“This could be me”: exploring the impact of genetic risk for Huntington’s disease young caregivers

  • Danielle S. DondanvilleEmail author
  • Andrea K. Hanson-Kahn
  • Melinda S. Kavanaugh
  • Carly E. Siskind
  • Joanna H. Fanos
Original Article


Huntington’s disease (HD) is a predominantly adult-onset, genetic, neurodegenerative condition. Children of affected individuals have a 50% risk of inheriting HD and often assume caregiving roles for their parent. Studies specifically focused on HD young caregivers have proposed that the genetic risk component of HD “exacerbates” the caregiving experience and identified common responsibilities, burdens, and support needs, but none have explored the relationship between the caregiving role and perception of genetic risk. In an attempt to understand this relationship, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the interaction between a young caregiver’s perception of genetic risk, the caregiving experience, and thoughts about and plans for predictive testing. Thirteen individuals between 15 and 25 years who provided care for a parent with HD were recruited from two HD youth groups and local support groups. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Two themes emerged: (1) caregiving and thoughts about risk and (2) caregiving and perceived opinions towards genetic testing. Our findings suggest that the genetic risk colors the caregiving experience by evoking feelings about the future and a potential diagnosis of HD, in addition to impacting plans for predictive testing. Genetic counselors can use these findings to inform their understanding of caregiver experiences, which can aid them when helping patients explore their motivations for testing during a genetic counseling session. Future studies should explore the extent to which health care providers acknowledge the work of young caregivers in the home and provide support to these individuals.


Young caregiver Young carer Huntington’s disease Genetic risk Genetic counseling Predictive testing 



This research project was conducted to fulfill a degree requirement and as part of training program in Human Genetics and Genetic Counseling at Stanford University School of Medicine. We thank the Huntington’s Disease Youth Organization (HDYO) and the Huntington’s Disease Society of America (HDSA) National Youth Alliance (NYA) for their support and assistance with the recruitment of participants. Chandler Swope of HDYO and Anne Lesserman of HDSA were instrumental in the recruitment process. We thank Aiste Narkeviciute for her help with data analysis. We are also grateful for the young people who participated in interviews for this study and many others who expressed their interest—their stories should be shared, as they exemplify immense strength and courage.

Compliance with ethical standards

Study with human subjects

This project was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Stanford University. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2005 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in this study.

Conflict of interest

Andrea Hanson-Kahn facilitates a support group for individuals with HD for which she receives a stipend from the HDSA. Authors Danielle S. Dondanville, Joanna H. Fanos, Melinda S. Kavanaugh, and Carly E. Siskind declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abel K, Browner C (1998) Selective compliance with biomedical authority and the uses of experiential knowledge. In: Lock M, Kaufert P (eds) Pragmatic women and body politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 310–326Google Scholar
  2. Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (2015) Practice-based competencies for genetic counselors. Retrieved from
  3. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors & American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors (1995) Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 57(5):1233–1241PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Aubeeluck A, Moskowitz CB (2008) Huntington’s disease. Part 3: family aspects of HD. Br J Nurs 17(5):328–331. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baig SS, Strong M, Rosser E, Taverner N, Glew R, Miedzybrodzka Z, Clarke A, Craufurd D, UK Huntington’s Disease Prediction Consortium, Quarrell OW (2016) 22 Years of predictive testing for Huntington’s disease: the experience of the UK Huntington’s Preduction Consortium. Eur J Hum Genet 24(10):1396–1402. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates G, Harper P, Jones L (2002) Huntington’s disease, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauman L, Foster G, Johnson Silver E, Berman R, Gamble I, Muchaneta L (2006) Children caring for their ill parents with HIV/AIDS. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud 1:56–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binedell J, Soldan JR, Scourfield J, Harper P (1996) Huntington’s disease predictive testing: the case for an assessment approach to requests from adolescents. J Med Genet 33:912–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boardman F (2014) Knowledge is power? The role of experiential knowledge in geneticially ‘risky’ reproductive decisions. Sociol Health Illn 36(1):137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dedoose Version 7.5.16 (2016) Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC, Los Angeles Retrieved from Google Scholar
  11. Driessnack M, Williams JK, Barnette JJ, Sparbel KJ, Paulsen JS (2012) Development of the HD-teen inventory. Clin Nurs Res 21(2):213–223. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dulin P, Hill RD (2008) Caregiver burden. In: Leong FT (ed) Encyclopedia of counseling: changes and challenges for counseling in the 21st century, vol 2. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 63–68Google Scholar
  13. Forrest Keenan K, Miedzybrodzka Z, van Teijlingen E, McKee L, Simpson SA (2007) Young people’s experiences of growing up in a family affected by Huntington’s disease. Clin Genet 71(2):120–129. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Forrest Keenan K, McKee L, Miedzybrodzka Z (2015) Help or hindrance: young people’s experiences of predictive testing for Huntington’s disease. Clin Genet 87(6):563–569. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Frank J, Slatcher C (2009) Supporting young carers and their families using a whole family approach. J Fam Health Care 19(3):86–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gates MF, Lackey NR (1998) Youngsters caring for adults with cancer. Image J Nurs Sch 30:11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanson JL, Balmer DF, Giardino AP (2011) Qualitative research methods for medical educators. Acad Pediatr 11(5):375–386. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayden MR, Ehrlich R, Parker H, Ferera SJ (1980) Social perspectives in Huntington’s chorea. S Afr Med J 58(5):201–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Howatson-Jones L, Coren E (2013) Scoping the assessment needs of young carers of adults with a long term condition. J Nurs Care 2(2):129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huntington’s Disease Society of America (2016) Genetic testing protocol for Huntington’s disease. Retrieved from
  21. Jacobson S, Wood FG (2004) Contributions of children to the care of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 30(5):820–826. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kavanaugh MS (2014) Children and adolescents providing care to a parent with Huntington’s disease: disease symptoms, caregiving tasks and young carer well-being. Child Youth Care Forum 43(6):675–690. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kavanaugh MS, Noh H, Studer L (2014) It’d be nice if someone asked me how I was doing. Like, “cause I will have an answer”: exploring support needs of young carers of a parent with Huntington’s disease. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud 10(1):12–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korer JR, Fitzsimmons JS (1987) Huntington’s chorea and the young person at risk. Br J Soc Work 17(5):521–534. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levine C, Hunt GG, Halper D, Hart AY, Lautz J, Gould DA (2005) Young adult caregivers: a first look at an unstudied population. Am J Public Health 95(11):2071–2075. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Macleod R, Tibben A, Frontali M, Evers-Kiebooms G, Jones A, Martinez-Descales A et al (2013) Recommendations for the predictive genetic test in Huntington’s disease. Clin Genet 83(3):221–231. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mand C, Gillam L, Duncan RE, Delatycki MB (2013) “It was the missing piece”: adolescent experiences of predictive genetic testing for adult-onset conditions. Genet Med 15(8):643–649. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Morrison PJ, Harding-Lester S, Bradley A (2011) Uptake of Huntington disease predictive testing in a complete population. Clin Genet 80(3):281–286. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nance M, Myers R, Wexler A, Zanko A (2003) Genetic testing for Huntington’s disease: its relevance and implications (revised). Retrieved from
  30. Nance M, Paulsen J, Rosenblatt A, Wheelock V (2011) A physician’s guide to the management of Huntington’s disease, 3rd edn. Retrieved from
  31. Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM (1990) Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist 30(5):583–594. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rivera-Navarro J, Cubo E, Mariscal N (2015) Analysis of the reasons for non-uptake of predictive testing for Huntington’s disease in Spain: a qualitative study. J Genet Couns 24(6):1011–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Røthing M, Malterud K, Frich JC (2014) Caregiver roles in families affected by Huntington’s disease: a qualitative interview study. Scand J Caring Sci 28(4):700–705. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sparbel KJH, Driessnack M, Williams JK, Schutte DL, Tripp-Reimer T, McGonigal-Kenney M, Jarmon L, Paulsen JS (2008) Experiences of teens living in the shadow of Huntington disease. J Genet Couns 17(4):327–335. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27(2):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tyler A, Harper PS, Davies K, Newcome RG (1983) Family break-down and stress in Huntington’s choea. J Biosoc Sci 15(2):127–138. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams JK, Hamilton R, Nehl C, McGonigal-Kenney M, Schutte DL, Sparbel K, Birrer E, Tripp-Reimer T, Friedrich R, Penziner E, Jarmon L, Paulsen J (2007) “No one else sees the difference:” family members’ perceptions of changes in persons with preclinical Huntington disease. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 144(5):636–641. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams JK, Ayres L, Specht J, Sparbel K, Klimek ML (2009) Caregiving by teens for family members with Huntington disease. J Fam Nurs 15(3):273–294. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams JK, Driessnack M, Barnette JJ, Sparbel KJH, Leserman A, Thompson S, Paulsen JS (2013) Strategies used by teens growing up in families with Huntington disease. J Pediatr Nurs 28(5):464–469. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeneticsStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical GeneticsStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Helen Bader School of Social WelfareUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA
  5. 5.Department of NeurologyStanford Health CarePalo AltoUSA
  6. 6.Children’s Hospital Oakland Research InstituteOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations