Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 45–48 | Cite as

A multiplex PCR assay for identification of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) using the mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes

  • Joana Gonçalves
  • Clive A. Marks
  • David Obendorf
  • António Amorim
  • Filipe Pereira
Technical Note

Abstract

The European red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is a highly adaptable predator indigenous to the northern hemisphere. However, in Australia the red fox is a widespread exotic predator that has contributed to the decline and extinction of several native species. Here we describe a multiplex PCR assay for the molecular identification of the red fox. The identification is achieved by the generation of a diagnostic profile combining the lengths of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene regions amplified using highly conserved PCR primers. The method was tested in DNA samples from 17 species, including in mixtures. Our results demonstrate that the red fox has a unique combination of fragment lengths determined by capillary electrophoresis that can be used for its unambiguous discrimination from common domestic and wild species.

Keywords

Red fox (Vulpes vulpesSpecies identification Mitochondrial DNA Ribosomal RNA Multiplex PCR 

Supplementary material

12686_2014_343_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (740 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 740 kb)

References

  1. Abbott I (2011) The importation, release, establishment, spread, and early impact on prey animals of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in Victoria and adjoining parts of south-eastern Australia. Aust Zool 35:463–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry O, Sarre SD, Farrington L, Aitken N (2007) Faecal DNA detection of invasive species: the case of feral foxes in Tasmania. Wildl Res 34:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carneiro J, Pereira F, Amorim A (2012) SPInDel: a multifunctional workbench for species identification using insertion/deletion variants. Mol Ecol Resour 12:1190–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Darling JA, Blum MJ (2007) DNA-based methods for monitoring invasive species: a review and prospectus. Biol Invasions 9:751–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eichmann C, Parson W (2008) Mitominis: multiplex PCR analysis of reduced size amplicons for compound sequence analysis of the entire mtDNA control region in highly degraded samples. Int J Legal Med 122:385–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernandes CA, Ginja C, Pereira I, Tenreiro R, Bruford MW, Santos-Reis M (2008) Species-specific mitochondrial DNA markers for identification of non-invasive samples from sympatric carnivores in the Iberian Peninsula. Conserv Genet 9:681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gonçalves J, Marks CA, Obendorf D, Amorim A, Pereira F (2014) The risks of using “species-specific” PCR assays in wildlife research: the case of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) identification in Tasmania. Forensic Sci Int Genet. doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.03.009 Google Scholar
  8. Hajibabaei M, Smith M, Janzen DH, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Hebert PD (2006) A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol Ecol Notes 6:959–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Livia L, Francesca V, Antonella P, Fausto P, Bernardino R (2007) A PCR-RFLP method on faecal samples to distinguish Martes martes, Martes foina, Mustela putorius and Vulpes vulpes. Conserv Genet 8:757–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Reilly C, Statham M, Mullins J, Turner PD, O’Mahony D (2008) Efficient species identification of pine marten (Martes martes) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) scats using a 5 nuclease real-time PCR assay. Conserv Genet 9:735–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Paxinos E, McIntosh C, Ralls K, Fleischer R (1997) A noninvasive method for distinguishing among canid species: amplification and enzyme restriction of DNA from dung. Mol Ecol 6:483–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pearce JM (2006) Minding the gap: frequency of indels in mtDNA control region sequence data and influence on population genetic analyses. Mol Ecol 15:333–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pereira F, Carneiro J, Amorim A (2008) Identification of species with DNA-based technology: current progress and challenges. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq 2:187–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pereira F, Carneiro J, Matthiesen R, van Asch B, Pinto N, Gusmao L, Amorim A (2010) Identification of species by multiplex analysis of variable-length sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 38:e203CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pun K, Albrecht C, Castella V, Fumagalli L (2009) Species identification in mammals from mixed biological samples based on mitochondrial DNA control region length polymorphism. Electrophoresis 30:1008–1014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffmann M, Macdonald DW (2004) Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals, and dogs: status survey and conservation action Plan, 62 edn, IUCNGoogle Scholar
  17. Tobe SS, Linacre AM (2008) A multiplex assay to identify 18 European mammal species from mixtures using the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Electrophoresis 29:340–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Weissenberger M, Reichert W, Mattern R (2011) A multiplex PCR assay to differentiate between dog and red fox. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5:411–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joana Gonçalves
    • 1
  • Clive A. Marks
    • 2
  • David Obendorf
    • 3
  • António Amorim
    • 1
    • 4
  • Filipe Pereira
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP)PortoPortugal
  2. 2.Nocturnal Wildlife Research Pty LtdEast MalvernAustralia
  3. 3.West HobartAustralia
  4. 4.Faculty of SciencesUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  5. 5.Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR/CIMAR)University of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations