Confidence of primary care physicians in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks—a European survey in five countries—Part 1
- 172 Downloads
Western health care systems are facing today increasing movement of genetic knowledge from research labs into clinical practice. This paper reports the results of a survey that addressed the confidence of primary care physicians in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks. The survey was conducted in five countries (France, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden and the UK). Stratified random samples were drawn from primary care physicians in the five countries representing a sampling frame of 139,579 physicians. Stepwise binary logistic regression procedures were performed to identify the predictor variables for self-reported confidence. Three thousand six hundred eighty-six physicians participated and filled out a self-administered questionnaire. The margin of error for accurate representation of each group of European general practitioners and specialists in the total sample is 2.9% for GP, 2.8% for obstetricians/gynaecologists (OB/GYN) and for paediatricians (PAED) 2.6% (95% confidence level). Confidence in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks is low among participating primary care physicians: 44.2% are not confident, 36.5% somewhat confident, confident or very confident are 19.3%. In each country, those confident/very confident represent less than 33% of the participating physicians. Primary care physicians who report the lowest levels of confidence prove to be those least exposed to medical genetics information and training. Although there are significant differences in the way in which professional education is organised and practice is regulated across European countries, there is a need for a coordinated European effort to improve primary care physicians’ background in medical genetics.
KeywordsGenetic education Genetic services Primary care
For the patient organisations: The contributions and support of Alastair Kent and Ysbrand Poortman are greatly appreciated. We also appreciate the technical support of Jean-Marc Calefato, Gaelle Santin in France; the contribution and support of Prof. Dr. E. Harms (paediatrician), Prof. Dr. W. Holzgreve (obstetrician/gynaecologist) and Prof. Dr. K. Wahle (general practitioner) in Germany; the contribution and support of Prof. Dr. Martina Cornel (community genetics), Dr. Marieke Baars (clinical geneticist), Dr. Attie Go (gynaecologist), Frans Boonekamp (general practitioner) and Dr. Michiel Weijers (paediatrician) in The Netherlands and the research and administrative support of Prof. Tony Heagerty (Professor of Medicine) and technical support of Daniel Cottam and Christine Waterman in UK.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Benjamin CM, Anionwu EN, Kristoffersson U, ten Kate LP, Plass AM, Nippert I, Julian-Reynier C, Harris HJ, Schmidtke J, Challen K, Calefato JM, Waterman C, Powell E, Harris R, GenEd Research Group (2009) Educational priorities and current involvement in genetic practice: a survey of midwives in the Netherlands, UK and Sweden. Midwifery 25(5):483–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Calefato JM, Nippert I, Harris HJ, Kristofferson U, Schmidtke J, ten Kate LP, Anionwu E, Benjamin C, Challen K, Plass AM, Harris R, Julian-Reynier C (2008) Assessing educational priorities in genetics for GPs and specialists in 5 countries: factor structure of genetic educational priorities (Gen-EP) scale. Genet Med 10(2):99–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carroll J, Rideout AL, Wilson BJ, Allanson J, Blaine SM, Esplen MJ, Farrell SA, Graham GE, MacKenzie J, Meschino W, Miller F, Prakash P, Summers A, Taylor S (2009) Genetic education for primary care providers—improving attitudes, knowledge, and confidence. Can Family Physician Le médecin de famille canadien 55:e92–e99Google Scholar
- Darzi A. Quality for all: next stage review, Final Report, London: Department of Health, 2008Google Scholar
- EuroGentest: Core competences in genetics for health professionals in Europe, source: http://www.eurogentest.org/web/info/public/unit6/core_competences.xhtml, July 2010
- Geller G. (1999) Americans’ attitudes toward informed consent for breast cancer susceptibility testing: questions for cross-cultural research. In: Nippert I, Neitzel H, Wolff G (eds.) The new genetics: from research into health care—social and ethical implications for users and providers. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–21Google Scholar
- Harris R (1994) Genetic counselling and testing in Europe. J R Coll Physicians Lond 32(4):335–338Google Scholar
- Harris R (ed.) (1997) Genetic services in Europe: a comparative study of 31 countries. European Journal of Human Genetics 5 (Suppl 2):1–220Google Scholar
- Holtzman NA, Watson MS (ed.) (1997) Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the United States. Final report of the task force on genetic testingGoogle Scholar
- Hunter A, Wright P, Cappelli M, Kasaboski A, Surh L (1998) Physician knowledge and atti- tudes toward molecular genetic (DNA) testing of their patients. Clin Genet 5(6):447–455Google Scholar
- Julian-Reynier C, Nippert I, Calefato JM, Harris HJ, Kristofferson U, Schmidtke J, ten Kate LP, Anionwu E, Benjamin C, Challen K, Plass AM, Harris R (2008) Genetics in clinical practice: general practitioners’ educational priorities in European countries. Genet Med 10(2):107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Korf BR (2002) Integration of genetics into clinical teaching in medical school education. Genet Med 4(6, Suppl):33S–38SGoogle Scholar
- Manek N, Allen K. (2009) Changes to GP training, BMJ Careers, July 15, 12–14Google Scholar
- Nuffield Trust (2000) Genetics and health. Policy issues for genetic science and their implica- tions for health and health services. Nuffield TrustGoogle Scholar
- Plass AM, Baars MJH, Cornel MC, Julian-Reynier C, Nippert I, Harris HJ, Kristofferson U, Schmidtke J, Anionwu E, Benjamin C, Challen K, Harris R, ten Kate LP (2009) Testing the children: do non-genetic health care providers differ in their decision to advise genetic pre-symptomatic testing of minors? A study in five countries in the EU. Genet Test Mol Biomark 13(3):367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Royal College of General Practitioners (2008) A review of GP specialty training in the UK: Interim report for the Department of Health. RCGP, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Smit C, Kent A, Poortman Y. (1996) Biomedical research and patenting: ethic, social, and legal aspects. European Platform for Patients’ Organisations, Science and IndustryGoogle Scholar