Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Five-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents from the post marketing study of CoCr-EES (XIENCE V/PROMUS) in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cobalt Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent (CoCr-EES) Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS) Japan study is a prospective multicenter registry designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of XIENCE V/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stents in routine clinical practice at 47 centers representative of the clinical environment in Japan. We enrolled 2010 consecutive patients (2649 lesions) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using CoCr-EES. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through 5 years. Mean age was 68.8 years, 41.9% had diabetes, 4.9% received hemodialysis. Five-year clinical follow up was available for 1704 (84.8%) patients. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 10.7% of patients, including cardiac death (3.8%), myocardial infarction (1.8%), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) (6.0%). Beyond 1 year, annual incidence of clinically driven TLR was 0.5–0.8%. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 9 (0.5%) patients at 5 years. After 1 year, definite stent thrombosis occurred in only 1 patient. Significant predictors for MACE were dialysis (ODDs ratio 4.58, 95% CI 2.75–7.64), prior cardiac intervention (ODDs ratio 2.47, 95% CI 1.75–3.49), total stent length (ODDs ratio 1.01, 95% CI 1.01–1.02), and number of diseased vessels (ODDs ratio 1.66, 95% CI 1.08–2.55). Five-year clinical outcomes from the CoCr-EES PMS Japan study demonstrated a low incidence of clinical events in the daily practice up to 5 years.

Clinical Trial Registration Information: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01086228.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Onuma Y, Miquel-Hebert K, Serruys PW. Five-year long-term clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the SPIRIT II trial. EuroIntervention. 2013;8:1047–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gada H, Kirtane AJ, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Mahaffey KW, et al. 5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1263–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smits PC, Vlachojannis GJ, McFadden EP, Royaards KJ, Wassing J, Joesoef KS, et al. Final 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization in daily practice: the COMPARE Trial (a trial of everolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel stents for coronary revascularization in daily practice). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1157–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jensen LO, Thayssen P, Christiansen EH, Maeng M, Ravkilde J, Hansen KN, et al. Safety and efficacy of everolimus- versus sirolimus-eluting stents: 5-year results from SORT OUT IV. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:751–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Iqbal J, Serruys PW, Silber S, Kelbaek H, Richardt G, Morel MA, et al. Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the RESOLUTE all-comers trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e002230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. von Birgelen C, van der Heijden LC, Basalus MW, Kok MM, Sen H, Louwerenburg HW, et al. Five-year outcome after implantation of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents in randomized trial participants and nonenrolled eligible patients: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:268–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ikari Y, Kotani J, Kozuma K, Kyo E, Nakamura M, Yokoi H, et al. Assessment of sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation with aspirin plus low dose ticlopidine administration: one year results from CYPHER Stent Japan Post-Marketing Surveillance Registry (J-PMS). Circ J. 2009;73:1038–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aoki J, Kozuma K, Awata M, Nanasato M, Shiode N, Tanabe K, et al. Three-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents from the post-marketing surveillance study of cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE V/PROMUS) in Japan. Circ J. 2016;80:906–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doyle B, Rihal CS, O’Sullivan CJ, Lennon RJ, Wiste HJ, Bell M, Bresnahan J, et al. Outcomes of stent thrombosis and restenosis during extended follow-up of patients treated with bare-metal coronary stents. Circulation. 2007;116:2391–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamaji K, Kimura T, Morimoto T, Nakagawa Y, Inoue K, Soga Y, et al. Very long-term (15 to 20 years) clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary bare metal stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:468–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Kadota K, Yamaji K, et al. Late adverse events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent: long-term (5–7 years) follow-up of the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome study-Kyoto registry Cohort-2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:168–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamaji K, Inoue K, Nakahashi T, Noguchi M, Domei T, Hyodo M, et al. Bare metal stent thrombosis and in-stent neoatherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:47–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kukreja N, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Xience V everolimus-eluting coronary stent. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6:219–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Ladich E, Ribichini F, Coleman L, Kolodgie FD, et al. Drug-eluting stent safety: findings from preclinical studies. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2008;6:1379–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Otsuka F, Vorpahl M, Nakano M, Foerst J, Newell JB, Sakakura K, et al. Pathology of second-generation everolimus-eluting stents versus first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in humans. Circulation. 2014;129:211–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Otsuka F, Cheng Q, Yahagi K, Acampado E, Sheehy A, Yazdani SK, et al. Acute thrombogenicity of a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent relative to contemporary drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer coatings assessed ex vivo in a swine shunt model. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1248–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Otsuka F, Byrne RA, Yahagi K, Mori H, Ladich E, Fowler DR, et al. Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2147–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stenvinkel P, Pecoits-Filho R, Lindholm B. Coronary artery disease in end-stage renal disease: no longer a simple plumbing problem. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:1927–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mintz GS, Weissman NJ. Intravascular ultrasound in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:421–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawamura Y, Nagaoka M, Ito D, Iseki H, Ikari Y. A case of percutaneous coronary intervention procedure successfully bailed out from multiple complications in hemodialysis patient. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013;28:76–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hage FG, Venkataraman R, Zoghbi GJ, Perry GJ, DeMattos AM, Iskandrian AE. The scope of coronary heart disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2129–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goligorsky MS, Yasuda K, Ratliff B. Dysfunctional endothelial progenitor cells in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:911–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakakibara T, Ishii H, Toriyama T, Aoyama T, Takahashi H, Kamoi D, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent vs. everolimus-eluting stent for coronary intervention in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Circ J. 2012;76:351–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ikari Y, Kyono H, Isshiki T, Ishizuka S, Nasu K, Sano K, et al. Usefulness of everolimus-eluting coronary stent implantation in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:872–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Otsuka M, Shiode N, Masaoka Y, Okimoto T, Tamekiyo H, Kawase T, Yamane K, et al. Comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in dialysis patients. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16:208–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and clinical research coordinators at the participating centers.

Funding

The XIENCE V/PROMUS PMS was sponsored and funded by Abbott Vascular (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01086228).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiro Aoki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ken Kozuma and Kengo Tanabe receive remuneration from Abbott Vascular, Kusano Hajime is an employee of Abbott Vascular and has stocks of Abbott Vascular, Hong Nie is an employee of Abbott Vascular, and Takeshi Kimura receives research and scholar funds from Abbott Vascular. Others have no disclosure related to this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aoki, J., Kozuma, K., Awata, M. et al. Five-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents from the post marketing study of CoCr-EES (XIENCE V/PROMUS) in Japan. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 34, 40–46 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-018-0515-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-018-0515-z

Keywords

Navigation