Advertisement

Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 759–761 | Cite as

Isolation and characterization of eleven novel polymorphic microsatellite loci in the spiny softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera)

  • Christina M. DavyEmail author
  • Ida M. Conflitti
  • Daniel M. L. Storisteanu
  • Robert W. Murphy
Technical Note

Abstract

We isolate and characterize 11 microsatellite loci for the spiny softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera) from a partial genomic library obtained using 454 sequencing technology. Genotypes of 15 individuals from southern Ontario and 30 individuals of unknown origin contain 6–20 alleles per locus and the level of heterozygosity ranges from 0.229 to 0.800. These loci will be useful for population genetics studies and enforcement activities such as assignment of illegally traded individuals to their population of origin.

Keywords

Microsatellite Next-generation sequencing Turtle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was made possible by a Canada Collection grant from Wildlife Preservation Canada to C.D. and a National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant A3148 to R.W.M. Generous assistance from the Schad Foundation offset genotyping costs. C.D. and I.D. are funded by NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarships; D.S. was funded by an NSERC Undergraduate Summer Research Award. We thank Dr. C. Kyle, E. Kerr and M. Harnden at the NRDPFC (Trent University) for assistance with 454 sequencing. Sample collection was conducted with the permission of the Government of Ontario following Animal Use Protocol 2010–14 (Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada). We thank R. Andrews and the Lake Ontario Enforcement Unit for providing tissues from confiscated turtles.

References

  1. Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of nontemplated nucleotide addition by tag DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechnol 20:1004–1010Google Scholar
  2. COSEWIC (2002) COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the spiny softshell turtle Apalone spinifera in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa, VII, 17 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Ernst C, Lovich J (2009) Turtles of the United States and Canada, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  4. Faircloth BC (2008) Msatcommander: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Mol Ecol Resour 8:92–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group (2010) A study of progress on conservation of and trade in CITES-listed tortoises and freshwater turtles in Asia. In: CoP15, Inf. 22. Convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora. Fifteenth meeting of the conference of the parties, Doha (Qatar). 13–25 March. http://www.cites.org/common/cop/15/inf/E15i-22.pdf
  6. King TL, Julian SE (2004) Conservation of microsatellite DNA flanking sequences across 13 Emydid genera assayed with novel bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) loci. Conserv Genet 5:719–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  9. Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 365–386. Source code available at http://fokker.wi.mit.edu/primer3/
  11. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning—a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  12. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith LM, Burgoyne LA (2004) Collecting, archiving and processing DNA from wildlife samples using FTA® databasing paper. BMC Ecol 4:4: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/4 Google Scholar
  14. van Dijk PP (2011) Apalone spinifera. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 19 December 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina M. Davy
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ida M. Conflitti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel M. L. Storisteanu
    • 3
  • Robert W. Murphy
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Natural HistoryRoyal Ontario MuseumTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke’s HospitalUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations