Advertisement

Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 345–353 | Cite as

Morphological Traits Associated with Drought Stress Tolerance in Six Moroccan Durum Wheat Varieties Released Between 1984 and 2007

  • Abdelali Boussakouran
  • El Hassan Sakar
  • Mohamed El Yamani
  • Yahia RharrabtiEmail author
Research Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Drought is one of the main environmental factors affecting grain yield and plant architecture in durum wheat. The present work was conducted to evaluate the contribution of morphological traits above flag leaf node on grain yield of six Moroccan durum wheat varieties released between 1984 and 2007 and grown under two water regimes (irrigated and rainfed) during the 2015–2016 crop season. The following morphological traits were measured at anthesis: Flag leaf length (FLL), flag leaf area (FLA), peduncle length (PL), spike length (SL), spike area (SA), and green leaf area (GLA). Days from sowing to anthesis (DSA) and grain-filling period (GFP) were recorded. In addition, grain yield per plant (GYP) was evaluated at maturity. Analysis of variance showed the greater effect of water stress in explaining total variability of the studied traits. Mean comparisons indicated that water deficit significantly affected GYP and all morphological traits; it shortened DSA and GFP by 4 and 7 days, respectively. Moreover, GYP, DSA, and GFP increased in modern varieties. In contrast, FLL, FLA, and PL were reduced from old to modern varieties. Under irrigated conditions, correlation studies revealed that GYP was positively associated to GLA. Regarding the rainfed trial, GYP was positively correlated to FLL. Additionally, negative relationships were found between GYP and DSA in both water regimes. Stepwise regression highlighted the relative importance of each morphological traits on the stress susceptibility index, FLL was the most consistent trait entered the model followed by PL and FLA. In this study, some morphological traits above flag leaf node proved to be useful tools to select for grain yield in water-limited environments.

Key words

Durum wheat morphological traits grain yield stress susceptibility index Morocco 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University for providing financial support of this work.

References

  1. Ahmed N, Khaliq I, Chowdhry MA, Ahsan M, Ibrahim M, Maekawa M. 2004. Heritability estimates of some flag leaf characters in wheat. Caderno de Pesquisa Série Biol. 16: 131–141Google Scholar
  2. Álvaro F, Isidro J, Villegas D, García del Moral LF, Royo C. 2008. Old and modern durum wheat varieties from Italy and Spain differ in main spike components. Field Crops Res. 106: 86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anjum SA, Xie X, Wang L, Saleem MF, Man C, Lei W. 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr. J. Agric. 6: 2026–2032Google Scholar
  4. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serret MD. 2008. Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 27: 377–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayed S, Othmani A, Mrabit M, Rassaa N, Mbarki A, Rezgui M, Younes MB. 2014. Selection of morpho-physiological traits associated with terminal drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) genotypes. J. New Sci. 11: 9–16Google Scholar
  6. Bansal KC, Sinha SK. 1991. Assessment of drought resistance in 20 accessions of Triticum aestivum and related species. I. Total dry matter and grain yield stability. Euphytica 56: 7–14Google Scholar
  7. Bogale A, Tesfaye K, Geleto T. 2011. Morphological and physiological attributes associated to drought tolerance of Ethiopian durum wheat genotypes under water deficit condition. JBES 1: 22–36Google Scholar
  8. Boussakouran A, Sakar EH, El Yamani M, Taghouti M, Rharrabti Y. 2018. Breeding effect on grain yield and protein content of six Moroccan durum wheat varieties released during the last three decades. Proc. 4th International American Moroccan Agricultural Sciences Conference, Meknes, Morocco, pp 56Google Scholar
  9. Briggs K, Aytenfisu A. 1980. Relationships between morphological characters above the flag leaf node and grain yield in spring wheats. Crop Sci. 20: 350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cedola M.C, Scalfati G, Soprano M, Rascio A, Iannucci A. 1994. Leaf morpho-physiological parameters as screening techniques for drought stress tolerance in Triticum durum Desf. J. Genet. Genome Res. 48: 229–236Google Scholar
  11. Chen W, Zhang J, Deng X. 2019. The spike weight contribution of the photosynthetic area above the upper internode in a winter wheat under different nitrogen and mulching regimes. Crop J. 7: 89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christopher JT, Manschadi AM, Hammer GL, Borrell AK. 2008. Developmental and physiological traits associated with high yield and stay-green phenotype in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 59: 354–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman RK, Gill GS, Rebetzke GJ. 2001. Identification of quantitative trait loci for traits conferring weed competitiveness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52: 1235–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalirie MS, Sharifi RS, Farzaneh S. 2010. Evaluation of yield, dry matter accumulation and leaf area index in wheat genotypes as affected by terminal drought stress. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. Napoca 38: 182–186Google Scholar
  15. De Vita P, Mastrangelo AM, Matteu L, Mazzucotelli E, Virzi N, Palumbo M, Lo Storto M, Rizza F, Cattivelli L. 2010. Genetic improvement effects on yield stability in durum wheat genotypes grown in Italy. Field Crop Res. 119: 68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Vita P, Nicosia O, Nigro F, Platani C, Riefolo C, Di Fonzo N, Cattivelli L. 2007. Breeding progress in morpho-physiological, agronomical and qualitative traits of durum wheat cultivars released in Italy during the 20th century. Eur. J. Agron. 26: 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El Yamani M, Sakar EH, Boussakouran A, Rharrabti Y. 2018. Physiological and biochemical responses of young olive trees (Olea europaea L.) to water stress during flowering. Arch. Biol. Sci. 71: 123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29: 185–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer RA, Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29: 897–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foulkes MJ, Snape JW, Shearman VJ, Reynolds MP, Gaju O, Sylvester-Bradley R. 2007. Genetic progress in yield potential in wheat: Recent advances and future prospects. J. Agric. Sci. 145: 17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. García A, Dorado M, Pérez I, Montilla E. 2010. Effect of water deficit on the distribution of photoassimilates in rice plants (Orysa Sativa L.). Interciencia 35: 47–54Google Scholar
  22. García del Moral LF, Rharrabti Y, Elhani S, Martos V, Royo C. 2005. Yield formation in Mediterranean durum wheats under two contrasting water regimes based on path-coefficient analysis. Euphytica 146: 203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. García del Moral LF, Rharrabti Y, Villegas D, Royo D. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Agron. J. 95: 266–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giraldo P, Royo C, González M, Carrillo JM, Ruiz M. 2016. Genetic diversity and association mapping for agromorphological and grain quality traits of a structured collection of durum wheat landraces including subsp. durum, turgidum, and diccocon. PloS One 11: e0166577PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giunta F, Motzo R, Pruneddu G. 2008. Has long-term selection for yield in durum wheat also induced changes in leaf and canopy traits? Field Crop Res. 106: 68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giunta F, Pruneddu G, Motzo R. 2019. Grain yield and grain protein of old and modern durum wheat cultivars grown under different cropping systems. Field Crop Res. 230: 107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gonzalez A, Martin I, Ayerbe L. 2007. Response of barley genotypes to terminal soil moisture stress: phenology, growth, and yield. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 58: 29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henkrar F, El-Haddoury J, Ouabbou H, Nsarellah H, Iraqi D, Bendaou N, Udupa. 2016. Genetic diversity reduction in improved durum wheat cultivars of morocco as revealed by microsatellite markers. Sci. Agr. 73: 134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Isidro J, Álvaro F, Royo C, Villegas D, Miralles DJ, García del Moral LF. 2011. Changes in duration of developmental phases of durum wheat caused by breeding in Spain and Italy during the 20th century and its impact on yield. Ann. Bot. 107: 1355–1366PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kamrani M. 2015. Relationship among agro-morphological traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under irrigated and rain-fed conditions. J. Agron. 14: 254–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaul R. 1974. Potential net photosynthesis in flag leaves of severely drought-stressed wheat cultivars and its relationship to grain yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54: 811–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khaliq I, Irshad A, Ahsan M. 2008. Awns and flag leaf contribution towards grain yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Res. Commun. 36: 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khamssi NN, Najaphy A. 2012. Agro-morphological and phenological attributes under irrigated and rain-fed conditions in bread wheat genotypes. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7: 51–57Google Scholar
  34. Kipp S, Mistele B, Schmidhalter U. (2014). Identification of stay-green and early senescence phenotypes in high-yielding winter wheat, and their relationship to grain yield and grain protein concentration using high-throughput phenotyping techniques. Func. Plant Biol. 41: 227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kong L, Wang F, Feng B, Li S, Si J, Zhang B. 2010. The structural and photosynthetic characteristics of the exposed peduncle of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): An important photosynthate source for grain-filling. BMC Plant Biol. 10: 141–151PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MS, Demontis A, El-Ahmed A, García del Moral LF, Maalouf F, Nachit M, Nserallah N, Ouabbou H, Rhouma S. 2010. Association mapping in durum wheat grown across a broad range of water regimes. J. Exp. Bot. 62: 409–438PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. McNeal FH, Berg MA, 1977. Flag leaf area in five spring wheat crosses and the relationship to grain yield. Euphytica 26: 739–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miralles DJ, Rharrabti Y, Royo C, Villegas D, García del Moral LF. 2002. Grain setting strategies of Mediterranean durum wheat cultivars released in different periods (1900–2000). “Genotype-Phenotype: Narrowing the Gaps”. Proc. AAB Conference, Cirencester, UK, pp: 16–18Google Scholar
  39. Mohammadi R. 2012. Genetic gain in grain yield and drought tolerance of durum wheat breeding lines under rainfed conditions in Iran. Acta Agron. Hung. 60: 417–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mohammadi R. 2016. Efficiency of yield-based drought tolerance indices to identify tolerant genotypes in durum wheat. Euphytica 211: 71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohammadi R, Amri A. 2013. Genotype × Environment interaction and genetic improvement for yield and yield stability of rainfed durum wheat in Iran. Euphytica 192: 227–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mollasadeghi V, Shahryari R, Imani AA, Khayatnezhad. 2011. Factor analysis of wheat quantitative traits on yield under terminal drought. Am. Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 10: 157–159Google Scholar
  43. Moragues M, García del Moral LF, Moralejo M, Royo C. 2006. Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal within the Mediterranean Basin I: yield components. Field Crop Res. 95: 194–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Motzo R, Giunta F. 2007. The effect of breeding on the phenology of Italian durum wheats: from landraces to modern cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 26: 462–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nouri-Ganbalani A, Nouri-Ganbalani G, Hassanpanah D. 2009. Effects of drought stress condition on the yield and yield components of advanced wheat genotypes in Ardabil, Iran. JFAE 7: 228–234Google Scholar
  46. Nsarellah N, Amri A, Nachit M. 2005. Amélioration Génétique du Blé Dur. In: F Andaloussi, A Chahbar, eds, La Création Variétale à l’INRA, Méthodologie, Acquis et Perspectives. INRA-Rabat, Morocco, pp 9–55Google Scholar
  47. Reynolds M, Foulkes J, Furbank R, Griffiths S, King J, Murchie E, Parry M, Slafer GA. 2012. Achieving yield gains in wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 35: 1799–1823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rharrabti Y, Elhani S. 2014. Using path analysis to evaluate breeding progress in grain yield and related characters of durum wheat in Morocco. IJIAS 9: 1224–1232Google Scholar
  49. Rharrabti Y, Miralles D, Martos V, García del Moral LF. 2010. Grain weight of durum wheat cultivars released in Italy and Spain during the 20th century as affected by source-sink manipulations. Cereal Res. Commun. 38: 134–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rharrabti Y, Villegas D, García del Moral LF, Aparicio N, Elhani S, Royo C. 2001. Environmental and genetic determination of protein content and grain yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Plant Breed. 120: 381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Royo C, Alvaro F, Martos V, Ramdani A, Isidro J, Villegas D, García del Moral LF. 2007. Genetic changes in durum wheat yield components and associated traits in Italian and Spanish varieties during the 20th century. Euphytica 155: 259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Royo C, Maccaferri M, Álvaro F, Moragues M, Sanguineti MC, Tuberosa R, Maalouf F, García del Moral LF, Demontis A, Rhouma S. 2010. Understanding the relationships between genetic and phenotypic structures of a collection of elite durum wheat accessions. Field Crop Res. 119: 91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Royo C, Martos V, Ramdani A, Villegas D, Rharrabti Y, García del Moral LF. 2008. Changes in yield and carbon isotope discrimination of Italian and Spanish durum wheat during the 20th century. Agron J. 100: 352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Royo C, Nazco R, Villegas D. 2014. The climate of the zone of origin of Mediterranean durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) landraces affects their agronomic performance. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 61: 1345–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Royo C, Villegas D, Rharrabti Y, Blanco R, Martos V, García del Moral LF. 2006. Grain growth and yield formation of durum wheat grown at contrasting latitudes and water regimes in a Mediterranean environment. Cereal Res. Commun. 34: 1021–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sanchez-Bragado R, Elazab A, Zhou B, Serret MD, Bort J, Nieto-Taladriz MT, Araus JL. 2014. Contribution of the ear and the flag leaf to grain filling in durum wheat inferred from the carbon isotope signature: genotypic and growing conditions effects. Integr. Plant Biol. 56: 444–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Selim, DAFH, Nassar RMA, Boghdady MS, Bonfill M. 2019. Physiological and anatomical studies of two wheat cultivars irrigated with magnetic water under drought stress conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 135: 480–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sharma SN, Sain RS, Sharma RK. 2003. The genetic control of flag leaf length in normal and late sown durum wheat. Agric. Sci. 141: 323–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singh D, Singh D. 1992. Effect of leaf-blade and awn on grain-yield of rain-fed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at different stages of spike development. Ind. J. Agr. Sci. 62: 468–471Google Scholar
  60. Slafer GA, Araus JL, Royo C, García del Moral LF. 2005. Promising eco-physiological traits for genetic improvement of cereal yields in Mediterranean environments. Ann. Appl. Biol. 146: 61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Subira J, Álvaro F, García del Moral LF, Royo C. 2015. Breeding effects on the cultivar × environment interaction of durum wheat yield. Eur. J. Agron. 68: 78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taghouti M, Gaboun F, Nsarellah N, Rhrib K, Benbrahim N, Amallah L. 2018. Evolution from durum wheat landraces to recent improved varieties in Morocco in terms of productivity increase to the detriment of grain quality. Rev. Mar. Sci. Agron. 5: 351–358Google Scholar
  63. Villegas D, García del Moral LF, Rharrabti Y, Martos V, Royo C. 2007. Morphological traits above the flag leaf node as indicators of drought susceptibility index in durum wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 193: 103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang P, Zhou G, Yu H, Yu S. 2011. Fine mapping a major QTL for flag leaf size and yield-related traits in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123: 1319–1330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Crop Science and Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdelali Boussakouran
    • 1
  • El Hassan Sakar
    • 1
  • Mohamed El Yamani
    • 1
  • Yahia Rharrabti
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Natural Resources and Environment, Polydisciplinary Faculty of TazaSidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah UniversityTaza-Gare, TazaMorocco

Personalised recommendations