Conservation Genetics Resources

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 533–536 | Cite as

Development and characterization of nine microsatellite loci for the endangered Kidneyshell, Ptychobranchus fasciolaris, and cross-amplification in closely-related lampsilines (Bivalvia: Unionoida)

  • Heather S. Galbraith
  • Caleigh M. Smith
  • Kristyne M. Wozney
  • David T. Zanatta
  • Chris C. Wilson
Technical Note

Abstract

Nine polymorphic microsatellite loci were isolated and characterized for the unionid Ptychobranchus fasciolaris. Screening of individuals from two Ontario rivers detected 4–15 alleles per locus and within-population heterozygosities from 0.280 to 0.800. Cross-amplification tests in six other lampsiline species largely yielded polymorphic data, suggesting that these loci should prove useful in population assessments for other species as well.

Keywords

Unionid Kidneyshell mussel Ontario Microsatellite Population genetics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the ESRF of World Wildlife Fund Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Friedrich Fischer, Ryan Hill, and Kirsty Hill assisted with field sampling. Missouri State University, University of Alabama Museum and Auburn University Museum provided tissue samples.

References

  1. Berg DJ, Haag WR, Guttman SI, Sickel JB (1995) Mantle biopsy: a technique for nondestructive tissue-sampling of freshwater mussels. J N Am Benthol Soc 14:577–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogan AE, Roe KJ (2008) Freshwater bivalve (Unioniformes) diversity, systematics, and evolution: status and future directions. J N Am Benthol Soc 27:349–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eackles MS, King TL (2002) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Lampsilis abrupta (Bivalvia: Unionidae) and cross-species amplification within the genus. Mol Ecol Notes 2:559–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glenn TC, Schable NA (2005) Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. Method Enzymol 395:202–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoftyzer E, Ackerman JD, Morris TJ, Mackie GL (2008) Genetic and environmental implications of reintroducing laboratory-raised unionid mussels to the wild. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:1217–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones JW, Culver M, David V, Struthers J, Johnson NA, Neves RJ, O’Brien SJ, Hallerman EM (2004) Development and characterization of microsatellite loci in the endangered oyster mussel Epioblasma capsaeformis (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Mol Ecol Notes 4:649–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lydeard C, Cowie RH, Ponder WF, Bogan AE, Bouchet P, Clark SA, Cummings KW, Frest TJ, Gargominy O, Herbert DG, Hershler R, Perez KE, Roth B, Seddon M, Strong EE, Thompson FG (2004) The global decline of nonmarine mollusks. Bioscience 54:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. NatureServe (2009) NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life. www.natureserve.org/explorer. Accessed Aug 2009
  9. Park SDE (2001) Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection. Ph.D. dissertation, University of DublinGoogle Scholar
  10. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  11. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments: a poor man’s approach to genotyping for research and high-throughput diagnostics. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zanatta DT, Murphy RW (2006) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for the endangered northern riffleshell mussel Epioblasma torulosa rangiana (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Mol Ecol Notes 6:850–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather S. Galbraith
    • 1
    • 5
  • Caleigh M. Smith
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kristyne M. Wozney
    • 2
    • 3
  • David T. Zanatta
    • 4
  • Chris C. Wilson
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.Natural Resources DNA Profiling and Forensics CentreTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  3. 3.Aquatic Research and Development Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural ResourcesTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  4. 4.Biology DepartmentCentral Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA
  5. 5.US Geological Survey, Northern Appalachian Research LaboratoryWellsboroUSA

Personalised recommendations