Advertisement

Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 363–369 | Cite as

Differential Expression Pattern Of MADS Box Genes in Floral Whorls of Garcinia indica

  • Reshma V. Patil
  • Kiran D. PawarEmail author
Research Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Flower formation is one of the main developmental stages in the life cycle of flowering plants that can be used as a model system to elucidate the molecular mechanics that control the developmental process in plants. In the present study, we investigated the floral homeotic and MADS box genes in the polygamadioecious tree Garcinia indica. The differential gene expressions of floral homeotic and MADS box genes in male, female, bisexual flowers, and floral organs such as sepal, petal, stamen, and carpel were studied by employing quantitative real-time, PCR-based assays. Of nine differentially expressed floral genes of the MADS box class, AGL11, the master control gene of ovule identity was found to be expressed 2-fold higher in female carpel whereas the ribosome protein involved in ovule development showed 2×106-fold high expression in the female carpel. The hierarchical clustering grouped these genes into four major clusters: cluster I comprised AGL11, AG, and PMADS2, cluster II comprised AP3 and AGL9, cluster III comprised SEP1 and ELFB, and cluster IV comprised AG pathway and ribosome protein. The clustering found was correlated with the quantitative and qualitative expression of genes.

Key words

Garciniaindica floral genes MADS box gene gene expression flower development sex determination 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by DST-SERB (YSS/2015/000319).

References

  1. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF. 2004. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-pcr data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 64: 5245–5250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angenent GC, Colombo L. 1996. Molecular control of ovule development. Trends Plant Sci. 1: 228–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett SCH, Yakimowski SB, Field DL, Pickup M. 2010. Ecological genetics on sex ratios in plant populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 365: 2549–2557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker Annette, Theissen Gunter. 2003. The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29: 464–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernier G, Havelange A, Houssa C, Petitjean A, Lejeune P. 1993. Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5: 1147–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowman JL, Drews GN, Meyerowitz EM. 1991a. Expression of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic geneAGAMOUS is restricted to specific cell types late in flower development. Plant Cell 3: 749–758PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM. 1991b. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112: 1–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen X, Meyerowitz EM. 1999. HUA1 and HUA2 are two members of the floral homeotic AGAMOUS pathway. Mol. Cell 3: 349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng Y, Kato N, Wang W, Li J, Chen X. 2003. Two RNA Binding Proteins, HEN4 and HUA1, Act in the Processing of AGAMOUS Pre-mRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev. Cell 4: 53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colombo L, Franken J, Koetje E, van Went J, Dons HJ, Angenent GC, van Tunen A J. 1995. The petunia MADS box gene FBP11 determines ovule identity. Plant Cell 7: 1859–68PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Goto K, Meyerowitz EM. 1994. Function and regulation of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene pistallata. Genes Dev. 8: 1548–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He Y, Doyle MR, Amasino RM. 2004. PAF1-complex-mediated histone methylation of FLOWERING LOCUS C chromatin is required for the vernalization-responsive, winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18: 2774–2784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang J, Struck F, Matzinger DF, Levings III CS. 1994. Flower-enhanced expression of a nuclear-encoded mitochondrial respiratory protein is associated with changes in mitochondrion number. Plant Cell 6: 439–448PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Joseph KS, Murthy HN. 2014. Sexual system of Garcinia indica Choisy: geographic variation in trioecy and sexual dimorphism in floral traits. Plant Syst. Evol. 301: 1065–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacKenzie S, McIntosh L. 1999. Higher plant mitochondria. Plant Cell 11: 571–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng M, Yanofsky M. 2001. Function and evolution of the plant MADS-box gene family. Nat. Rev. Gen. 2: 186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Patil RV and Pawar KD. 2019. Comparative de novo flower transcriptome analysis of polygamodioecious tree Garciniaindica. 3 Biotech. 9:72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. 2004. Determination of stablehousekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper — excel based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol. Lett. 26: 509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Theissen G, Saedler H. 2001. Floral quartets. Nature 409: 469–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Theissen G. 2001. Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Theissen G, Strater T, Fischer A, Saedler H. 1995. Structural characterization, chromosomal localization and phylogenetic evaluation of two pairs of AGAMOUS-like MADS-box genes from maize. Gene 156: 155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thornton B, Basu C. 2011. Real-Time PCR (qPCR) Primer Design Using Free Online Software. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 39: 145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Krol Alexander R, Brunellel A, Tsuchimoto S, Chua N. 1993. Functional analysis of petunia floral homeotic MADS box gene pMADS1. Genes Dev. 7: 1214–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Speleman F. 2002. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winter KU, Saedler H, Theißen G. 2002. On the origin of class B floral homeotic genes: functional substitution and dominant inhibition in Arabidopsis by expression of an ortholog from the gymnosperm Gnetum. Plant J. 31: 457–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xie F, Xiao P, Chen D, Xu L, Zhang B. 2012. miRDeepFinder: a miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs. Plant Mol. Biol. 80: 75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Crop Science and Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Nanoscience and BiotechnologyShivaji UniversityKolhapurIndia

Personalised recommendations