Support for the Development and Use of the Child Observation of Mindfulness Measure (C-OMM)
- 26 Downloads
We describe the Child Observation of Mindfulness Measure (C-OMM), a new instrument designed to assess young children’s outward expressions of self-regulated attention and orientation to experience.
Twenty-three 3- to 4-year-old children were assessed using the C-OMM. Using Generalizability theory, differentiated variances were examined across three settings (free play, teacher-directed activities, and meals), five dimensions (three for self-regulated attention and two for orientation to experience), and two components (summary scores for self-regulated attention and orientation to experience). A follow-up decision study was conducted to identify the number of raters needed and the number of observations per child required to achieve acceptable reliability.
Results from the generalizability study indicate that the use of the C-OMM was moderately reliable (ϕ = .79 and .86, for self-regulated attention and orientation to experience, respectively) during teacher-directed activities only. The decision study indicated that future uses of the C-OMM require either a greater number of raters or a greater number of observations for acceptable reliability.
The C-OMM represents a more appropriate instrument for trained observers to assess children’s mindfulness related behaviors in certain educational settings given the limitations inherent to young children’s capacity to accurately self-report. Furthermore, as an observational measure of children’s mindfulness behaviors, the C-OMM might be more sensitive to multiple observations that therefore lends to the measurement of ongoing development over time.
KeywordsMindfulness Behavioral observation Childhood assessment Executive functioning
MELT designed the measure, designed and executed the study, and wrote the paper. KJC collaborated in designing the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the results. AKZ designed the measure, collaborated on designing and executing the study, assisted with analyses, and collaborated in writing the paper. DJA collaborated in designing the measure, collaborated in designing and executing the study, and collaborated in writing and editing of the final manuscript.
This study was funded by the Thornburg Foundation (grant number 10/8/15). This research was supported by a grant from the Thornburg Foundation in cooperation with the Dean of the College of Education at the University of New Mexico.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was reviewed and approved by the IRB at the University of New Mexico.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. In the case of adult participants, informed consent was procured directly. In the case of minors participating in the study, ascent (from the child) and consent (from the relevant guardian) was procured, as consistent with IRB approval.
- Achenbach, T. M. (1986). The direct observation form of the child behavior checklist (rev. ed.). Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
- Bishop, S.R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N.D., Carmody, J., … Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bph077.
- Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2012). 2013 CASEL guide effective social and emotional learning programs: preschool and elementary school edition. Chicago: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.Google Scholar
- Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Downer, J. T., Booren, L. M., Hamre, B., Pianta, R. C., & Williford, A. (2011). The Individualized Classroom Assessment Scoring (inCLASS). Unpublished technical manual. Charlottesville: Curry School of Education, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
- Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guy, S. C., Gioia, G. A., & Isquith, P. K. (2004). BRIEF-SR: behavior rating inventory of executive function--self-report version: Professional Manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Jones, L., Hastings, R. P., Totsika, V., Keane, L., & Rhule, N. (2014). Child behavior problems and parental well-being in families of children with autism: the mediating role of mindfulness and acceptance. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 119(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-119.2.171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lemberger-Truelove, M., Carbonneau, K., Atencio, D., Zieher, A., & Palacious, A. (2018). Self-regulatory growth effects for young children participating in a combined social-emotional learning and mindfulness-based intervention. Journal of Counseling and Development, 96(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.556-6676.2014.00000.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mantzicopoulos, P., French, B. F., Patrick, H., Watson, J. S., & Ahn, I. (2018). The stability of kindergarten teachers’ effectiveness: a generalizability study comparing the framework for teaching and the classroom assessment scoring system. Educational Assessment, 23, 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2017.1408407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J. T., Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., & Martinez, A. (2014). Improving the power of an efficacy study of a social and emotional learning program: application of generalizability theory to the measurement of classroom-level outcomes. Prevention Science, 15, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0357-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McClelland, M. M., Geldhof, G. J., Cameron, C. E., & Wanless, S. B. (2015). Development and self-regulation. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. 1) (7th ed., pp. 523–565). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Meisels, S. J., & Atkins-Burnett, S. (2006). Evaluating early childhood assessments: A differential analysis. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood development (pp. 533–549). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2008) Early childhood assessment: why, what, and how. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Nojavanasghari, B., Baltrušaitis, T., Hughes, C. E., & Morency, L. P. (2016). The future belongs to the curious: Towards automatic understanding and recognition of curiosity in children. Paper presented at the Workshop on Child Computer Interaction, California, USA.Google Scholar
- Poehlmann-Tynan, J., Vigna, A. B., Weymouth, L. A., Gerstein, E. D., Burnson, C., Zabransky, M., ... & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2016). A pilot study of contemplative practices with economically disadvantaged preschoolers: children’s empathic and self-regulatory behaviors. Mindfulness, 7(1), 46–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0426-3.
- Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Oberle, E., Lawlor, M. S., Abbott, D., Thomson, K., Oberlander, T. F., & Diamond, A. (2015). Enhancing cognitive and social–emotional development through a simple-to-administer mindfulness-based school program for elementary school children: a randomized controlled trial. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: a primer. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar