Apigenin Induces Apoptosis and Blocks Growth of Medroxyprogesterone Acetate-Dependent BT-474 Xenograft Tumors
Recent clinical and epidemiological evidence shows that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) containing both estrogen and progestin increases the risk of primary and metastatic breast cancer in post-menopausal women while HRT containing only estrogen does not. We and others previously showed that progestins promote the growth of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we sought to determine whether apigenin, a low molecular weight anti-carcinogenic flavonoid, inhibits the growth of aggressive Her2/neu-positive BT-474 xenograft tumors in nude mice exposed to medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), the most commonly used progestin in the USA. Our data clearly show that apigenin (50 mg/kg) inhibits progression and development of these xenograft tumors by inducing apoptosis, inhibiting cell proliferation, and reducing expression of Her2/neu. Moreover, apigenin reduced levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) without altering blood vessel density, indicating that continued expression of VEGF may be required to promote tumor cell survival and maintain blood flow. While previous studies showed that MPA induces receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) expression in rodent mammary gland, MPA reduced levels of RANKL in human tumor xenografts. RANKL levels remained suppressed in the presence of apigenin. Exposure of BT-474 cells to MPA in vitro also resulted in lower levels of RANKL; an effect that was independent of progesterone receptors since it occurred both in the presence and absence of the antiprogestin RU-486. In contrast to our in vivo observations, apigenin protected against MPA-dependent RANKL loss in vitro, suggesting that MPA and apigenin modulate RANKL levels differently in breast cancer cells in vivo and in vitro. These preclinical findings suggest that apigenin has potential as an agent for the treatment of progestin-dependent breast disease.
Post-menopausal women routinely undergo hormone replacement therapy (HRT) containing estrogen alone or a combination of estrogen and progestin to alleviate the climacteric symptoms of menopause such as hot flashes, osteoporosis, insomnia, mood swings, dementia, and decreased libido . Progestins have been included in HRT to counteract the increased risk of endometrial cancer associated with post-menopausal estrogen supplementation. However, the Women’s Health Initiative and subsequent studies of combination HRT showed recently that breast cancer risk is higher in post-menopausal women undergoing estrogen/progestin-based HRT compared with their post-menopausal counterparts given oral estrogen or placebo [2, 3]. While several studies have shown a negative effect of progestins on proliferation of breast cancer cells in vitro , progestins increase breast epithelial cell proliferation in vivo [5, 6]. As a result, the use of combination HRT has become controversial and recent epidemiological studies link the decline in HRT to reduced incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ, particularly hormone-receptor-positive invasive breast cancer [7, 8, 9, 10]. Due to the rapid onset of tumor growth in postmenopausal women undergoing combination HRT, we and others have suggested that the progestin component promotes the progression of latent tumor cells or stimulates proliferation of cancer stem cells [11, 12].
A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain progestin-stimulated breast cancer in post-menopausal women [11, 12, 13]. Several studies showed that progestins induce the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent pro-angiogenic factor, in human and rodent breast cancer cells [11, 14]. Another study showed that progestins activate several genes that promote cell transformation, increase cell motility, and increase the rate of cancer metastasis . Recently, Schramek et al.  and Gonzalez-Suarez et al.  reported that progestin induces receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), and that higher RANKL may correlate with higher rates of mammary cancer in mice. Kariagina et al.  also reported that in cells co-expressing estrogen and progesterone receptors, estrogen and progesterone increase expression of amphiregulin, and that the two hormones co-operate to stimulate robust proliferation of hormone-dependent mammary cancer. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify compounds which can be used in a clinical context to counteract the tumor-promoting effects of progestins in breast cells.
Apigenin is a low molecular weight flavonoid, common in fruits, vegetables, nuts, and plant-derived beverages, that inhibits the growth of human cancer cells in vitro and in vivo ([19 and references therein]). We previously showed that apigenin prevents and/or delays the appearance of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)-dependent 7, 12-dimethylbenz (a) anthracene (DMBA)-induced tumors in vivo . In the present study, we demonstrate that apigenin inhibits the progression and development of MPA-dependent BT-474 xenograft tumors in nude mice via a mechanism which involves apoptosis of proliferating human breast cancer cells.
Materials and Methods
Female athymic nu/nu nude mice, 5 to 6 weeks old (20–22 g) were purchased from Harlan Sprague–Dawley, Inc. Mice were housed in a laminar air-flow cabinet under specific pathogen-free conditions. All facilities were approved by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care in accordance with current federal regulations and standards. All surgical and experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Missouri (Columbia, MO) and were in accordance with procedures outlined in the “Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” (NIH publication 85-23).
Apigenin was dissolved in 50 % dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 15 % ethinyl alcohol, and 35 % phosphate-buffered saline. Starting on day 25 after inoculation with tumor cells, apigenin (50 mg/kg) or vehicle were administered daily by intra-peritoneal injection for a total of 21 injections. Animals were sacrificed and tumors were collected 3 h after the last injection. Figure 1 summarizes the entire experimental protocol for this study.
Tumors were collected immediately after the animals were killed and placed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining or frozen in liquid nitrogen for future analysis. Collected tissues were then processed for IHC staining using standard procedures previously described by Liang et al. . Stained sections were assessed and analyzed for expression of the following proteins; VEGF, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, progesterone receptor (PR), estrogen receptor (ER)-α, ER-β, Ki-67, CD31, and RANKL. Antibodies and dilutions were as follows: anti-PR antibody (1:50 dilution (A0098); DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), anti-ER-α (1:300 (sc-542); Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), anti-ER-ß (1:25 (MCA1974S); AbD Serotec), anti-VEGF antibody (1:100 (sc-152); Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), anti-VEGFR-1 antibody (1:50 (Flt-1, H225, sc-9029); Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), anti-VEGFR-2 antibody (1:50 (Flk-1, ab2349); Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, MA), anti-RANKL antibody (1:100 (sc-7628); Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc), anti-CD31 antibody (1:100 (ab28364); Abcam, Inc.), anti-Ki-67 antibody (1:600 (RB1510-P); Fisher Scientific), and anti-Her2/neu antibody (1:250 (sc-284); Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc).
Tumor samples were stained immunohistochemically and relative staining intensity was quantified using morphometric software (Fovea Pro 3.0, Reindeer Graphics, Asheville, NC). Four images were recorded at ×20 magnification per given tumor, and threshold image intensity was adjusted for measurement in pixels. To determine microvessel density (MVD), four representative photographs of CD31-labeled sections were taken at ×20 magnification for at least five tumor samples per treatment group. The total number of vessels per field was counted. A vessel was defined as an open lumen with adjacent CD31-positive cells. MVD was then expressed as mean microvessel number per field ± SEM.
Ki-67 staining was quantified as previously described by Burcombe et al. . A minimum of five randomly selected ×40 high-power fields were examined, each containing representative sections of the tumor with at least 1,500 total cells. Epithelial cells with nuclear Ki-67 immunoreactivity were counted and the proliferation index determined (i.e., number of Ki-67-positive cells divided by total cells).
Tumor tissues were stained by terminal deoxy-nucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL; in situ cell death detection kit, cat no: 11684817910, Roche) and counterstained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The procedure was performed following instructions provided by the manufacturer and in reference to previous studies . A minimum of three randomly selected high-power fields containing representative sections of each tumor were imaged. At least five tumors were examined per treatment group. TUNEL-positive cells and total cells were counted and percent apoptotic cells calculated.
Human sRANKL levels were measured in supernatant collected from cultured BT-474 cells using an enzyme-linked immunoassay kit (RD193004200R, BioVendor, Czech Republic) with a sensitivity of 0.4 pmol/l, an intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) of 7 % and an inter-assay CV of 11 %. Supernatant was collected from cultured BT-474 cells treated with vehicle (DMSO), MPA (10 nM) ± either apigenin (100 μM) or RU-486 (1 μM) and apigenin or RU-486 alone. All experiments were performed in triplicate following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol, and each sample was analyzed in duplicate.
Statistical significance was tested with one-way ANOVA using SigmaStat Software version 3.5 (Sigmastat Software Inc., Richmond, CA). The assumption of ANOVA was examined and a nonparametric measure based on ranks was used as needed. Values are reported as mean±SEM. When ANOVA indicated a significant effect (p < 0.05), Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc test was used to compare the means of individual groups. When normality test failed, significance was determined by the Kruskal–Wallis test (one-way ANOVA by ranks) followed by the Dunn test as a post hoc test.
Apigenin Prevents Progression of MPA-dependent BT-474 Xenograft Tumors in Nude Mice
Immunohistochemical Analysis for Her2/neu
Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Markers of Proliferation and Apoptosis
Apigenin could reduce the rate at which a tumor’s size increases by increasing the rate of tumor cell death and/or by decreasing the rate of tumor cell proliferation. To determine which mechanism explains the effect of apigenin on MPA-dependent BT-474 xenograft tumors in nude mice, TUNEL assay was used to measure the fraction of cells undergoing apoptosis in tumors collected from mice either treated with apigenin or not given the flavonoid. We found that apoptotic cells represented a significantly higher fraction (p < 0.05) of tumors from apigenin-treated mice (34 ± 3 %) compared with tumors from untreated (7 ± 1 %) or control mice (14 ± 2 %) (Fig. 4b). Conversely, apigenin slightly lowered immunoreactivity for Ki-67, a marker for cell proliferation, to 47 ± 2 % from 53 ± 1 %, with 45 ± 3 % of control cells staining positively for Ki-67 (Fig. 4c). These data suggest that the anti-tumor effects of apigenin primarily reflect its ability to increase the fraction of tumor cells that undergo apoptosis while it has a smaller effect on tumor cell proliferation.
Immunohistochemical Analysis for PR
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Angiogenic Factors/Blood Vessel Density
Immunohistochemical and ELISA Analysis of RANKL
In a previous study, we showed that apigenin reduces the frequency of DMBA-induced, progestin-accelerated mammary tumors in rats . The present study examines the effect of apigenin on growth and progression of progestin-dependent BT-474 xenograft tumors in nude mice. BT-474 cells are an aggressive progestin-responsive highly metastatic human breast cancer cell [21, 22]. Under the dose regimen used here (21 daily 50 mg/kg subcutaneous injections of apigenin), apigenin significantly inhibited the growth of BT-474 xenograft tumors. The dose selected was from a previous study  and while higher levels of apigenin might prove more potent against tumor growth, this remains to be established. TUNEL assays showed that apigenin induces tumor cell apoptosis, but only modestly inhibits tumor cell proliferation. Wang et al.  reported similar findings in colorectal cancer xenografts. Apoptosis is also induced by other tumor growth-inhibiting phytochemicals  and anticancer drugs such as 5-flurouracil  and cisplatin . Previous studies demonstrating induction of apoptosis by apigenin suggested that the following mechanisms may be involved: induction of caspase 3 , induction/activation of p53 , up-regulation of FADD , and, in MDA-MB-435 cells, stimulation of proteasome-dependent degradation of Her2/neu . In the present study apigenin was associated with reduced tumor cell Her2/neu immunoreactivity, though in agreement with a previous report , apigenin did not reduce Her2/neu mRNA levels (not shown). Although it is possible that apigenin stimulates proteasome-dependent degradation of Her2/neu in BT474 xenograft tumors, there are other mechanisms that might alternatively explain reduced immunoreactivity and its consequences. These include reduced Her2/neu autophosphorylation, binding of apigenin to Her2/neu, or interactions that block events downstream of Akt or PI3-kinase. The effect of reduced Her2/neu on tumor cell growth may relate to its potential role in maintaining human breast cancer stem cells . This could be due to the robust regulation of VEGF by Her2/neu  which is also associated with maintaining survival of breast tumor cells [39, 40].
As expected, MPA stimulates proliferation of BT-474 xenograft tumor cells, though the proliferation index was modest. This supports the hypothesis that progestins may promote the proliferation of latent breast tumor cells, which may contribute to the increased breast cancer risk associated with progestin-containing HRT [10, 11, 21, 41]. Apigenin blocked MPA-induced proliferation, reducing levels of tumor cell proliferation to those observed in controls. This is consistent with previous studies, and a number of mechanisms by which apigenin could inhibit proliferation have been proposed [19, 42, 43].
In accord with previous studies [14, 28], we observed that MPA inhibits PR expression in human breast cancer cells; in the present study MPA inhibited expression of PR in BT-474 xenograft tumors in both apigenin-treated and untreated animals. As described previously, exogenous progestins stimulate proteasomal degradation of PR , which is associated with functional PR activity. Apigenin does not appear to modulate the effects of MPA on PR in tumor cells and thus it is unlikely that it modulates functionality of tumor cell PR, though this remains to be firmly established. In addition, BT-474 cells express androgen receptors (AR) , which may also play a role in MPA-dependent tumor growth due to cross-reactivity of the ligand. It is thus possible that some of the inhibitory effects of apigenin occur via modification of AR-mediated growth effects on BT-474 cells, a possibility which remains to be studied.
Contrary to our earlier findings [21, 22], in the present study MPA did not stimulate expression of VEGF in BT-474 xenograft tumors, possibly indicating that VEGF levels are differentially affected by MPA at different stages of tumor growth. However, in this study, basal VEGF immunoreactivity was lower in tumors from apigenin-treated animals. Since VEGF has been shown to be involved in survival and proliferation of mammary tumor cells [39, 40, 45, 46], it is possible that loss of the angiogenic growth factor leads to tumor cell loss. Furthermore, although blood vessel density was similar in tumors from all animal groups, apigenin-treatment correlated with smaller blood vessel lumen size. It is therefore conceivable that apigenin restricts tumor blood supply, though the mechanism through which this occurs remains to be determined.
Recent studies show that MPA induces RANKL in DMBA-induced mammary tumors, which is consistent with a role for RANKL in the growth of progestin-dependent breast cancer [16, 17]. Because MPA stimulates proliferation of BT-474 xenograft tumor cells, we examined whether RANKL might also be induced by MPA in BT-474 cells. However, in contrast to findings in rodents, RANKL expression was lower in BT-474 xenograft tumor cells from animals treated with MPA (with or without apigenin) than in controls (animals not exposed to MPA). A similar effect was seen in vitro; MPA inhibited expression of RANKL in cultured BT-474 cells, an effect that was not blocked by RU-486, but was blocked by apigenin. The significance of this observation remains to be determined. A previous study indicated that membrane-associated PR is insensitive to the negative regulatory effect of antiprogestins , thus it is possible that membrane-associated PR mediates MPA-dependent down-regulation of RANKL. Moreover, the effect of progestin-dependent RANKL on human breast cancer progression is controversial , and it is possible that progestin regulates expression of RANKL via different mechanisms in murine and human mammary cells . In vitro, progestins generally reduce the proliferation of human breast cancer cells . It is therefore possible that in vitro inhibition of RANKL by progestins is associated with inhibition of progestin-mediated cell proliferation in vitro, a process which appears to occur differently in vivo, possibly due to epithelial-stromal interactions modifying the signal. Earlier studies reported that serum levels of RANKL are unaffected by progestin-containing HRT in postmenopausal women . However, it is possible that different tumors (or different cells within a single tumor) might differentially induce or suppress expression of RANKL in response to MPA. Further studies are needed; in particular, the effect of progestin on expression of RANKL should be evaluated in other human breast cancer cells. It is worth noting that progesterone exerts strain-specific effects on RANKL expression in mice .
Although this study shows that apigenin blocks breast cancer xenograft tumor growth by inducing apoptosis, apigenin does not affect proliferation and hyperplasia of ducts and lobular epithelial cells in the normal mammary gland of nude mice. Similar observations were made by Mafuvadze et al.  in DMBA-induced progestin-accelerated rat mammary tumors and by Gupta et al. , who suggested that apigenin may exert different effects on prostate cancer cells than on normal cells. By virtue of its ability to selectively induce apoptosis in rapidly growing breast cancer cells, while having no effect on normal mammary cells, apigenin would seem to be an extremely promising chemotherapeutic agent.
In conclusion, we show that apigenin inhibits the growth of MPA-dependent BT-474 xenograft tumors, both by inducing apoptosis and by inhibiting proliferation of tumor epithelial cells. Apigenin may also reduce the production by tumor cells of pro-angiogenic VEGF, which is essential for growth and maintenance of blood vessels in the tumor microenvironment. The use of antiprogestins as a therapeutic agent was previously explored , and mostly phased out due to toxicities and inconsistent effects on tumor shrinkage. The potential use of a natural antiprogestin would therefore appear to possess a number of advantages. Although the pharmacokinetics and effectiveness of apigenin in humans need to be evaluated, we contend that combination therapy including apigenin and other chemotherapeutic agents warrants further study. For example, the combined use of apigenin and tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors should be explored, since, as we show in this study, apigenin does not affect in vivo ER expression in breast cancer cells. Future studies should also examine the effects of apigenin on breast cancer progression promoted by other synthetic progestins and the endogenous hormone progesterone.
This research was supported by COR funds and research funds from RADIL, University of Missouri, Columbia. SMH is the Zalk Missouri Professor of Tumor Angiogenesis. We wish to thank Dr. F. Lopez for assistance with the photographs shown in the manuscript as well as the RADIL staff for assistance with immunohistochemistry.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 5.Aupperlee M, Kariagina A, Osuch J, Haslam SZ (2005–2006) Progestins and breast cancer. Breast Dis 24:37–57Google Scholar
- 14.Benakanakere I, Besch-Williford C, Schnell J, Brandt S, Ellersieck MR, Molinolo A, Hyder SM (2006) Natural and synthetic progestins accelerate 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-initiated mammary tumors and increase angiogenesis in Sprague–Dawley rats. Clin Cancer Res 12:4062–4071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Ellmann S, Sicht H, Thiel F et al (2009) Estrogen and progesterone receptors: from molecular structures to clinical targets. Cell Mol Life Sci. doi:10.1007/s00018-009-0017-3
- 30.Chen D, Landis-Piwowar KR, Chen MS, Dou QP (2007) Inhibition of proteasome activity by the dietary flavonoid apigenin is associated with growth inhibition in cultured breast cancer cells and xenografts. Breast Cancer Res Treat 9:R80Google Scholar