Advertisement

Mindfulness

pp 1–6 | Cite as

In the Seen Just the Seen: Mindfulness and the Construction of Experience

  • Bhikkhu Anālayo
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

In this article, I relate findings in cognitive psychology on the constructed nature of experience to related notions in early Buddhist thought, which recognize the degree to which the mind influences sensory perception. In particular, I take up the doctrinal teaching of dependent arising in its bearing on the reciprocal relationship between consciousness and name-and-form. I complement this by turning to the role of the mind as a forerunner of all things and to the impact of affect, in the form of “feeling,” on the arising of craving (another aspect of the doctrine of dependent arising). Based on these explorations, I examine the notion of “bare awareness” as a mode of practice already recognized in early Buddhist thought. From an early Buddhist viewpoint, the cultivation of mindfulness can help to become aware of, and avoid being carried away by, the influence of mental construction on experience, resulting in the ability to remain just with what is seen in the seen.

Keywords

Bare awareness Construction of experience Dependent arising Mindfulness Name-and-form Perceptual prediction 

Abbreviations

Dīrgha-āgama (T 1)

Dhp

Dhammapada

Ekottarika-āgama (T 125)

Madhyama-āgama (T 26)

MN

Majjhima-nikāya

Saṃyukta-āgama (T 99)

SHT

Sanskrithandschriften aus den Turfanfunden

SN

Saṃyutta-nikāya

T

Taishō edition

Ud

Udāna

Up

Abhidharmakośopāyikā-ṭīkā

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies performed by the author with human participants or animals.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agostini, G. (2010). ‘Preceded by Thought Are the Dhammas’: The ancient exegesis on Dhp 1–2. In G. Orofino & S. Vita (Eds.), Buddhist Asia 2. Papers from the second conference of Buddhist studies held in Naples in June 2004 (pp. 1–34). Kyoto: Italian School of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  2. Anālayo, Bh. (2011). A comparative study of the Majjhima-nikāya. Taipei: Dharma Drum Publishing Corporation http://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/compstudyvol1.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Anālayo, Bh. (2012). The historical value of the Pāli discourses. Indo-Iranian Journal, 55, 223–253.  https://doi.org/10.1163/001972412X620187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anālayo, Bh. (2013). Perspectives on Satipaṭṭhāna. Cambridge: Windhorse Publications https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/perspectives.pdf.Google Scholar
  5. Anālayo, Bh. (2017). Nāma-rūpa. In K. T. S. Sarao & J. D. Long (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Indian religions, Buddhism and Jainism (pp. 802–804). Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0852-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anālayo, Bh. (2018a). The Bāhiya instruction and bare awareness. Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies, 19, 1–19.Google Scholar
  7. Anālayo, Bh. (2018b). Why be mindful of feelings? Contemporary Buddhism, 19(1), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barret, L. Feldman (2017). How emotions are made, the secret life of the brain. Boston: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bodhi, Bh. (2011). What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 19–39.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2011.564813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter, O. L., Presti, D. E., Callistempon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G. B., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2005). Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks. Current Biology, 15(11), R412–R413.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chetverikov, A., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2016). On the joys of perceiving: affect as feedback for perceptual predictions. Acta Psychologica, 169, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. (2011). Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 449–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhammadinnā, Bh. (2017). Bhikkhu Ñāṇananda’s concept and reality: a reply to Stephen Evans. Buddhist Studies Review, 34(2), 151–180.  https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.35391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, C. G., Vangkilde, S., Frokjaer, V., & Hasselbalch, S. G. (2012). Mindfulness training affects attention—or is it attentional effort? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 106–123.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lao, S., Kissane, D., & Meadows, G. (2016). Cognitive effects of MBSR/MBCT: a systematic review of neuropsychological outcomes. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 109–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 163–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Sauer, S., Lemke, J., Wittmann, M., Kohls, N., Mochty, U., & Walach, H. (2012). How long is now for mindfulness meditators? Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 750–754.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skilling, P. (2007). ‘Dhammas are as swift as thought ...’ A note on Dhammapada 1 and 2 and their parallels. Journal of the Centre for Buddhist Studies, Sri Lanka, 5, 23–50.Google Scholar
  20. Verhaegen, P. (2016). Mindfulness and meditation training. In T. Strobach & J. Karback (Eds.), Cognitive training, an overview of features and applications (pp. 127–136). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42662-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Westra, E. (2017). Stereotypes, theory of mind, and the action-prediction hierarchy. Synthese, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1575-9.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barre Center for Buddhist StudiesBarreUSA

Personalised recommendations