Texture Features of Magnetic Resonance Images: an Early Marker of Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment

  • Nacim BetrouniEmail author
  • Moussaoui Yasmina
  • Stéphanie Bombois
  • Maud Pétrault
  • Thibaut Dondaine
  • Cédrick Lachaud
  • Charlotte Laloux
  • Anne-Marie Mendyk
  • Hilde Henon
  • Régis Bordet
Original Article


Stroke is frequently associated with delayed, long-term cognitive impairment (CI) and dementia. Recent research has focused on identifying early predictive markers of CI occurrence. We carried out a texture analysis of magnetic resonance (MR) images to identify predictive markers of CI occurrence based on a combination of preclinical and clinical data. Seventy-two-hour post-stroke T1W MR images of 160 consecutive patients were examined, including 75 patients with confirmed CI at the 6-month post-stroke neuropsychological examination. Texture features were measured in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex and compared between patients with CI and those without. A correlation study determined their association with MoCA and MMSE clinical scores. Significant features were then combined with the classical prognostic factors, age and gender, to build a machine learning algorithm as a predictive model for CI occurrence. A middle cerebral artery transient occlusion model was used. Texture features were compared in the hippocampus of sham and lesioned rats and were correlated with histologically assessed neural loss. In clinical studies, two texture features, kurtosis and inverse difference moment, differed significantly between patients with and without CI and were significantly correlated with MoCA and MMSE scores. The prediction model had an accuracy of 88 ± 3%. The preclinical model revealed a significant correlation between texture features and neural density in the hippocampus contralateral to the ischemic area. These preliminary results suggest that texture features of MR images are representative of neural alteration and could be a part of a screening strategy for the early prediction of post-stroke CI.


Stroke Cognitive impairment Neuron loss Texture analysis Radiomics Predictive features 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.


  1. 1.
    Annual report of the World Stroke Organization. Available at:
  2. 2.
    Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:1006–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalaria RN, Akinyemi R, Ihara M. Stroke injury, cognitive impairment and vascular dementia. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1862;2016:915–25.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delattre C, Bournonville C, Auger F, Lopes R, Delmaire C, Henon H, et al. Hippocampal deformations and entorhinal cortex atrophy as an anatomical signature of long-term cognitive impairment: from the MCAO rat model to the stroke patient. Transl Stroke Res. 2018;9:294–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Oliveira, Balthazar ML, D’Abreu A, Yasuda CL, Damasceno BP, Cendes F, et al. MR imaging texture analysis of the corpus callosum and thalamus in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:60–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chincarini A, Bosco P, Calvini P, Gemme G, Esposito M, Olivieri C, et al. Local MRI analysis approach in the diagnosis of early and prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2011;58:469–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tozer DJ, Zeestraten E, Lawrence AJ, Barrick TR, Markus HS. Texture analysis of T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images detects abnormalities that correlate with cognitive decline in small vessel disease. Stroke. 2018;49:1656–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ponchel A, Labreuche J, Bombois S, Delmaire C, Bordet R, Hénon H. Influence of medication on fatigue six months after stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2016;2410921.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jorm AF. The informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (iqcode): a review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2004;16:275–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knopman DS, Beiser A, Machulda MM, Fields J, Roberts RO, Pankratz VS, et al. Spectrum of cognition short of dementia: Framingham Heart Study and Mayo Clinic study of aging. Neurology. 2015;85:1712–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woolf C, Slavin MJ, Draper B, Thomassen F, Kochan NA, Reppermund S, et al. Can the clinical dementia rating scale identify mild cognitive impairment and predict cognitive and functional decline? Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2016;1:292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zietemann V, Georgakis M, Dondaine T, Muller C, Mendyk AM, Kopczak A, et al. Early MoCA predicts long-term cognitive and functional outcome and mortality after stroke. Neurology. 2018;91:e1838–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33:341–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;3:610–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koizumi J, Yoshida Y, Nazakawa T, Ooneda G. Experimental studies of ischemic brain edema: a new experimental model of cerebral embolism in rats in which re circulation can be introduced in the ischemic area. Jpn J Stroke. 1986;8:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Valdés-Hernández PA, Sumiyoshi A, Nonaka H, Haga R, Aubert-Vásquez E, Ogawa T, et al. An in vivo MRI template set for morphometry, tissue segmentation and fMRI localization in rats. Front Neuroinform. 2011;24:5–26.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sørensen L, Igel C, Liv Hansen N, Osler M, Lauritzen M, Rostrup E, et al. Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease using MRI hippocampal texture. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37:1148–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hwang EJ, Kim HG, Kim D, Rhee HY, Ryu CW, Liu T, et al. Texture analyses of quantitative susceptibility maps to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease from cognitive normal and mild cognitive impairment. Med Phys. 2016;43:4718–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Colgan N, Ganeshan B, Harrison IF, Ismail O, Holmes HE, Wells JA, et al. In vivo imaging of Tau pathology using magnetic resonance imaging textural analysis. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:599.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang J, Yu C, Jiang G, Liu W, Tong L. 3D texture analysis on MRI images of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012;6:61–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997;17:87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:441–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:1234–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278:563–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bordet R, Ihl R, Korczyn AD, Lanza G, Jansa J, Hoerr R, et al. Towards the concept of disease-modifier in post-stroke or vascular cognitive impairment: a consensus report. BMC Med. 2017;15:107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nacim Betrouni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Moussaoui Yasmina
    • 1
  • Stéphanie Bombois
    • 1
  • Maud Pétrault
    • 1
  • Thibaut Dondaine
    • 1
  • Cédrick Lachaud
    • 1
  • Charlotte Laloux
    • 1
  • Anne-Marie Mendyk
    • 1
  • Hilde Henon
    • 1
  • Régis Bordet
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Pharmacologie, Faculté de MédecineUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, U1171, Degenerative & Vascular Cognitive DisordersLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations