Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 907–909 | Cite as

Development and characterization of ten polymorphic microsatellite loci for the Great Capricorn beetle (Cerambyx cerdo) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

  • L. Drag
  • J. Kosnar
  • L. Cizek
Technical Note


Ten polymorphic microsatellite loci, developed using next-generation sequencing technology, are described for the Great Capricorn beetle, Cerambyx cerdo; an endangered and internationally protected European longicorn. Based on 30 individuals from South-East Czech Republic, the number of alleles per locus ranged from 4 to 8, and the observed and expected heterozygosity was 0.36–0.79 (mean = 0.57) and 0.5–0.77 (mean = 0.63), respectively. In one locus tests indicated a deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, as well as the presence of null alleles. Future studies using markers described here may provide additional information for the efficient protection of this threatened species.


Xylophagous insect Roche 454 SSR markers Population genetics 



We would like to thank Matthew Sweney for language correction, Jaroslav Vohánka and Lucie Vondráčková (both Roche Ltd., Prague) for GS Junior Sequencer demo runs and assistance, and Michal Plátek for support. This study and its authors were supported by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (TA02021501), the Grant Agency of the University of South Bohemia (168/2013/P), the project Biodiversity of Forest Ecosystems CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0064, and the Higher Education Development Fund from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (1904/2012).


  1. Albert J, Platek M, Cizek L (2012) Vertical stratification and microhabitat selection by the Great Capricorn Beetle (Cerambyx cerdo) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in open-grown, veteran oaks. Eur J Entomol 109:553–559Google Scholar
  2. Alexander KNA (2002) The invertebrates of living and decaying timber in Britain and Ireland. Research report 467. English Nature, Peterborough, CambridgeshireGoogle Scholar
  3. Buse J, Schröder T, Assmann B (2007) Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle —a case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biol Conserv 137:372–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. IUCN (2012) IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2012.2. Accessed 27 March 2013
  5. Lindhe A, Jeppsson T, Ehnström B (2010) Longhorn beetles in Sweden—changes in distribution and abundance over the last two hundred years. (Långhorningar i Sverige—förändringar av utbredning och frekvens under de senaste tvåhundra åren.) Entomologisk Tidskrift, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  6. Nunome T, Negoro S, Miyatake K, Yamaguchi H, Fukuoka H (2006) A protocol for the construction of microsatellite enriched genomic library. Plant Mol Biol Rep 24:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sama G (2002) Atlas of Cerambycidae of Europe and the Mediterranean Area. Vol. 1: Northern, Western, Central and Eastern Europe, British Isles and Continental Europe from France (excl. Corsica) to Scandinavia and the Urals. Kabourek, ZlínGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchison WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of SciencesUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Entomology, Biology CentreCzech Academy of SciencesCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations