Environmental DNA from avian residual saliva in fruits and its potential uses in population genetics
- 77 Downloads
Buccal cells are a valid source of vertebrate DNA for genetic analysis, typically collected with mouth swabs on captured individuals. Yet, advances in DNA storage and processing now permit recovering genomic material from traces of saliva in food remains. For example, the feeding habits of canopy-dwelling frugivorous birds, e.g. large macaws (Psittaciformes), could present an ideal opportunity to obtain environmental DNA (eDNA) from partially consumed fruits. We tested this by collecting tropical almond (Terminalia catappa) fruits, eaten and discarded by scarlet macaws (Ara macao), and processed them using three different collection/storage methods. We successfully isolated DNA molecules from macaw residual saliva in fruits. This genetic material allowed the amplification of 7 microsatellite markers and of the CHD region of the avian sex chromosomes using two different primer pairs. Macaw eDNA concentration (mean 12 ng/µl) was similar to the reported in other avian studies using buccal swabs but overall microsatellite (60% success) and CHD-gen (20% success) amplification was low. The best results were obtained for samples preserved in ethanol. We conclude that saliva eDNA in partially consumed food items is an underused source of non-invasive bird DNA for genetic analyses. Based on our results, we recommend that a combination of specialized collection swabs or ethanol stored swabs along with commercial DNA extraction kits be used. Protocols should be modified accordingly to reach a consistent level of individual identification and gender determination that closely matches traditional sampling.
KeywordsPsittacidae Swab Non-invasive Genetic analysis PCR
DNA Genotek Inc. kindly donated the Perfomagene™ PG-100 collection swabs used in this study. We want to acknowledge support given by the School of Biology at the University of Costa Rica for the elaboration of this project. IB thanks the Academic Exchange Programs of the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile and University of Costa Rica.
This research was elaborated under permit 111-B7-198 from the Vice-Rectory of Research of the University of Costa Rica.
- Bosnjak J, Stevanov-Pavlovic M, Vucicevic M, Stevanovic J, Simeunovic P, Resanovic R, Stanimirovic Z (2013) Feasibility of non-invasive molecular method for sexing of parrots. Pakistan J Zool 45:715–720Google Scholar
- Innes J, King C, Bartlam S, Forrester G, Howitt R (2015) Predator control improves nesting success in Waikato forest fragments. N Z J Ecol 39:245–253Google Scholar
- Meyers JM (1994) Improved capture techniques for psittacines. Wildl Soc Bull 22:511–516Google Scholar
- Nemeth N, Vaughan C (2004) Feeding observations on Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) in Costa Rica. Cotinga 21:71–72Google Scholar
- Pearce JM, Fields RL, Scribner KT (1997) Nest materials as a source of genetic data for avian ecological studies. J Field Ornithol 68:471–481Google Scholar
- Steffens K, Sanders MD, Gleeson DM, Pullen KM, Stowe CJ (2012) Identification of predators at black-fronted tern Chlidonias albostriatus nests, using mtDNA analysis and digital video recorders. NZJ Ecol 36:48–55Google Scholar
- Yannic G, Broquet T, Strøm H, Aebischer A, Dufresnes C, Gavrilo MV, Gilchrist HG, Mallory ML, Morrison RIG, Sabard B, Sermier R, Gilg O (2016) Genetic and morphological sex identification methods reveal a male-biased sex ratio in the Ivory Gull Pagophila eburnea. J Ornithol 157:861–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar