Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 113–116 | Cite as

Isolation and characterisation of novel microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers for the Eastern Water Dragon (Physignathus lesueurii)

  • C. H. FrèreEmail author
  • P. J. Prentis
  • T. Ezaz
  • A. Georges
Technical Note


Habitat fragmentation as a result of urbanisation is a growing problem for native lizard species. The Eastern Water Dragon (Physignathus lesueurii) is a social arboreal agamid lizard, native to Australia. This species represents an ideal model species to investigate the effect of urbanisation because of their prominent abundance in the urban landscape. Here we describe the isolation and characterisation of a novel set of 74 di-, tri-, and tetra-microsatellites from which 18 were selected and optimised into two multiplexes. The 18 microsatellites generated a total 148 alleles across the two populations. The number of alleles per locus varied from 2 to 18 alleles and measures of Ho and He varied from 0.395 to 0.877 and from 0.441 to 0.880, respectively. We also present primers for four novel mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers. The combined length of the four mtDNA marker pairs was 2,528 bp which included 15 nucleotides changes. In comparison to threatened species, which are generally characterised by small population sizes, the Eastern Water Dragon represents an ideal model species to investigate the effect of urbanisation on their behavioural ecology and connectivity patterns among populations.


Paternity Agamid lizards Agamidae Gene flow Kinship 454 Pryosequencing 



The research was carried out under permit no. WISP08423810 issued by Environment Protection Agency. Ethics approval was given from The University of Queensland (no. GPA/378/10). This work is partially supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Grants (DP110104377) awarded to A.G and T.E.

Supplementary material

12686_2011_9487_MOESM1_ESM.doc (223 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 223 kb)


  1. Austin JJ, Rose RJ, Melville J (2006) Polymorphic microsatellite markers in the painted dragon lizard, Ctenophorus pictus. Mol Ecol Notes 6:194–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cogger HG (2000) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia, 6th edn. Ralph Curtis Books, Sanibel Island, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  3. Faircloth BC (2007) Msatcommander: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Mol Ecol Resour 8:92–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frère CH, Mann J, Krützen M et al (2011) Nature and nurture: a step towards investigating their interactions in the wild. Commun Integr Biol 4, open accessGoogle Scholar
  5. Greer AE (1999) The biology and evolution of Australian Lizards. Surrey Beatty and sons, Chipping Norton, NSWGoogle Scholar
  6. Noël S, Lapointe F-J (2010) Urban conservation genetics: study of a terrestrial salamander in the city. Biol Conserv 143:2823–2831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pryke SR, Rollins LA, Griffith SC (2010) Females use multiple mating and genetically loaded sperm competition to target compatible genes. Science 329:964–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rousset F (2008) genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schwartz TS, Warner DA, Beheregaray LB, Olsson M (2007) Microsatellite loci for Australian agamid lizards. Mol Ecol Notes 7:528–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sexton GJ, Frere CH, Dieters MJ, Godwin ID, Prentis PJ (2010) Development and characterisation of microsatellire loci for Khaya senegakensis (Meliaceae). Am J Bot 97:e111–e113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Strimmer K (2008) A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation. BMC Bioinformatics 9:303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thompson MB (1993) Estimate of the population structure of the Eastern Water Dragon, Physignathus lesueurii (Reptilia: Agamidae), along riverside habitat. Wild Res 20:613–619Google Scholar
  14. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. H. Frère
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. J. Prentis
    • 2
  • T. Ezaz
    • 3
  • A. Georges
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Biogeosciences DisciplineQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for Applied EcologyUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations