, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 112–124 | Cite as

Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction in Alkaline Medium at Graphene-Supported Silver-Iron Carbon Nitride Sites Generated During Thermal Decomposition of Silver Hexacyanoferrate

  • Beata DembinskaEmail author
  • Kamila Brzozowska
  • Adam Szwed
  • Krzysztof Miecznikowski
  • Enrico Negro
  • Vito Di Noto
  • Pawel J. KuleszaEmail author
Open Access
Original Research


Silver-iron carbon nitride, which has been prepared by pyrolysis (under inert atmosphere) of silver hexacyanoferrate(II) deposited on graphene nanoplatelets, is considered here as electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction in alkaline medium (0.1 M potassium hydroxide electrolyte) in comparison to simple silver nanoparticles and iron carbon nitride (prepared separately in a similar manner on graphene nanoplatelets). The performance of catalytic materials has been examined using such electrochemical diagnostic techniques as cyclic voltammetry and rotating ring-disk electrode voltammetry. Upon application of the graphene nanoplatelet-supported mixed silver-iron carbon nitride catalyst, the reduction of oxygen proceeds at more positive potentials, as well as the amounts of hydrogen peroxide (generated during reduction of oxygen at potentials more positive than 0.3 V) are lower relative to those determined at pristine silver nanoparticles and iron carbon nitride (supported on graphene nanoplatelets), when they have been examined separately. The enhancement effect shall be attributed to high activity of silver toward the reduction/decomposition of H2O2 in basic medium. Additionally, it has been observed that the systems based on carbon nitrides show considerable stability due to strong fixation of metal complexes to CN shells.

Graphical Abstract


Graphene nanoplatelets Carbon nitride electrocatalyst Silver Iron Oxygen reduction reaction Hydrogen peroxide intermediate Alkaline fuel cell 


Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs) are promising environmentally friendly electrochemical devices for energy conversion and are still dominating research on low-temperature fuel cells, but, in recent years, substantial progress in fabrication and utilization of anion exchange membranes has driven growing interest in Alkaline Fuel Cells (AFCs) [1, 2]. Relative to acidic electrolytes, such general features as faster dynamics of the oxygen reduction reaction and larger availability of catalytic systems in alkaline media [3, 4] justify substitution of platinum and platinum group metals with more abundant and less expensive materials like silver [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9], transition metals (especially Fe, Co), particularly when coordinated with nitrogen [10, 11, 12, 13], transition metal oxides [14, 15], or even carbon nanostructures doped with heteroatoms (N, S, P, B) [16, 17, 18, 19].

Among the most widely studied oxygen reduction catalysts in alkaline media are the carbon-supported nitrogen-coordinated iron systems (abbreviated as FeNC) obtained via high-temperature pyrolysis of simple precursors. Structurally, the active sites are believed to resemble the centers existing in such macromolecular complexes as porphyrins or phthalocyanines. An interesting recent approach describes the carbon nitride-based electrocatalysts prepared through thermal decomposition of hexacyanometalates in which the carbon-based matrix embeds nitrogen atoms capable of coordination of metallic species [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. Among advantages coming from the use of hexacyanometalates as starting compounds is the possibility of fabrication of materials of controlled stoichiometry with mixed metallic species (e.g., Fe, Co, Ni, Sn, Mn, Cu, Ag).

Due to appreciable electrocatalytic activity and reasonable stability during both oxygen and hydrogen peroxide reduction reactions [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 29, 30], silver can be considered as promising alternative to platinum for studies in alkaline media. The mechanism of oxygen reduction on Ag usually is reported to proceed predominantly to water. When it comes to structural dependence of the oxygen reduction kinetics, it tends to increase according to the following order of planes: (100) < (111) < (110) [31]. It is also noteworthy that fairly active and stable materials have been obtained by combining silver with manganese oxides [32, 33], cobalt oxides [34], molybdenum oxides [35], and other transition metals (Co, Cu, Ni, Sn, Fe) [36, 37, 38, 39, 40].

Among important issues concerning preparation of the cathode materials for operation in low-temperature alkaline fuel cells is the need of utilization of carbon supports of high electrochemically accessible surface area and suitable porosity for proper mass transport. Special attention has been paid to high graphitization degree which determines electron conductivity and stability of the whole electrocatalytic system. Relative to the systems based on conventional carbon blacks [41, 42], various graphene-related materials with their unique properties have also been considered with an ultimate goal of increasing effectiveness and stability of catalysts [43, 44]. Nevertheless, the absence of surface functional groups and defects complicates utilization of pristine graphene as matrix for immobilization of the homogenously distributed largely dispersed active centers. Consequently, more porous and defected graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) have been more broadly studied as supports (or their precursors) capable of anchoring finely dispersed catalytic nanoparticles. However, stability of such materials and their electronic conductivity has often been reported as insufficient [42, 45]. On the other hand, it has recently been demonstrated that durability can be improved through application of the polyelectrolyte-modified graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) as supports for Pt nanoparticles. In this respect, the intrinsic high graphitization degree of GNP and the enhanced interactions between Pt and carbon (GNP) have been described as advantageous in Pt/GNP [46]. Finally, irrespective of the choice of graphene-type material, the problem of gas permeability and water management (originating from so-called stacking effect) leads to lower intrinsic performance of cathodes during oxygen reduction reaction in relation to those based on other carbon nanostructures. In fact, graphene and its derivatives can be used as fairly effective additives to gas-barrier systems [47]. The latter problem can be addressed by designing three-dimensional morphologies of composite assemblies in which additives of other carbonaceous materials act as spacers between the graphene-type sheets [42, 45, 48, 49, 50]. Durability of such hybrid systems seems to be significantly improved.

Nitrogenated derivatives of graphene-related materials have recently been also considered as supports or modifiers for silver-based electrocatalysts active toward oxygen reduction in alkaline environment [51, 52, 53, 54]. In the present work, we address fabrication and physicochemical identity of the graphene-nanoplatelet-supported silver-iron carbon nitride catalytic systems derived from thermal decomposition of silver(I) hexacyanoferrate(II) deposited onto polycarboxylate-functionalized GNP. The resulting material is elucidated for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in 0.1 M KOH, and the system’s activity is compared to the performance of pristine silver nanoparticles and iron carbon nitride (prepared separately in a similar manner on GNP and investigated under analogous conditions). Regarding strong fixation of metal centers coordinated within CN shells, the stability issue of examined systems is also discussed.


All chemicals were commercial materials of the highest available purity. HClO4, ethanol, 2-propanol, KOH, and K4[Fe(CN)6]·3H2O were from POCh (Poland). The solution of 5% Nafion-1100, as well as AgNO3, Fe2(SO4)3·6H2O, and the polycarboxylate-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) were from Sigma-Aldrich. Vulcan XC-72R (C) was from Cabot (USA); graphene oxide sheets (GO) of 300–700 nm sizes (thickness, 1.1 ± 0.2 nm) were from Megantech; Pt(20%)/C was from E-Tek; 30% hydrogen peroxide was from Chempur (Poland); and the nitrogen, oxygen, and argon gases (purity 99.999%) were from Air Products (Poland). As a rule, the solutions were prepared from doubly distilled and subsequently deionized (Millipore Milli-Q) water.

Preparation of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) modified with silver hexacyanoferrate (AgI4[FeII(CN)6]), abbreviated as Ag4HCF/GNP, was achieved by precipitation method. In the actual procedure, the mixture of 15.1 cm3 of water, 2 cm3 of ethanol, and 50 mg of GNP was first placed for 1 h in an ultrasonic bath to obtain good dispersion. Then, 10.3 cm3 of 10 mmol dm−3 AgNO3 aqueous solution was added, and the slurry was left in the bath for about 15 min followed by mixing under magnetic stirring. After 10 min of mixing, 2.6 cm3 of 10 mmol dm−3 K4[Fe(CN)6] water solution was added, and the dispersion was left for ca. 5 h to assure full precipitation of the product (white sediment in a blank test). Total volume of mixture was 30 cm3. In the next step, the solution was centrifuged and removed. The sediment was washed three times with water and dried on a hot plate at about 60 °C. When taking into account the amounts of GNP and precursors used for synthesis, and assuming that the main precipitate is AgI4[FeII(CN)6], the overall content of Ag and Fe in the sample was on the level of 20% relative to GNP.

Preparation of GNPs modified with Prussian Blue (FeIII4[FeII(CN)6]), Fe4HCF3/GNP, was pursued in an analogous manner as for Ag4HCF/GNP, except that, in order to obtain the “insoluble” (largely K+-free) form of Prussian Blue postulated previously, Fe3+ was used in excessive (super stoichiometric amounts). Consequently, during the synthesis, 7.4 cm3 of 10 mmol dm−3 solution of Fe2(SO4)3 and 9.6 cm3 of 10 mmol dm−3 K4[Fe(CN)6] were added. The amount of water and ethanol solutions was adjusted to the level of 30 cm3 of the total volume. The resulting material (dark blue sediment in a blank test) was washed and dried. The content of Fe in the sample was on the level of 20% by weight relative to GNP.

Preparation of GNPs modified with silver nitrate (AgINO3), AgNO3/GNP, was accomplished by a simple impregnation method; namely, to 18.4 cm3 of the homogenized dispersion of GNP in water-ethanolic solution, 11.6 cm3 of 10 mmol dm3 AgNO3 was added. The slurry was subjected to magnetic stirring for several hours; later, the solvent was evaporated under ambient conditions (22 °C). The content of Ag in the sample was ca. 20% by weight relative to GNP.

All prepared samples were subjected to grinding in agate mortar and, subsequently, annealed in a silica tube under Ar atmosphere at 800 °C for 2 h (with the heating up rate of an oven, 4 °C min−1). The heat-treated samples are labeled AgFeCNx/GNP800, FeCNx/GNP800, and Ag/GNP800. For comparison, pristine GNP was also washed with water and annealed under the same conditions as described previously (it is labeled GNP800). The additional sample of AgFeCNx/GO800 was prepared.

The electrochemical measurements were performed with CH Instruments (Austin, TX, USA) Model 750D and 920D workstations. All electrochemical experiments were conducted at room temperature, 22 ± 2 °C. The mercury-mercury sulfate electrode (Hg/Hg2SO4) (in acid medium) and the saturated calomel electrode (SCE) (in alkaline medium) were used as reference electrodes. In the latter case, care was exercised to use a high-quality bridge to avoid contamination of the electrolyte with chlorides. As a rule, all potentials were recalculated by usual means and expressed against the standard RHE. Glassy carbon rod served as counter electrodes. The rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) experiments were performed using a variable speed rotator (Pine Instruments, USA). The electrode assembly utilized a glassy carbon disk (with geometric area of 0.247 cm2) and Pt ring. The collection efficiency (N) of the RRDE assembly was equal to 0.388, as determined from the ratio of ring and disk currents (at 1600 rpm) using the argon-saturated 0.005 mol dm−3 K3[Fe(CN)6] in 0.1 mol dm−3 K2SO4 solution. Before electrode layer preparation, working electrodes were polished with aqueous alumina slurries (grain size, 5–0.05 μm) on a Buehler polishing cloth. In the course of RRDE experiments, in order to oxidize H2O2 (generated at the disk) under convection-diffusional control, the potential of the ring electrode was kept at 1.23 V vs. RHE.

Electrode layers were deposited on a glassy carbon disk by dropping appropriate volumes of homogenized inks containing 5 mg of nanostructured catalyst admixed with Vulcan® XC-72R (labeled as C) in the mass ratio of 1 to 1, 500 μl of solvent (2-propanol) and 6 μl of binder (5% solution of Nafion®). They were subsequently dried at room temperature, 22 ± 2 °C. The final content of Nafion® was 5% in relation to the weight of catalyst and Vulcan. Catalyst loadings were 600 μg cm−2. In comparative measurements with the Pt(20%)/C standard, the Pt loading was 15 μg cm−2. The electrodes covered with the catalytic layers were typically washed out with the stream of water (in order to clean the surface from impurities) and, later, subjected to voltammetric potential cycling at the scan rate of 100 mV s−1 in the nitrogen-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH in the potential range from 0.05 to 1.05 V to activate the layers and receive reproducible responses. To assure reproducibility of the electrode preparation and its performance, we have conducted electrochemical experiments at least three times. The data were reproducible within ca. 5%.

In the experiments involving the preconditioning step (labeled P), the electrode was cycled in nitrogen-saturated 0.1 M HClO4 solution in the range of 0.05–1.05 V at the scan rate of 100 mV s−1 until stable (flat) response was obtained. The electrolyte was changed twice during the experiments.

In the additional experiments conducted in 0.5 M K2SO4, which were aiming at obtaining the electrochemical characteristics of precursors, Fe4HCF3/GNP, Ag4HCF/GNP, and the GNP carrier, the respective inks were prepared without Vulcan additive and loadings of the respective electrode layers were on the level of 300 μg cm−2.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) experiments were carried out with Libra 120 EFTEM (Carl Zeiss) operating at 120 kV. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) measurements and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis were achieved using MERLIN FE-SEM (Carl Zeiss) equipped with EDX analyzer (Bruker). X-Ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were collected using Bruker D8 Discover equipped with a Cu lamp (1.54 Å) and Vantec (linear) detector.

Results and Discussion

General Physicochemical Characteristics

Figure 1 illustrates representative SEM and TEM images of bare GNP800 support and after its modification with catalytic nanostructures (typically nanoparticles). It is evident from Fig. 1a,b that the GNP support indeed exists in the form of platelets with the sizes ranging from few hundred nanometers up to few micrometers. In the case of Ag/GNP800 (Fig. 1c,d), silver deposit forms fairly large nano-, or submicro-, particles with diameters ranging from 50 to 200–300 nm, and virtually, no smaller species could be observed in the series of images. TEM images of precursor (AgNO3) recrystallized onto GNP (for simplicity, data are not shown here) clearly show that presence of the polycarboxylate-modified GNPs enables good dispersion of crystallites having diameters from few to tens of nanometers (but usually not exceeding 100 nm). It is reasonable to expect that the aggregation occurs under high temperature (800 °C) of annealing. In contrast, the micrographs of FeCNx/GNP800 (Fig. 1e,f) and AgFeCNx/GNP800 (Fig. 1g,h) imply diversity of sizes: in addition to particles with diameters of hundreds of nanometers, there is also appreciable population of much smaller species. Therefore, it may be concluded that the application of the precursors in the form of such inorganic metal clusters as Prussian Blue and its analogs lowers (at least to a certain degree) sintering of metal nanoparticles. Another important observation concerns samples FeCNx/GNP800 (Fig. 2f) and AgFeCNx/GNP800 (Fig. 2h) where metal nanoparticles are embedded in a shell somewhat reflecting stoichiometry of the starting material. The results are in agreement with the previous reports [23, 24, 25, 26, 27] postulating the existence of metal nanoparticles within a compact carbon nitride shell (CN).
Fig. 1

SEM (WD = 6 mm, EHT = 15 kV) and TEM images of the following materials: (a,b) GNP-800, (c,d) Ag/GNP800, (e,f) FeCNx/GNP800, and (g,h) AgFeCNx/GNP800

Fig. 2

Elemental EDX mapping of the following materials: (a) FeCNx/GNP800 and (b) AgFeCNx/GNP800

The EDX analysis of the materials generally reflects ratios and amounts of precursors used for their synthesis. In the case of Fe4HCF3/GNP (before annealing), the molar ratio of Fe to N is 0.5 (which is close to the value 0.4 expected from the stoichiometry of the FeIII4[FeII(CN)6]) compound); however, after pyrolysis (sample FeCNx/GNP800), the ratio of Fe to N has substantially changed to the value closer to 10 thus implying substantial loss of nitrogen species. The data obtained for Ag4HCF/GNP (before annealing) are consistent with the molar ratio of the elements Ag:Fe:N which is 3:1:6 and for AgFeCNx/GNP800 (after annealing), the composition changes into the order, 3:1:3, again implying the loss of N. The analytical data also imply the presence of carbon, oxygen, as well as some content of potassium. The EDX mapping of FeCNx/GNP800 (Fig. 2a) shows fairly homogenous distribution of N and Fe. In the case of AgFeCNx/GNP800 (Fig. 2b), the distribution of signals originating form Fe and Ag is less homogeneous: they tend to superimpose in certain areas thus implying the mixed nature of obtained nanoparticles.

As shown in Fig. 3a, the XRD pattern of Ag/GNP800 illustrates peak characteristic of the face-centered cubic (fcc) crystal structure of Ag ((111), (200), and (220)) with the cell parameter of 4.083 Å and the average crystallite size of 51.7 nm (calculated using the Scherrer’s equation). In the XRD spectrum of FeCNx/GNP800 (Fig. 3b), the main reflections correspond to the body-centered cubic structure (bcc) of α-Fe ((110) and (200)) with the cell parameter of 2.862 Å and the average crystallite size of 32.7 nm. Some other, but much less distinct, peaks (Fig. 3b) could be ascribed to the traces of oxide forms of iron, like γ-Fe2O3 or Fe3O4. One has to be aware that, for Fe-containing materials, the fluorescence of X-rays, appearing when a Cu lamp is used, tend to increase the background noise. In the case of AgFeCNx/GNP800 (Fig. 3c), in addition to signal characteristic of Ag and α-Fe, there are also small peaks most likely originating from the traces of iron oxides. Here, the cell parameter for Ag is 4.075 Å (average crystallite size of Ag is 92.8 nm) and for Fe is 2.886 Å (average crystallite size of Fe is 104.6 nm). It should be remembered that the Scherrer’s formula constitutes an approximation, and it gives reliable results for nearly spherical particles. In all patterns, the GNP support reflections are present ((002), (111), and (004)), thus indicating partial stacking.
Fig. 3

XRD patterns of the following samples: (a) Ag/GNP800, (b) FeCNx/GNP800, and (c) AgFeCNx/GNP800

An evidence for the presence of the corresponding cyanometallate compounds (silver and iron(III) hexacyanoferrates(II)) on the surface of GNPs has been examined using cyclic voltammetry (conducted in 0.5 M K2SO4). Figure 4a shows voltammograms recorded for GC electrode covered with (a) Fe4HCF3/GNP and (b) Ag4HCF/GNP, in comparison to (c) the GNP support itself. The voltammetric response recorded for Fe4HCF3/GNP (blue line in Fig. 4a) resembles the well-known pattern characteristic of PB in which the partial oxidation to iron(III) hexacyanoferrate(III) or Prussian Yellow proceeds at about 1.2 V, and the reduction to iron(II) hexacyanoferrate(II) or Prussian White appears at about 0.4 V [55, 56]. In the case of Ag4HCF/GNP, the representative voltammogram (red line in Fig. 4a) has been recorded after the first few scans, in which some Ag+ has been replaced with potassium ions during oxidation of hexacyanoferrate(II) component to hexacyanoferrate(III) [55, 56]. The latter response resembles typical behavior of silver(I) hexacyanoferrate(III) in K+-containing electrolytes, where the reversible couple of peaks at about 0.95 V corresponds to Ag3K[FeII(CN)6]/Ag3[FeIII(CN)6] transitions [57, 58].
Fig. 4

(A) Cyclic voltammetric responses recorded for electrode films (deposited on glassy carbon disk) of (a) Fe4HCF3/GNP, (b) Ag4HCF/GNP, and (c) GNP. Electrolyte: nitrogen-saturated 0.5 mol dm−3 K2SO4. Scan rate: 50 mV s−1. (B) Voltammograms recorded for catalytic films of (a) Ag/GNP800-C, (b) FeCNx/GNP800-C, (c) AgFeCNx/GNP800-C, and (d) GNP800-C. Electrolyte: nitrogen-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH. Scan rate: 10 mV s−1

Figure 4b presents cyclic voltammetric responses of (a) Ag/GNP800-C, (b) FeCNx/GNP800-C, (c) AgFeCNx/GNP800-C, and (d) GNP800-C layers deposited on glassy carbon electrode recorded in the de-aerated 0.1 M KOH. In the investigated range of potentials, basically all catalytic materials do not show redox transitions (i.e., they are not electroactive), and they are characterized by similar capacitive-type currents. Some current increases observed for FeCNx/GNP800-C at potentials lower than 0.3 V may reflect the presence of larger amounts of iron species (when compared to other compounds studied here). This redox pair was previously attributed to transition between Fe(OH)2 and Fe(OH)3 (coming from iron core) [20].

Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Figure 5a illustrates background-subtracted (normalized) RDE responses recorded in the oxygen-saturated 0.1 M KOH (at 1600 rpm) at the disk electrode covered with different catalytic films. The results indicate that all three catalysts, Ag/GNP800-C (curve a), FeCNx/GNP800-C (curve b), and AgFeCNx/GNP800-C (curve c), are much more active than bare (annealed) GNP800-C carrier (curve d) in terms of higher catalytic currents and lower overpotentials of the oxygen reduction process. What is even more important, the onset and half-wave potentials for oxygen reduction are slightly shifted toward more positive values in the case of AgFeCNx/GNP800-C relative to both Ag/GNP800-C and FeCNx/GNP800-C, thus indicating the enhanced activity of that sample. It is also noteworthy that, while the convective-diffusion-limiting current plateaus are reached (at about 0.6 V) in the case of the Ag-containing samples (curves a and c), the response characteristic of FeCNx/GNP800-C (curve b) is somewhat distorted as the initial plateau is followed by further current increases (at potentials lower than 0.5 V). Such behavior may reflect changes in the oxygen reduction mechanism including the number of electrons involved in the process. Interpretation of the oxygen reduction RDE curves recorded at lower potentials in alkaline media may be somewhat complicated due to the competition for O2 between metallic centers and different forms of carbon (existing here as GNP, Vulcan additive, and CN shell) which also exhibit activity toward oxygen reduction [30]. Finally, it should be noted that the half-wave potential for oxygen reduction at the AgFeCNx/GNP800-C catalyst (~ 0.71 V) is still ca. 120 mV less positive than that characteristic of conventional carbon-supported platinum (~ 0.83 V) (Fig. 5a, curve e). However, comparison to conventional Pt/C (containing 3–4 nm Pt nanoparticles) is not straightforward here because our catalysts have not been optimized as yet, e.g., with respect to sizes of nanoparticles. The annealing step during preparation of our samples has involved long-term high-temperature pyrolysis (to generate CN shells), and, under such conditions, the metallic nanoparticles undergo inevitable aggregation. Perhaps, by application of rapid heating and by shortening the period of pyrolysis, fabrication of smaller particles is feasible. Further research is along this line.
Fig. 5

Normalized (background-subtracted) rotating disk (A) and ring (B) voltammograms recorded during oxygen reduction at the films of (a) Ag/GNP800-C, (b) FeCNx/GNP800-C, (c) AgFeCNx/GNP800-C, (d) GNP800-C, and (e) Pt/C (E-tek) in the oxygen-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH at the scan rate of 10 mV s−1 and the rotation rate of 1600 rpm. (C) Formation of the hydrogen peroxide-type intermediate and (D) monitoring of number of exchanged electrons during oxygen reduction under conditions of RRDE voltammetric experiments

The oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media may proceed by direct four-electron (Eq. (1)) or indirect two-electron (Eqs. (2) and (3)) pathways [59].
$$ {\mathrm{O}}_2+2{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+4{\mathrm{e}}^{-}\to 4{\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}}^{-} $$
$$ {\mathrm{O}}_2+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+2{\mathrm{e}}^{-}\to {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}}_2^{-}+{\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}}^{-} $$
$$ {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}}_2^{-}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+2{\mathrm{e}}^{-}\to 3{\mathrm{OH}}^{-} $$
Alternatively, the intermediate form (HO2) can undergo disproportionation reaction:
$$ 2{\mathrm{HO}}_2^{-}\to 2{\mathrm{O}\mathrm{H}}^{-}+{\mathrm{O}}_2 $$

It is apparent from Fig. 5b (where the amount of the HO2 intermediate formed during electroreduction of oxygen has been monitored at the platinum ring electrode) that although Ag/GNP800-C (curve a), FeCNx/GNP800-C (curve b), and AgFeCNx/GNP800-C (curve c) are less selective toward the four-electron reduction of oxygen in comparison to the standard Pt(20%)/C (curve e), they exhibit much lower currents corresponding to oxidation of the HO2 intermediate relative to the unmodified GNP800-C carrier (curve d). In the case of Ag-containing samples (curves a and c in Fig. 5b), the HO2 oxidation currents have considerably decreased at potentials higher than 0.3 V relative to the silver-free system containing only iron (curve b in Fig. 5b).

Upon consideration of both HO2 oxidation (ring) and O2 reduction disk currents (Fig. 5a,b), the relative (percentage) formation of intermediate product and the corresponding number of transferred electrons (ne) per oxygen molecule involved in the oxygen reduction were calculated using the following equations [5, 60, 61]:
$$ {\mathrm{X}}_{\mathrm{H}{\mathrm{O}}_2^{-}}=\frac{200{I}_{\mathrm{R}}/\mathrm{N}}{I_{\mathrm{D}}+{I}_{\mathrm{R}}/\mathrm{N}} $$
$$ {\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{e}}=\frac{4{I}_{\mathrm{D}}}{I_{\mathrm{D}}+{I}_{\mathrm{R}}/\mathrm{N}} $$
where IR was the ring current, ID was the disk current, and N was the collection efficiency of the RRDE assembly. Figure 5c shows the dependence of XHO2-plotted versus the potential applied to the disk electrode. It is apparent from Fig. 5c that, at potentials higher than 0.3 V (i.e., in a region characteristic of the cathode operation in a fuel cell), the fraction of produced hydrogen peroxide-type intermediate is lower (below 20%) for AgFeCNx/GNP800-C (curve c) relative to both Ag/GNP800-C (up to 25%, curve a) and FeCNx/GNP800-C (up to 47%, curve b). Furthermore, as expected, at unmodified GNP800-C carrier (Fig. 5c, curve d), relative amount of hydrogen peroxide-type intermediate is on the level of 90% whereas, at the standard Pt(20%)/C (Fig. 5c, curve e), it is only 4%. The dependence of the number of exchanged electrons (ne) plotted versus the disk potential (Fig. 5d) implies that, at potentials close to 0.5–0.6 V, the oxygen reduction at FeCNx/GNP800-C proceeds partially via the two-electron route (the value of ne is around 3). Obviously higher values of ne have been observed for silver-containing systems. Indeed, the ne parameter characteristic of AgFeCNx/GNP800-C has been the highest, and it approaches most closely the one observed for standard Pt(20%)/C. The results presented in Fig. 5 imply that silver is an effective component of the catalytic materials in terms of increasing their activity and selectivity toward 4-electron reduction of oxygen in alkaline environment. Although not optimized as yet, the combination of Ag with Fe within AgFeCNx/GNP800-C seems to be particularly advantageous, and it makes it attractive alternative for possible applications in alkaline fuel cells. By comparison to literature concerning the application of nanostructured Ag-based catalysts for oxygen reduction in alkaline media, it can be concluded that AgFeCNx/GNP800-C has comparable performance relative to such materials as Ag4Sn/Vulcan [38], CoOx-Ag/rGO [34], Ag/GO/C [62], Ag/rGO [63], and to some Vulcan-supported Ag nanoparticles [9, 64, 65]. On the other hand, the activity has been still lower than that characteristic of FeAgPc/KB(600) [37], AgFelotus/Vulcan [40], and Ag/N-rGO [66] systems. Nevertheless, precise comparison of performances of various catalysts reported in literature is rather difficult, due to differences in morphologies and textures of supports, shapes and sizes of nanoparticles, loadings of catalysts, compositions of electrolytes, and their concentrations.

Importance of Pretreatment in Acid Medium

Electrochemical characterization and electrocatalytic activity of the catalysts were further diagnosed after treatment in acid medium (the preconditioning step, P). The materials, Ag/GNP800-C, FeCNx/GNP800-C, and AgFeCNx/GNP800-C, were subjected to continuous potential cycling in the nitrogen-saturated 0.1 M HClO4. The gradual decreases of currents characteristic of silver and iron species have been observed for all samples (for simplicity, data are not shown here), thus implying their dissolution into the bulk of the electrolyte. The above-mentioned experiments have been terminated when no further changes in electrochemical responses are observed. Figure 6 presents cyclic voltammetric responses recorded in 0.1 M KOH solution of GC electrodes covered with resulting residues (after washing them with water). It is evident that signals coming from the formation of silver oxides/hydroxides and their reduction (Fig. 6a,c) as well as the iron redox transitions (Fig. 6b) are much suppressed after preconditioning in perchloric acid (solid lines) when compared to untreated samples (dashed lines) which confirms the significant loss of metallic species in all pretreated catalysts. It is noteworthy that the extent of changes varies from sample to sample, and the current suppressions after preconditioning are particularly apparent for Ag/GNP800-C (Fig. 6a, solid line) and AgFeCNx/GNP800-C (Fig. 6c, solid line). Addition items of information are apparent upon comparison of Fig. 6a,c. First, the positive shift (ca. 25 mV) of the Ag reduction peaks in AgFeCNx/GNP800-C (relative to Ag/GNP800-C) implies the existence of the reduced (metallic) silver up to higher potentials in the presence of iron species (here, as before [37], partial charge density transfer from Fe to Ag or changes in particle size of Ag can be postulated). Obviously, the voltammetric characteristics of silver may also reflect the Ag loading and its surface structure [8, 38, 62, 64, 67]. Simple comparison of charges under the oxidation and reduction peaks of Ag clearly implies that, in the case of AgFeCNx/GNP800-C catalyst, the electrochemically active surface area (EASA) of silver is about 50% of that observed for Ag/GNP800-C. The EASA was calculated from the charge corresponding to the reduction of silver oxide (Eq. (7) [8, 62, 64]), which was clearly visible at 1.02 and 1.04 V in Fig. 6a,c, according to Eq. (8) [64]:
$$ {\mathrm{Ag}}_2\mathrm{O}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+2{\mathrm{e}}^{-}\to 2\mathrm{Ag}+2{\mathrm{OH}}^{-} $$
$$ \mathrm{EASA}=\frac{Q_{\mathrm{O}}}{Q_{\mathrm{O},\mathrm{ML}}\times {\mathrm{L}}_{\mathrm{Ag}}} $$

surface oxide reduction charge per unit area (C m−2)


charge due to the reduction of a monolayer of surface oxide per unit area (4.2 C m−2 adopted from Pt surface oxide reduction [8, 64])


loading of Ag per unit area (g m−2)

Fig. 6

Cyclic voltammograms recorded for catalytic films of (A) Ag/GNP800-C, (B) FeCNx/GNP800-C, and (C) AgFeCNx/GNP800-C recorded in 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH (at 100 mV s−1) before (dashed lines) and after (solid lines) preconditioning (P) in 0.1 mol dm−3 HClO4

The estimated EASA of Ag in Ag/GNP800-C (loading of Ag is about 60 μg cm−2) and AgFeCNx/GNP800-C (loading of Ag is about 53 μg cm−2) are as follows: 17.7 and 8.2 m2 g−1, respectively. A number of factors should be taken into account here: somewhat (about 11%) lower amounts of Ag (according to the synthesis procedure described in the “Experimental” section), higher average crystallite size (as it comes from the XRD analysis), as well as partial over-coating of catalytic centers by CN shells (as apparent from Fig. 1h) are applicable to the AgFeCNx/GNP800-C samples.

Electrochemical experiments aiming at evaluation of catalytic activity and selectivity in the oxygen reduction at the acid-pretreated Ag/GNP800-C-P, FeCNx/GNP800-C-P, and AgFeCNx/GNP800-C-P catalysts were conducted under identical conditions as for untreated samples. The results are presented in Fig. 7. First, the system’s performance for O2 reduction is only slightly lowered at FeCNx/GNP800-C-P relative to untreated FeCNx/GNP800-C (Fig. 7b, solid and dotted lines, respectively). Furthermore, the current decreases are only slightly more pronounced for AgFeCNx/GNP800-C-P relative to FeCNx/GNP800-C (Fig. 7c, solid and dotted lines, respectively). However, the greatest change (drop) in activity has been observed for Ag/GNP800-C-P in comparison to its untreated form (Fig. 7a, solid and dotted lines, respectively). In the latter case, the performance and selectivity toward O2 reduction closely approach that characteristic for bare GNP800-C (compare curves d in Fig. 5a,b). The obtained results can be rationalized as follows: contrary to bare GNP-supported silver nanoparticles (prepared by simple impregnation method), the application of such inorganic coordination compounds as Prussian Blue and its silver analog as precursors tends to preserve the systems’ active sites even after preconditioning in an acid electrolyte. The increased stability should be ascribed to the existence of catalytic centers (iron and silver) in the form of coordination complexes strongly bonded to the surface of carbon nitride shell, as suggested previously [23, 24, 25, 26, 27].
Fig. 7

Normalized (background-subtracted) rotating disk and ring voltammetric responses recorded during oxygen reduction at the films of (A, A′) Ag/GNP800-C, (B, B′) FeCNx/GNP800-C, and (C, C′) AgFeCNx/GNP800-C in the oxygen-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH at the scan rate of 10 mV s−1 and the rotation rate of 1600 rpm before (dashed lines) and after preconditioning in 0.1 mol dm−3 HClO4 (abbreviated as P, solid lines)

Consideration of Graphene Oxide as Support

For comparative purposes, we have also performed additional diagnostic experiments utilizing the sample of AgFeCNx deposited onto Graphene Oxide (GO), prepared in an analogous manner as described previously for AgFeCNx/GNP800. It can be expected that GO, while containing numerous oxygen functionalities and surface defects, could be a proper candidate for obtaining well-dispersed catalysts (in spite of using high pyrolysis temperature during synthesis). In addition, cyanides, which are released upon decomposition of hexacyanoferrates, are known to act as reducing agents (their presence should lead to partial reduction of GO to the more conducting reduced graphene oxide, rGO). Because basic physicochemical properties of GO samples considered here were described elsewhere [68], we limit our microscopic characterization to the basic TEM image of AgFeCNx/GO800 and present the electrocatalytic performance toward O2 reduction only in comparison to AgFeCNx/GNP800. As evident from Fig. 8a, the catalytic material AgFeCNx/GO800 is characterized by fairly uniform distribution of crystals (with diameters on the level of 50 nm with only some larger up to ca. 100 nm) on the support. However, it is apparent from the comparison of RRDE data (Fig. 8b,c) that the activity and selectivity of the GO-based AgFeCNx/GO800-C, despite of the presence of Vulcan as “separator” between graphene sheets, is much lower when compared to the performance of AgFeCNx/GNP800-C. Most probably, the O2 and water management are still largely hindered and/or the electron conductivity is not sufficiently high in the AgFeCNx/GO800-C case. The present results favor the use of the graphene derivatives (rather than graphene oxide) as supports in the oxygen reduction electrocatalysis.
Fig. 8

(A) TEM image of AgFeCNx/GO800. Normalized rotating disk (B) and ring (C) voltammograms recorded during oxygen reduction at the films of (a) AgFeCNx/GNP800-C and (b) AgFeCNx/GO800-C in the oxygen-saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 KOH at the scan rate of 10 mV s−1 and the rotation rate of 1600 rpm


It has been demonstrated for the first time that thermal decomposition under the inert atmosphere of silver(I) hexacyanoferrate(II), deposited on graphene nanoplatelets, produces nanomaterial containing silver and iron species coordinated to carbon nitride shells and exhibiting the remarkable efficiency toward oxygen reduction process in alkaline environment. It is important to note that, at the graphene-nanoplatelet-supported mixed silver-iron carbon nitrides, the reaction proceeds at more positive potential values in comparison to both bare silver nanoparticles and the iron-carbon nitride systems themselves (prepared separately under the same conditions on graphene-nanoplatelet carriers). Furthermore, amounts of the hydrogen peroxide-type intermediate (generated during reduction of oxygen in the potential range where cathode is expected to operate in a real fuel cell) are lower at the composite material mentioned previously. In this respect, high activity of silver toward decomposition of the undesirable intermediate (HO2) seems to be of primary importance. Another important factor is that the systems based on carbon nitrides retain their electrocatalytic activity even after continuous polarization in acidic medium thus implying strong fixation of metal complexes to CN shells.



We acknowledge the European Commission through the Graphene Flagship—Core 1 project [Grant number GA-696656] and the Maestro Project [2012/04/A/ST4/00287 (National Science Center, Poland)].


  1. 1.
    G. Merle, M. Wessling, K. Nijmeijer, Anion exchange membranes for alkaline fuel cells: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 377(1-2), 1–35 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.A. Hickner, A.M. Herring, E.B. Coughlin, Anion exchange membranes: current status and moving forward. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 51(24), 1727–1735 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Ramaswamy, S. Mukerjee, Influence of inner- and outer-sphere electron transfer mechanisms during electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction in alkaline media. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(36), 18015–18026 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.S. Spendelow, A. Wieckowski, Electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction and small alcohol oxidation in alkaline media. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9(2654), 2654–2675 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Chatenet, L. Genies-Bultel, M. Aurousseau, R. Durand, F. Andolfatto, Oxygen reduction on silver catalysts in solutions containing various concentrations of sodium hydroxide—comparison with platinum. J. Appl. Electrochem. 32(10), 1131–1140 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Tammeveski, H. Erikson, A. Sarapuu, J. Kozlova, P. Ritslaid, V. Sammelselg, K. Tammeveski, Electrocatalytic oxygen reduction on silver nanoparticle/multi-walled carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrodes in alkaline solution. Electrochem. Commun. 20, 15–18 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F.W. Campbell, S.R. Belding, R. Baron, L. Xiao, R.G. Compton, Hydrogen peroxide electroreduction at a silver-nanoparticle array: investigating nanoparticle size and coverage effects. J. Phys. Chem. C 113(21), 9053–9062 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Fazil, R. Chetty, Synthesis and evaluation of carbon nanotubes supported silver catalyst for alkaline fuel cell. Electroanalysis 26(11), 2380–2387 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Guo, A. Hsu, D. Chu, R. Chen, Improving oxygen reduction reaction activities on carbon-supported Ag nanoparticles in alkaline solutions. J. Phys. Chem. C 114(10), 4324–4330 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Masa, A. Zhao, W. Xia, M. Muhler, W. Schuhmann, Metal-free catalysts for oxygen reduction in alkaline electrolytes: influence of the presence of Co, Fe, Mn and Ni inclusions. Electrochim. Acta 128, 271–278 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K.-K. Türk, I. Kruusenberg, J. Mondal, P. Rauwel, J. Kozlova, L. Matisen, V. Sammelselg, K. Tammeveski, Oxygen electroreduction on MN4-macrocycle modified graphene/multi-walled carbon nanotube composites. J. Electroanal. Chem. 756, 69–76 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H.T. Chung, J.H. Won, P. Zelenay, Active and stable carbon nanotube/nanoparticle composite electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. Nat. Commun. 4, 1922 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Jäger, P.E. Kasatkin, E. Härk, P. Teppor, T. Romann, R. Härmas, I. Tallo, U. Mäeorg, U. Joost, P. Paiste, K. Kirsimäe, E. Lust, The effect of N precursors in Fe-N/C type catalysts based on activated silicon carbide derived carbon for oxygen reduction activity at various pH values. J. Electroanal. Chem. 823, 593–600 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. Neburchilov, H. Wang, J.J. Martin, W. Qu, A review on air cathodes for zinc–air fuel cells. J. Power Sources 195(5), 1271–1291 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Bidault, D.J.L. Brett, P.H. Middleton, N.P. Brandon, Review of gas diffusion cathodes for alkaline fuel cells. J. Power Sources 187(1), 39–48 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Geng, N. Ding, T.S.A. Hor, Z. Liu, X. Sun, Y. Zong, Potential of metal-free “graphene alloy” as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 3(5), 1795–1810 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. del Cueto, P. Ocón, J.M.L. Poyato, Comparative study of oxygen reduction reaction mechanism on nitrogen-, phosphorus-, and boron-doped graphene surfaces for fuel cell applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 119(4), 2004–2009 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Liu, P. Song, Z. Ning, W. Xu, Recent advances in heteroatom-doped metal-free electrocatalysts for highly efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Electrocatalysis 6(2), 132–147 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Z. Lin, G. Waller, Y. Liu, M. Liu, C.-P. Wong, Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene via pyrolysis of graphene oxide and urea, and its electrocatalytic activity toward the oxygen-reduction reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2(7), 884–888 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Zhou, S.Z. Qia, Fe/N co-doped graphitic carbon bulb for high performance oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Commun. 51(35), 7516–7519 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. Sawai, N. Suzuki, Heat-treated transition metal hexacyanometallates as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction insensitive to methanol. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151(5), A682 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    K. Sawai, Y.-S. Maeda, Peroxide elimination activity of heat-treated transition metal hexacyanoferrate catalysts for oxygen reduction in alkaline solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155(1), B27 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. Di Noto, E. Negro, S. Polizzi, K. Vezzu, L. Toniolo, G. Cavinato, Synthesis, studies and fuel cell performance of “core-shell” electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction based on a PtNix carbon nitride “shell” and a pyrolyzed polyketone nanoball “core”. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39(6), 2812–2827 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Negro, S. Polizzi, K. Vezzu, L. Toniolo, G. Cavinato, V. Di Noto, Interplay between morphology and electrochemical performance of “core-shell” electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction based on a PtNix carbon nitride “shell” and a pyrolyzed polyketone nanoball “core”. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39(6), 2828–2841 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. Di Noto, E. Negro, K. Vezzù, F. Bertasi, G. Nawn, Developments, and perspectives of carbon nitride-based electrocatalysts for application in low-temperature FCs. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 24, 59 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. Vezzù, A. Bach Delpeuch, E. Negro, S. Polizzi, G. Nawn, F. Bertasi, G. Pagot, K. Artyushkova, P. Atanassov, V. Di Noto, Fe-carbon nitride “core-shell” electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta 222, 1778–1791 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Negro, A. Bach Delpeuch, K. Vezzu, G. Nawn, F. Bertasi, A. Ansaldo, V. Pellegrini, B. Dembinska, S. Zoladek, K. Miecznikowski, I. Rutkowska, M. Skunik-Nuckowska, P.J. Kulesza, F. Bonaccorso, V. Di Noto, Towards Pt-free anion-exchange membrane fuel cells: Fe-Sn carbon nitride-graphene core-shell electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Mater. 30(8), 2651–2659 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Liu, H. Wang, D. Lin, J. Zhao, C. Liu, J. Xie, Y. Cui, A Prussian blue route to nitrogen-doped graphene aerogels as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction with enhanced active site accessibility. Nano Res. 10(4), 1213–1222 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. Liu, X. Yu, G. Zhang, S. Zhang, H. Cao, A. Dolbecq, P. Mialane, B. Keitad, L. Zhi, Polyoxometalate-mediated green synthesis of a 2D silver nanonet/graphene nanohybrid as a synergistic catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(38), 11961 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Y. Yang, Y. Zhou, Particle size effects for oxygen reduction on dispersed silver + carbon electrodes in alkaline solution. J. Electroanal. Chem. 397(1-2), 271–278 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    B.B. Blizanac, P.N. Ross, N.M. Markovic, Oxygen reduction on silver low-index single-crystal surfaces in alkaline solution: rotating ring DiskAg (hkl) studies. J. Phys. Chem. B 110(10), 4735–4741 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Y. Sun, M. Yang, J. Pan, P. Wang, W. Li, P. Wan, Manganese dioxide-supported silver bismuthate as an efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in zinc-oxygen batteries. Electrochim. Acta 197, 68–76 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Q. Wu, L. Jiang, L. Qi, L. Yuan, E. Wang, G. Sun, Electrocatalytic activity and stability of Ag-MnOx/C composites toward oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline solution. Electrochim. Acta 123, 167–175 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    F. Sun, G. Zhang, Y. Xu, Z. Chang, P. Wan, Y. Li, X. Sun, Promoted oxygen reduction activity of Ag/reduced graphene oxide by incorporated CoOx. Electrochim. Acta 132, 136–141 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Y. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Lu, Z. Li, H. Zhang, X. Cui, Y. Zhang, F. Shi, Y. Deng, Silver-molybdate electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. Electrochem. Commun. 20, 171–174 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Q. Yi, H. Chu, M. Tang, Z. Yang, Q. Chen, X. Liu, Carbon nanotube-supported binary silver-based nanocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. J. Electroanal. Chem. 739, 178–186 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    H.A. Miller, M. Bevilacqua, J. Filippi, A. Lavacchi, A. Marchionni, M. Marelli, S. Moneti, W. Oberhauser, E. Vesselli, M. Innocenti, F. Vizza, Nanostructured Fe–Ag electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(42), 13337 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Y. Lu, N. Zhang, L. An, X. Li, D. Xia, Synthesis of high dispersed intermetallic Ag4Sn/C and its enhanced oxygen reduction reaction activity. J. Power Sources 240, 606–611 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    F.H.B. Lima, J.F.R. de Castro, E.A. Ticianelli, Silver-cobalt bimetallic particles for oxygen reduction in alkaline media. J. Power Sources 161(2), 806–812 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    G.A. El-Nagar, I. Lauermann, R.M. Sarhan, C. Roth, Hierarchically structured iron-doped silver (Ag-Fe) lotus flowers for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Nanoscale 10(15), 7304–7310 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    E. Quesnel, F. Roux, F. Emieux, P. Faucherand, E. Kymakis, G. Volonakis, F. Giustino, B. Martín-García, I. Moreels, S.A. Gürsel, A.B. Yurtcan, V. Di Noto, A. Talyzin, I. Baburin, D. Tranca, G. Seifert, L. Crema, G. Speranza, V. Tozzini, P. Bondavalli, G. Pognon, C. Botas, D. Carriazo, G. Singh, T. Rojo, G. Kim, W. Yu, C.P. Grey, V. Pellegrini, Graphene-based technologies for energy applications, challenges and perspectives. 2D Mater 2, 030204 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    D. Higgins, P. Zamani, A. Yu, Z. Chen, The application of graphene and its composites in oxygen reduction electrocatalysis: a perspective and review of recent progress. Energy Environ. Sci. 9(2), 357–390 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. Zak, E. Negro, I.A. Rutkowska, B. Dembinska, V. Di Noto, P.J. Kulesza, in Encyclopedia of Interfacial Chemistry: Surface Science and Electrochemistry. Graphene-Based Nanostructures in Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2018), pp. 651–659 ISBN: 978-0-12-809894-3Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    P.J. Kulesza, J.K. Zak, I.A. Rutkowska, B. Dembinska, S. Zoladek, K. Miecznikowski, E. Negro, V. Di Noto, P. Zelenay, Elucidation of role of graphene in catalytic designs for electroreduction of oxygen. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 9, 257–264 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Y. Li, Y. Li, E. Zhu, T. McLouth, C.-Y. Chiu, X. Huang, Y. Huang, Stabilization of high-performance oxygen reduction reaction Pt electrocatalyst supported on reduced graphene oxide/carbon black composite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(30), 12326–12329 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Y. Shao, S. Zhang, C. Wang, Z. Nie, J. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Lin, Highly durable graphene nanoplatelets supported Pt nanocatalysts for oxygen reduction. J. Power Sources 195(15), 4600–4605 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Y. Cui, S.I. Kundalwal, S. Kumar, Gas barrier performance of graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Carbon 98, 313–333 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    D. He, K. Cheng, T. Peng, M. Pan, S. Mu, Graphene/carbon nanospheres sandwich supported PEM fuel cell metal nanocatalysts with remarkably high activity and stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(6), 2126–2132 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    J. Jung, H.J. Park, J. Kim, S.H. Hur, Highly durable Pt/graphene oxide and Pt/C hybrid catalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources 248, 1156–1162 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    J.-S. Lee, K. Jo, T. Lee, T. Yun, J. Cho, B.-S. Kim, Facile synthesis of hybrid graphene and carbon nanotubes as a metal-free electrocatalyst with active dual interfaces for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 1(34), 9603 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    D. Ji, Y. Wang, S. Chen, Y. Zhang, L. Li, W. Ding, Z. Wei, Nitrogen-doped graphene wrapped around silver nanowires for enhanced catalysis in oxygen reduction reaction. J. Solid State Electrochem. 22(7), 2287–2296 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    A. Qaseem, F. Chen, X. Wu, N. Zhang, Z. Xia, Ag, Co/graphene interactions and its effect on electrocatalytic oxygen reduction in alkaline media. J. Power Sources 370, 1–13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    J.M. Linge, H. Erikson, A. Sarapuu, M. Merisalu, M. Rähn, L. Matisen, V. Sammelselg, K. Tammeveski, Electroreduction of oxygen on nitrogen-doped graphene oxide supported silver nanoparticles. J. Electroanal. Chem. 794, 197 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    S. Hu, T. Han, C. Lin, W. Xiang, Y. Zhao, P. Gao, F. Du, X. Li, Y. Sun, Enhanced electrocatalysis via 3D graphene aerogel engineered with a silver nanowire network for ultrahigh-rate zinc–air batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1700041 (2017)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    P.J. Kulesza, K. Doblhofer, The membrane properties of Prussian Blue films on electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 274(1-2), 95–105 (1989)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    P.J. Kulesza, S. Zamponi, M. Malik, K. Miecznikowski, M. Berrettoni, R. Marassi, Spectroelectrochemical identity of Prussian blue films in various electrolytes: comparison of time-derivative voltabsorptometric responses with conventional cyclicvoltammetry. J. Solid State Electrochem. 1(1), 88–93 (1997)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    P.J. Kulesza, T. Jedral, Z. Galus, A new development in polynuclear inorganic films: silver(I)/“crosslinked” nickel(II)-hexacyanoferrate(III, II) microstructures. Electrochim. Acta 34(6), 851–853 (1989)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    U. Schroder, F. Scholz, The solid-state electrochemistry of metal octacyanomolybdates, octacyanotungstates, and hexacyanoferrates explained on the basis of dissolution and reprecipitation reactions. Inorg. Chem. 39(5), 1006–1015 (2000)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    E. Yeager, Dioxygen electrocatalysis: mechanisms in relation to catalyst structure. J. Mol. Catal. 38(1-2), 5–25 (1986)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    O. Antoine, R. Durand, RRDE study of oxygen reduction on Pt nanoparticles inside Nafion®: H2O2 production in PEMFC cathode conditions. J. Appl. Electrochem. 30(7), 839–844 (2000)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    T.J. Schmidt, U.A. Paulus, H.A. Gasteiger, R.J. Behm, The oxygen reduction reaction on a Pt/carbon fuel cell catalyst in the presence of chloride anions. J. Electroanal. Chem. 508(1-2), 41–47 (2001)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    L. Yuan, L. Jiang, J. Liu, Z. Xia, S.Wana, G. Sun, Facile synthesis of silver nanoparticles supported on three-dimensional graphene oxide/carbon black composite and its application for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta 135, 168–174 (2014)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    E.J. Lim, S.M. Choi, M.H. Seo, Y. Kim, S. Lee,W.B. Kim, Highly dispersed Ag nanoparticles on nanosheets of reduced graphene oxide for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. Electrochem. Commun. 28, 100–103 (2013)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    S. Maheswari, P. Sridhar, S. Pitchumani, Carbon-supported silver as cathode electrocatalyst for alkaline polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Electrocatalysis 3(1), 13–21 (2012)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    T. Van Cleve, E. Gibara, S. Linic, Electrochemical oxygen reduc tion reaction on Ag nanoparticles of different shapes. ChemCatChem 8(1), 256–261 (2016)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    R. Zhou, S.Z. Qiao, Silver/nitrogen-doped graphene interaction and its effect on electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Chem. Mater. 26(20), 5868–5873 (2014)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    M. Hepel, M. Tomkiewicz, Study of the initial stages of anodic oxidation of polycrystalline silver in KOH solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 131(6), 1288 (1984)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    S. Zoladek, I.A. Rutkowska, M. Blicharska, K. Miecznikowski, W. Ozimek, J. Orlowska, E. Negro, V. Di Noto, P.J. Kulesza, Evaluation of reduced-graphene-oxide-supported gold nanoparticles as catalytic system for electroreduction of oxygen in alkaline electrolyte. Electrochim. Acta 233, 113–122 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of PadovaPadova (PD)Italy

Personalised recommendations