Advertisement

Mindfulness

pp 1–9 | Cite as

Differences in Compassion, Well-being, and Social Anxiety Between Japan and the USA

  • Kohki Arimitsu
  • Hidefumi Hitokoto
  • Shelley Kind
  • Stefan G. Hofmann
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Research has shown that self-compassion can improve individual well-being in many cultures; however, little research has examined cultural differences regarding compassion for others and individual well-being. Cross-cultural research has indicated that interdependent happiness and taijin kyofusho (TKS) (other-focused social anxiety) are aspects of well-being and psychopathology, respectively, related to interdependent (i.e., collectivistic) cultures such as Japan. First, we hypothesized that self-compassion would foster greater positive affect and satisfaction with life and less negative affect and social anxiety in the USA than in Japan. Our second hypothesis was that compassion for others would be associated with greater interdependent happiness, and with less TKS symptoms, in Japan compared with the USA. Through a web-based survey of Japanese and American adults, we found that self-compassion was related to positive and negative affect, social anxiety disorder and TKS symptoms, and well-being in both countries. Compassion for others was found to be associated with increased positive affect and decreased TKS symptoms across both cultures. Simple slope tests revealed that self-compassion had a stronger relation with positive affect among US adults than their Japanese counterparts, whereas compassion for others was related to interdependent happiness only in Japan. These findings suggest that the link between compassion, well-being, and psychopathology might be universal, although the effects of the two types of compassion have different patterns between the two cultures.

Keywords

Culture Compassion Affect Well-being Social anxiety Taijin kyofusho 

Notes

Author Contributions

KA: designed and executed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. HH: collaborated with the design, assisting with the data analyses, and editing of the final manuscript. SK and SH: collaborated with the design and editing of the final manuscript.

Funding Information

This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), awarded by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (Numbers 25380944 and 17K04453) and a Special Research Program of Komazawa University 2016 to the first author. Dr. Hofmann receives financial support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (as part of the Humboldt Prize), NIH/NCCIH (R01AT007257), NIH/NIMH (R01MH099021, U01MH108168), and the James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative in Understanding Human Cognition – Special Initiative. He receives compensation for his work as editor from SpringerNature and the Association for Psychological Science, and as an advisor from the Palo Alto Health Sciences and for his work as a Subject Matter Expert from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and SilverCloud Health, Inc. He also receives royalties and payments for his editorial work from various publishers.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the present study were approved by the ethical committee of Boston University.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Alden, L. E., & Trew, J. L. (2013). If it makes you happy: engaging in kind acts increases positive affect in socially anxious individuals. Emotion, 13, 64–75.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arimitsu, K. (2014). Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Self-Compassion Scale. Shinrigaku Kenkyu: The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 85, 50–59.  https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.85.50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arimitsu, K., & Hofmann, S. G. (2017). Effects of compassionate thinking on negative emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 160–167.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1078292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arimitsu, K., Hitokoto, H., Kind, S., & Hofmann, S. G. (2016). The Japanese version of the Social Anxiety Questionnaire for Adults. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  6. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caballo, V. E., Salazar, I. C., Irurtia, M. J., Arias, B., Hofmann, S. G., & Research Team, C. I. S. O.-A. (2012). The multidimensional nature and multicultural validity of a new measure of social anxiety: the Social Anxiety Questionnaire for Adults. Behavior Therapy, 43, 313–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.07.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dinnel, D. L., Kleinknecht, R. A., & Tanaka-Matsumi, J. (2002). A cross-cultural comparison of social phobia symptoms. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 75–84.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015316223631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerber, Z., Tolmacz, R., & Doron, Y. (2015). Self-compassion and forms of concern for others. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 394–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Matos, M., & Rivis, A. (2011). Fears of compassion: development of three self-report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 84, 239–255.  https://doi.org/10.1348/147608310X526511.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351–374.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Güngör, D., Boiger, M., Dinçer, D., Karasawa, M., & Mesquita, B. (2014). Fitting in or sticking together: the prevalence and adaptivity of conformity, relatedness, and autonomy in Japan and Turkey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1374–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114542977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., & Lehman, D. R. (2001). Cultural differences in self-evaluation: Japanese readily accept negative self-elevant information. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 434–443.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hitokoto, H., & Uchida, Y. (2015). Interdependent happiness: theoretical importance and measurement validity. Journal of Happiness Studies., 16, 211–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9505-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofmann, S. G. (2007). Cognitive factors that maintain social anxiety disorder: a comprehensive model and its treatment implications. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 36, 193–209.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070701421313.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofmann, S. G., Anu Asnaani, M. A., & Hinton, D. E. (2010). Cultural aspects in social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 1117–1127.  https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20759.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Fang, A., & Asnaani, A. (2012). Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 29, 409–416.  https://doi.org/10.1002/da.21888.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kawahito, J., Otsuka, Y., Kaida, K., & Nakata, A. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of 20-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Hiroshima Psychological Research, 11, 225–240.  https://doi.org/10.15027/32396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, J., & Hatfield, E. (2004). Love types and subjective well-being: a cross-cultural study. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 173–182.  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2004.32.2.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitayama, S., & Karasawa, M. (1997). Implicit self-esteem in Japan: name letters and birthday numbers. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 736–742.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kleinknecht, R. A., Dinnel, D. L., Kleinknecht, E. E., Hiruma, N., & Harada, N. (1997). Cultural factors in social anxiety: a comparison of social phobia symptoms and taijin kyofusho. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 157–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(97)00004-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. MacBeth, A., & Gumley, A. (2012). Exploring compassion: a meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 545–552.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Makransky, J. (2012). Compassion in Buddhist psychology. In C. K. Germer & R. D. Siegel (Eds.), Compassion and wisdom in psychotherapy (pp. 61–74). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muris, P., & Petrocchi, N. (2017). Protection or vulnerability? A meta-analysis of the relations between the positive and negative components of self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24, 373–383.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Na, J., Grossmann, I., Varnum, M. E. W., Kitayama, S., Gonzalez, R., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 6192–6197.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001911107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakamura, K., Kitanishi, K., Miyake, Y., Hashimoto, K., & Kubota, M. (2002). The neurotic versus delusional subtype of taijin-kyofu-sho: their DSM diagnoses. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 56, 595–601.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1819.2002.01061.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223–250.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neff, K. D., & Vonk, R. (2009). Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: two different ways of relating to oneself. Journal of Personality, 77, 23–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Neff, K. D., Pisitsungkagarn, K., & Hsieh, Y. P. (2008). Self-compassion and self-construal in the United States, Thailand, and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 267–285.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108314544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norasakkunkit, V., Kitayama, S., & Uchida, Y. (2012). Social anxiety and holistic cognition: self-focused social anxiety in the United States and other-focused social anxiety in Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 742–757.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111405658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sato, K., Yuki, M., & Norasakkunkit, V. (2014). A socio-ecological approach to cross-cultural differences in the sensitivity to social rejection: the partially mediating role of relational mobility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1549–1560.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114544320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & John, O. J. (2006). Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 61–71.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500510833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, P. B., Ahmad, A. H., Owe, E., Celikkol, G., Ping, H., Gavreliuc, A., et al. (2016). Nation-level moderators of the extent to which self-efficacy and relationship harmony predict student depression and life satisfaction: evidence from nine nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 643–658.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116648210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sprecher, S., & Fehr, B. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 629–651.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00070.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sugawara, D., Arimitsu, K., & Sugie, M. (2016). The Japanese version of Differential Positive Emotions Scale. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  40. Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of a brief measure of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Werner, K. H., Jazaieri, H., Goldin, P. R., Ziv, M., Heimberg, R. G., & Gross, J. J. (2012). Self-compassion and social anxiety disorder. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 25, 543–558.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.608842.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yamaguchi, A., Kim, M. S., & Akutsu, S. (2014). The effects of self-construals, self-criticism, and self-compassion on depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 65–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zessin, U., Dickhauser, O., & Garbade, S. (2015). The relationship between self-compassion and well-being: a meta-analysis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 7, 340–364.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesKwansei Gakuin UniversityNishinomiyaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Culture, Faculty of HumanitiesFukuoka UniversityFukuoka cityJapan
  3. 3.Suffolk UniversityBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations