Advertisement

Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 439–442 | Cite as

Assessing genetic diversity, fine-scale population structure, and demographics in the narrow endemic chittenango ovate amber snail (Novisuccinea chittenangoensis)

  • T. L. King
  • M. S. Eackles
  • A. R. Breisch
  • R. Niver
Technical Note

Abstract

We document isolation and characterization of 12 tetra-nucleotide microsatellite DNA markers in the hermaphroditic Chittenango ovate amber snail ( Novisuccinea chittenangoensis ) endemic to Chittenango Falls in central New York State, USA. The markers displayed a moderate level of allelic diversity (averaging 5.2 alleles/locus) and heterozygosity (averaging 58.6%) in the single extant population. Allelic diversity was sufficient to produce unique multilocus genotypes; no indication of selfing was observed among this cosexual species. Minimal deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and no linkage disequilibrium were observed when three collections, representing different rock ledge heights, were analyzed separately. A series of analyses identified weak population differentiation among the ledge collections. Demographic analyses suggested each collection has achieved mutation-drift equilibrium. The microsatellite markers developed for N. chittenangoensis yielded sufficient genetic diversity to: (i) distinguish all individuals and assess the level of selfing; (ii) elucidate fine-scale population structuring; and (iii) provide unique demographic perspectives for recovery efforts.

Keywords

Chittenango ovate amber snail (Novisuccinea chittenangoensisMicrosatellite DNA Narrow endemic Differentiation Captive breeding management Demographics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the USGS-Leetown Science Center and the USGS and US Fish and Wildlife Service’s Quick Response Program. The following individuals assisted in tissue collection for marker development and subsequent genetic surveys: Jake Bengeyfield, Joseph Brown, Stephen Campbell, Jeremy Coleman, Brian Stiwell, and Kris Whiteleather.

References

  1. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Davies N, Villablanca FX, Roderick GK (1999) Determining the source of individuals: Multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 14:17–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jarne P, Charlesworth D (1993) The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24:441–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. King TL, Eackles MS ‘Snail trails’ as a source of noninvasive tissue collection for DNA analysis. Conserv Genet Resour (in preparation)Google Scholar
  5. King TL, Switzer JF, Morrison CL, Eackles MS, Young CC, Lubinski BA, Cryan P (2006) Comprehensive genetic analyses reveal evolutionary distinction of a mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) proposed for delisting from the US endangered species act. Mol Ecol 15:4331–4359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Luikart G, Sherwin WB, Steele BM, Allendorf FW (1998) Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Mol Ecol 7:963–974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Peacock MM, Kirchoff VS, Merideth SJ (2002) Identification and characterization of nine polymorphic microsatellite loci in the North American pika, Ochotona princeps. Mol Ecol Notes 2:360–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Peel D, Ovenden JR, Peel SL (2004) NEESTIMATOR: software for estimating effective population size, version 1.3. Queensland Government, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries. Available at http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/fishweb/13887.html
  10. Piry S, Luikart G, Cornuet J-M (1999) BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J Hered 90:502–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  12. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Taberlet P, Luikart G (1999) Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biol J Linn Soc 68:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. US Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) Chittenango ovate amber snail (Novisuccinea chittenangoensis) recovery plan, 2nd Revision. Technical/Agency Draft, Hadley, p 55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. L. King
    • 1
  • M. S. Eackles
    • 1
  • A. R. Breisch
    • 2
  • R. Niver
    • 3
  1. 1.US Geological Survey (USGS), Leetown Science CenterAquatic Ecology BranchKearneysvilleUSA
  2. 2.New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAlbanyUSA
  3. 3.US Fish and Wildlife ServiceCortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations