Advertisement

Mindfulness

pp 1–15 | Cite as

Effects of an Ultra-brief Computer-based Mindfulness Training on Mindfulness and Self-control: a Randomised Controlled Trial Using a 40-Day Ecological Momentary Assessment

  • Zarah RowlandEmail author
  • Mario Wenzel
  • Thomas Kubiak
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

This study examined whether an ultra-brief mindfulness (UBM) training can change state mindfulness and perceived state self-control in daily life (primary outcomes), ultimately improving habitual mindfulness and perceived self-control (secondary outcomes). To gain a better understanding of the beneficial effects of practising mindfulness, the study additionally examined how mindfulness and self-control were related to each other during the training.

Methods

The randomised controlled trial combined a 40-day ecological momentary assessment with seven weekly surveys. Undergraduate students (Nenrolled = 137, 104 females, Mage = 23.08, SD = 5.04 years), were either assigned to the UBM training (n = 68) or wait-list control condition (n = 69). Primary outcomes were assessed six times a day using ecological momentary assessments (7-point scales). Secondary outcomes were measured weekly (6-point scales). A breath counting task at pre- and post-training was an additional behavioural measure of mindfulness.

Results

An intention-to-treat multivariate mixed model identified day-to-day training effects (group × days-interaction) on state mindfulness (b = .005, p = .001) and perceived state self-control (b = .007, p < .001). A mediation analysis revealed that state mindfulness mediated the training effect on perceived state self-control (b = .001, p < .001). Habitual mindfulness (b = .049, p < .001) and breath counting task performance (b = 2.446, p = .043) also improved with training whereas habitual perceived self-control did not.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that state mindfulness and perceived state self-control may be interconnected in daily life and may be similarly improved through an UBM training.

Trial Registration

NCT02647801

Keywords

Ultra-brief mindfulness training Ecological momentary assessment Mindfulness Perceived self-control Randomised controlled trial 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to our research assistants Maike Vogel, Julius Welzel, Markus Müssig, and Kimberly Holtz who assisted us in the organisation and the data collection of the study.

Author Contributions

ZR: conducted and organised the study, analysed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MW: designed and organised the study, assisted with the data analyses, contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. TK: assisted with the data analyses and contributed to the writing and editing of the final manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Funding Information

This work has been financially supported by a scholarship (Promotionsstipendium der Stipendienstiftung Rheinland-Pfalz).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This trial was approved by the local ethics committee at the Institute of Psychology at the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Germany (2015-JGU-psychEK-011).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12671_2019_1204_MOESM1_ESM.docx (5.5 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 5611 kb)

References

  1. Aarts, E., Verhage, M., Veenvliet, J. V., Dolan, C. V., & van der Sluis, S. (2014). A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 491–496.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3648.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach, R. P., Alonso, J., Axinn, W. G., Cuijpers, P., Ebert, D. D., Green, J. G., et al. (2016). Mental disorders among college students in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Psychological Medicine, 46(14), 2955–2970.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001665.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, S. A., Imel, Z. E., Braithwaite, S. R., & Atkins, D. C. (2014). Analyzing multiple outcomes in clinical research using multivariate multilevel models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(5), 920–930.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035628.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: how and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Bratlavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertrams, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2009). Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität Eine deutsche Adaptation der Kurzform der Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D) [Measuring dispositional self-control capacity. A German adaptation of the short form of the Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D)]. Diagnostica, 55(1), 2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.1.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrams, A., Unger, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2011). Momentan verfügbare Selbstkontrollkraft – Vorstellung eines Messinstruments und erste Befunde aus pädagogisch-psychologischen Kontexten [Momentarily Available Self-Control Strength – Introduction of a Measure and First Findings from Educational- Psychological Contexts]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25(3), 185–196.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.  https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanke, E. S., & Brose, A. (2017). Mindfulness in daily life: a multidimensional approach. Mindfulness, 8(3), 737–750.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0651-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canby, N. K., Cameron, I. M., Calhoun, A. T., & Buchanan, G. M. (2015). A brief mindfulness intervention for healthy college students and its effects on psychological distress, self-control, meta-mood, and subjective vitality. Mindfulness, 6(5), 1071–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0356-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 23–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9130-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2009). How long does a mindfulness-based stress reduction program need to be? A review of class contact hours and effect sizes for psychological distress. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(6), 627–638.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter, E. C., Kofler, L. M., Forster, D. E., & McCullough, M. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 796–815.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chakraborty, H., & Gu, H. (2009). A mixed model approach for intent-to-treat analysis in longitudinal clinical trials with missing values. (RTI Press Publication No. MR-0009-0903). Research Triangle Park: RTI Press.  https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2009.mr.0009.0903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ciarocco, N. J., Twenge, J. M., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2007). Measuring state self-control: Reliability, validity, and correlations with physical and psychological stress. Unpublished manuscript, Monmouth University, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  18. de Ridder, D. T. D., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: a meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76–99.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. de Vibe, M., Solhaug, I., Tyssen, R., Friborg, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., Sørlie, T., et al. (2015). Does personality moderate the effects of mindfulness training for medical and psychology students? Mindfulness, 6(2), 281–289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0258-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: when mind mediates behavior. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
  21. Demarzo, M., Montero-Marin, J., Puebla-Guedea, M., Navarro-Gil, M., Herrera-Mercadal, P., Moreno- González, S., et al. (2017). Efficacy of 8- and 4-session mindfulness-based interventions in a non-clinical population: a controlled study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1343.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01343.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Feltman, R., Robinson, M. D., & Ode, S. (2009). Mindfulness as a moderator of neuroticism–outcome relations: a self-regulation perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 953–961.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friese, M., & Hofmann, W. (2016). State mindfulness, self-regulation, and emotional experience in everyday life. Motivation Science, 2(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friese, M., Messner, C., & Schaffner, Y. (2012). Mindfulness meditation counteracts self-control depletion. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 1016–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Friese, M., Loschelder, D. D., Gieseler, K., Frankenbach, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2019). Is ego depletion real? An analysis of arguments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(2), 107–131.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318762183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Grund, A., & Carstens, C. (2019). Self-control motivationally reconsidered: “Acting” self-controlled is different to “being good” at self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 43(1), 63–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9721-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: an experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1318–1335.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.Google Scholar
  29. Hunt, J., & Eisenberg, D. (2010). Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(1), 3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 450–463.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612454134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
  32. Josefsson, T., Lindwall, M., & Broberg, A. G. (2014). The effects of a short-term mindfulness based intervention on self-reported mindfulness, decentering, executive attention, psychological health, and coping style: examining unique mindfulness effects and mediators. Mindfulness, 5(1), 18–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0142-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan, S. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 480–506.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaplan, S., & Berman, M. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 43–57.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356784.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., et al. (2013). Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(6), 763–771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lang, F. R., Lüdtke, O., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen [Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory in young, middle-aged and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47(3), 111–121.  https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levinson, D. B., Stoll, E. L., Kindy, S. D., Merry, H. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2014). A mind you can count on: validating breath counting as a behavioral measure of mindfulness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1202.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitoring and Acceptance Theory (MAT). Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 48–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Liu, X., Wang, S., Chang, S., Chen, W., & Si, M. (2013). Effect of brief mindfulness intervention on tolerance and distress of pain induced by cold-pressor task. Stress and Health, 29(3), 199–204.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mahmood, L., Hopthrow, T., & de Moura, G. R. (2016). A moment of mindfulness: computer-mediated mindfulness practice increases state mindfulness. PLoS One, 11(4), e0153923.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153923.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Michalak, J., Heidenreich, T., Ströhle, G., & Nachtigall, C. (2008). Die deutsche Version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS): Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen [German version of the Mindful Attention an Awareness Scale (MAAS)—Psychometric features of a mindfulness questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 37(3), 200–208.  https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443.37.3.200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Muraven, M. (2010). Building self-control strength: practicing self-control leads to improved self-control performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 465–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Nyklíček, I., & Irrmischer, M. (2017). For whom does mindfulness-based stress reduction work? Moderating effects of personality. Mindfulness, 8(4), 1106–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0687-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Rheinberg, F., & Engeser, S. (2010). Motive training and motivational competence. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 510–548). Oxford: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rowland, Z., Wenzel, M., & Kubiak, T. (2016). The effects of computer-based mindfulness training on self-control and mindfulness within ambulatorily assessed network systems across health-related domains in a healthy student population (SMASH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 17, 570.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1707-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruscio, A. C., Muench, C., Brede, E., MacIntyre, J., & Waters, A. J. (2016). Administration and assessment of brief mindfulness practice in the field: a feasibility study using ecological momentary assessment. Mindfulness, 7(4), 988–999.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0538-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salmon, P., Lush, E., Jablonski, M., & Sephton, S. E. (2009). Yoga and mindfulness: clinical aspects of an ancient mind/body practice. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16(1), 59–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2008.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2002). Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: Chance, not choice. The Lancet, 359(9305), 515–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  53. Shrout, P. E., & Lane, S. P. (2012). Psychometrics. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 302–321). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Snapinn, S. M., & Jiang, Q. (2007). Responder analyses and the assessment of a clinically relevant treatment effect. Trials, 8(31), 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stöber, J. (2001). The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 222–232.  https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. (2013). Ambulatory assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 151–176.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Wichers, M., Wigman, J. T. W., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2015). Micro-level affect dynamics in psychopathology viewed from complex dynamical system theory. Emotion Review, 7(4), 362–367.  https://doi.org/10.1146/10.1177/1754073915590623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zeidan, F., Johnson, S. K., Diamond, B. J., David, Z., & Goolkasian, P. (2010). Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: evidence of brief mental training. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(2), 597–605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Psychology, Institute of PsychologyJohannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations