie Institute Washington 467 (Papers Tortugas Laboratory), 30, 1–225.Google Scholar
  21. Dendy, A. (1922). Report on the Sigmatotetraxonida collected by H.M.S. ‘Sealark’ in the Indian Ocean. In Reports of the Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, Volume 7. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London (2) (Vol. 18(1). pp. Pp. 1–164, pls 161–118.).Google Scholar
  22. Diaz, M.C. (1997). Molecular detection and characterization of specific bacterial groups associated with tropical sponges. Proceedings of the eighth international coral reef symposium, Panama, June 24–29, 1996. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama, 2, 13399–11402.Google Scholar
  23. Donati, V. (1750). Della storia naturale marina dell’ Adriatico. Venezia: Saggio.Google Scholar
  24. Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32(5), 1792–1797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Erpenbeck, D., Breeuwer, J. A. J., Parra-Velandia, F. J., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2006). Speculation with spiculation?—Three independent gene fragments and biochemical characters versus morphology in demosponge higher classification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 38, 293–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erpenbeck, D., Breeuwer, J. A. J., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2005a). Identification, characterization and phylogenetic signal of an elongation factor-1 alpha fragment in demosponges (Metazoa, Porifera, Demospongiae). Zoologica Scripta, 34(4), 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erpenbeck, D., Breeuwer, J. A. J., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2005b). Implications from a 28S rRNA gene fragment for the phylogenetic relationships of halichondrid sponges (Porifera: Demospongiae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 43(2), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Erpenbeck, D., Duran, S., Rützler, K., Paul, V., Hooper, J. N. A., & Wörheide, G. (2007a). Towards a DNA taxonomy of Caribbean demosponges: a gene tree reconstructed from partial mitochondrial CO1 gene sequences supports previous rDNA phylogenies and provides a new perspective on the systematics of Demospongiae. Journal of the Marine Biological Society of the United Kingdom, 87, 1563–1570.Google Scholar
  29. Erpenbeck, D., Hooper, J. N. A., List-Armitage, S. E., Degnan, B. M., Wörheide, G., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2007b). Affinities of the family Sollasellidae (Porifera, Demospongiae). II. Molecular evidence. Contributions to Zoology, 76(2), 95–102.Google Scholar
  30. Erpenbeck, D., List-Armitage, S. E., Alvarez, B., Degnan, B. M., Hooper, J. N. A., & Wörheide, G. (2007c). The systematics of Raspailiidae (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida, Microcionina) reanalysed with a ribosomal marker. Journal of the Marine Biological Society of the United Kingdom, 87, 1571–1576.Google Scholar
  31. Erpenbeck, D., McCormack, G. P., Breeuwer, J. A. J., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2004). Order level differences in the structure of partial LSU across demosponges (Porifera): new insights into an old taxon. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 32(1), 388–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Erpenbeck, D., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2002). Family Halichondriidae Gray, 1867. In J. N. A. Hooper & R. W. M. Van Soest (Eds.), Systema Porifera, A guide to the classification of Sponges (Vol. 1, pp. 787–815). New York: KluwerAcademic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Erpenbeck, D., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2005). A survey for biochemical synapomorphies to reveal phylogenetic relationships of halichondrid demosponges (Metazoa: Porifera). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 33, 585–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Erpenbeck, D., Voigt, O., Gültas, M., & Wörheide, G. (2008). The sponge genetree server-providing a phylogenetic backbone for poriferan evolutionary studies. Zootaxa, 1939, 58–60.Google Scholar
  35. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39(4), 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Galtier, N., Gouy, M., & Gautier, C. (1996). SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: Two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 12(6), 543–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gazave, E., Carteron, S., Chenuil, A., Richelle-Maurer, E., Boury-Esnault, N., & Borchiellini, C. (2010). Polyphyly of the genus Axinella and of the family Axinellidae (Porifera: Demospongiae(p)). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 57(1), 35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.05.028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gerasimova, E., Erpenbeck, D., & Plotkin, A. (2008). Vosmaeria Fristedt, 1885 (Porifera, Demospongiae, Halichondriidae): revision of species, phylogenetic reconstruction and evidence for split. Zootaxa(1694), 1–37.Google Scholar
  39. Grant, R. E. (1836). Animal Kingdom. In R. B. Todd (Ed.), The Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology 1–813 (Vol. 1, pp. 107–118). London: Sherwood, Gilbert, and Piper.Google Scholar
  40. Gray, J. E. (1867). Notes on the arrangement of sponges, with the descriptions of some new genera. Proceedings Zoological Society London, Lit. IV (1868), 492–558.Google Scholar
  41. Gray, J. E. (1872). Notes on the Classification of the Sponges. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4(9 (54)), 442–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Haeckel, E.H.P.A. (1872). Die Kalkschwaemme (Vol. 1): Atlas.Google Scholar
  43. Hallmann, E.F. (1917 (1916)). A revision of the genera with microscleres included, or provisionally included, in the family Axinellidae; with descriptions of some Australian species. Part III. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 41(164), 634–675.Google Scholar
  44. Hansson, H. G. (1994). Sydskandinaviska marina flercelliga evertebrater. Göteborg: Länstyrelsen i Göteborgs och Bohus län.Google Scholar
  45. Hartman, W. D. (1969). New genera and species of coralline sponges (Porifera) from Jamaica. Postilla, 137, 1–39.Google Scholar
  46. Hartman, W. D. (1982). Porifera. In S. P. Parker (Ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms (Vol. 1). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  47. Hartman, W. D., & Goreau, T. F. (1970). Jamaican coralline sponges: Their morphology, ecology and fossil relatives. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 25, 205–243.Google Scholar
  48. Hentschel, E. (1923). Erste Unterabteilung der Metazoa: Parazoa, Porifera = Schwämme. In W. Kükenthal, & T. Krumbach (Eds.), Handbuch der Zoologie. Eine Naturgeschichte der Stämme des Tierreiches. Protozoa, Porifera, Coelenterata, Mesozoa (Vol. 1, pp. 307–418). Berlin and Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter und Co.Google Scholar
  49. Hogg (1842). Remarks on the Horny Sponges with proposed divisions of the Order Spongiae. Ann. And Mag., VIII, 3.Google Scholar
  50. Holmes, B., & Blanch, H. (2007). Genus-specific associations of marine sponges with group I crenarchaeotes. Marine Biology, 150(5), 759–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hooper, J. N. A. (1984). Sigmaxinella soelae and Desmacella ithystela, two new desmacellid sponges (Porifera, Axinellida, Desmacellidae) from the Northwest shelf of Western Australia, with a revision of the family Desmacellidae. Monograph series of the Northern Territory Museum of Arts and Sciences, 2, 1–58.Google Scholar
  52. Hooper, J. N. A. (1990). Character stability, systematics and affinities between Microcionidae (Poecilosclerida) and Axinellida. In K. Rützler (Ed.), New perspectives in Sponge Biology (pp. 284–294). Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hooper, J. N. A. (1991). Revision of the family Raspailiidae (Porifera: Demospongiae) with description of Australian species. Invertebrate Taxonomy, 5(6), 1179–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hooper, J. N. A. (2002a). Family Desmoxyidae Hallmann, 1917. In J. N. A. Hooper & R. W. M. Van Soest (Eds.), Systema Porifera, A guide to the classification of Sponges (Vol. 1, pp. 755–772). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  55. Hooper, J. N. A. (2002b). Family Raspailiidae Hentschel, 1923. In J. N. A. Hooper & R. W. M. Van Soest (Eds.), Systema Porifera. Guide to the classification of sponges (Vol. 1, pp. 469–510). New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  56. Hooper, J. N. A., & Bergquist, P. R. (1992). Cymbastela, a new genus of lamellate coral reef sponges. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 32(1), 99–137.Google Scholar
  57. Hooper, J. N. A., Capon, R. J., Keenan, C. P., Parry, D. L., & Smit, N. (1992). Chemotaxonomy of marine sponges: Families Microcionidae, Raspailidae and Axinellidae and their relationships with other families of the orders Poecilosclerida and Axinellida (Porifera: Demospongiae). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 6, 261–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hooper, J. N. A., & Lévi, C. (1993). Axinellida (Porifera: Demospongiae) from the New Caledonia Lagoon. Invertebrate Taxonomy, 6, 1395–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hooper, J. N. A., & Lévi, C. (1994). Biogeography of Indo-west Pacific sponges: Microcionidae, Raspailidae, Axinellidae. In R. W. M. Van Soest, T. M. Gv. Kempen, & J. C. Braekman (Eds.), Sponges in Time and Space (pp. 191–212). Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
  60. Hooper, J. N. A., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (2002). Systema Porifera, A guide to the classification of sponges. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  61. Hoppe, W. F., & Reichert, M. J. M. (1987). Predictable annual mass release of gametes by the coral reef sponge (Porifera: Demospongiae). Marine Biology, 94(2), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ranala, B. (2004). Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Systematic Biology, 53(6), 904–913.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Johnston, G. (1842). A History of British Sponges and Lithophytes. Edinburgh: W.H. Lizars.Google Scholar
  64. Kelly Borges, M., Bergquist, P. R., & Bergquist, P. L. (1991). Phylogenetic relationships within the order Hadromerida (Porifera, Demospongiae, Tetractinomorpha) as indicated by ribosomal RNA sequence comparisons. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 19(2), 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kober, K., & Nichols, S. (2007). On the phylogenetic relationships of hadromerid and poecilosclerid sponges. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 87(06), 14. doi: 10.1017/S0025315407058237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lafay, B., Boury Esnault, N., Vacelet, J., & Christen, R. (1992). An analysis of partial 28S ribosomal RNA sequences suggests early radiations of sponges. Biosystems, 28(1–3), 139–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. de Monet JBPA, Lamarck. (1813). Sur les polypiers empates. Ann du Mus., XX, 370, 432.Google Scholar
  68. Lavrov, D., Wang, X., & Kelly, M. (2008). Reconstructing ordinal relationships in the Demospongiae using mitochondrial genomic data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 49(1), 111–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lévi, C. (1951). L’oviparité chez les spongiaires. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 233, 272–274.Google Scholar
  70. Lévi, C. (1953a). Description de Plakortis nigra nov. sp. et remarques sur les Plakinidae (Demosponges). Bulletin de Museum, 2e serie,, XXV(3).Google Scholar
  71. Lévi, C. (1953b). Sur une nouvelle classification des Démosponges. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 236, 853–855.Google Scholar
  72. Lévi, C. (1955). Les Clavaxinellides, Démosponges Tétractinomorphes. Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale. Notes et Revue., 92(2), 78–87.Google Scholar
  73. Lévi, C. (1956). Étude des Halisarca de Roscoff. Embryologie et systématique des Démosponges. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, 93, 1–181.Google Scholar
  74. Lévi, C. (1957). Ontogeny and systematics in sponges. Systematic Zoology, 6, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lévi, C. (1973). Systématique de la classe des Demospongiaria (Démosponges). In P. Brien, C. Lévi, M. Sarà, O. Tuzet, & J. Vacelet (Eds.), Traité de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, Biologie. III. Spongiaires (pp. 577–631). Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
  76. Lévi, C. (1997). La classification des Porifera Grant, 1836, en 1996. Bulletin de la Societe Zoologique de France, 122(3), 255–259.Google Scholar
  77. Linnaeus, C. (1759). Systema Naturae. Vol.II. Vegetabilia: Holmiae.Google Scholar
  78. Linnaeus, C. (1767). Systema Naturae (12th edn revised. ed., Vol. 1): Holmiae, Laur. Salvii.Google Scholar
  79. McCormack, G. P., & Kelly, M. (2002). New indications of the phylogenetic affinity of Spongosorites suberitoides Diaz et al., 1993 (Porifera, Demospongiae) as revealed by 28S ribosomal DNA. Journal of Natural History, 36(9), 1009–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Meyer, C. P., Geller, J. B., & Paulay, G. (2005). Fine scale endemism on coral reefs: Archipelagic differentiation in turbinid gastropods. Evolution, 59(1), 113–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Moore, W. S. (1995). Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation—mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution, 49(4), 718–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Morrow, C. C., Picton, B. E., Erpenbeck, D., Boury-Esnault, N., Maggs, C. A., & Allcock, A. L. (2011). Congruence between nuclear and mitochondrial genes in Demospongiae: A new hypothesis for relationships within the G4 clade (Porifera: Demospongiae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.016. Available online 7 October 2011.
  83. Nardo, G.D. (1833). Auszug aus einem neuen System der Spongiarien, wonach bereits die Aufstellung in der Universitäts-Sammlung zu Padua gemacht ist., Isis, oder Encyclopädische Zeitung Coll. (Oken: Jena). 519–523.Google Scholar
  84. Nichols, S. (2005). An evaluation of support for order-level monophyly and interrelationships within the class Demospongiae using partial data from the large subunit rDNA and cytochrome oxidase subunit I. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 34(1), 81–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.08.019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Raleigh, J., Redmond, N. E., Delahan, E., Torpey, S., Van Soest, R. W. M., Kelly, M., et al. (2007). Mitochondrial Cytochrome oxidase 1 phylogeny supports alternative taxonomic scheme for the marine Haplosclerida. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 87(6), 1577–1584. doi: 10.1017/S0025315407058341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Reitner, J. (1992). ‘Coralline Spongien’ Der Versuch einer phylogenetisch-taxonomischen Analyse. Berliner geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen Reihe E (Paläobiologie), 1, 1–352.Google Scholar
  87. Ridley, S.O., & Dendy, A. (1886). Preliminary Report on the Monaxonida collected by the H.M.S. ‘Challenger’. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 5(18), 325–351, 470–493.Google Scholar
  88. Ridley, S.O., & Dendy, A. (1887). Report on the Monaxonida collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–1876. Report on the scientific Results Voyage HMS ‘Challenger’, 1873–76. Zoology, 20, 1–275.Google Scholar
  89. Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19(12), 1572–1574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schmidt, E. O. (1862). Die Spongien des adriatischen Meeres. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
  91. Schmidt, E. O. (1866). Zweites Supplement der Spongien des adriat. Leipzig: Meeres.Google Scholar
  92. Schmidt, E. O. (1868). Drittes Supplement der Spongien des adriat. Meeres. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
  93. Schmidt, E.O. (1869). Das natürliche System der Spongien. Mitth. Naturw. Verein Steiermark, II, 261.Google Scholar
  94. Schmidt, E. O. (1870). Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des Atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  95. Schmidt, E.O. (1880). Die Spongien des Meerbusen von Mexico (Und des caraibischen Meeres). Abtheilung II. Hexactinelliden. In Reports on the dredging under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the Gulf of Mexico, by the USCSS ‘Blake’. (Vol. 2, pp. 33–90 pls V–X). Jena: Gustav Fischer:.Google Scholar
  96. Sole-Cava, M. A., Thompson, J. D., & Manconi, R. (1991). A new mediterranean species of Axinella detected by biochemical genetic methods. In J. Reitner & H. Keupp (Eds.), Fossil and recent sponges (pp. 313–321). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sollas, D. (1885). A classification of the sponges. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 5(16 (95)), 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Stamatakis, A. (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics, 22(21), 2688–2690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Topsent, E. (1894a). Application de la taxonomie actuelle à une collection de spongiaires du Banc de Campêche et de la Guadeloupe décrite précédemment. Mémoirs de Societé Zoologique de France, 7, 27–36.Google Scholar
  100. Topsent, E. (1894b). Une réforme dans la classificaiton des Halichondrina. Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de France, 7, 5–26.Google Scholar
  101. Topsent, E. (1928). Spongiaires de l'Atlantique et de la Méditerranée provenant des croisières du Prince Albert Ier de Monaco. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques Accomplies sur son Yacht par Albert Ier Prince Souverain de Monaco, 74, 1–376.Google Scholar
  102. Vacelet, J. (1985). Coralline sponges and the evolution of Porifera. In S. C. Morris, J. D. George, R. Gibson, & H. M. Platt (Eds.), The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates. 28 (Vol. i–ix, 1–397, pp. 1–13). The Systematics Association, Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
  103. Van Soest, R. W. M. (1984). Marine sponges from Curacao and other Caribbean Localities. Part III. Poecilosclerida. In P. Wagenaar-Hummelinck, & L. J. van der Steen (Eds.), Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and Other Caribbean Islands (Vol. 66). Utrecht: Foundation for Scientific Research in Suriname and the Netherlands Antilles No. 112.Google Scholar
  104. Van Soest, R. W. M. (1987). Phylogenetic exercises with monophyletic groups of sponges. In J. Vacelet & N. Boury-Esnault (Eds.), NATO ASI Series (Vol. G13, pp. 227–241). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Taxonomy of Porifera.Google Scholar
  105. Van Soest, R. W. M. (1991). Demosponge higher taxa classification re-examined. In J. Reitner & H. Keupp (Eds.), Fossil and Recent Sponges (pp. 54–71). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Van Soest, R. W. M., & Braekman, J. C. (1999). Chemosystematics of Porifera: A review. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 44, 569–589.Google Scholar
  107. Van Soest, R. W. M., Diaz, M. C., & Pomponi, S. A. (1990). Phylogenetic classification of the halichondrids (Porifera, Demospongiae). Beaufortia, 40(2), 15–62.Google Scholar
  108. Van Soest, R. W. M., Erpenbeck, D., & Alvarez, B. (2002). Family Dictyonellidae Van Soest, Diaz & Pomponi 1990. In J. N. A. Hooper & R. W. M. Van Soest (Eds.), Systema Porifera, A guide to the classification of Sponges (Vol. 1, pp. 773–786). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  109. Van Soest, R. W. M., & Hooper, J. N. A. (2002). Order Halichondrida Gray, 1867. In J. N. A. Hooper & R. W. M. Van Soest (Eds.), Systema Porifera, A guide to the classification of Sponges (Vol. 1, pp. 721–723). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  110. Van Soest, R. W. M., & Hooper, J. N. A. (2005). Resurrection of Desmoxya (Porifera: Halichondrida), with the description of a new species from Rockall Bank bathyal coral reefs, North Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 85(6), 1367–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Van Soest, R. W. M., & Lehnert, H. (1997). The genus Julavis de Laubenfels (Porifera: Halichondrida). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 110(4), 502–510.Google Scholar
  112. Vargas, S., Erpenbeck, D., Schuster, A., Sacher, K., Büttner, G., Schätzle, S., et al. (2010). A high-throughput, low-cost Porifera DNA barcoding pipeline. In VIII. World Sponge Conference (pp. 242). Girona, Spain.Google Scholar
  113. von Lendenfeld, R. (1887). On the systematic position and classification of sponges. Proc. Soc. London, 558–662.Google Scholar
  114. Vosmaer, G. C. J. (1882-1886). Porifera. In Bronn’s Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs II.Google Scholar
  115. Vosmaer, G.C.J. (1886 (1887)). Porifera. In H. G. Bronn (Ed.), Die Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreichs (Vol. 2, pp. i-xii, 1–496).Google Scholar
  116. Wapstra, M., & Van Soest, R. W. M. (1987). Sexual reproduction, larval morphology and behaviour in demosponges from the southwest of the Netherlands. In J. Vacelet & N. Boury-Esnault (Eds.), Taxonomy of Porifera NATO ASI Series (Vol. G13, pp. 281–307). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  117. Wörheide, G. (1998). The reef cave dwelling ultraconservative coralline demosponge Astrosclera willeyana Lister 1900 from the Indo-Pacific - Micromorphology, ultrastructure, biocalcification, isotope record, taxonomy, biogeography, phylogeny. Facies, 38, 1–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wörheide, G., & Erpenbeck, D. (2007). DNA taxonomy of sponges—progress and perspectives. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 87, 1629–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Erpenbeck
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kathryn Hall
    • 2
  • Belinda Alvarez
    • 4
  • Gabriele Büttner
    • 1
  • Katharina Sacher
    • 1
  • Simone Schätzle
    • 1
  • Astrid Schuster
    • 1
  • Sergio Vargas
    • 1
  • John N. A. Hooper
    • 2
  • Gert Wörheide
    • 1
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  2. 2.Biodiversity Program, Queensland Museum, South BrisbaneQldAustralia
  3. 3.GeoBio-CenterLMU Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  4. 4.Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern TerritoryDarwinAustralia
  5. 5.Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und GeologieMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations