The development of real-time PCR assays for species and sex identification of three sympatric deer species from noninvasive samples
Reliably identifying the species occupying an area is an essential part of any wildlife conservation study or sustainable management plan, especially when dealing with a harvested species such as deer. Traditional deer monitoring techniques such as faecal standing crop or faecal accumulation rate estimates cannot accurately identify deer species based on pellet morphology where more than one deer species is present. This study presents real-time PCR assays for the identification of fallow deer (Dama dama), red deer (Cervus elaphus), and sika deer (Cervus nippon) species from pellet samples, and real-time PCR sex determining assays to amplify the ZFX and SRY gene of all three deer species. These assays successfully identified tissue and faecal pellets of all three species with no cross species amplification. Sex determination was successful from both tissue and faecal pellets samples, with the assays amplifying as little as 4 pg of nDNA, making them suitable for use with the often poor quality and low quantity DNA found in noninvasive samples. Application of these assays will provide reliable species presence and distribution data not possible with traditional methods as well as valuable information on sex ratios which can inform sustainable wildlife management and harvest strategies.
KeywordsqPCR Faecal pellets Cervus Dama Species identification Sex identification
The study was supported by Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine.
- Asherg W, Adam JL (1985) Reproduction of farmed red and fallow deer in northern New Zealand. In: Biology of deer production. Springer, New York, pp 217–224Google Scholar
- Forsyth DM (2005) Protocol for estimating changes in the relative abundance of deer in New Zealand forests using the Faecal Pellet Index (FPI). Landcare Research Contract Report LC0506/027. Department of Conservation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- Fraser KW (1996) The effect of recreational hunters on deer populations in Pureora Conservation Park. Department of Conservation, Wellington, p 39Google Scholar
- Kendall KC, McKelvey KS (2008) Hair collection. In: Long RA, MacKay P, Ray J, Zielinski W (eds) Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 141–182Google Scholar
- Ludt CJ, Kuehn R (2006) First insight into male deer phylogeny. Ecology and Ecosystem Sciences, Wildlife Biology and Management, FreisingGoogle Scholar
- Ludwig A, Lieckfeldt D, Lattenkamp EZ, Wiethoelter A, Vernesi C, Lutz W (2011) Tracing the roots of German fallow deer. In: Evolutionary Genetics. Leibniz Institute of Zoo and Wildlife Research, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Mayle BA, Peace AJ, Gill RMA (1999) How many deer? A field guide to estimating deer population size. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, p 96Google Scholar
- Schwartz MK, Monfort SL (2008) Genetic and endocrine tools for carnivore surveys. In: Long RA, MacKay P, Ray J, Zielinski W (eds) Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 238–262Google Scholar
- Skog A, Stenseth N, Jakobsen K (2007) Sex chromosome DNA variation in red deer; higher Y- than X-chromosome variation within the ZFY/ZFX paralogs. CEES, OsloGoogle Scholar
- Thompson WL (2004) Sampling rare or elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar