Isolation of 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci for slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus)

  • Lorissa M. Fujishin
  • F. Keith Barker
  • David D. Huff
  • Loren M. Miller
Technical Note


Our research on slimy sculpins (Cottus cognatus), a benthic, freshwater fish, requires highly polymorphic genetic markers, and microsatellite loci developed for other Cottus species were insufficient for our needs. We therefore developed 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci from C. cognatus libraries enriched for tri- and tetranucleotide repeats. These loci had 2–22 alleles and observed heterozygosities ranging from 0.36 to 0.86 in a sample of 47 individuals from one population. There was no evidence of linkage disequilibrium; however, one locus had a putative null allele. Twelve loci also worked for mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi) but only eight were polymorphic in a sample of seven individuals.


Microsatellite Cottus Slimy sculpin Enrichment 


  1. Adams SB, Schmetterling DA (2007) Freshwater sculpins: phylogenetics to ecology. Trans Am Fish Soc 136:1736–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boutin-Ganache I, Raposo M, Raymond M, Deschepper CF (2001) M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. BioTechniques 31:25–28Google Scholar
  3. Englbrecht CC, Largiader CR, Hanfling B, Tautz D (1999) Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the European bullhead Cottus gobio L. (Osteichthyes) and their applicability to related taxa. Mol Ecol 8:1957–1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Englbrecht CC, Freyhof J, Nolte A, Rassmann K, Schliewen U, Tautz D (2000) Phylogeography of the bullhead Cottus gobio (pisces: Teleostei: Cottidae) suggests a pre-Pleistocene origin of the major central European populations. Mol Ecol 9:709–722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiumera AC, Porter BA, Grossman GD, Avise JC (2002) Intensive genetic assessment of the mating system and reproductive success in a semi-closed population of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi. Mol Ecol 11:2367–2377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Glenn TC, Schable NA (2005) Isolation microsatellite DNA loci. Methods Enzymol 395:202–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalinowski ST (2006) HW-QUICKCHECK: an easy-to-use computer program for checking genotypes for agreement with Hardy–Weinberg expectations. Mol Ecol Notes 6:974–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Meyer KA, Schill DJ, Campbell MR, Kozfkay CC (2008) Distribution, abundance, and genetic population structure of Wood River sculpin, Cottus leiopomus. West N Am Nat 68:508–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nolte AW, Stemshorn KC, Tautz D (2005) Direct cloning of microsatellite loci from Cottus gobio through a simplified enrichment procedure. Mol Ecol Notes 5:628–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oosterhout CV, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-Checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
  12. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misnener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  13. Sweigart A (2009) Sculpin hybrid zones: natural laboratories for the early stages of speciation. Mol Ecol 18:2547–2548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorissa M. Fujishin
    • 1
  • F. Keith Barker
    • 2
  • David D. Huff
    • 1
  • Loren M. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior and Bell Museum of Natural HistoryUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations