Advertisement

Mindfulness

, Volume 10, Issue 12, pp 2555–2566 | Cite as

Mindfulness Training, Implicit Bias, and Force Response Decision-Making

  • Matthew HunsingerEmail author
  • Michael Christopher
  • Andi M. Schmidt
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 199 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

The goal of this study was to assess the preliminary efficacy of a mindfulness-based training (mindfulness-based resilience training; MBRT) in improving weapon identification among law enforcement officers (LEOs).

Methods

Participants (N = 61) were randomly assigned to either MBRT or a no-intervention control (NIC) group. A self-report questionnaire assessing mindfulness and a computerized measure assessing implicit stereotype reliance were administered at baseline, post-training, and 3 months following intervention completion. We also collected information about meditation practice outside of the training for LEOs in the MBRT group.

Results

Inferential analyses yielded improvements in mindfulness in the MBRT group compared to NIC. Analyses did not provide evidence for implicit stereotype reliance at baseline and therefore did not yield a significant impact of MBRT versus NIC on implicit stereotype reliance, ps > .05; however, participants across both conditions exerted more control when responding to Black male targets compared to White male targets, F(1,74) = 3.98, p = .05, 95% CI [− .05, − .01], d = .36.

Conclusions

Our results do not provide evidence for the impact of MBRT on weapon identification but do suggest that LEOs exerted more effort when responding to images of Black males compared to White males. We discuss recommendations for future clinical trials assessing implicit stereotype reliance, viz., that researchers utilize measures more sensitive to a wider range of LEO samples and with higher ecological validity, and we discuss potential reasons why our results do not align with past research.

Keywords

Mindfulness Implicit bias Police 

Notes

Author Contributions

MH: designed and executed the study; performed data analyses; and wrote the methods, results, and discussion sections. MC: designed and executed the study, provided feedback on data analyses, and provided feedback on writing the manuscript. AS: wrote the introduction section and provided feedback on the rest of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was funded by the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R21AT008854. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Matthew Hunsinger received grant funding from the National Institutes of Health to conduct the reported study; Michael Christopher received grant funding from the National Institutes of Health to conduct the reported study; Andi M. Schmidt has no funding to disclose.

Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The reported research was approved by the Interval Review Board at the home institution of all authors (Pacific University).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. B. (2012). Stress-induced cortisol facilitates threat-related decision making among police officers. Behavioral Neuroscience, 126(1), 167–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., Devine, P. G., Curtin, J. J., Hartley, S. L., & Covert, A. E. (2004). Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychological Science, 15(2), 88–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, J. P., & Gustafsberg, H. (2016). A training method to improve police use of force decision making: a randomized controlled trial. SAGE Open, 6(2), 2158244016638708.Google Scholar
  4. Avdija, A. S. (2014). Stress and law enforcers: testing the relationship between law enforcement work stressors and health-related issues. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2(1), 100–110.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.Google Scholar
  6. Bohlmeijer, E., ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18(3), 308–320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. (2011). Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 449–464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in health people: a review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(5), 593–600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chopko, B. A., & Schwartz, R. C. (2013). The relation between mindfulness and posttraumatic stress symptoms among police officers. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 18(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  10. Christopher, M. S., Goerling, R. J., Rogers, B. S., Hunsinger, M., Baron, G., Bergman, A. L., & Zava, D. T. (2016). A pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention on cortisol awakening response and health outcomes among law enforcement officers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(1), 15–28.Google Scholar
  11. Christopher, M. S., Hunsinger, M., Goerling, L. R. J., Bowen, S., Rogers, B. S., Gross, C. R., Dapalonia, E., & Pruessner, J. C. (2018). Mindfulness-based resilience training to reduce health risk, stress reactivity, and aggression among law enforcement officers: a feasibility and preliminary efficacy trial. Psychiatry Research, 264, 104–115.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Correll, J., Hudson, S. M., Guillermo, S., & Ma, D. S. (2014). The police officer’s dilemma: a decade of research on racial bias in the decision to shoot. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(5), 201–213.Google Scholar
  13. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1314–1329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Park, B., Judd, C. M., Sadler, M. S., & Keesee, T. (2007). Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1006–1023.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Crosswell, A. D., Moreno, P. I., Raposa, E. B., Motivala, S. J., Stanton, A. L., Ganz, P. A., & Bower, J. E. (2017). Effects of mindfulness training on emotional and physiologic recovery from induced negative affect. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 86, 78–86.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. de Bruin, E. I., Topper, M., Muskens, J. G., Bögels, S. M., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) in a meditating and a non-meditating sample. Assessment, 19(2), 187–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dias-Ferreira, E., Sousa, J. C., Melo, I., Morgado, P., Mesquita, A. R., Cerqueira, J. J., et al. (2009). Chronic stress causes frontostriatal reorganization and affects decision-making. Science, 325(5940), 621–625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dror, I. E. (2007). Perception of risk and the decision to use force. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1(3), 265–272.Google Scholar
  20. DuCharme, S. D. (2002). The search for reasonableness in use-of-force cases: understanding the effects of stress on perception and performance. Fordham Law Review, 70, 47.Google Scholar
  21. Eberhardt, J. L., Davies, P. G., Purdie-Vaughns, V. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: perceived stereotypicality of black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fachner, G., & Carter, S. (2015). Collaborative reform initiative: an assessment of deadly force in the Philadelphia police department. Washington, DC: Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from httpd://ric-zai-inc.com/ric.php?page=detailandid=COPS=W0753.
  23. Forscher, P., Lai, C. R. Axt, J., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P., & Nosek, B. (2016). A meta-analysis of change in implicit bias. PsyArXiv Preprints. Retreived from https://psyarxiv.com/dv8tu. Accessed 1 Apr 2019
  24. Friese, M., Hoffmann, W., & Wänke, M. (2008). When impulses take over: moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 397–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gouin, J. P., Glaser, R., Malarkey, W. B., Beversdorf, D., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. (2012). Chronic stress, daily stressors, and circulating inflammatory markers. Health Psychology, 31(2), 264–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hetey, R. C., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2018). The numbers don’t speak for themselves: racial disparities and the persistence of inequality in the criminal justice system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 183–187.Google Scholar
  30. Hofmann, W., & Friese, M. (2008). Impulses got the better of me: alcohol moderates the influence of implicit attitudes toward food cues on eating behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 420–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2007). And deplete us not into temptation: automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 497–504.Google Scholar
  32. Holmes, M. D., & Smith, B. W. (2012). Intergroup dynamics of extra-legal police aggression: an integrated theory of race and place. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 344–353.Google Scholar
  33. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 5, 513–541.Google Scholar
  34. James, L., James, S. M., & Vila, B. J. (2016). The reverse racism effect: are cops more hesitant to shoot Black than White suspects? American Society of Criminology, 15(2), 457–479.Google Scholar
  35. James, L., Klinger, D., & Vila, B. (2014). Racial and ethnic bias in decisions to shoot seen through a stronger lens: experimental results from high-fidelity laboratory simulations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(3), 323–340.Google Scholar
  36. James, L., Vila, B., & Daratha, K. (2013). Results from experimental trials testing participant responses to White, Hispanic and Black suspects in high-fidelity deadly force judgment and decision-making simulations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(2), 189–212.Google Scholar
  37. Jha, A. P., Stanley, E. A., Kiyonaga, A., Wong, L., & Gelfand, L. (2010). Examining the protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and affective experience. Emotion, 10(1), 54–64.Google Scholar
  38. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living (revised edition): using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York, NY: Random House Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  39. Kaplan, J. B., Bergman, A. L., Christopher, M., Bowen, S., & Hunsinger, M. (2017). Role of resilience in mindfulness training for first responders. Mindfulness, 8(5), 1373–1380.Google Scholar
  40. Kleider, H. M., Parrott, D. J., & King, T. Z. (2010). Shooting behaviour: how working memory and negative emotionality influence police officer shoot decisions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 707–717.Google Scholar
  41. Kubota, J. T., & Ito, T. A. (2014). The role of expression and race in weapons identification. Emotion, 14(6), 1115–1124.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Lilja, J. L., Lundh, L. G., Josefsoon, T., & Falkenström (2013). Observing as an essential facet of mindfulness: a comparison of FFMQ patterns in meditating and non-meditating individuals. Mindfulness, 4(3), 203–212.Google Scholar
  43. Lueke, A., & Gibson, B. (2014). Mindfulness meditation reduces implicit age and race bias: the role of reduced automaticity of responding. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(3), 284–291.Google Scholar
  44. Lueke, A., & Gibson, B. (2016). Brief mindfulness meditation reduces discrimination. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(1), 34–44.Google Scholar
  45. Ma, D. S., & Correll, J. (2011). Target prototypicality moderates racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 391–396.Google Scholar
  46. Ma, D. S., Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Bar-Anan, Yoav, B., Sriram, N., & Nosek, B. A. (2013). When fatigue turns deadly: the association between fatigue and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 515–524.Google Scholar
  47. McCraty, R., & Atkinson, M. (2012). Resilience training program reduces physiological and psychological stress in police officers. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 1(5), 44–66.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. McEwen, B. S. (2012). Brain on stress: how the social environment gets under the skin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Supplement 2), 17180–17185.Google Scholar
  49. Mekawi, Y., & Bresin, K. (2015). Is the evidence from racial bias shooting task studies a smoking gun? Results from a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 120–130.Google Scholar
  50. Nieuwenhuys, A., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2012). Shoot or don’t shoot? Why police officers are more inclined to shoot when they are anxious. Emotion, 12(4), 827–833.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nix, J., Campbell, B. A., Byers, E. H., & Alpert, G. P. (2017). A bird’s eye view of civilians killed by police in 2015. Criminology and Public Policy, 16, 309–340.Google Scholar
  52. O’Hara, A. F., Violanti, J. M., Levenson, R. L., & Clark, R. G. (2013). National police suicide estimates: web surveillance study III. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 15(1), 31–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Parker, K., Horowitz, J. M., Brown, A., Fry, R., Cohn, D., & Igielnik, R. (2018, May 22). Demographic and economic trends in urban, suburban, and rural communities. Pew Research Center: Social & Demograhics Trends Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/05/22/demographic-and-economic-trends-in-urban-suburban-and-rural-communities/. Accessed 20 Mar 2019
  54. Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 181–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Payne, B. K. (2006). Weapon bias: split-second decisions and unintended stereotyping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 287–291.Google Scholar
  56. Plessow, F., Schade, S., Kirschbaum, C., & Fischer, R. (2017). Successful voluntary recruitment of cognitive control under acute stress. Cognition, 168, 182–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Porcelli, A. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2009). Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science, 20(3), 278–283.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Uusberg, H., Uusberg, A., Talpsep, T., & Paaver, M. (2016). Mechanisms of mindfulness: the dynamics of affective adaptation during open monitoring. Biological Psychology, 118, 94–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Violanti, J. M., Burchfiel, C. M., Miller, D. B., Andrew, M. E., Dorn, J., Wactawski-Wende, J., et al. (2006). The Buffalo Cardio-Metabolic Occupational Police Stress (BCOPS) pilot study: methods and participant characteristics. Annals of Epidemiology, 16(2), 148–156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Violanti, J. M., Fekedulegn, D., Andrew, M. E., Charles, L. E., Hartley, T. A., & Burchfiel, C. M. (2011). Adiposity in policing: mental health consequences. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 13(4), 257–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Wahbeh, H., Zwickey, H., & Oken, B. (2011). One method for objective adherence measurement in mind-body medicine. Joirnal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 17(2), 175–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Hu, Y., Fang, Y., Wang, G., Cui, X., & Wang, L. (2016). The effect of implicit preferences on food consumption: moderating role of ego depletion and impulsivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1699.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Wheeler, M. S., Arnkoff, D. B., & Glass, C. R. (2017). The neuroscience of mindfulness: how mindfulness alters the brain and facilitates emotion regulation. Mindfulness, 8(6), 1471–1487.Google Scholar
  64. Whitmarsh, S., Uddén, J., Barendregt, H., & Petersson, K. M. (2013). Mindfulness reduces habitual responding based on implicit knowledge: evidence from artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(3), 833–845.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Graduate PsychologyPacific UniversityHillsboroUSA

Personalised recommendations