Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 209–214 | Cite as

Incidence and risk factors of vascular complications following endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease via the popliteal artery

  • Yoko YanagitaEmail author
  • Katsuo Noda
Original Article


To evaluate vascular complications associated with endovascular treatment (EVT) of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) through the popliteal artery and to identify the risk factors for these complications. Between November 2005 and January 2009, 63 patients with PAD received EVT via the popliteal artery. Retrograde (n = 58) and antegrade (n = 5) transpopliteal procedures were performed to target 77 lesions, including 12 distal to the trifurcation. Thirty-five punctures were performed under ultrasound guidance and 7 under angiographic guidance; 21 punctures were performed without any guidance. Vascular complications were evaluated by physical examination and duplex ultrasonography. Vascular complications at the popliteal puncture site occurred in 8 patients (12.7%): 6 hematomas and 2 arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). Seven of 24 patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) (29%) had significantly higher complications (P = 0.004) compared with 1 of 39 patients not receiving hemodialysis (non-HD) (2.6%). HD alone was also a significant risk factor for hematoma (P = 0.010). Both AVF occurred in HD patients (P = 0.141), and one occurred despite ultrasound-guided puncture. Ultrasound-guided puncture showed no significant improvement in reducing both complications. The combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy showed no statistical significance in overall complications. In non-HD patients, the transpopliteal approach in the EVT of PAD seems to be safe. More attention should be paid to HD patients when using the transpopliteal approach due to a higher complication rate.


Transpopliteal approach Vascular complications Peripheral arterial disease 



We are grateful to the Cardiology Department of the Kumamoto Central Hospital for giving us the opportunity to publish this paper. We thank Dr. Taro Saito in particular for the advice and expertise in the field of endovascular treatment.


  1. 1.
    Gardiner GA Jr, Meyerovitz MF, Stokes KR, Clouse ME, Harrington DP, Bettmann MA. Complications of transluminal angioplasty. Radiology. 1986;159:201–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tonnesen KH, Sager P, Karle A, Putnam SG III, Ball D. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery by retrograde catheterization via the PA. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1988;11:127–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schroeder J. Catheter lysis and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty below the knee via the popliteal artery in a patient with femoral artery obstruction: technical note. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1990;12:344–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noory E, Rastan A, Schwarzwälder U, Sixt S, Beschorner U, Bürgelin K, et al. Retrograde transpopliteal recanalization of chronic superficial femoral artery occlusion after failed re-entry during antegrade subintimal angioplasty. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:619–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacCullough KM. Retrograde transpopliteal salvage of the failed antegrade transfemoral angioplasty. Australas Radiol. 1993;37:329–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaitoun R, Lyer SS, Lewin RF, Dorros G. Percutaneous popliteal approach for angioplasty of superficial femoral artery occlusions. Cathet Cadiovasc Diagn. 1990;21:154–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saha S, Gibson M, Magee TR, Galland RB, Torrie EP. Early results of retrograde transpopliteal angioplasty of iliofemoral lesions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;24:378–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kluge A, Rauber K, Breithecker A, Rau WS, Bachmann G. Puncture of the popliteal artery using a Doppler-equipped (SMART) needle in transpopliteal interventions. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1972–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trigaux JP, Van Beers B, Dewispelaere J. Anatomic relationship between the popliteal artery and vein: a guide to accurate angiographic puncture. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1259–62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yilmatz S, Sindel T, Luleci E. Ultrasound-guided retrograde popliteal artery catheterization: Experience in 174 consecutive patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:714–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noory E, Rastan A, Sixt S, Schwarzwälder U, Leppännen O, Schwarz T, et al. Arterial puncture closure using a clip device after transpopliteal retrograde approach for recanalization of the superficial femoral artery. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:310–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;1:45 Suppl S:S5–67.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weigert AL, Schafer AI. Uremic bleeding: pathogenesis and therapy. Am J Med Sci. 1998;316:94–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galbusera M, Remuzzi G, Boccardo P. Treatment of bleeding in dialysis patients. Semin Dial. 2009;22:279–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perings SM, Kelm M, Jax T, Strauer BE. A prospective study on incidence and risk factors of arteriovenous fistulae following transfemoral cardiac catheterization. Int J Cardiol. 2003;88:223–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CardiologyFukuoka Wajiro HospitalFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of CardiologyKumamoto Central HospitalKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations