Journal of Service Science Research

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 125–147 | Cite as

Measuring IT service quality: evaluation of IT service quality measurement framework in industry

Article

Abstract

IT service quality is determined by the value that the IT service brings to both the IT service provider and its customers, but service value is not measured in most IT service organizations today. We describe the fourth iteration of our IT service quality measurement framework and report on the evaluation of the framework in the Australian IT service industry. The data was gathered from 63 IT service providers through an online survey. The paper focuses on the application of the proposed IT service quality measurement framework in industry as well as the importance and feasibility of measuring and interlinking various IT service quality aspects. An important finding is that although the majority of respondents recognize the importance of IT service value, very few providers actually measure the value of their IT services. The findings also support the importance of taking a systemic approach to IT service measurement. It is clear that various service areas are inter-linked: IT service stability impacts on customer satisfaction, and process performance affects IT service stability. With the exception of three indicators, all the proposed indicators and measures were applied in the surveyed IT service organizations. Further efforts to confirm these findings will be under-taken within the global IT service industry.

Keywords

IT Service IT Service Quality IT Service Quality Measurement Evaluation Online Survey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Hawari M, Ward T, & Newby, L (2009) The relationship between service quality and retention within the automated and traditional contexts of retail banking. Journal of Service Marketing 20(4):455–472.Google Scholar
  2. den Hertog P (2000) Knowledge-intensive Business Services as Co-Producers of Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 4(4):491–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Donko D & Traljic I (2009) Measurement of service effectiveness and establishment of baselines. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications 6(8):1310–1319.Google Scholar
  4. Gregor S & Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly 37(2):337–355.Google Scholar
  5. Grönroos C & Helle R (2010) Adopting a service logic in manufacturing-conceptual foundation and metric for mutual value creation. JOSM 21(5):564–590.Google Scholar
  6. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, & Ram, S (2004) Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1):75–105.Google Scholar
  7. ISO/IEC 20000-4 (2010) ISO/IEC TR 20000-4: 2010 Information Technology-Service Management-Part 4: Process reference model. ISO/IEC SC7.Google Scholar
  8. ISO/ IEC JTC1 SC7 (2009). ISO/IEC FCD 25010, Systems and software engineering-System and software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)-System and software models.Google Scholar
  9. Järvinen P (2001) On Research Methods, Juvenes Print, Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
  10. Kang H & Bradley G (2002) Measuring the performance of IT services: An assessment of SERVQUAL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 3(3):151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ladhari R (2009) A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 1(2):172–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lepmets M, Cater-Steel A, Gacenga F, & Ras E (2012) Extending the IT service quality measurement framework through a systematic literature review. Journal of Service Science Research 4(1):7–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lepmets M, Mesquida AL, Cater-Steel A, Mas A, & Ras E (2014) The Evaluation of the IT Service Quality Measurement Framework in Industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 15(1):39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lepmets M, Ras E, & Renault A (2011) A Quality Measurement Framework for IT Services. Global Conference on Service Research and Innovation 2011. San Jose, California: IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. Lloyd V & Rudd C (2007) ITIL Service Design. In: Office of Government Commerce (ed.) ITIL. London: TSO.Google Scholar
  16. March ST & Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4):251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez JA, Martinez L (2010) Some insights on conceptualizing and measuring service quality. Journal of Retail and Consumer Services 17(1):29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. OGC (2011) ITIL Service Strategy, London: TSO for the Office of Government Commerce.Google Scholar
  19. Parasuraman A, Berry L, & Zeithaml V (1991) Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing 67(4):420–450.Google Scholar
  20. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, & Berry L (1985) A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. The Journal of Marketing 49(4):41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. PSM (2000) Practical Software and Systems Measurement: A Foundation for Objective Project Management, DoD Implementation Guide, 4.0b1.Google Scholar
  22. Spohrer J, Maglio PP, Bailey J, & Gruhl D (2007) Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer 40(1):71.Google Scholar
  23. Zeithaml VA, Parasuraman A, & Berry LL (1985) Problems and Strategies in Services Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49(2):33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhu JC, Ramanathan R, & Ramanathan U (2011) Measuring Service Quality using SERVQUAL and AHP: An application to a Chinese IT company and comparison. International Journal of Services and Operations Management 8(4):418–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Service Science and Springer 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of management and EnterpriseUniversity of Southern QueenslandCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Regulated Software Research CentreDundalk Institute of TechnologyDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations