Hormones and Cancer

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 62–72 | Cite as

Circulating Sex Hormones and Mammographic Breast Density among Postmenopausal Women

  • Brian L. Sprague
  • Amy Trentham-Dietz
  • Ronald E. Gangnon
  • Diana S. M. Buist
  • Elizabeth S. Burnside
  • Erin J. Aiello Bowles
  • Frank Z. Stanczyk
  • Gale S. Sisney
Article

Abstract

The use of breast density as an intermediate or predictive marker of breast cancer risk is limited by an incomplete understanding of the etiology of breast density. High blood levels of endogenous estrogens and androgens are associated with increased risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. We sought to examine whether these hormones are also associated with breast density. The Wisconsin Breast Density Study enrolled 257 postmenopausal women, ages 55–70 years, with no history of postmenopausal hormone use, from mammography clinics in Madison, Wisconsin. Subjects provided a blood sample for sex hormone analysis, and breast density was measured from subjects' screening mammograms using a computer-assisted thresholding method. Numerous sex hormones were associated with breast density in age-adjusted analyses. However, further adjustment for body mass index and other potentially confounding factors substantially attenuated or eliminated these associations. In the fully adjusted model, there remained a positive association between percent breast density and serum progesterone (P = 0.03), with percent density rising from 11.9% (95% CI: 9.8, 14.1%) among women in the lowest quartile of serum progesterone to 15.4% (12.9, 18.2%) among women in the highest quartile. There was also a positive association between sex hormone binding globulin and percent breast density (P = 0.06). In contrast, there were no independent associations between percent breast density and estradiol (total, free, or bioavailable), estrone, estrone sulfate, or testosterone (total, free, or bioavailable). These results suggest that breast density has a hormonal etiology; however, it may differ in important ways from that of breast cancer risk.

Keywords

Mammographic breast density Estrogens Androgens Progesterone Breast cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Komen for the Cure Foundation (FAS0703857), the Department of Defense (BC062649), and the National Cancer Institute (CA139548, CA014520). Dr. Sprague is supported by a fellowship from the American Society of Preventive Oncology, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, and the Prevent Cancer Foundation. The authors would like to thank Kristi Klein and the staff of UW Health Clinics, Dr. Walter Peppler, Eva Baird, and Lori Wollett and staff of the UW OCT for their assistance in subject recruitment and data collection; Dr. Halcyon Skinner, Dr. Marty Kanarek, John Hampton, Tammy LeCaire, Tanya Watson, Matt Walsh, Jane Maney, and Cecilia Bellcross for study-related advice; Dr. Martin Yaffe and Chris Peressotti for assistance in breast density measurements; Dr. Karen Cruickshanks, Carla Schubert, and Scott Nash for assistance in sample storage; and Julie McGregor, Kathy Peck, and Dawn Fitzgibbons for study support.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(3):227–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vacek PM, Geller BM (2004) A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(5):715–722Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA et al (2007) Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res 9(6):217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M et al (2010) Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(16):1224–1237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(6):1159–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1998) Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 7(12):1133–1144Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K et al (2005) Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 6(10):798–808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becker S, Kaaks R (2009) Exogenous and endogenous hormones, mammographic density and breast cancer risk: can mammographic density be considered an intermediate marker of risk? Recent Results Cancer Res 181:135–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H et al (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(2):456–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schatzkin A, Gail M (2002) The promise and peril of surrogate end points in cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer 2(1):19–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brisson J, Morrison AS, Kopans DB et al (1984) Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 119(3):371–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW et al (1998) The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer 78(9):1233–1238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Li Q et al (2006) Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(5):961–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L et al (2006) Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(11):2086–2092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Key TJ, Verkasalo PK, Banks E (2001) Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2(3):133–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Russo J, Hu YF, Yang X, Russo IH (2000) Developmental, cellular, and molecular basis of human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 27:17–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group (2002) Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(8):606–616Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Missmer SA, Eliassen AH, Barbieri RL, Hankinson SE (2004) Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentrations and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(24):1856–1865CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaaks R, Rinaldi S, Key TJ et al (2005) Postmenopausal serum androgens, oestrogens and breast cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Endocr Relat Cancer 12(4):1071–1082CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pike MC, Spicer DV, Dahmoush L, Press MF (1993) Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 15(1):17–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Willett WC (2004) Towards an integrated model for breast cancer etiology: the lifelong interplay of genes, lifestyle, and hormones. Breast Cancer Res 6(5):213–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dumitrescu RG, Cotarla I (2005) Understanding breast cancer risk—where do we stand in 2005? J Cell Mol Med 9(1):208–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Slone S et al (2003) Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(1):30–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Wu FF, Brandt KR (2002) Case-control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11(11):1382–1388Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goebelsmann U, Bernstein GS, Gale JA et al (1979) Serum gonadotropin, testosterone, estradiol and estrone levels prior to and following bilateral vasectomy. In: Lepow IH, Crozier R (eds) Vasectomy: immunologic and pathophysiologic effects in animals and man. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goebelsmann U, Horton R, Mestman JH et al (1973) Male pseudohermaphroditism due to testicular 17b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 36(5):867–879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scott JZ, Stanczyk FZ, Goebelsmann U, Mishell DR Jr (1978) A double-antibody radioimmunoassay for serum progesterone using progesterone-3-(0-carboxymethyl)oximino-[125I]-iodohistamine as radioligand. Steroids 31(3):393–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sodergard R, Backstrom T, Shanbhag V, Carstensen H (1982) Calculation of free and bound fractions of testosterone and estradiol-17 beta to human plasma proteins at body temperature. J Steroid Biochem 16(6):801–810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM (1999) A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84(10):3666–3672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rinaldi S, Geay A, Dechaud H et al (2002) Validity of free testosterone and free estradiol determinations in serum samples from postmenopausal women by theoretical calculations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11(10 Pt 1):1065–1071Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ (1994) The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 39(10):1629–1638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R (1992) Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology, vol 21. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schafer JL (1997) Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    SAS Institute Inc. (2009) Construction of least squares means. In: SAS/STAT 9.2 User's Guide. 2nd edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 2528–2531Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Boyd NF, Stone J, Martin LJ et al (2002) The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities. Br J Cancer 87(8):876–882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tamimi RM, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Byrne C (2005) Endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14(11 Pt 1):2641–2647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Verheus M, Peeters PH, van Noord PA et al (2007) No relationship between circulating levels of sex steroids and mammographic breast density: the Prospect-EPIC cohort. Breast Cancer Res 9(4):R53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Warren R, Skinner J, Sala E et al (2006) Associations among mammographic density, circulating sex hormones, and polymorphisms in sex hormone metabolism genes in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(8):1502–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Greendale GA, Palla SL, Ursin G et al (2005) The association of endogenous sex steroids and sex steroid binding proteins with mammographic density: results from the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions mammographic density study. Am J Epidemiol 162(9):826–834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lanari C, Molinolo AA (2002) Progesterone receptors—animal models and cell signalling in breast cancer. Diverse activation pathways for the progesterone receptor: possible implications for breast biology and cancer. Breast Cancer Res 4(6):240–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lamb C, Simian M, Molinolo A, Pazos P, Lanari C (1999) Regulation of cell growth of a progestin-dependent murine mammary carcinoma in vitro: progesterone receptor involvement in serum or growth factor-induced cell proliferation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 70(4–6):133–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD et al (2003) Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the women's health initiative randomized trial. JAMA 289(24):3243–3253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR et al (2004) Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the women's health initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291(14):1701–1712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bremnes Y, Ursin G, Bjurstam N et al (2007) Endogenous sex hormones, prolactin and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women. Int J Cancer 121(11):2506–2511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Aiello EJ, Tworoger SS, Yasui Y et al (2005) Associations among circulating sex hormones, insulin-like growth factor, lipids, and mammographic density in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14(6):1411–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Johansson H, Gandini S, Bonanni B et al (2008) Relationships between circulating hormone levels, mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108(1):57–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hankinson SE, Manson JE, Spiegelman D et al (1995) Reproducibility of plasma hormone levels in postmenopausal women over a 2–3-year period. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 4(6):649–654Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tamimi RM, Byrne C, Colditz GA, Hankinson SE (2007) Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(15):1178–1187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian L. Sprague
    • 1
    • 2
  • Amy Trentham-Dietz
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ronald E. Gangnon
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Diana S. M. Buist
    • 5
  • Elizabeth S. Burnside
    • 3
    • 6
  • Erin J. Aiello Bowles
    • 5
  • Frank Z. Stanczyk
    • 7
    • 8
  • Gale S. Sisney
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  3. 3.University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer CenterMadisonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biostatistics and Medical InformaticsUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  5. 5.Group Health Research InstituteSeattleUSA
  6. 6.Department of RadiologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  7. 7.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  8. 8.Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations