, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 654–663 | Cite as

Forgive and Let Go: Effect of Self-Compassion on Post-Event Processing in Social Anxiety

  • Rebecca A. Blackie
  • Nancy L. Kocovski


Post-event processing refers to negative and repetitive thinking following socially anxious situations and has been posited as a maintaining factor in social anxiety. One strategy for reducing post-event processing may be through self-compassion, which was the primary purpose of the present study. An additional aim was to examine the effect of self-compassion on willingness to engage in future social scenarios. Socially anxious undergraduates (N = 98) provided an impromptu speech and were randomly assigned to a self-compassion, rumination, or control condition. Participants completed measures of post-event processing and willingness to engage in social situations the following day. As expected, self-compassion immediately following a speech led to less post-event processing the next day, as well as greater willingness to engage in future social situations. There was also support for a mediation model illustrating the mechanisms through which self-compassion exerted its effects on these two outcomes. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the utility of self-compassion on reducing the negative and repetitive thinking that serves to maintain social anxiety and increasing willingness to partake in future social events.


Self-compassion Social anxiety Post-event processing Rumination Performance perceptions 



This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) in the form of a doctoral fellowship to the first author and by the Ministry of Research and Innovation (ER09-06-227; second author).

Author Contributions

RAB collaborated with the design and writing of the manuscript, executed the study, and conducted the data analyses. NLK collaborated with the design and writing of the study and edited the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the research ethics board of Wilfrid Laurier University and/or the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos (version 22.0) [Computer program]. Chicago: IBM-SPSS.Google Scholar
  2. Arch, J. J., Warren Brown, K., Dean, D. J., Landy, L. N., Brown, K. D., & Laudenslager, M. L. (2014). Self-compassion training modulates alpha-amylase, heart rate variability, and subjective responses to social evaluative threat in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 42, 49–58. Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the beck depression inventory–II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Blackie, R. A., & Kocovski, N. L. (2016). Letting go of yesterday: effect of distraction on post-event processing and anticipatory anxiety in a socially anxious sample. Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 45, 60–72. Scholar
  5. Blackie, R. A., & Kocovski, N. L. (2017a). Examining the relationships among self-compassion, social anxiety, and post-event processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  6. Blackie, R. A., & Kocovski, N. L. (2017b). Development and validation of the trait and state versions of the post-event processing inventory. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 30, 202–218. Scholar
  7. Brozovich, F. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (2013). Mental imagery and post-event processing in anticipation of a speech performance among socially anxious individuals. Behavior Therapy, 44, 701–716. Scholar
  8. Clark, D. M. (2001). A cognitive perspective on social phobia. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: concepts, research and interventions relating to the self and shyness (pp. 405–430). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd..Google Scholar
  9. Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., Weisler, R. H., & Foa, E. (2000). Psychometric properties of the social phobia inventory (SPIN). British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379–386. Scholar
  11. Harwood, E. M., & Kocovski, N. L. (2017). Self-compassion induction reduces anticipatory anxiety among socially anxious students. Mindfulness. Advance online publication.
  12. Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910. Scholar
  13. Holzman, J. B., & Valentiner, D. P. (2016). Self-focused attention affects subsequent processing of positive (but not negative) performance appraisals. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 295–302. Scholar
  14. Kashdan, T. B., & Roberts, J. E. (2007). Social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and post-event rumination: affective consequences and social contextual influences. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 284–301. Scholar
  15. Kocovski, N. L., MacKenzie, M. B., & Rector, N. A. (2011). Rumination and distraction periods immediately following a speech task: effect on post-event processing in social anxiety. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40, 45–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Leary, M. R., Tate, E. B., Adams, C. E., Allen, A. B., & Hancock, J. (2007). Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: the implications of treating oneself kindly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 887–904. Scholar
  17. Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 455–470. Scholar
  18. McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40, 16–25. Scholar
  19. Mongrain, M., Chin, J. M., & Shapira, L. B. (2011). Practicing compassion increases happiness and self-esteem. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 963–981. Scholar
  20. Neff, K. D. (2003a). Self-compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85–101. Scholar
  21. Neff, K. D. (2003b). Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2, 223–250. Scholar
  22. Neff, K. D., & Dahm, K. A. (2015). Self-compassion: what it is, what it does, and how it relates to mindfulness. In B. D. Ostafin, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness and self-regulation (pp. 121–137). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neff, K. D., & Vonk, R. (2009). Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: two different ways of relating to oneself. Journal of Personality, 77, 23–50. Scholar
  24. Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y. P., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4, 263–287. 13576500444000317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Odou, N., & Brinker, J. (2015). Self-compassion, a better alternative to rumination than distraction as a response to negative mood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 447–457. Scholar
  26. Raes, F. (2010). Rumination and worry as mediators of the relationship between self-compassion and depression and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 757–761. Scholar
  27. Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construct and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 250–255. Scholar
  28. Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 741–756. Scholar
  29. Rapee, R. M., & Lim, L. (1992). Discrepancy between self- and observer ratings of performance in social phobics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 728–731. Scholar
  30. Robins, R., Hendin, H., & Trzesniewski, K. (2001). Measure global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. Scholar
  31. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. Scholar
  33. Wolpe, J. (1969). The practice of behavior therapy. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations