Guidelines for collecting and maintaining archives for genetic monitoring
- 388 Downloads
Rapid advances in molecular genetic techniques and the statistical analysis of genetic data have revolutionized the way that populations of animals, plants and microorganisms can be monitored. Genetic monitoring is the practice of using molecular genetic markers to track changes in the abundance, diversity or distribution of populations, species or ecosystems over time, and to follow adaptive and non-adaptive genetic responses to changing external conditions. In recent years, genetic monitoring has become a valuable tool in conservation management of biological diversity and ecological analysis, helping to illuminate and define cryptic and poorly understood species and populations. Many of the detected biodiversity declines, changes in distribution and hybridization events have helped to drive changes in policy and management. Because a time series of samples is necessary to detect trends of change in genetic diversity and species composition, archiving is a critical component of genetic monitoring. Here we discuss the collection, development, maintenance, and use of archives for genetic monitoring. This includes an overview of the genetic markers that facilitate effective monitoring, describes how tissue and DNA can be stored, and provides guidelines for proper practice.
KeywordsConservation Museum DNA Biodiversity Molecular markers Biological collections
This work was conducted as part of the Genetic Monitoring (GeM) Working Group jointly supported by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NSF #EF-0423641) and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a center funded by NSF (NSF #EF-0553768), the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the State of California. L.L. also acknowledges the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) under grant agreement No 217246 made with BONUS, the joint Baltic Sea research and development programme. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
- Hughes S (2005) Whole genome amplification. Methods express series. Scion Publishing Limited, OxfordshireGoogle Scholar
- MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey LL, Hines JE (2006) Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Elsevier, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Morgera E, Tsioumani E (2011) Yesterday, today and tomorrow: looking afresh at the Convention on Biological Diversity. University of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper Series No 2011/21Google Scholar
- Murphy MA, Waits LP, Kendall KC (2000) Quantitative evaluation of fecal drying methods for brown bear DNA analysis. Wildl Soc Bull 28(4):951–957Google Scholar
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2011) Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological Diversity: text and annex. Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Smith LM, Burgoyne LA (2004) Collecting, archiving and processing DNA from wildlife samples using FTA® databasing paper. BMC Ecol 4(4):1–11Google Scholar
- Stetz JB, Kendall KC, Vojta CD et al Genetic monitoring for managers: a new online resource. J Fish Wildl Manag (in press)Google Scholar