Hormones and Cancer

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 135–142 | Cite as

A Novel Strategy to Co-target Estrogen Receptor and Nuclear Factor κB Pathways with Hybrid Drugs for Breast Cancer Therapy

Original Paper

Abstract

Nearly 75% of breast tumors express estrogen receptor (ER), and will be treated with endocrine therapy, such as selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), tamoxifen, or aromatase inhibitors. Despite their proven success, as many as 40–50% of ER+ tumors fail to respond to endocrine therapy and eventually recur as aggressive, metastatic cancers. Therefore, preventing and/or overcoming endocrine resistance in ER+ tumors remains a major clinical challenge. Deregulation or activation of the nuclear factor κB (NFκB) pathway has been implicated in endocrine resistance and poor patient outcome in ER+ tumors. As a consequence, one option to improve on existing anti-cancer treatment regimens may be to introduce additional anti-NFκB activity to endocrine therapy drugs. Our approach was to design and test SERM-fumarate co-targeting hybrid drugs capable of simultaneously inhibiting both ER, via the SERM, raloxifene, and the NFκB pathway, via fumarate, in breast cancer cells. We find that the hybrid drugs display improved anti-NFκB pathway inhibition compared to either raloxifene or fumarate. Despite some loss in potency against the ER pathway, these hybrid drugs maintain anti-proliferative activity in ER+ breast cancer cells. Furthermore, these drugs prevent clonogenic growth and mammosphere formation of ER+ breast cancer cells. As a proof-of-principle, the simultaneous inhibition of ER and NFκB via a single bifunctional hybrid drug may represent a viable approach to improve the anti-inflammatory activity and prevent therapy resistance of ER-targeted anti-cancer drugs.

Keywords

Breast cancer Estrogen receptor NFκB pathway Co-targeting drugs 

Supplementary material

12672_2017_294_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (106 kb)
Supplemental Figure 1Synthetic scheme for synthesizing Ral-Fum hybrids. (PPTX 106 kb)
12672_2017_294_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (126 kb)
Supplemental Figure 2Raloxifene inhibits ICAM1 gene expression and NFκB-RE activity. (A) MCF-7 cells were treated with various concentrations of drugs for 1 h, followed by TNFα (10 ng/mL) for 2 h to activate the NFκB pathway. mRNA expression of ICAM1 was measured by RT-QPCR. Drug’s inhibitory activity was calculated as % of TNFα alone, which is set to 100%. (B) T47D cells were transfected and treated with raloxifene as described in Fig. 1. (PPTX 126 kb)
12672_2017_294_MOESM3_ESM.pptx (108 kb)
Supplemental Figure 3Ral-Fum 2 inhibits NFκB-RE activity in breast cancer cells. (A) T47D and (B) MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected and treated as described in Fig. 1. (PPTX 108 kb)
12672_2017_294_MOESM4_ESM.pptx (47 kb)
Supplemental Figure 4Raloxifene-Succinate (Ral-Succ) fails to inhibit the NFκB pathway. MCF-7 cells were treated with 10 μM Ral-Succ for 1 h, followed by TNFα (10 ng/mL) for 2 h to activate the NFκB pathway. mRNA expression of ICAM1 was measured by RT-QPCR. (PPTX 46 kb)
12672_2017_294_MOESM5_ESM.pptx (70 kb)
Supplemental Figure 5DMF fails to inhibit ER in breast cancer cells. MCF-7 cells were treated with 10 μM DMF for 1 h, followed by E2. (A) mRNA expression of ER-target genes, pS2 and EGR3, was measured by RT-QPCR. (B) ERE luciferase activity was measured as described in Fig. 4. (PPTX 70 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI (2007) Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 9:R6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MC, Voduc D, Speers CH, Nielsen TO, Gelmon K (2010) Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 28:3271–3277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou Y, Eppenberger-Castori S, Marx C, Yau C, Scott GK, Eppenberger U, Benz CC (2005) Activation of nuclear factor-kappaB (NFkappaB) identifies a high-risk subset of hormone-dependent breast cancers. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 37:1130–1144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones RL, Rojo F, A'Hern R, Villena N, Salter J, Corominas JM, Servitja S, Smith IE, Rovira A, Reis-Filho JS, Dowsett M, Albanell J (2011) Nuclear NF-kappaB/p65 expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 64:130–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kubo M, Kanaya N, Petrossian K, Ye J, Warden C, Liu Z, Nishimura R, Osako T, Okido M, Shimada K, Takahashi M, Chu P, Yuan YC, Chen S (2013) Inhibition of the proliferation of acquired aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer cells by histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 (panobinostat). Breast Cancer Res Treat 137:93–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu H, Lee ES, Gajdos C, Pearce ST, Chen B, Osipo C, Loweth J, McKian K, De Los Reyes A, Wing L, Jordan VC (2003) Apoptotic action of 17beta-estradiol in raloxifene-resistant MCF-7 cells in vitro and in vivo. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1586–1597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou Y, Eppenberger-Castori S, Eppenberger U, Benz CC (2005) The NFkappaB pathway and endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 12 Suppl 1:S37–S46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Riggins RB, Zwart A, Nehra R, Clarke R (2005) The nuclear factor kappa B inhibitor parthenolide restores ICI 182,780 (Faslodex; fulvestrant)-induced apoptosis in antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 4:33–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    deGraffenried LA, Chandrasekar B, Friedrichs WE, Donzis E, Silva J, Hidalgo M, Freeman JW, Weiss GR (2004) NF-kappa B inhibition markedly enhances sensitivity of resistant breast cancer tumor cells to tamoxifen. Ann Oncol 15:885–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garber K (2006) The second wave in kinase cancer drugs. Nat Biotechnol 24:127–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kastrati I, Siklos MI, Calderon-Gierszal EL, El-Shennawy L, Georgieva G, Thayer EN, Thatcher GR, Frasor J (2016) Dimethyl fumarate inhibits the nuclear factor kappaB pathway in breast cancer cells by covalent modification of p65 protein. J Biol Chem 291:3639–3647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kastrati I, Litosh VA, Zhao S, Alvarez M, Thatcher GR, Frasor J (2015) A novel aspirin prodrug inhibits NFkappaB activity and breast cancer stem cell properties. BMC Cancer 15:845CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morphy R, Kay C, Rankovic Z (2004) From magic bullets to designed multiple ligands. Drug Discov Today 9:641–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pradhan M, Baumgarten SC, Bembinster LA, Frasor J (2012) CBP mediates NF-kappaB-dependent histone acetylation and estrogen receptor recruitment to an estrogen response element in the BIRC3 promoter. Mol Cell Biol 32:569–575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frasor J, Weaver A, Pradhan M, Dai Y, Miller LD, Lin CY, Stanculescu A (2009) Positive cross-talk between estrogen receptor and NF-kappaB in breast cancer. Cancer Res 69:8918–8925CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, Jackson KW, Clarke MF, Kawamura MJ, Wicha MS (2003) In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev 17:1253–1270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guzman C, Bagga M, Kaur A, Westermarck J, Abankwa D (2014) ColonyArea: an ImageJ plugin to automatically quantify colony formation in clonogenic assays. PLoS One 9:e92444CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schulze-Topphoff U, Varrin-Doyer M, Pekarek K, Spencer CM, Shetty A, Sagan SA, Cree BA, Sobel RA, Wipke BT, Steinman L, Scannevin RH, Zamvil SS (2016) Dimethyl fumarate treatment induces adaptive and innate immune modulation independent of Nrf2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:4777–4782CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoefnagel JJ, Thio HB, Willemze R, Bouwes Bavinck JN (2003) Long-term safety aspects of systemic therapy with fumaric acid esters in severe psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 149:363–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frasor J, El-Shennawy L, Stender JD, Kastrati I (2014) NFkappaB affects estrogen receptor expression and activity in breast cancer through multiple mechanisms. Mol Cell EndocrinolGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brzozowski AM, Pike AC, Dauter Z, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Engstrom O, Ohman L, Greene GL, Gustafsson JA, Carlquist M (1997) Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature 389:753–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF (2003) Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:3983–3988CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li X, Lewis MT, Huang J, Gutierrez C, Osborne CK, Wu MF, Hilsenbeck SG, Pavlick A, Zhang X, Chamness GC, Wong H, Rosen J, Chang JC (2008) Intrinsic resistance of tumorigenic breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:672–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Diehn M, Cho RW, Lobo NA, Kalisky T, Dorie MJ, Kulp AN, Qian D, Lam JS, Ailles LE, Wong M, Joshua B, Kaplan MJ, Wapnir I, Dirbas FM, Somlo G, Garberoglio C, Paz B, Shen J, Lau SK, Quake SR, Brown JM, Weissman IL, Clarke MF (2009) Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells. Nature 458:780–783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Croker AK, Allan AL (2008) Cancer stem cells: implications for the progression and treatment of metastatic disease. J Cell Mol Med 12:374–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Velasco-Velazquez MA, Popov VM, Lisanti MP, Pestell RG (2011) The role of breast cancer stem cells in metastasis and therapeutic implications. Am J Pathol 179:2–11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hollier BG, Evans K, Mani SA (2009) The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells: a coalition against cancer therapies. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 14:29–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baumgarten SC, Frasor J (2012) Inflammation: an instigator of more aggressive estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers. Mol Endocrinol 26:360–371CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robinson DP, Klein SL (2012) Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis. Horm Behav 62:263–271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Biswas DK, Singh S, Shi Q, Pardee AB, Iglehart JD (2005) Crossroads of estrogen receptor and NF-kappaB signaling. Sci STKE 2005:pe27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chadwick CC, Chippari S, Matelan E, Borges-Marcucci L, Eckert AM, Keith JC Jr, Albert LM, Leathurby Y, Harris HA, Bhat RA, Ashwell M, Trybulski E, Winneker RC, Adelman SJ, Steffan RJ, Harnish DC (2005) Identification of pathway-selective estrogen receptor ligands that inhibit NF-kappaB transcriptional activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:2543–2548CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nettles KW, Bruning JB, Gil G, Nowak J, Sharma SK, Hahm JB, Kulp K, Hochberg RB, Zhou H, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS, Kim Y, Joachmiak A, Greene GL (2008) NFkappaB selectivity of estrogen receptor ligands revealed by comparative crystallographic analyses. Nat Chem Biol 4:241–247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nwachukwu JC, Srinivasan S, Bruno NE, Parent AA, Hughes TS, Pollock JA, Gjyshi O, Cavett V, Nowak J, Garcia-Ordonez RD, Houtman R, Griffin PR, Kojetin DJ, Katzenellenbogen JA, Conkright MD, Nettles KW (2014) Resveratrol modulates the inflammatory response via an estrogen receptor-signal integration network. elife 3:e02057CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao Y, Gong P, Chen Y, Nwachukwu JC, Srinivasan S, Ko C, Bagchi MK, Taylor RN, Korach KS, Nettles KW, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS (2015) Dual suppression of estrogenic and inflammatory activities for targeting of endometriosis. Sci Transl Med 7:271ra279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Singh J, Petter RC, Baillie TA, Whitty A (2011) The resurgence of covalent drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:307–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zaro BW, Whitby LR, Lum KM, Cravatt BF (2016) Metabolically labile fumarate esters impart kinetic selectivity to irreversible inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc 138:15841–15844CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irida Kastrati
    • 1
  • Marton I. Siklos
    • 2
  • Svitlana D. Brovkovych
    • 1
  • Gregory R. J. Thatcher
    • 2
  • Jonna Frasor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and Biophysics, College of MedicineUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations