Users’ motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories
The relatively rapid growth of the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing market in the last few years has led to increasing attention from both the scientific community and policy makers. One voice often missing in these debates, however, is that of the actual user of these genetic testing services. In order to gain a better picture of the motivations and expectations that propel individuals to purchase DTC genome-wide testing, we conducted an exploratory study based on users’ personal stories. Through qualitative content analysis of users’ personal stories found on Internet blogs and DTC genetic testing companies’ websites, we identified five major sets of motivations and expectations towards DTC genome-wide testing. These themes are related to (1) health, (2) curiosity and fascination, (3) genealogy, (4) contributing to research, and (5) recreation. Obtaining such information can help us to understand how users consider genome-wide testing and forms the basis for further research.
YS was funded by an Erasmus Mundus Masters studentship, PB is funded by the Research Fund Flanders (FWO), and HCH is funded by the European Commission FP7 Marie Curie initiative. The authors thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and helpful comments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 23andMe (2010) Terms of service. https://www.23andme.com/about/tos/ Accessed 11 Nov 2010
- Collins F (2010) The language of life: DNA and the revolution in personalized medicine. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Burril & Company/Change Wave Research (2008) Personalized medicine and wellness survey. Executive summary. http://www.burrillandco.com/content/CWSurvey_61708.pdf. Accessed 21 Sept 2010
- deCODE (2010) deCODEme Genetic scan service agreement and informed consent. http://www.decodeme.com/service-agreement Accessed 11 Nov 2010
- Duncan D (2009) The experimental man. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Federal Trade Commission (2009) FTC facts for consumers. At-home genetic tests: a healthy dose of skepticism may be the best prescription. http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/health/hea02.shtm. Accessed 26 Apr 2011
- Human Genetics Commission (2010) A common framework of principles for direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/document.asp?DocId=280&CAtegoryId=10 Accessed 17 Feb 2011
- Kaufman D, Murphy Bollinger J, Devaney S, Scott J (2010) Direct from consumers: a survey of 1,048 customers of three direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing companies about motivations, attitudes, and responses to testing.http://www.ashg.org/cgi-bin/2010/showdetail.pl?absno=21043 Accessed 26 Apr 2011
- Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2010) Medical profiling and online medicine: the ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age. Nuffield Press, OxfordshireGoogle Scholar
- Silverman D (2006) Interpreting qualitative data. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- United States Government Accountability Office (2006) Nutrigenetic testing: tests purchased from four websites mislead consumers. US GAO, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- United States Government Accountability Office (2010) Direct-to-consumer genetic tests misleading test results are further complicated by deceptive marketing and other questionable practices .http://energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100722/Kutz.Testimony.07.22.2010.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2010
- Wade CH, Wilfond BS (2006) Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 142:284–292Google Scholar