Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 199–201 | Cite as

Microsatellite markers for vulnerable Australian aridzone Acacias

  • David G. Roberts
  • Cairo N. Forrest
  • Andrew J. Denham
  • David J. Ayre
Technical Note
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Several Australian arid zone Acacia species are under threat because of decades of fruiting and recruitment failure that may reflect the loss of genetic diversity within small and isolated populations. We developed primers for eight microsatellite loci for Acacia carneorum and Acacia loderi. We detected high levels of clonality in each of two stands of A. carneorum (1 and 2 genets). In contrast, one stand of A. loderi was wholly clonal (1 genet), while in a second there were 30 unique genotypes. These loci allow assessment of the genetic diversity and connectedness of populations, the relative contribution of asexual reproduction to genotypic diversity and population structure, and use of paternity analysis to identify sires of seed within populations known to have set seed in past decades. This type of information may provide a basis for a recovery plan based on ‘genetic rescue’.

Keywords

Perennial plant Recruitment failure Genetic diversity Sexual and asexual reproduction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Supplementary material

12686_2012_9767_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 13.7 kb)

References

  1. Arnaud-Haond S, Belkhir K (2007) GENCLONE: a computer program to analyse genotypic data, test for clonality and describe spatial clonal organization. Mol Ecol Notes 7:15–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnaud-Haond S, Duarte CM, Alberto F, Serrao EA (2007) Standardizing methods to address clonality in population studies. Mol Ecol 16:5115–5139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auld TD (1993) The impact of grazing on regeneration of the shrub Acacia carnei in arid Australia. Biol Conserv 65:165–176Google Scholar
  4. Auld TD (1995) Soil seedbank patterns of four trees and shrubs from arid Australia. J Arid Environ 29:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auld TD, Denham AJ (2001) Flora conservation issues at Kinchega National Park, western NSW. Cunninghamia 7:27–41Google Scholar
  6. Chapman AR, Maslin BR (2001) Acacia loderi. Flora of Australia, vol 11B, Mimosaceae, Acacia part 2. Australian Biological Resources Study/CSIRO Publishing, p. 107Google Scholar
  7. Crisp MD, Lange RT (1976) Age structure, distribution and survival under grazing of the arid-zone shrub Acacia burkittii. Oikos 27:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham SA (2000a) Depressed pollination in habitat fragments causes low fruit set. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:1149–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham SA (2000b) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive ecology of four plant species in mallee woodland. Conserv Biol 14:758–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denham AJ, Auld TD (2004) Survival and recruitment of seedlings and suckers of trees and shrubs of the Australian arid zone following habitat management and the outbreak of Rabbit Calicivirus Disease (RCD). Aust Ecol 29:585–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faircloth BC (2008) MSATCOMMANDER: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Mol Ecol Resour 8:92–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayden MJ, Nguyen TM, Waterman A, Chalmers KJ (2008) Multiplex-ready PCR: a new method for multiplexed SSR and SNP genotyping. BMC Genomics 9:80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maslin BR (2001) Acacia carneorum. Flora of Australia, volume 11A, Mimosaceae, Acacia part 1. Australian Biological Resources Study/CSIRO Publishing, p. 366Google Scholar
  14. Morton SR, Stafford Smith DM, Friedel MH, Griffin GF, Pickup M (1995) The stewardship of arid Australia: ecology and landscape management. J Environ Manage 43:195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. No 101. Accessed 6 Aug 2012. http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au
  16. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pickup M, Young AG (2008) Population size, self-incompatibility and genetic rescue in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Asteraceae). Heredity 100:268–274. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801070 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  19. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Woinarski JCZ, Fisher A (2003) Conservation and the maintenance of biodiversity in the rangelands. Rangel J 25:157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David G. Roberts
    • 1
  • Cairo N. Forrest
    • 1
  • Andrew J. Denham
    • 1
    • 2
  • David J. Ayre
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Conservation Biology and Environmental ManagementUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Office of Environment and HeritageNew South Wales Department of Premier and CabinetHurstvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations