Advertisement

Mindfulness

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 1615–1622 | Cite as

The Impact of Mindfulness and Perspective-Taking on Implicit Associations Toward the Elderly: a Relational Frame Theory Account

  • Darren J. Edwards
  • Ciara McEnteggart
  • Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
  • Rob Lowe
  • Nicky Evans
  • Roger Vilardaga
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Perspective-taking interventions have been shown to improve attitudes toward social outgroups. In contrast, similar interventions have produced opposite effects (i.e., enhanced negativity) in the context of attitudes toward elderly groups. The current study investigated whether a brief perspective-taking intervention enhanced with mindfulness would be associated with less negativity than perspective-taking alone. One hundred five participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions which comprised of an active or control perspective-taking component and an active or control mindfulness component. Participants were then administered an Implicit Associated Test to assess implicit biases toward the elderly. Results supported previous findings in that the condition in which perspective-taking was active but mindfulness was inactive was associated with greater negative implicit bias toward the elderly; however, some of this negativity decreased in the active perspective-taking and active mindfulness condition. The current findings and other mixed effects that have emerged from perspective-taking interventions are discussed from a Relational Frame Theory perspective.

Keywords

Implicit association test Perspective-taking Mindfulness Relational frame theory 

Notes

Author Contributions

DJE designed and operationalized the study, conducted the data analyses, wrote the majority paper, as well as edited the final draft. CM collaborated by helping with the wording of the RFT components of the study, and conducted an independent analysis of the raw data which confirmed the findings. YBH collaborated with CM in the wording of the RFT components of the study and aided in the independent analysis to confirm the findings. RL helped with some parts of the design and writing of the paper. NE collected the data, conducted the pre-analysis of the D scores, as well as assisted in some of the writing. RV collaborated by helping with the writing and implementation of the RFT theory as part of the conclusions.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arch, J. J., & Craske, M. G. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness: emotion regulation following a focused breathing induction. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1849–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Cullinan, V. (2001). Education. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  3. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., et al. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadinu, M. R., & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation process in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661–677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dovidio, J. F., ten Vergert, M., Stewart, T. L., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, J. D., Esses, V. M., et al. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1537–1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). The role of self in acceptance and commitment therapy. In L. McHugh & I. Stewart (Eds.), The self and perspective-taking: contributions and applications from modern behavioral science (pp. 125–142). Oakland, CA: Context Press.Google Scholar
  7. Galinsky, A. D., & Ku, G. (2004). The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: the moderating role of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 594–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and ingroup favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of frame. Attitudes of. Social Cognition, 68(2), 181–198.Google Scholar
  10. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experimental avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1152–1168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  14. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.Google Scholar
  15. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  16. Leech, A., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Madden, L. (2016). The implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a measure of spider fear, avoidance, and approach. The Psychological Record, 66(3), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levin, M. E., Luoma, J. B., Vilardaga, R., Lillis, J., Nobles, R., & Hayes, S. C. (2016). Examining the role of psychological inflexibility, perspective taking, and empathic concern in generalized prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(3), 180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lueke, A., & Gibson, B. (2015). Mindfulness meditation reduces implicit age and race bias: the role of reduced automaticity of responding. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(3), 284–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Masuda, A., Price, M., Anderson, P., Schmertz, S. K., & Calamaras, M. (2009). The role of psychological flexibility in mental health stigma and psychological distress for the stigmatizer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 1244–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McHugh, L., Simpson, A., & Reed, P. (2010). Mindfulness as a potential intervention for stimulus over-selectivity in older adults. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(1), 178–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice, 6(1), 101.Google Scholar
  22. Parker, S. K., & Axtell, C. M. (2001). Seeing another viewpoint: antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1085–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench & Trubner.Google Scholar
  24. Skorinko, J. L., & Sinclair, S. A. (2013). Perspective taking can increase stereotyping: the role of apparent stereotype confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: response time evidence. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: evidence from social memory, behaviour explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 30(1), 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Todd, A. R., Bodenhausen, G. V., Richeson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1027–1042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Turner, R. N., & Crisp, R. J. (2010). Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 129–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: the mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vilardaga, R. (2009). A relational frame theory account of empathy. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 5, 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vilardaga, R., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). A contextual behavioral approach to pathological altruism. In B. Oakley, A. Knafo, G. Madhavan, & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), Pathological altruism (pp. 25–37). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Vilardaga, R., Levin, M.E. & Hayes, S.C. (2014). The flexible connectedness model: A contextual behavioral framework for effective human interaction. In S. N. O’Neill (Chair), Perspective taking: A conceptual analysis and applications. Symposium conducted at the ACBS Annual World Conference 12, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren J. Edwards
    • 1
  • Ciara McEnteggart
    • 2
  • Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
    • 2
  • Rob Lowe
    • 1
  • Nicky Evans
    • 1
  • Roger Vilardaga
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Interprofessional Health StudiesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  2. 2.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium
  3. 3.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations