Abstract
Quality of life (QoL) in medicine and in oncology is an accepted parameter for the evaluation of the benefit of treatments. Scientific methods exist to assess QoL measures in clinical trials. However, many components of the person that are properly humane and determine the patient’s attitude towards the disease are not measured by current criteria. Based on clinical experience, the author considers that a shift in knowledge and in doctors’ attitudes is required to also include non-measurable parameters in the doctor-patient relationship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lipscomb J, Reeve BB, Clauser SB et al (2007) Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: taking stock, moving forward. J Clin Oncol; 25:5133–5140
Ganz PA (2002) What outcomes matter to patients: a physician-researcher point of view. Medical Care 40:11–19
Ganz PA (2008) Quality of life and quality of care: moving the patient to the center of medical care. J Med Person 6:51–44
Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH et al (2007) Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value in Health 10(s2):S125–S137
Garcia SF, Cella D, Clauser SB et al (2007) Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. J Clin Oncol 25:5106–5112
Bonadonna G (2008) Quality of life from the point of view of the patient-physician. J Med Person 6:65–66
Cesana GC (2008) Quality of life: between measurements and sense of life. J Med Person 6:95–98
Melazzini M (2008) From the other side. J Med Person 6:67–68
Stiefel F, Krenz S, Zdrojewski C et al (2008) Meaning in life assessed with the “Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation” (SMiLE): a comparison between a cancer patient and student sample. Support Care Cancer 16:1151–1155
Stiefel F, Real O, Guex P (1998) An introduction to psychooncology with a special emphasis in its historical and cultural context. In: Portenoy RK, Bruera E (eds) Topics of palliative care. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 175–196
Balducci L (2006) The prominence of the person in clinical trials. J Med Person 4:112–116
Ellis C (2008) Beyond measure: the role of stories, conversations, and personal narratives in quality of life research. J Med Person 6:104–112
Post SG, Puchalski C, Larson DB (2000) Physician and patient spirituality: professional boundaries, competency, and ethics. Ann Intern Med 132:578–583
Chochinov HM (2004) Dignity and the eye of the beholder. J Clin Oncol 22:1336–40
Chochinov HM, Hack T, Hassard T et al (2005) Dignity therapy: a novel psychotherapeutic intervention for patients nearing death. J Clin Oncol 23:5520–5525
Chochinov HM, Krisjanson LJ, Hack TF et al (2006). Dignity in the terminally ill: revisited. J Palliative Med 6 666–672
Puchalski C, Ferrell B, Virani R et al (2009) Improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: the report of the Consensus Conference. J Palliative Med 12: 885–904
Puchalski C (2008) Honoring the sacred in medicine: spirituality as an essential element of patient-centered care. J Med Person 6:113–117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bregni, M. Quality of life and meaning of life: measuring the unmeasurable. J Med Pers 8, 60–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-010-0056-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-010-0056-4