Journal of Community Genetics

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 223–231

Establishing a community partnership to optimize recruitment of African American pedigrees for a genetic epidemiology study

  • Heather M. Ochs-Balcom
  • Elisa M. Rodriguez
  • Deborah O. Erwin
Original Article

Abstract

We developed a breast cancer genetic epidemiology study in collaboration with a community partnership to optimize recruitment and participation of African American women. We recognized that recruitment of relatives for a family-based study was a unique challenge in this minority group in the USA. Through an established partnership with The National Witness Project, we convened focus groups to identify potential recruitment challenges and issues related to decisions about study participation that may be unique to African Americans and family-based recruitment. Using the PEN-3 model, we analyzed qualitative data and applied the thematic findings to our recruitment protocol in order to mitigate potential recruitment challenges. The most relevant positive themes included a need for research and education and potential benefit to future generations. Negative themes included communication barriers in sharing disease status within a family and historical issues such as fatalistic attitudes and shamefulness of cancer. Collaboration with community partners allowed for development of culturally appropriate recruitment strategies for African American breast cancer survivors and their family members for a genetic epidemiology study. Understanding factors unique to family-based recruitment in the USA is a significant factor in enhancing participation of under-represented minorities in future genetic studies.

Keywords

African American Genetic epidemiology Study design Family study Community-based research 

References

  1. Airhinenbuwa CO (1992) Health promotion and disease prevention strategies for African Americans: a conceptual model. In: Braithwaite RL, Taylor SE (eds) Health issues in the Black community. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 267–280Google Scholar
  2. Airhinenbuwa CO (1995) Health and culture. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  3. Clerget-Darpoux F, Elston RC (2007) Are linkage analysis and the collection of family data dead? Prospects for family studies in the age of genome-wide association. Hum Hered 64(2):91–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S (1999) Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med 14(9):537–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eley JW, Hill HA, Chen VW, Austin DF, Wesley MN, Muss HB, Greenberg RS, Coates RJ, Correa P, Redmond CK et al (1994) Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. Results of the National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study. JAMA 272(12):947–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elledge RM, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Osborne CK (1994) Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among white, Hispanic, and black women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(9):705–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erwin DO, Spatz TS, Turturro CL (1992) Development of an African-American role model intervention to increase breast self-examination and mammography. J Cancer Educ 7(4):311–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erwin DO, Johnson VA, Feliciano-Libid L, Zamora D, Jandorf L (2005) Incorporating cultural constructs and demographic diversity in the research and development of a Latina breast and cervical cancer education program. J Cancer Educ 20(1):39–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erwin DO, Trevino M, Saad-Harfouche FG, Rodriguez EM, Gage E, Jandorf L (2010) Contextualizing diversity and culture within cancer control interventions for Latinas: changing interventions, not cultures. Soc Sci Med 71(4):693–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gamble VN (1993) A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. Am J Prev Med 9(6 Suppl):35–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gamito EJ, Burhansstipanov L, Krebs LU, Bemis L, Bradley A (2005) The use of an electronic audience response system for data collection. J Cancer Educ 20(1 Suppl):80–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall JM, Lee MK, Newman B, Morrow JE, Anderson LA, Huey B, King M-C (1990) Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. Science 250:1684–1689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartz SM, Johnson EO, Saccone NL, Hatsukami D, Breslau N, Bierut LJ (2011) Inclusion of African Americans in genetic studies: what is the barrier? Am J Epidemiol. doi:10.1093/aje/kwr084
  14. Hughes C, Peterson SK, Ramirez A, Gallion KJ, McDonald PG, Skinner CS, Bowen D (2004) Minority recruitment in hereditary breast cancer research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(7):1146–1155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurd TC, Muti P, Erwin DO, Womack S (2003) An evaluation of the integration of non-traditional learning tools into a community based breast and cervical cancer education program: the Witness Project of Buffalo. BMC Cancer 3:18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Israel BA, Parker EA, Rowe Z, Salvatore A, Minkler M, Lopez J, Butz A, Mosley A, Coates L, Lambert G, Potito PA, Brenner B, Rivera M, Romero H, Thompson B, Coronado G, Halstead S (2005) Community-based participatory research: lessons learned from the Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research. Environ Health Perspect 113(10):1463–1471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kass NE, Sugarman J, Faden R, Schoch-Spana M (1996) Trust, the fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. Hastings Cent Rep 26(5):25–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lerman C, Hughes C, Benkendorf JL, Biesecker B, Kerner J, Willison J, Eads N, Hadley D, Lynch J (1999) Racial differences in testing motivation and psychological distress following pretest education for BRCA1 gene testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8(4 Pt 2):361–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb, DG, Howlader N, Horner MJ, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Altekruse SF, Lewis DR, Clegg, L, Eisner MP, Reichman M, Edwards BK (eds) “SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2005, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD.” http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/, based on November 2007 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2008

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather M. Ochs-Balcom
    • 1
  • Elisa M. Rodriguez
    • 2
  • Deborah O. Erwin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Health ProfessionsUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral Science and Community Health, College of Public Health and Health ProfessionsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Office of Cancer Health Disparities Research, Department of Cancer Prevention and Population SciencesRoswell Park Cancer InstituteBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations