Advertisement

Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 695–698 | Cite as

Characterization of 10 novel microsatellite loci and cross-amplification of two loci in the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina)

  • Christina M. DavyEmail author
  • Ashley E. Leifso
  • Ida M. Conflitti
  • Robert W. Murphy
Technical Note

Abstract

We use 454 (“shotgun”) sequencing to obtain a partial genomic library for the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). We characterize ten microsatellite loci from these sequences and test cross-amplification of loci originally developed for the alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii). We genotype 127 individuals from Ontario at twelve loci. The number of alleles per locus ranges from 1 to 14; heterozygosity ranges from 0.157 to 0.850. These loci will be used to study population genetic structure in this long-lived reptile and may cross-amplify in two closely related species.

Keywords

Microsatellite Chelydra serpentina Macrochelys temminckii 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a Canada Collection grant from Wildlife Preservation Canada (WPC) to C.D. and a National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant (A3148) to R.W.M. Genotyping costs were offset by the generous assistance of the Schad Foundation. C.D. and I.D. are funded by Canada Graduate Scholarships from NSERC; A.L. is funded by WPC through a Science Horizons grant from Environment Canada. We thank Dr. C. Kyle, E. Kerr and M. Harnden at the NRDPFC, Trent University, for assistance with 454 sequencing. Sample collection was conducted with the permission of the Government of Ontario and Ontario Parks and followed Animal Use Protocol 2010-14 (Royal Ontario Museum).

References

  1. Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of nontemplated nucleotide addition by tag DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. BioTech 20:1004–1010Google Scholar
  2. Ernst C, Lovich J (2009) Turtles of the United States and Canada, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  3. Faircloth BC (2008) msatcommander: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Mol Ecol Resour 8:92–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hackler JC, van den Bussche RAV, Leslie DM (2006) Characterization of microsatellite DNA markers for the alligator snapping turtle, Macrochelys temminckii. Mol Ecol Notes 7:474–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. King TL, Julian SE (2004) Conservation of microsatellite DNA flanking sequences across 13 Emydid genera assayed with novel bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) loci. Conserv Genet 5:719–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Phillips CA, Dimmick WW, Carr JL (1996) Conservation genetics of the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). Conserv Biol 10:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  9. Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 365–386. Available at http://fokker.wi.mit.edu/primer3/
  11. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning—a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith LM, Burgoyne LA (2004) Collecting, archiving and processing DNA from wildlife samples using FTA® databasing paper. BMC Ecol 4:4. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/4/4
  14. van Dijk PP (2011) Chelydra serpentina. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2011.2. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 12 December 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina M. Davy
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ashley E. Leifso
    • 3
  • Ida M. Conflitti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert W. Murphy
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Natural HistoryRoyal Ontario MuseumTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Wildlife Preservation CanadaGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations